Danielle F Haley1,2, Michael R Kramer3, Adaora A Adimora4,5, Regine Haardörfer1, Gina M Wingood6, Christina Ludema2, Anna Rubtsova1, DeMarc A Hickson7, Zev Ross8, Elizabeth Golub9, Hector Bolivar10, Hannah Lf Cooper1. 1. Department of Behavioral Sciences and Health Education, Rollins School of Public Health at Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. 2. Institute for Global Health and Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA. 3. Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health at Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. 4. Department of Medicine, UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA. 5. Department of Epidemiology, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA. 6. Department of Sociomedical Sciences, Lerner Center for Public Health Promotion, Mailman School of Public Health at Columbia University, New York, New York, USA. 7. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Jackson State University School of Public Health, Jackson, Mississippi, USA. 8. ZevRoss Spatial Analysis, Ithaca, New York, USA. 9. Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. 10. Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Neighbourhood characteristics (eg, high poverty rates) are associated with STIs among HIV-uninfected women in the USA. However, no multilevel analyses investigating the associations between neighbourhood exposures and STIs have explored these relationships among women living with HIV infection. The objectives of this study were to: (1) examine relationships between neighbourhood characteristics and current STI status and (2) investigate whether the magnitudes and directions of these relationships varied by HIV status in a predominantly HIV-infected cohort of women living in the Southern USA. METHODS: This cross-sectional multilevel analysis tests relationships between census tract characteristics and current STI status using data from 737 women enrolled at the Women's Interagency HIV Study's southern sites (530 HIV-infected and 207 HIV-uninfected women). Administrative data (eg, US Census) described the census tract-level social disorder (eg, violent crime rate) and social disadvantage (eg, alcohol outlet density) where women lived. Participant-level data were gathered via survey. Testing positive for a current STI was defined as a laboratory-confirmed diagnosis of chlamydia, gonorrhoea, trichomoniasis or syphilis. Hierarchical generalised linear models were used to determine relationships between tract-level characteristics and current STI status, and to test whether these relationships varied by HIV status. RESULTS: Eleven per cent of participants tested positive for at least one current STI. Greater tract-level social disorder (OR=1.34, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.87) and social disadvantage (OR=1.34, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.86) were associated with having a current STI. There was no evidence of additive or multiplicative interaction between tract-level characteristics and HIV status. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that neighbourhood characteristics may be associated with current STIs among women living in the South, and that relationships do not vary by HIV status. Future research should establish the temporality of these relationships and explore pathways through which neighbourhoods create vulnerability to STIs. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00000797; results. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.
OBJECTIVES: Neighbourhood characteristics (eg, high poverty rates) are associated with STIs among HIV-uninfectedwomen in the USA. However, no multilevel analyses investigating the associations between neighbourhood exposures and STIs have explored these relationships among women living with HIV infection. The objectives of this study were to: (1) examine relationships between neighbourhood characteristics and current STI status and (2) investigate whether the magnitudes and directions of these relationships varied by HIV status in a predominantly HIV-infected cohort of women living in the Southern USA. METHODS: This cross-sectional multilevel analysis tests relationships between census tract characteristics and current STI status using data from 737 women enrolled at the Women's Interagency HIV Study's southern sites (530 HIV-infected and 207 HIV-uninfectedwomen). Administrative data (eg, US Census) described the census tract-level social disorder (eg, violent crime rate) and social disadvantage (eg, alcohol outlet density) where women lived. Participant-level data were gathered via survey. Testing positive for a current STI was defined as a laboratory-confirmed diagnosis of chlamydia, gonorrhoea, trichomoniasis or syphilis. Hierarchical generalised linear models were used to determine relationships between tract-level characteristics and current STI status, and to test whether these relationships varied by HIV status. RESULTS: Eleven per cent of participants tested positive for at least one current STI. Greater tract-level social disorder (OR=1.34, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.87) and social disadvantage (OR=1.34, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.86) were associated with having a current STI. There was no evidence of additive or multiplicative interaction between tract-level characteristics and HIV status. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that neighbourhood characteristics may be associated with current STIs among women living in the South, and that relationships do not vary by HIV status. Future research should establish the temporality of these relationships and explore pathways through which neighbourhoods create vulnerability to STIs. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00000797; results. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.
Entities:
Keywords:
EPIDEMIOLOGY (GENERAL); HIV; INFECTIOUS DISEASES; SEXUAL HEALTH; WOMEN
Authors: Jacky M Jennings; Ralph Taylor; Vince G Iannacchione; Susan M Rogers; Shang-En Chung; Steven Huettner; Jonathan M Ellen Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 3.797
Authors: Hannah L F Cooper; Sabriya Linton; Danielle F Haley; Mary E Kelley; Emily F Dauria; Conny Chen Karnes; Zev Ross; Josalin Hunter-Jones; Kristen K Renneker; Carlos Del Rio; Adaora Adimora; Gina Wingood; Richard Rothenberg; Loida E Bonney Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2015-06
Authors: Melanie C Bacon; Viktor von Wyl; Christine Alden; Gerald Sharp; Esther Robison; Nancy Hessol; Stephen Gange; Yvonne Barranday; Susan Holman; Kathleen Weber; Mary A Young Journal: Clin Diagn Lab Immunol Date: 2005-09
Authors: D Heather Watts; Gayle Springer; Howard Minkoff; Sharon L Hillier; Lisa Jacobson; Michael Moxley; Jessica Justman; Helen Cejtin; Casey O'Connell; Ruth M Greenblatt Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2006-10-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Jane K Burke-Miller; Kathleen Weber; Susan E Cohn; Ronald C Hershow; Beverly E Sha; Audrey L French; Mardge H Cohen Journal: AIDS Care Date: 2016-04-21
Authors: Morgan M Philbin; Carrigan Parish; Margaret Pereyra; Daniel J Feaster; Mardge Cohen; Gina Wingood; Deborah Konkle-Parker; Adebola Adedimeji; Tracey E Wilson; Jennifer Cohen; Lakshmi Goparaju; Adaora A Adimora; Elizabeth T Golub; Lisa R Metsch Journal: J Health Commun Date: 2019-06-14
Authors: Danielle F Haley; Andrew Edmonds; Nadya Belenky; DeMarc A Hickson; Catalina Ramirez; Gina M Wingood; Hector Bolivar; Elizabeth Golub; Adaora A Adimora Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2018-01 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Danielle F Haley; Regine Haardörfer; Michael R Kramer; Adaora A Adimora; Gina M Wingood; Neela D Goswami; Anna Rubtsova; Christina Ludema; DeMarc A Hickson; Catalina Ramirez; Zev Ross; Hector Bolivar; Hannah L F Cooper Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2017-04-10 Impact factor: 3.797
Authors: Christine M Zachek; Lara E Coelho; Rosa M S M Domingues; Jesse L Clark; Raquel B De Boni; Paula M Luz; Ruth K Friedman; Ângela C Vasconcelos de Andrade; Valdilea G Veloso; Jordan E Lake; Beatriz Grinsztejn Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2019-06
Authors: Natalie M Leblanc; Kamila Alexander; Sierra Carter; Hugh Crean; Ladrea Ingram; James Kobie; James McMahon Journal: Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle) Date: 2020-05-19
Authors: Danielle F Haley; Andrew Edmonds; Victor J Schoenbach; Catalina Ramirez; DeMarc A Hickson; Gina M Wingood; Hector Bolivar; Elizabeth Golub; Adaora A Adimora Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2018-10-29 Impact factor: 3.797