| Literature DB >> 28270825 |
Shaowei Duan1, Changyu Jin1, Dong Li1, Chenhao Gao1, Shuanghui Qi1, Kaige Liu1, Jiangbo Hai1, Haoli Ma1, Mingxun Chen1.
Abstract
The MYB family of transcription factors is important in regulatory networks controlling development, metabolism and responses to biotic and abiotic stresses in Arabidopsis. However, their role in regulating fatty acid accumulation in seeds is still largely unclear. Here, we found that MYB76, localized in the nucleus, was predominantly expressed in developing seeds during maturation. The myb76 mutation caused a significant increase in the amounts of total fatty acids and several major fatty acid compositions in mature seeds, suggesting that MYB76 functioned as an important repressor during seed oil biosynthesis. RNA sequencing and quantitative real-time PCR analysis revealed remarkable alteration of numerous genes involved in photosynthesis, fatty acid biosynthesis, modification, and degradation, and oil body formation in myb76 seeds at 12 days after pollination. These results help us to understand the novel function of MYB76 and provide new insights into the regulatory network of MYB transcriptional factors controlling seed oil accumulation in Arabidopsis.Entities:
Keywords: Arabidopsis; MYB76; RNA sequencing; fatty acids; seeds
Year: 2017 PMID: 28270825 PMCID: PMC5318433 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00226
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
Figure 1Analysis of qRT-PCR analysis of MYB76 expression in various tissues of the wild type (Col-0). Rt, roots; St, stems; RL, rosette leaves; CL, cauline leaves; OF, open flowers. (B) qRT-PCR analysis of MYB76 expression in developing seeds of the wild type. (C) Subcellular localization of MYB76 protein fused with GFP (35S:MYB76-GFP) in tobacco (Nicotiana benthamiana) leaves. DAPI, fluorescence of 4′,6-diamino-2-phenylindole; Merge, merge of GFP, DAPI, and bright field images. All the qRT-PCR results were normalized against the expression of EF1aA4 as an internal control. Error bars denote SD.
Figure 2Characterization of Microscopic observation of mature seeds randomly selected from the wild type (Col-0) and myb76 plants. Bars: 500 μm. (B) Quantitative comparisons of seed size (length and width) between the wild type (Col-0) and myb76 plants. (C) Quantitative comparison of dry weight of seeds between the wild type (Col-0) and myb76 plants. (D) Comparison of seed total FA content (μg/mg) between the wild type (Col-0) and myb76 plants. (E) Comparison of seed total FA content (μg/dry seed) between the wild type (Col-0) and myb76 plants. (F) Comparison of contents of major seed FA compositions between the wild type (Col-0) and myb76 plants. Asterisks indicate significant differences in the seed total FA content (D,E) and the contents of major seed FA compositions (F) compared to that in the wild type (two-tailed paired Student's t-test, P ≤ 0.05). Values are means ± SD (n ≥ 3). DW, dry weight. Error bars denote SD.
Functional classification of DEGs in developing seeds of .
| Glucosinolate biosynthesis | 5 | 0 | 5 | 5.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Photosynthesis | 3 | 3 | 6 | 6.1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.9 |
| Cell wall | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1.0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1.9 |
| Oil metabolism | 3 | 4 | 7 | 7.1 | 2 | 10 | 12 | 11.2 |
| Carbohydrate metabolism | 2 | 9 | 11 | 11.1 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 6.5 |
| Nucleic acid | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2.0 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 4.7 |
| Amino acid and protein | 3 | 4 | 7 | 7.1 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 4.7 |
| Leaf and root development | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Shoot development | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1.0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.9 |
| Embryo/seed development | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1.0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 2.8 |
| Flower development | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2.0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1.9 |
| Cell growth | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.9 |
| Hormone | 1 | 5 | 6 | 6.1 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 4.7 |
| Stress/defense response | 4 | 4 | 8 | 8.1 | 2 | 23 | 25 | 23.4 |
| Transcriptional regulation | 2 | 4 | 6 | 6.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Signaling transduction | 3 | 0 | 3 | 3.0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1.9 |
| Transport facilitation | 3 | 3 | 6 | 6.1 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 3.7 |
| Others | 8 | 17 | 25 | 25.3 | 5 | 27 | 32 | 29.9 |
Functional classification of DEGs was performed using the biological process category of Arabidopsis Gene Ontology (.
Figure 3Comparison of the expression of genes contributing to FA biosynthesis or modification in the developing seeds of the wild type (Col-0) and . RNA samples were extracted from developing seeds at different developmental stages and values are the means of two replicates, carried out using cDNA dilutions obtained from two independent RNA extractions. Results were estimated based on the expression levels of EF1aA4, set as the internal standard. The gene expression level in the wild type was set to one at each developmental stage. Two-tailed paired Student's t-test significance: *P ≤ 0.05. Error bars denote SD.
Figure 4Comparison of the expression of two . RNA samples were extracted from developing seeds at different developmental stages and values are the means of two replicates, carried out using cDNA dilutions obtained from two independent RNA extractions. Results were estimated based on the expression levels of EF1aA4, set as the internal standard. The gene expression level in the wild type was set to one at each developmental stage. Two-tailed paired Student's t-test significance: *P ≤ 0.05. Error bars denote SD.