Literature DB >> 34239956

Diagnostic Accuracy of Ultrasonography Method of Graf in the detection of Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.

Mohammadreza Chavoshi1, Seyed Ali Mirshahvalad2, Mehrzad Mahdizadeh3, Fatemeh Zamani3.   

Abstract

Background: The present study aimed to perform a meta-analysis on the performance of Graf's ultrasonography method in the detection of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH).
Methods: A query was conducted on electronic bibliographic databases until the end of October 2020. The inclusion criteria entailed: 1. the use of Graf method in less than 12 weeks of age, 2. the use of follow-up as reference test, and 3. provision of crude data. Pooled diagnostic performance measures were calculated. Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) checklist was utilized to assess the quality of the included studies. The hierarchical summary receiver-operating characteristic (HROC) curves were also drawn.
Results: Six articles (including seven populations, 11,012 patients) were considered eligible. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were obtained at 93% (95% CI: 0.57-0.99) and 97% (95% CI:0.86-0.99), respectively (area under curve= 0.99). The pooled positive and negative likelihood ratio, as well as diagnostic odds ratio, was reported as 28.4, 0.07, and 396, respectively.
Conclusion: As evidenced by the obtained results, Graf's method is a useful ultrasonography technique with acceptable accuracy for screening DDH in neonates. However, there are uncertainties about the best population and age for screening. Furthermore, more attention should be paid to the proper training of this method to reduce the number of operator errors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DDH; Diagnostic performance; Graf; Meta-analysis; Pediatrics; Ultrasonography

Year:  2021        PMID: 34239956      PMCID: PMC8221445          DOI: 10.22038/abjs.2021.55292.2755

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg        ISSN: 2345-461X


  32 in total

1.  A meta-analysis of common risk factors associated with the diagnosis of developmental dysplasia of the hip in newborns.

Authors:  Clara L Ortiz-Neira; Elizabeth Oddone Paolucci; Tyrone Donnon
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2011-11-26       Impact factor: 3.528

2.  Developmental dysplasia of the hip: real world data from a retrospective analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of universal screening.

Authors:  Danilo Buonsenso; Antonietta Curatola; Ilaria Lazzareschi; Giuseppina Panza; Rosa Morello; Raffaella Marrocco; Piero Valentini; Francesco Cota; Claudia Rendeli
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2020-04-30

3.  The performance of tests of publication bias and other sample size effects in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy was assessed.

Authors:  Jonathan J Deeks; Petra Macaskill; Les Irwig
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 4.  Ultrasonography in screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip in newborns: systematic review.

Authors:  Nerys F Woolacott; Milo A Puhan; Johann Steurer; Jos Kleijnen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-06-01

5.  Selective ultrasound screening for developmental hip dysplasia: effect on management and late detected cases. A prospective survey during 1991-2006.

Authors:  Lene Bjerke Laborie; Trond Jacob Markestad; Henrik Davidsen; Kari Røine Brurås; Stein Magnus Aukland; John Asle Bjørlykke; Hallvard Reigstad; Kari Indrekvam; Trude Gundersen Lehmann; Ingvild Øvstebø Engesæter; Lars Birger Engesæter; Karen Rosendahl
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2013-12-13

6.  Cost-effectiveness of universal ultrasound screening compared with clinical examination alone in the diagnosis and treatment of neonatal hip dysplasia in Austria.

Authors:  M Thaler; R Biedermann; J Lair; M Krismer; F Landauer
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2011-08

7.  Reliability of 2D and 3D ultrasound for infant hip dysplasia in the hands of novice users.

Authors:  Emanuel Mostofi; Baljot Chahal; Dornoosh Zonoobi; Abhilash Hareendranathan; Koosha P Roshandeh; Sukhdeep K Dulai; Jacob L Jaremko
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Optimizing the Time for Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip Screening: Earlier or Later?

Authors:  Fatma Dilek Gokharman; Sonay Aydin; Erdem Fatihoglu; Elif Ergun; Pinar Nercis Kosar
Journal:  Ultrasound Q       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 1.657

9.  Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement.

Authors:  David Moher; Larissa Shamseer; Mike Clarke; Davina Ghersi; Alessandro Liberati; Mark Petticrew; Paul Shekelle; Lesley A Stewart
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2015-01-01

Review 10.  Recommendations for reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Trevor A McGrath; Mostafa Alabousi; Becky Skidmore; Daniël A Korevaar; Patrick M M Bossuyt; David Moher; Brett Thombs; Matthew D F McInnes
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2017-10-10
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Diagnostic Performance of Clinical Examination Versus Ultrasonography in the Detection of Developmental Dysplasia of Hip: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Mohammadreza Chavoshi; Ghazaleh Soltani; Shekoufe Shafiei Zargar; Cody Clayton Wyles; Hilal Maradit Kremers; Pouria Rouzrokh
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2022-05
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.