Jonathan Loveday1, Sonal P Sachdev2, Meena N Cherian2, Francisco Katayama3, A K M Akhtaruzzaman4, Joe Thomas5, N Huda6, E Brian Faragher1, Walter D Johnson7. 1. Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, L3 5QA, UK. 2. Emergency and Essential Surgical Care Programme, World Health Organisation, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211, Geneva 27, Switzerland. 3. WHO Regional Office for Southeast Asia, World Health House, Indraprastha Estate, Mahatma Gandhi Marg, New Delhi, 110 002, India. 4. Department Neuroanaesthesiology, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Shahbagh, Dhaka, Bangladesh. 5. Partners in Population and Development, Mohakhali, Dhaka, 1212, Bangladesh. 6. Special Adviser for GAVI Alliance to the Honourable Minister, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Gob, Dhaka, Bangladesh. 7. Emergency and Essential Surgical Care Programme, World Health Organisation, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211, Geneva 27, Switzerland. johnsonw@who.int.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the capacity of government-run hospitals in Bangladesh to provide emergency and essential surgical, obstetric and anaesthetic services. METHODS: Cross-sectional survey of 240 Bangladeshi Government healthcare facilities using the World Health Organisation Situational Analysis Tool to Assess Emergency and Essential Surgical Care (SAT). This tool evaluates the ability of a healthcare facility to provide basic surgical, obstetric and anaesthetic care based on 108 queries that detail the infrastructure and population demographics, human resources, surgical interventions and reason for referral, and available surgical equipment and supplies. For this survey, the Bangladeshi Ministry of Health sent the SAT to sub-district, district/general and teaching hospitals throughout the country in April 2013. RESULTS: Responses were received from 240 healthcare facilities (49.5% response rate): 218 sub-district and 22 district/general hospitals. At the sub-district level, caesarean section was offered by 55% of facilities, laparotomy by 7% and open fracture repair by 8%. At the district/general hospital level, 95% offered caesarean section, 86% offered laparotomy and 77% offered open fracture treatment. Availability of anaesthesia services, general equipment and supplies reflected this trend, where district/general hospitals were better equipped than sub-district hospitals, though equipment and infrastructure shortages persist. CONCLUSION: There has been overall impressive progress by the Bangladeshi Government in providing essential surgical services. Areas for improvement remain across all key areas, including infrastructure, human resources, surgical interventions offered and available equipment. Investment in surgical services offers a cost-effective opportunity to continue to improve the health of the Bangladeshi population and move the country towards universal healthcare coverage.
OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the capacity of government-run hospitals in Bangladesh to provide emergency and essential surgical, obstetric and anaesthetic services. METHODS: Cross-sectional survey of 240 Bangladeshi Government healthcare facilities using the World Health Organisation Situational Analysis Tool to Assess Emergency and Essential Surgical Care (SAT). This tool evaluates the ability of a healthcare facility to provide basic surgical, obstetric and anaesthetic care based on 108 queries that detail the infrastructure and population demographics, human resources, surgical interventions and reason for referral, and available surgical equipment and supplies. For this survey, the Bangladeshi Ministry of Health sent the SAT to sub-district, district/general and teaching hospitals throughout the country in April 2013. RESULTS: Responses were received from 240 healthcare facilities (49.5% response rate): 218 sub-district and 22 district/general hospitals. At the sub-district level, caesarean section was offered by 55% of facilities, laparotomy by 7% and open fracture repair by 8%. At the district/general hospital level, 95% offered caesarean section, 86% offered laparotomy and 77% offered open fracture treatment. Availability of anaesthesia services, general equipment and supplies reflected this trend, where district/general hospitals were better equipped than sub-district hospitals, though equipment and infrastructure shortages persist. CONCLUSION: There has been overall impressive progress by the Bangladeshi Government in providing essential surgical services. Areas for improvement remain across all key areas, including infrastructure, human resources, surgical interventions offered and available equipment. Investment in surgical services offers a cost-effective opportunity to continue to improve the health of the Bangladeshi population and move the country towards universal healthcare coverage.
Authors: Luke M Funk; Thomas G Weiser; William R Berry; Stuart R Lipsitz; Alan F Merry; Angela C Enright; Iain H Wilson; Gerald Dziekan; Atul A Gawande Journal: Lancet Date: 2010-07-02 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Blake C Alkire; Nakul P Raykar; Mark G Shrime; Thomas G Weiser; Stephen W Bickler; John A Rose; Cameron T Nutt; Sarah L M Greenberg; Meera Kotagal; Johanna N Riesel; Micaela Esquivel; Tarsicio Uribe-Leitz; George Molina; Nobhojit Roy; John G Meara; Paul E Farmer Journal: Lancet Glob Health Date: 2015-04-27 Impact factor: 26.763
Authors: Margaret E Kruk; Andreas Wladis; Naboth Mbembati; S Khady Ndao-Brumblay; Renee Y Hsia; Moses Galukande; Sam Luboga; Alphonsus Matovu; Helder de Miranda; Doruk Ozgediz; Ana Romàn Quiñones; Peter C Rockers; Johan von Schreeb; Fernando Vaz; Haile T Debas; Sarah B Macfarlane Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2010-03-09 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: John G Meara; Andrew J M Leather; Lars Hagander; Blake C Alkire; Nivaldo Alonso; Emmanuel A Ameh; Stephen W Bickler; Lesong Conteh; Anna J Dare; Justine Davies; Eunice Dérivois Mérisier; Shenaaz El-Halabi; Paul E Farmer; Atul Gawande; Rowan Gillies; Sarah L M Greenberg; Caris E Grimes; Russell L Gruen; Edna Adan Ismail; Thaim Buya Kamara; Chris Lavy; Ganbold Lundeg; Nyengo C Mkandawire; Nakul P Raykar; Johanna N Riesel; Edgar Rodas; John Rose; Nobhojit Roy; Mark G Shrime; Richard Sullivan; Stéphane Verguet; David Watters; Thomas G Weiser; Iain H Wilson; Gavin Yamey; Winnie Yip Journal: Lancet Date: 2015-04-26 Impact factor: 79.321