| Literature DB >> 28274257 |
James G Carlucci1,2, Meridith Blevins Peratikos3,4,5, Charlotte B Cherry3, Melanie L Lopez6, Ann F Green3,5, Lazaro González-Calvo3,5, Troy D Moon3,7,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Malaria is the leading cause of death among children in Mozambique. Prevalence and factors associated with malaria are not well studied among children in rural Zambézia Province. Whether prevalence of malaria varies across diverse districts within the province is unknown.Entities:
Keywords: Child; Fever; Health services accessibility; Infant; Malaria; Mozambique; Prevalence; Risk factors
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28274257 PMCID: PMC5343407 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-017-1741-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Malar J ISSN: 1475-2875 Impact factor: 2.979
Fig. 1Map of Zambézia Province, Mozambique (right panel), as it is situated within Mozambique and Southern Africa (left panel). Borders of districts within the province are outlined, and the three oversampled focus districts (Alto Molócuè, Morrumbala, and Namacurra) are outlined in bold. Sampled enumeration areas are overlaid as black polygons.
Charlotte Buehler Cherry; Vanderbilt Institute for Global Health; Projection: WGS 1984 Web Mercator Auxiliary Sphere. Permission has been granted by the copy-right holder for publication of this figure in an open access journal
Approach to weighted overlay method for creating a predicted mosquito suitability model for Zambézia Province, Mozambique
| Mosquito suitability score | Elevation (m) | Mean annual temperature (°C) | Mean annual precipitation (mm) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 = high suitability | Weight in model: 50% | Weight in model: 25% | Weight in model: 25% |
| 1 | ≥650 | >27 | >271.9 |
| 2 | Not applicable (NA) | 26–27 | 257.5–271.9 |
| 3 | NA | 25–26 | 230.4–257.5 |
| 4 | NA | 24–25 | 201.1–230.4 |
| 5 | <650 | <24 | <201.1 |
Fig. 2Predicted mosquito suitability in Zambézia Province, Mozambique. Darker areas are predicted to be more suitable for mosquitoes, and lighter areas are predicted to be less suitable for mosquitoes. Borders of districts within the province are outlined, and the three oversampled focus districts (Alto Molócuè, Morrumbala, and Namacurra) are outlined in bold. Sampled enumeration areas are overlaid as white polygons.
Charlotte Buehler Cherry; Vanderbilt Institute for Global Health; Projection: WGS 1984 Web Mercator Auxiliary Sphere. Permission has been granted by the copy-right holder for publication of this figure in an open access journal
Fig. 3Schematic of multivariable logistic regression analyses to identify factors associated with self-reported symptomatic malaria among children in Zambézia Province, Mozambique. The main analysis compared those who had symptomatic malaria confirmed by a diagnostic test to the rest of the children in the cohort. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to account for the potential influences of accessibility of care and health-seeking behaviour
Characteristics of children, female head of household respondents, and households in Zambézia Province and across three focus districts
| All Province | Alto Molócuè | Morrumbala | Namacurra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (n = 2540) | (n = 781) | (n = 522) | (n = 416) | |
| Sex of child | ||||
| Male (%) | 50.2 | 47.5 | 43.3 | 49.2 |
| Female (%) | 49.8 | 52.5 | 56.7 | 50.8 |
| Age of child (months) | 24 (12–36) | 24 (12–36) | 24 (12–36) | 24 (12–36) |
| Weight (kg) | 10.9 (9.2–13) | 10.2 (8.5–12.1) | 10.2 (8.5–12.5) | 11 (9.5–13.4) |
| Missing, n (%) | 1119 (44) | 596 (76) | 313 (60) | 153 (37) |
| Weight for age WHO Z-score | ||||
| Missing, n (%) | 1191 (47) | 604 (77) | 331 (63) | 169 (41) |
| ≤−3 (%) | 4.6 | 1.4 | 5.6 | 5.3 |
| −2.99 to −2 (%) | 10.5 | 9.2 | 10.3 | 8.9 |
| −1.99 to −1 (%) | 19.9 | 29.9 | 16.9 | 19.1 |
| >−1 (%) | 65.0 | 59.5 | 67.2 | 66.7 |
| Age of respondent (years) | 26 (22–33) | 26 (22–33) | 28 (22–38) | 27 (21–33) |
| Missing, n (%) | 120 (5) | 13 (2) | 51 (10) | 26 (6) |
| Education of respondent (years) | 3 (0–5) | 4 (2–6) | 1 (0–2) | 2 (0–5) |
| Education of respondent (category) (years) | ||||
| 0–5 (%) | 77.2 | 73.0 | 93.1 | 77.3 |
| 6–10 (%) | 18.7 | 25.9 | 6.6 | 20.3 |
| >10 (%) | 4.1 | 1.1 | 0.3 | 2.3 |
| Respondent understands Portuguese (%) | 47.3 | 63.5 | 19.0 | 40.1 |
| Urban/rural | ||||
| Rural (%) | 77.5 | 89.7 | 96.0 | 100.0 |
| Urban (%) | 22.5 | 10.3 | 4.0 | 0.0 |
| Household size | 5 (4–6) | 5 (4–6) | 5 (4–6) | 4 (4–5) |
| Number of children under 5 years | 2 (1–2) | 2 (1–2) | 2 (1–2) | 2 (1–2) |
| Ethnic groupa | ||||
| Elomwe (%) | 27.8 | 52.5 | 2.0 | 0.5 |
| Echuabo (%) | 12.1 | 0.1 | 1.3 | 81.2 |
| Cisena (%) | 7.1 | 0.0 | 67.2 | 0.2 |
| Cinyanja (%) | 10.1 | 0.0 | 0.9 | 0.0 |
| Other (%) | 7.2 | 0.0 | 11.4 | 0.5 |
| Missing | 895 (35%) | 375 (48%) | 126 (24%) | 85 (20%) |
| Household income (sum of all members’ monthly earnings) | ||||
| Missing, n (%) | 613 (24) | 58 (7) | 90 (17) | 133 (32) |
| <1000 MZN per month (%) | 82.6 | 63.4 | 75.5 | 92.9 |
| ≥1000 MZN per month (%) | 17.4 | 36.6 | 24.5 | 7.1 |
| Roofing material | ||||
| Missing, n (%) | 784 (31) | 283 (36) | 187 (36) | 139 (33) |
| Thatch (%) | 78.7 | 84.8 | 93.3 | 83.2 |
| Other (%) | 21.3 | 15.2 | 6.7 | 16.8 |
| Electricity in the home (%) | 11.4 | 7.5 | 4.0 | 0.7 |
| Does the family raise pigs (%) | 9.2 | 28.4 | 32.7 | 1.1 |
| Missing, n (%) | 128 (5) | 21 (3) | 9 (2) | 18 (4) |
| EA distance to health facility (km) | 9.3 (4–16.8) | 11.8 (6.1–17.8) | 10.7 (5.5–20.5) | 6.2 (4–8) |
Continuous variables are reported as weighted estimates of median (interquartile range), with each observation being weighted by the inverse of the child sampling probability
Categorical variables are reported as weighted percentages, with each observation being weighted by the inverse of the child sampling probability
aRespondents were allowed to select all that apply, so totals may add up to greater than 100%. Missing indicates no category was selected or documented
Bed net availability and utilization in Zambézia Province and across three focus districts
| All Province | Alto Molócuè | Morrumbala | Namacurra | p value* | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (n = 2540) | (n = 781) | (n = 522) | (n = 416) | ||
| How many mosquito nets in the household | <0.001 | ||||
| Missing, n (%) | 77 (3) | 13 (2) | 16 (3) | 9 (2) | |
| Less than the number of beds (%) | 38.2 | 40.8 | 39.0 | 37.1 | |
| More than the number of beds (%) | 3.6 | 5.2 | 0.3 | 8.3 | |
| None (%) | 33.8 | 20.1 | 53.1 | 7.3 | |
| One for every bed (%) | 24.4 | 33.9 | 7.6 | 47.3 | |
| Child slept under bed night last night | <0.001 | ||||
| Missing, n (%) | 156 (6) | 81 (10) | 20 (4) | 5 (1) | |
| No (%) | 40.4 | 34.3 | 51.5 | 11.6 | |
| Yes (%) | 59.6 | 65.7 | 48.5 | 88.4 | |
| Respondent slept under bed net last night | <0.001 | ||||
| Missing, n (%) | 59 (2) | 20 (3) | 8 (2) | 10 (2) | |
| No (%) | 44.7 | 39.9 | 61.7 | 12.8 | |
| Yes (%) | 55.3 | 60.1 | 38.3 | 87.2 |
Categorical variables are reported as weighted percentages, with each observation being weighted by the inverse of the child sampling probability
* Chi square tests comparing across three focus districts. p values ignore effects of clustering
Prevalence of fever, healthcare utilization, and malaria among children in Zambézia Province and across three focus districts
| All Province | Alto Molócuè | Morrumbala | Namacurra | p value* | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (n = 2540) | (n = 781) | (n = 522) | (n = 416) | ||
| Fever in the past 30 days | <0.001 | ||||
| Missing, n (%) | 39 (2) | 24 (3) | 4 (1) | 1 (<1) | |
| No (%) | 56.6 | 53.6 | 61.6 | 50.6 | |
| Yes (%) | 43.4 | 46.4 | 38.4 | 49.4 | |
| Sought advice or treatment for the fever (if fever) | 72.5% | 78.4% | 79.2% | 69.6% | 0.47 |
| Source of medical care (if sought advice) | <0.001 | ||||
| Missing, n (%) | 269 (25) | 75 (21) | 49 (23) | 56 (28) | |
| Family member (%) | 2.8 | 7.6 | 3.0 | 0.0 | |
| Health facility (%) | 91.3 | 87.1 | 86.0 | 93.1 | |
| Other (%) | 1.1 | 2.0 | 3.1 | 1.1 | |
| Pharmacy (%) | 0.1 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 2.1 | |
| Traditional healer (%) | 4.7 | 2.5 | 8.0 | 3.8 | |
| Malaria diagnostic performed (if health facility) | |||||
| Rapid diagnostic test (RDT) | 0.003 | ||||
| Missing, n (%) | 19 (3) | 14 (6) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
| No (%) | 34.5 | 25.8 | 32.5 | 35.0 | |
| Yes (%) | 65.5 | 74.2 | 67.5 | 65.0 | |
| Blood smear | 0.025 | ||||
| Missing, n (%) | 27 (4) | 17 (7) | 1 (1) | 2 (2) | |
| No (%) | 41.4 | 32.0 | 35.0 | 41.1 | |
| Yes (%) | 58.6 | 68.0 | 65.0 | 58.9 | |
| Either RDT or smear | 0.003 | ||||
| Missing, n (%) | 19 (3) | 14 (6) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
| No (%) | 33.4 | 24.2 | 28.6 | 34.4 | |
| Yes (%) | 66.6 | 75.8 | 71.4 | 65.6 | |
| Positive test result for malaria (if test performed) | 0.18 | ||||
| Missing, n (%) | 4 (1) | 1 (1) | 0 (0) | 2 (2) | |
| No (%) | 32.7 | 33.6 | 30.4 | 19.6 | |
| Yes (%) | 67.3 | 66.4 | 69.6 | 80.4 | |
| Estimated prevalence of malaria | 12.8% | 15.9% | 13.6% | 16.8% | <0.001 |
Continuous variables are reported as weighted estimates of median (interquartile range), with each observation being weighted by the inverse of the child sampling probability
Categorical variables are reported as weighted percentages, with each observation being weighted by the inverse of the child sampling probability
* Chi square tests comparing across three focus districts. p values ignore effects of clustering
Multivariable logistic regression analyses to identify factors associated with self-reported symptomatic malaria among children in Zambézia Province, Mozambique with adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) reported
| Main analysisa
| Sensitivity analysis Ab
| Sensitivity analysis Bc
| Sensitivity analysis Cd
| Sensitivity analysis De
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| District | |||||
| Alto Molócuè (reference) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Morrumbala | 1.24 (0.76, 2.02) | 0.88 (0.61, 1.26) | 1.38 (0.69, 2.77) | 1.16 (0.69, 1.96) | 1.21 (0.73, 1.99) |
| Namacurra | 1.40 (0.88, 2.24) | 1.38 (0.98, 1.96) | 2.12 (0.95, 4.74) | 1.50 (0.91, 2.47) | 1.54 (0.95, 2.51) |
| Others | 0.86 (0.55, 1.34) | 0.93 (0.69, 1.24) | 1.14 (0.61, 2.13) | 0.87 (0.55, 1.38) | 0.89 (0.57, 1.40) |
| Age (per 6 months) | 1.04 (0.95, 1.14) | 0.94 (0.88, 1.00) | 1.82 (0.99, 3.36) | 1.00 (0.92, 1.09) | 1.01 (0.93, 1.11) |
| Male vs. female child | 0.96 (0.75, 1.24) | 1.00 (0.86, 1.18) | 0.95 (0.62, 1.46) | 0.99 (0.76, 1.28) | 0.98 (0.76, 1.28) |
| Weight (per 1 kg) | 0.87 (0.60, 1.26) | 0.94 (0.73, 1.21) | 0.79 (0.49, 1.28) | 0.88 (0.61, 1.28) | 0.87 (0.60, 1.25) |
| Respondent age (per 10 years) | 1.05 (0.87, 1.27) | 1.01 (0.88, 1.16) | 1.15 (0.85, 1.54) | 1.05 (0.87, 1.27) | 1.07 (0.89, 1.28) |
| Respondent education (5 vs. 0 years) | 1.88 (1.31, 2.70) | 1.30 (0.96, 1.74) | 1.02 (0.63, 1.64) | 1.94 (1.31, 2.85) | 1.96 (1.35, 2.85) |
| Respondent understands Portuguese | 1.15 (0.83, 1.61) | 1.06 (0.81, 1.38) | 1.02 (0.58, 1.79) | 1.15 (0.78, 1.68) | 1.10 (0.77, 1.59) |
| Rural vs. urban | 0.60 (0.36, 1.02) | 0.81 (0.48, 1.35) | 0.77 (0.34, 1.73) | 0.60 (0.34, 1.06) | 0.61 (0.35, 1.06) |
| Household size (per 1 member) | 1.03 (0.94, 1.12) | 1.07 (1.01, 1.15) | 1.06 (0.91, 1.24) | 1.04 (0.96, 1.14) | 1.05 (0.97, 1.15) |
| Children under 5 (per 1 less child) | 1.25 (1.01, 1.56) | 1.01 (0.87, 1.18) | 1.38 (0.94, 2.04) | 1.22 (0.98, 1.54) | 1.25 (0.99, 1.59) |
| Monthly income ≥1000 MZN | 1.56 (1.11, 2.22) | 1.18 (0.87, 1.59) | 1.45 (0.74, 2.78) | 1.59 (1.11, 2.27) | 1.59 (1.12, 2.22) |
| Roofing material | |||||
| Thatch (reference) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Other | 1.00 (0.56, 1.79) | 1.25 (0.79, 1.99) | 0.75 (0.34, 1.67) | 1.11 (0.56, 2.20) | 1.09 (0.57, 2.09) |
| House has electricity | 0.68 (0.37, 1.23) | 0.60 (0.37, 0.97) | 0.58 (0.23, 1.47) | 0.57 (0.32, 1.04) | 0.58 (0.32, 1.07) |
| Household raises pigs | 1.16 (0.80, 1.68) | 1.10 (0.81, 1.50) | 1.10 (0.60, 2.01) | 1.17 (0.77, 1.79) | 1.17 (0.78, 1.77) |
| Distance of enumeration area to health facility (20 vs. 5 km) | 1.03 (0.87, 1.21) | 1.04 (0.89, 1.22) | 1.27 (0.95, 1.71) | 1.03 (0.85, 1.25) | 1.05 (0.87, 1.25) |
| Child slept under bed net the night prior to survey | 1.28 (0.86, 1.92) | 1.15 (0.85, 1.56) | 1.24 (0.68, 2.23) | 1.30 (0.86, 1.97) | 1.31 (0.87, 1.96) |
| Respondent slept under bed net the night prior to survey | 0.98 (0.64, 1.51) | 0.87 (0.66, 1.15) | 1.32 (0.70, 2.48) | 0.95 (0.62, 1.47) | 0.97 (0.64, 1.49) |
Missing values of covariates were accounted for using multiple imputation in the main and sensitivity analyses
Because there was evidence (p < 0.10) that the relationship with log-odds of symptomatic malaria is non-linear, respondent education was fit using restricted cubic splines in the in the main and sensitivity analyses
aMain analysis: compares those who had symptomatic malaria confirmed by a diagnostic test to the rest of the children in the cohort. There are 2501 children included in this model, 380 of which had symptomatic malaria. There are 18 symptomatic malaria cases for every degree of freedom. The main model was repeated excluding child weight, due to excessive missingness, and results were similar. Respondent education is associated with household income (median [interquartile range] education among those with household income <1000 MZN per month was 3 [0–5] years, and among those with household income ≥1000 MZN per month was 4 [1–6] years). When household income was removed from the model, the OR (95% CI) for 5 vs. 0 years of education was 1.93 (1.32, 2.83). When education was removed from the model, the OR (95% CI) for household income ≥1000 MZN per month was 1.61 (1.15, 2.27)
bSensitivity analysis A: compares those who reported fever in the past 30 days (cases) to those without report of fever. There are 2501 children included in this model, 1092 of which reported fever in the past 30 days
cSensitivity analysis B: compares those who had symptomatic malaria confirmed by a diagnostic test to other symptomatic children who accessed care and were tested for malaria but had a negative test result. There are 533 children included in this model, 380 of which had symptomatic malaria
dSensitivity analysis C: compares those who had symptomatic malaria confirmed by a diagnostic test to those who did not have fever and therefore did not access care or have a malaria diagnostic test. There are 1789 children included in this model, 380 of which had symptomatic malaria
eSensitivity analysis D: compares those who had symptomatic malaria confirmed by a diagnostic test to a group that included both those who were symptomatic but had a negative malaria diagnostic test and those who did not have fever and therefore did not seek care or malaria testing (i.e., the comparison group excluded those who were symptomatic but not tested for malaria). There are 1942 children included in this model, 380 of which had symptomatic malaria