Literature DB >> 18702111

Interpretation of the "positive" methacholine challenge.

David J Hewitt1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A methacholine challenge may be used in confirming the diagnosis of asthma, occupational asthma, or reactive airways dysfunction syndrome (RADS) through identification of bronchial hyperreactivity (BHR). While sensitivity of the test in diagnosing clinically significant asthma is excellent, specificity of the test is poor. Since there are many conditions which have been associated with BHR, a positive test must be interpreted cautiously.
METHODS: This paper reviews potential causes of a positive methacholine challenge other than asthma or RADS which have been reported in the medical literature.
RESULTS: Factors which may be associated with a positive methacholine test include test methodology, normal variation of BHR in the general population, and numerous medical conditions.
CONCLUSIONS: In cases of inhalation exposure evaluations, alternative explanations must be considered when determining whether a causal association exists between the exposure and a positive methacholine test result. Published 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18702111     DOI: 10.1002/ajim.20631

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ind Med        ISSN: 0271-3586            Impact factor:   2.214


  7 in total

1.  Different cutoff values of methacholine bronchial provocation test depending on age in children with asthma.

Authors:  Eun Lee; Young-Ho Kim; Seungbong Han; Song-I Yang; Young-Ho Jung; Ju-Hee Seo; Hyo-Bin Kim; So Yeon Lee; Ji-Won Kwon; Soo-Jong Hong
Journal:  World J Pediatr       Date:  2017-03-08       Impact factor: 2.764

2.  Variability of methacholine bronchoprovocation and the effect of inhaled corticosteroids in mild asthma.

Authors:  Kaharu Sumino; Elizabeth A Sugar; Charles G Irvin; David A Kaminsky; Dave Shade; Christine Y Wei; Janet T Holbrook; Robert A Wise; Mario Castro
Journal:  Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 6.347

3.  Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback Does Not Substitute for Asthma Steroid Controller Medication.

Authors:  Paul M Lehrer; Charles G Irvin; Shou-En Lu; Anthony Scardella; Beatrix Roehmheld-Hamm; Milisyaris Aviles-Velez; Jessica Graves; Evgeny G Vaschillo; Bronya Vaschillo; Flavia Hoyte; Harold Nelson; Frederick S Wamboldt
Journal:  Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback       Date:  2018-03

4.  Identifying biomarkers for asthma diagnosis using targeted metabolomics approaches.

Authors:  William Checkley; Maria P Deza; Jost Klawitter; Karina M Romero; Jelena Klawitter; Suzanne L Pollard; Robert A Wise; Uwe Christians; Nadia N Hansel
Journal:  Respir Med       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 3.415

5.  Characteristics of a residential and working community with diverse exposure to World Trade Center dust, gas, and fumes.

Authors:  Joan Reibman; Mengling Liu; Qinyi Cheng; Sybille Liautaud; Linda Rogers; Stephanie Lau; Kenneth I Berger; Roberta M Goldring; Michael Marmor; Maria Elena Fernandez-Beros; Emily S Tonorezos; Caralee E Caplan-Shaw; Jaime Gonzalez; Joshua Filner; Dawn Walter; Kymara Kyng; William N Rom
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.162

6.  Airway hyperresponsiveness in asthma: mechanisms, clinical significance, and treatment.

Authors:  John D Brannan; M Diane Lougheed
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2012-12-10       Impact factor: 4.566

7.  Bronchial hyperresponsiveness in an adult population in Helsinki: decreased FEV1 , the main determinant.

Authors:  Maria Juusela; Paula Pallasaho; Seppo Sarna; Päivi Piirilä; Bo Lundbäck; Anssi Sovijärvi
Journal:  Clin Respir J       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 2.570

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.