Literature DB >> 28271087

Comparison of Pediatric and General Orthopedic Surgeons' Approaches in Management of Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip and Flexible Flatfoot: the Road to Clinical Consensus.

Ramin Haj Zargarbashi1, Hirbod Nasiri Bonaki1, Shayan Abdollah Zadegan1, Taghi Baghdadi1, Mohammad Hossein Nabian1, Mehdi Ramezan Shirazi1.   

Abstract

Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) and flatfoot are common pediatric orthopedic disorders, being referred to and managed by both general and pediatric orthopedic surgeons, through various modalities. Our study aimed to evaluate their consensus and perspective disagreements in terms of diagnostic and therapeutic approaches of the mentioned deformities. Forty participants in two groups of general orthopedic surgeons (GOS) (n=20) and pediatric orthopedic surgeons (POS) (n=20), were asked to answer an 8-item questionnaire on DDH and flexible flatfoot. The questions were provided with two- or multiple choices and a single choice was accepted for each one. Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests was performed to compare the responses. For a neonate with limited hip abduction, hip ultrasonography was the agreed-upon approach in both groups (100% POS vs 71% GOS), and for its interpretation 79% of POS relied on their own whereas 73% of GOS relied on radiologist's report (P=0.002). In failure of a 3-week application of the Pavlik harness, ending it and closed reduction (57% POS vs. 41% GOS) followed by surgery quality assessment with CT scan (64% POS vs. 47% GOS) and without the necessity for avascular necrosis evaluation (79% POS vs. 73% GOS) were the choice measures. In case of closed reduction failure, open reduction via medial approach was the favorite next step in both groups (62% POS and 80% GOS). For the patient with flexible flat foot, reassurance was the choice plan of 79% of pediatric orthopedists. Our findings demonstrated significant disagreements among the orthopedic surgeons. This proposes insufficiency of high-level evidence.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Congenital hip dislocation; Consensus; Flatfoot; Orthopedics; Pediatrics

Year:  2017        PMID: 28271087      PMCID: PMC5339355     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg        ISSN: 2345-461X


  28 in total

1.  Open reduction of congenital dislocation of the hip by Ludloff's method.

Authors:  H Mau; W M Dörr; L Henkel; J Lutsche
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1971-10       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 2.  Developmental dysplasia of the hip: What has changed in the last 20 years?

Authors:  Pavel Kotlarsky; Reuben Haber; Victor Bialik; Mark Eidelman
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2015-12-18

Review 3.  Development dysplasia of the hip from birth to six months.

Authors:  J T Guille; P D Pizzutillo; G D MacEwen
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2000 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.020

Review 4.  Common questions about developmental dysplasia of the hip.

Authors:  Jonathan C Jackson; Melissa M Runge; Nathaniel S Nye
Journal:  Am Fam Physician       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 3.292

5.  The significance of at-risk factors in ultrasound surveillance of developmental dysplasia of the hip. A ten-year prospective study.

Authors:  R W Paton; K Hinduja; C D Thomas
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2005-09

6.  Ludloff's medial approach for open reduction of congenital dislocation of the hip. A 20-year follow-up.

Authors:  W Koizumi; H Moriya; K Tsuchiya; T Takeuchi; M Kamegaya; T Akita
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1996-11

7.  Congenital dislocation of the hip. Open reduction by the medial approach.

Authors:  A Kalamchi; T L Schmidt; G D MacEwen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  The effect of the femoral head ossific nucleus in the treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip. A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Andreas Roposch; Kuldeep K Stöhr; Michael Dobson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  A long-term follow-up study of open reduction using Ludloff's approach for congenital or developmental dislocation of the hip.

Authors:  K Yamada; H Mihara; H Fujii; M Hachiya
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 5.853

10.  Closed versus open reduction of congenital hip dislocation in patients under 2 years of age.

Authors:  S L Weinstein
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 1.390

View more
  2 in total

1.  Musculoskeletal ultrasound: a useful tool for diagnosis of hip developmental dysplasia: One single-center experience.

Authors:  Simona Mureşan; Maria Oana Mărginean; Septimiu Voidăzan; Ionuţ Vlasa; Ioana Sîntean
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 2.  Diagnostic Accuracy of Ultrasonography Method of Graf in the detection of Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.

Authors:  Mohammadreza Chavoshi; Seyed Ali Mirshahvalad; Mehrzad Mahdizadeh; Fatemeh Zamani
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2021-05
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.