Literature DB >> 28272751

Excess Mortality After Pelvic Fractures Among Older People.

Silke Andrich1, Burkhard Haastert1,2, Elke Neuhaus3, Kathrin Neidert3, Werner Arend1, Christian Ohmann4, Jürgen Grebe4, Andreas Vogt4, Pascal Jungbluth5, Simon Thelen5, Joachim Windolf5, Andrea Icks1.   

Abstract

The study aimed to estimate excess mortality in patients aged 60 years or older up to 1 year after pelvic fracture compared with a population without pelvic fracture. In this retrospective population-based observational study, we use routine data from a large health insurance in Germany. For each patient with a first pelvic fracture between 2008 and 2010 (n = 5685 cases, 82% female, mean age 80 ± 9 years), about 34 individuals without pelvic fracture (n = 193,159 controls) were frequency matched by sex, age at index date, and index month. We estimated survival probabilities in the first year after the index date separated for cases (further stratified into inpatient/outpatient treated or minor/major pelvic fractures) and controls using Kaplan-Meier curves. Additionally, time-dependent hazard ratios (HRs) measuring excess mortality in 4-week intervals up to 52 weeks were estimated by fitting Cox regression models including adjustment for relevant confounders. Twenty-one percent of cases and 11% of controls died within 1 year. HRs (95% confidence intervals) decreased from 3.9 (3.5-4.5) within the first 4 weeks to 1.4 (1.1-1.9) within weeks 49 to 52 after the index date. After full adjustment, HRs lowered substantially (3.0 [2.6-3.4] and 1.0 [0.8-1.4]) but were still significantly increased up to week 32. Adjusted HRs in women were lower than in men: 2.8 (2.4-3.2) and 1.0 (0.7-1.4) versus 3.8 (2.9-5.0) and 1.2 (0.6-2.3). We found a clear excess mortality among older people in the first 8 months after pelvic fracture even after full adjustment. Excess mortality was higher among men in the beginning as well as for inpatient-treated persons. Absence of excess mortality was noticed for outpatient-treated persons within the first 3 months. When broken down into site-specific data, excess mortality was no longer significant for most pelvic fractures classified as minor. The only exception was fracture of pubis within the first 4 weeks.
© 2017 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. © 2017 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EPIDEMIOLOGY; EXCESS MORTALITY; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; INPATIENT TREATMENT; OUTPATIENT TREATMENT; PELVIC FRACTURE; POPULATION-BASED STUDY

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28272751     DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.3116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  19 in total

1.  [3D image enhancer-adjusted percutaneous triangular stabilization of geriatric pelvic ring fractures : Operation technique and indications].

Authors:  Matthias Spalteholz; Jens Gulow
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  Age and "general health"-beside fracture classification-affect the therapeutic decision for geriatric pelvic ring fractures: a German pelvic injury register study.

Authors:  Andreas Höch; Philipp Pieroh; Florian Gras; Tim Hohmann; Sven Märdian; Francis Holmenschlager; Holger Keil; Hans-Georg Palm; Steven C Herath; Christoph Josten; Hagen Schmal; Fabian M Stuby
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 3.  Osteoporotic Pelvic Fractures.

Authors:  Ludwig Oberkircher; Steffen Ruchholtz; Pol Maria Rommens; Alexander Hofmann; Benjamin Bücking; Antonio Krüger
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 4.  Paradigm shift in geriatric fracture treatment.

Authors:  Pol Maria Rommens
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 3.693

5.  Epidemiology and mortality of pelvic and femur fractures-a nationwide register study of 417,840 fractures in Sweden across 16 years: diverging trends for potentially lethal fractures.

Authors:  Natalie Lundin; Tuomas T Huttunen; Anders Enocson; Alejandro I Marcano; Li Felländer-Tsai; Hans E Berg
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 3.717

6.  In-screw polymethylmethacrylate-augmented sacroiliac screw for the treatment of fragility fractures of the pelvis: a prospective, observational study with 1-year follow-up.

Authors:  Andreas Höch; Philipp Pieroh; Ralf Henkelmann; Christoph Josten; Jörg Böhme
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  Biomechanical Comparison of Five Fixation Techniques for Unstable Fragility Fractures of the Pelvic Ring.

Authors:  Moritz F Lodde; J Christoph Katthagen; Clemens O Schopper; Ivan Zderic; Geoff Richards; Boyko Gueorguiev; Michael J Raschke; René Hartensuer
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 4.241

8.  Trans-sacral bar osteosynthesis provides low mortality and high mobility in patients with fragility fractures of the pelvis.

Authors:  Daniel Wagner; Miha Kisilak; Geoffrey Porcheron; Sven Krämer; Isabella Mehling; Alexander Hofmann; Pol M Rommens
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  Biomechanics of Osteoporotic Fracture Fixation.

Authors:  Marianne Hollensteiner; Sabrina Sandriesser; Emily Bliven; Christian von Rüden; Peter Augat
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 5.096

10.  Minimally invasive posterior locked compression plate osteosynthesis shows excellent results in elderly patients with fragility fractures of the pelvis.

Authors:  Imke U Schmerwitz; Philipp Jungebluth; Wolfgang Lehmann; Thomas J Hockertz
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 3.693

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.