Literature DB >> 28271407

Three-dimensional eye movement recordings during magnetic vestibular stimulation.

Jorge Otero-Millan1, David S Zee1,2,3,4, Michael C Schubert2,5, Dale C Roberts1,2, Bryan K Ward6.   

Abstract

Human subjects placed in strong magnetic fields such as in an MRI scanner often feel dizzy or vertiginous. Recent studies in humans and animals have shown that these effects arise from stimulation of the labyrinth and are accompanied by nystagmus. Here, we measured the three-dimensional pattern of nystagmus using video eye tracking in five normal human subjects placed in a 7T MRI to infer which semicircular canals are activated by magnetic vestibular stimulation. We found that the nystagmus usually had a torsional as well as a horizontal component. Analysis of the relative velocities of the three eye movement components revealed that the lateral and anterior (superior) canals are the only canals activated, and by a similar amount.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Labyrinth; Magnetic resonance imaging; Magnetic vestibular stimulation; Vertigo; Vestibular

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28271407     DOI: 10.1007/s00415-017-8420-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol        ISSN: 0340-5354            Impact factor:   4.849


  10 in total

1.  The effect of habituation and plane of rotation on vestibular perceptual responses.

Authors:  E A Grunfeld; T Okada; K Jáuregui-Renaud; A M Bronstein
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.435

2.  Knowing what the brain is seeing in three dimensions: A novel, noninvasive, sensitive, accurate, and low-noise technique for measuring ocular torsion.

Authors:  Jorge Otero-Millan; Dale C Roberts; Adrian Lasker; David S Zee; Amir Kheradmand
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  MRI magnetic field stimulates rotational sensors of the brain.

Authors:  Dale C Roberts; Vincenzo Marcelli; Joseph S Gillen; John P Carey; Charles C Della Santina; David S Zee
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  The use of matrices in analyzing the three-dimensional behavior of the vestibulo-ocular reflex.

Authors:  D A Robinson
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 2.086

Review 5.  Vestibular stimulation by magnetic fields.

Authors:  Bryan K Ward; Dale C Roberts; Charles C Della Santina; John P Carey; David S Zee
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 5.691

6.  Multiple Time Courses of Vestibular Set-Point Adaptation Revealed by Sustained Magnetic Field Stimulation of the Labyrinth.

Authors:  Prem Jareonsettasin; Jorge Otero-Millan; Bryan K Ward; Dale C Roberts; Michael C Schubert; David S Zee
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  Rotational kinematics of the human vestibuloocular reflex. I. Gain matrices.

Authors:  D Tweed; D Sievering; H Misslisch; M Fetter; D Zee; E Koenig
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Magnetic field effects on the vestibular system: calculation of the pressure on the cupula due to ionic current-induced Lorentz force.

Authors:  A Antunes; P M Glover; Y Li; O S Mian; B L Day
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Magnetic-field-induced vertigo: a theoretical and experimental investigation.

Authors:  P M Glover; I Cavin; W Qian; R Bowtell; P A Gowland
Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.010

10.  On the vertigo due to static magnetic fields.

Authors:  Omar S Mian; Yan Li; Andre Antunes; Paul M Glover; Brian L Day
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total
  7 in total

1.  Impact of extremely low-frequency magnetic fields on human postural control.

Authors:  Sebastien Villard; Alicia Allen; Nicolas Bouisset; Michael Corbacio; Alex Thomas; Michel Guerraz; Alexandre Legros
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  10.5 T MRI static field effects on human cognitive, vestibular, and physiological function.

Authors:  Andrea Grant; Gregory J Metzger; Pierre-François Van de Moortele; Gregor Adriany; Cheryl Olman; Lin Zhang; Joseph Koopermeiners; Yiğitcan Eryaman; Margaret Koeritzer; Meredith E Adams; Thomas R Henry; Kamil Uğurbil
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 2.546

3.  Mouse Magnetic-field Nystagmus in Strong Static Magnetic Fields Is Dependent on the Presence of Nox3.

Authors:  Bryan K Ward; Yoon H Lee; Dale C Roberts; Ethan Naylor; Americo A Migliaccio; Charles C Della Santina
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 4.  Magnetic Vestibular Stimulation (MVS) As a Technique for Understanding the Normal and Diseased Labyrinth.

Authors:  Bryan K Ward; Jorge Otero-Millan; Prem Jareonsettasin; Michael C Schubert; Dale C Roberts; David S Zee
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 4.003

5.  Visual Fixation and Continuous Head Rotations Have Minimal Effect on Set-Point Adaptation to Magnetic Vestibular Stimulation.

Authors:  Bryan K Ward; David S Zee; Dale C Roberts; Michael C Schubert; Nicolas Pérez-Fernández; Jorge Otero-Millan
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 4.003

6.  Modulatory effects of magnetic vestibular stimulation on resting-state networks can be explained by subject-specific orientation of inner-ear anatomy in the MR static magnetic field.

Authors:  R Boegle; V Kirsch; J Gerb; M Dieterich
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 4.849

7.  Direct comparison of activation maps during galvanic vestibular stimulation: A hybrid H2[15 O] PET-BOLD MRI activation study.

Authors:  Sandra Becker-Bense; Frode Willoch; Thomas Stephan; Matthias Brendel; Igor Yakushev; Maximilian Habs; Sibylle Ziegler; Michael Herz; Markus Schwaiger; Marianne Dieterich; Peter Bartenstein
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.