Literature DB >> 11354432

The effect of habituation and plane of rotation on vestibular perceptual responses.

E A Grunfeld1, T Okada, K Jáuregui-Renaud, A M Bronstein.   

Abstract

A technique was applied to assess vestibular sensation without reference to external spatial, position cues. The stimuli were stopping responses to velocity-steps of 90 deg/s in the dark. Subjects indicated their perceived angular velocity by turning a flywheel connected to a tachogenerator. Two separate experiments were conducted. In one, subjects were rotated in yaw about an earth-vertical axis before and after prolonged rotational or visual (optokinetic) stimuli. In the second experiment, subjects were rotated in roll supine, with either the head ('roll centred') or the feet ('roll eccentric') on the axis of rotation. The two aims of the paper were to (i) examine the effect of repetitive vestibular and optokinetic stimulation on the time constant of decay of vestibular sensation in yaw; (ii) to compare vestibular sensation responses to rotation in roll both with and without the addition of a Z-axis centrifugal force. The pre-habituation sensation response in yaw decayed exponentially with a median time constant of 12.8 s. The duration of the sensation responses were significantly reduced following both prolonged vestibular and optokinetic stimulation. The reduction in vestibular responses following prolonged visual and vestibular stimuli, 1) is likely to occur in velocity storage mechanisms mediating ocular and perceptual responses, 2) may represent a mechanism for reducing the disorientating consequences of visual-vestibular conflict and 3) supports the use of optokinetic stimuli as a treatment for vestibular patients. The time constant of the sensation responses in roll was shorter and not significantly influenced by head position: 5.7 s in the head-centred position compared to 4.7 s in the eccentric head position. Therefore, perceptual as well as ocular responses to rotation in roll are determined primarily by cupula dynamics and not influenced by velocity storage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11354432

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vestib Res        ISSN: 0957-4271            Impact factor:   2.435


  10 in total

1.  Role of cerebellum in motion perception and vestibulo-ocular reflex-similarities and disparities.

Authors:  Aasef G Shaikh; Antonella Palla; Sarah Marti; Itsaso Olasagasti; Lance M Optican; David S Zee; Dominik Straumann
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.847

2.  Prolonged asymmetric vestibular stimulation induces opposite, long-term effects on self-motion perception and ocular responses.

Authors:  V E Pettorossi; R Panichi; F M Botti; A Kyriakareli; A Ferraresi; M Faralli; M Schieppati; A M Bronstein
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Three-dimensional eye movement recordings during magnetic vestibular stimulation.

Authors:  Jorge Otero-Millan; David S Zee; Michael C Schubert; Dale C Roberts; Bryan K Ward
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 4.849

4.  Development of a conversion model between mechanical and electrical vestibular stimuli.

Authors:  A Chen; N Khosravi-Hashemi; C Kuo; J K Kramer; J-S Blouin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Retention of habituation of vestibulo-ocular reflex and sensation of rotation in humans.

Authors:  Gilles Clément; Caroline Tilikete; Jean-Hubert Courjon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-07-01       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Symptomatic Recovery in Miller Fisher Syndrome Parallels Vestibular-Perceptual and not Vestibular-Ocular Reflex Function.

Authors:  Barry M Seemungal; Panos Masaoutis; David A Green; Gordon T Plant; Adolfo M Bronstein
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2011-02-11       Impact factor: 4.003

7.  Vestibular Adaptations Induced by Gentle Physical Activity Are Reduced Among Older Women.

Authors:  Julien Maitre; Thierry Paillard
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2017-05-29       Impact factor: 5.750

8.  Simulator based rehabilitation in refractory dizziness.

Authors:  Marousa Pavlou; Ari Lingeswaran; Rosalyn A Davies; Michael A Gresty; Adolfo M Bronstein
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.849

9.  Postural Effects of Vestibular Manipulation Depend on the Physical Activity Status.

Authors:  Julien Maitre; Thierry Paillard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Functional neuroimaging of visuo-vestibular interaction.

Authors:  R E Roberts; H Ahmad; Q Arshad; M Patel; D Dima; R Leech; B M Seemungal; D J Sharp; A M Bronstein
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2016-12-10       Impact factor: 3.270

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.