Literature DB >> 28272105

Can We Improve the Tolerance of an Ocular Prosthesis by Enhancing Its Surface Finish?

Andre S Litwin1, Emma Worrell1, Jonathan C P Roos1, Barry Edwards1, Raman Malhotra1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Patients who wear an ocular prosthesis frequently suffer with dry eye symptoms and socket discharge, often on a daily basis. The aim of the study was to determine whether a smoother, optical quality polish of the prosthesis' surface could improve symptoms and wear tolerance. The study was designed as single-center, single-masked, prospective randomized controlled trial. Eighty-eight consecutive patients undergoing annual ocular prosthesis maintenance review were approached from the prosthesis clinic. Forty-one out of 49 eligible patients were recruited.
METHODS: Participants were randomized to either a standard or a higher "optical quality" polish of their prosthesis. At entry to the trial, at 1 month, and 12 months they completed a questionnaire covering cleaning, lubricant use, inflammation, discomfort, and discharge. Lower scores indicated better tolerance of the prosthesis. At each visit, the prosthesis was stained and photographed against a standard background to assess deposit build up. Primary outcome measures were 1) a subjective questionnaire score and 2) an objective assessment of surface deposit build-up on prosthetic eyes by standardized photographic grading.
RESULTS: Forty-one patients participated in the study. The median age of their prosthesis was 36 months (range 9 months-40 years). There was no statistically significant difference in questionnaire scores or deposit build up between the 2 groups at baseline. By 12-months, the higher optical quality polish showed a statistically significant reduction in symptoms and frequency of discharge (2.19 vs. 3.85; p = 0.05-lower scores better). Scoring of the prosthesis' deposit build-up showed a significant difference at 1 month, but this was not sustained at 12 months.
CONCLUSIONS: Creating an optical quality finish to an ocular prosthesis reduces deposit build up on artificial eyes. The authors found this modification improved patient tolerance at 12 months.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28272105     DOI: 10.1097/IOP.0000000000000891

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0740-9303            Impact factor:   1.746


  3 in total

1.  The UK National Artificial Eye Questionnaire Study: predictors of artificial eye wearers' experience Part 2 - visual function and quality of life.

Authors:  Yinon Shapira; Emma Worrell; Andre S Litwin; Raman Malhotra
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  The UK National Artificial Eye Questionnaire study: predictors of artificial eye wearers' experience part 1-comfort and satisfaction.

Authors:  Yinon Shapira; Emma Worrell; Andre S Litwin; Raman Malhotra
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 4.456

3.  Towards improving the biocompatibility of prosthetic eyes.

Authors:  Keith R Pine; Karnika De Silva; Fengqian Zhang; Janice Yeoman; Robert Jacobs
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2021-02-18
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.