Literature DB >> 28276002

Different cutoff values of methacholine bronchial provocation test depending on age in children with asthma.

Eun Lee1, Young-Ho Kim2, Seungbong Han3, Song-I Yang4, Young-Ho Jung5, Ju-Hee Seo6, Hyo-Bin Kim7, So Yeon Lee8, Ji-Won Kwon9, Soo-Jong Hong8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) is a fundamental pathophysiological characteristic of asthma. Although several factors such as airway caliber can affect BHR, no study has established age-dependent cutoff values of BHR to methacholine for the diagnosis of asthma in children. We investigated the cutoff values of the methacholine challenge test (MCT) in the diagnosis of asthma according to age.
METHODS: A total of 2383 individuals aged from 6 to 15 years old were included in this study. MCTs using the five-breath technique were performed in 350 children with suspected asthma based on symptoms by pediatric allergists and in 2033 healthy children from a general population-based cohort. We determined the provocative concentration of methacholine producing a 20% decrease in forced expiratory volume in 1 second from baseline (PC20). A modified Korean version of the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood questionnaire was used to distinguish asthmatics and healthy subjects. Receiver-operator characteristic curve analysis was used to assess the cutoff value of PC20 for the diagnosis of asthma.
RESULTS: Cutoff values of methacholine PC20, which provided the best combination of diagnostic sensitivity and specificity, showed an increasing pattern with age: 5.8, 9.1, 11.8, 12.6, 14.9, 21.7, 23.3, 21.1, 21.1, and 24.6 mg/mL at ages 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, and 15 years, respectively.
CONCLUSION: The application of different cutoff values of methacholine PC20 depending on age might be a practical modification for the diagnosis of asthma in children and adolescents with asthmatic symptoms.

Entities:  

Keywords:  asthma; bronchial hyperresponsiveness; cutoff value; receiver-operator characteristics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28276002     DOI: 10.1007/s12519-017-0026-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Pediatr            Impact factor:   2.764


  41 in total

1.  Airway response to exercise and methacholine in children with respiratory symptoms.

Authors:  J B Clough; S A Hutchinson; J D Williams; S T Holgate
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 2.  Interpretation of the "positive" methacholine challenge.

Authors:  David J Hewitt
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.214

3.  Distribution of bronchial nonspecific reactivity in the general population.

Authors:  I Cerveri; C Bruschi; M C Zoia; P Zanon; L Maccarini; M Grassi; C Rampulla
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 9.410

4.  Diagnostic value of the bronchial provocation test with methacholine in asthma. A Bayesian analysis approach.

Authors:  M Perpiñá; C Pellicer; A de Diego; L Compte; V Macián
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 9.410

5.  Perception of airway narrowing in a general population sample.

Authors:  C M Salome; W Xuan; E J Gray; E Belooussova; J K Peat
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 16.671

6.  A general practice based survey of bronchial hyperresponsiveness and its relation to symptoms, sex, age, atopy, and smoking.

Authors:  C J Trigg; J B Bennett; M Tooley; B Sibbald; M F D'Souza; R J Davies
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 9.139

7.  Loss of normal cyclical beta 2 adrenoceptor regulation and increased premenstrual responsiveness to adenosine monophosphate in stable female asthmatic patients.

Authors:  K S Tan; L C McFarlane; B J Lipworth
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 9.139

8.  Prevalence of allergic sensitization in the United States: results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2005-2006.

Authors:  Päivi M Salo; Samuel J Arbes; Renee Jaramillo; Agustin Calatroni; Charles H Weir; Michelle L Sever; Jane A Hoppin; Kathryn M Rose; Andrew H Liu; Peter J Gergen; Herman E Mitchell; Darryl C Zeldin
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2014-02-09       Impact factor: 10.793

Review 9.  Prognostic value of asymptomatic skin sensitization to aeroallergens.

Authors:  Uffe Bodtger
Journal:  Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2004-02

10.  Is asymptomatic bronchial hyperresponsiveness an indication of potential asthma? A two-year follow-up of young students with bronchial hyperresponsiveness.

Authors:  N S Zhong; R C Chen; M O Yang; Z Y Wu; J P Zheng; Y F Li
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 9.410

View more
  2 in total

1.  Bronchial hyperresponsiveness and asthma during oral immunotherapy for egg or peanut allergy in children.

Authors:  Janne Burman; Kati Palosuo; Anna Pelkonen; Pekka Malmberg; Sami Remes; Kaarina Kukkonen; Mika J Mäkelä
Journal:  Clin Transl Allergy       Date:  2022-10-10       Impact factor: 5.657

2.  Prevalence, Risk Factors and Cutoff Values for Bronchial Hyperresponsiveness to Provocholine in 7-Year-Old Children.

Authors:  Sungsu Jung; Dong In Suh; So Yeon Lee; Jisun Yoon; Hyun Ju Cho; Young Ho Kim; Song I Yang; Ji Won Kwon; Gwang Cheon Jang; Yong Han Sun; Sung Il Woo; You Sook Youn; Kang Seo Park; Hwa Jin Cho; Myung Hee Kook; Hye Ryoung Yi; Hai Lee Chung; Ja Hyeong Kim; Hyung Young Kim; Jin A Jung; Hyang Ok Woo; Soo Jong Hong
Journal:  Allergy Asthma Immunol Res       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 5.764

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.