Literature DB >> 28270126

Analysis of novel Sjogren's syndrome autoantibodies in patients with dry eyes.

Sandra Everett1, Sahana Vishwanath2, Vanessa Cavero2, Long Shen3, Lakshmanan Suresh4,3, Kishore Malyavantham3, Norah Lincoff-Cohen1,5, Julian L Ambrus6,7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Dry eye is a common problem in Ophthalmology and may occur for many reasons including Sjogren's syndrome (SS). Recent studies have identified autoantibodies, anti-salivary gland protein 1 (SP1), anti-carbonic anhydrase 6 (CA6) and anti-parotid secretory protein (PSP), which occur early in the course of SS. The current studies were designed to evaluate how many patients with idiopathic dry eye and no evidence of systemic diseases from a dry eye practice have these autoantibodies.
METHODS: Patients from a dry eye clinic and normal controls were assessed by Schirmer's test for tear flow. Sera were assessed for autoantibodies using ELISA assays. Statistics was performed with Prism 7 software and student's unpaired t test.
RESULTS: In this study 60% of the dry eye patients expressed one of these autoantibodies. Only 30% expressed one of the autoantibodies associated with long-standing SS, which are included in the diagnostic criteria for SS, anti-Ro and anti-La. Patients with disease for less than 2 years and mild dry eyes did not express anti-Ro or anti-La, while 25% expressed anti-SP1. Similar observations, with smaller numbers, were made when patients had not only dry eye but also dry mouth.
CONCLUSIONS: Antibodies to SP1, CA6 and PSP occur in some patients with idiopathic dry eyes. Further studies will be needed to determine how many of these patients go on to develop systemic manifestations of SS. Testing for these autoantibodies may allow early recognition of patients with SS. This will lead to improved management of the patients and the development of new strategies to maintain normal lacrimal and salivary gland function in patients with SS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Autoantibodies; Corneal abrasion; Dry eyes; Sjogren’s syndrome

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28270126      PMCID: PMC5341407          DOI: 10.1186/s12886-017-0412-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol        ISSN: 1471-2415            Impact factor:   2.209


Background

Dry eyes and their complications are commonly seen in Ophthalmology practices [1, 2]. Recent studies have demonstrated that Sjogren’s syndrome (SS) is common among patients with dry eyes and is likely underestimated in this patient population [3, 4]. Current diagnostic criteria for SS include serological tests, anti-nuclear antibodies (ANA), rheumatoid factor (RF), anti-La and anti-Ro [5]. Studies investigating dry eye patients with SS diagnosed by clinical criteria note that anti-Ro and anti-La may frequently be negative [6]. Lip biopsies are then required to make a diagnosis of SS. Studies initially utilizing animal models for SS and various subgroups of SS patients have demonstrated novel autoantibodies, anti-salivary gland protein 1 (SP1), anti-carbonic anhydrase 6 (CA6) and anti-parotid secretory protein (PSP) [7]. In animal models, anti-SP1, anti-CA6 and anti-PSP are expressed earlier in the course of the disease than anti-Ro and anti-La. Various studies have suggested that this may be true in patients with SS [7, 8]. The current studies were established to investigate the presence of anti-SP1, anti-CA6 and anti-PSP in a population of patients with dry eyes. Patients were classified according to the degree of dysfunction noted by Schirmer’s test. No patients had significant medical co-morbidities. Normal controls were obtained from the general community.

Methods

Study design

This was a retrospective study performed on a population of patients being followed in a Dry Eye Practice (Investigator SE). All patients were included in the study who lacked a primary cause for their dry eyes, such as medication with anti-cholinergic effects, radiation therapy, sarcoidosis, hepatitis C, HIV, lymphoma or graft-versus-host disease. Normal controls were obtained from the general population. The Institutional Review Board, SUNY at Buffalo School of Medicine, approved these studies.

Clinical studies

Schirmer’s tests were performed as previously described [9]. Tear osmolarity was determined by The TearLab Osmolarity System following the manufacturer’s instruction. The serology studies for anti-Ro (IgG), anti-La (IgG), anti-SP1 (IgG, IgA & IgM), anti-CA6 (IgG, IgA & IgM), and anti-PSP (IgG, IgA & IgM), were performed at by utilizing enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) at Immco Diagnostics, Buffalo, NY [10].

Statistics

Statistical analysis was performed using Prism 7 software. Comparison of various groups was performed using unpaired student’s t test.

Results

The characteristics of the patients studied are shown in Table 1. The patients with Schirmer’s tests < 3 mm had a longer duration of disease than the patients with Schirmer’s tests 3 mm < SCH < 6 mm, but interestingly both groups had similar ages. The majority of patients in each group had only dry eyes, but the presence of dry mouth was present in similar numbers in each group. Of the patients with Schirmer’s test < 3 mm, one had rheumatoid arthritis and one had diabetes and hypertension. Of the patients with Schirmer’s tests 3 mm < SCH < 6 mm, two had diabetes, four had hypertension and two had allergic rhinitis. The remainder of the patients lacked other significant medical conditions.
Table 1

Patient Characteristics

SCH < 3 mm3 mm < SCH < 6 mmNormal
Number in Group273835
Age40 – 95 (mean 67.8) yrs.44 – 80 (mean 63.8) yrs.31-93 (mean 57.4 years)
Duration of Dry Eyes1 – 30 (mean 13) yrs.0.5 – 10 (mean 4.1) yearsNone
Presence of Dry Mouth9 patients8 patientsNone
Patient Characteristics Because the use of tear osmolarity has been suggested as a good indicator for lacrimal gland dysfunction in early Sjogren’s syndrome [11], we evaluated tear osmolarity in normal controls and patients with keratoconjunctivitis sicca. Figure 1 demonstrates that tear osmolarity did not distinguish these two groups (p = .388). We did not therefore use tear osmolarity further in our studies.
Fig. 1

Tear osmolarity studies were done as described in materials and methods. Data shown are the tear osmolarity in the right and left eye of the normal controls (HC) and the patients with keratoconjunctivitis sicca (KCS)

Tear osmolarity studies were done as described in materials and methods. Data shown are the tear osmolarity in the right and left eye of the normal controls (HC) and the patients with keratoconjunctivitis sicca (KCS) The evaluation of autoantibodies in these patients led to very interesting results. As shown in Fig. 2, the novel autoantibodies, anti-SP1, anti-CA6 and anti-PSP were present equally in both groups of patients, those with Schirmer’s tests 3 mm < SCH < 6 mm and those with Schirmer’s tests < 3 mm. In the patients with Schirmer’s tests < 3 mm, the difference between expression of Ro/La versus SP1/CA6/PSP was not statistically significant (p = .175). The difference in Ro/La expression (p = .036) or SP1/CA6/PSP (P < .003) between the patients with Schirmer’s < 3 mm compared to the normal controls was significant. When looking at the patients with Schirmer’s tests 3 mm < SCH < 6 mm, the difference in expression of SP1/CA6/PSP was greater than the expression of Ro/L a in the patients (p <. 001) and greater in the patients than in the normal controls (p = .0001). The difference in Ro/La expression in these patients was not significantly different than the expression of Ro/La in the normal controls (p = .93). Anti-Ro and anti-La antibodies were more common in the sera of patients with less tear production.
Fig. 2

Antibodies to Ro, La, SP1, CA6 and PSP were determined by ELISA in the sera of patients with idiopathic dry eyes and Schirmer’s tests < 3 mm (27 patients), Schirmer’s tests < 6 mm (38 patients) or normal controls (35 patients). Data shown are the percent positive in each group for each of these autoantibodies

Antibodies to Ro, La, SP1, CA6 and PSP were determined by ELISA in the sera of patients with idiopathic dry eyes and Schirmer’s tests < 3 mm (27 patients), Schirmer’s tests < 6 mm (38 patients) or normal controls (35 patients). Data shown are the percent positive in each group for each of these autoantibodies Figure 3 demonstrates that similar findings were observed when the analysis included only those patients with both dry eyes and dry mouth. When comparing the expression of anti-SP1 with that of anti-CA6 and anti-PSP a few observations were notable. In patients with dry eyes and dry mouth and Schirmer’s tests 3 mm < SCH < 6 mm, anti-SP1 was the dominant autoantibody while in the patients with Schirmer’s tests < 3 mm, anti-CA6 was the dominant autoantibody. However, the numbers were small so that no conclusions can be drawn from these results. In patients with only dry eyes, equal numbers of patients express either anti-SP1, anti-CA6 or anti-PSP with several patients expressing two or all three of these autoantibodies.
Fig. 3

Antibodies to Ro, La, SP1, CA6 and PSP were determined by ELISA in the sera of patients with idiopathic dry eyes and dry mouth with Schirmer’s tests < 3 mm (9 patients), Schirmer’s tests < 6 mm (10 patients). Data shown are the percent positive in each group for each of these autoantibodies

Antibodies to Ro, La, SP1, CA6 and PSP were determined by ELISA in the sera of patients with idiopathic dry eyes and dry mouth with Schirmer’s tests < 3 mm (9 patients), Schirmer’s tests < 6 mm (10 patients). Data shown are the percent positive in each group for each of these autoantibodies To further evaluate patients with very early disease, we examined the autoantibody studies in 24 patients in the cohort who not only had Schirmer’s test 3 mm < SCH < 6 mm, but also had symptomatic dry eyes for less than 2 years. None of these patients had dry mouth. As shown in Fig. 4, this group did not express anti-Ro or anti-La. Anti-SP1 antibodies were seen in 25% of the patients. The difference in expression of anti-Ro/anti-La compared to anti-SP1/anti-PSP/anti-CA6 is statistically significant (p = .0081).
Fig. 4

Antibodies to Ro, La, SP1, CA6 and PSP were determined by ELISA in the sera of 24 patients with idiopathic dry eyes for less than 2 years and Schirmer’s tests < 6 mm. Data shown are the percent positive for each of these autoantibodies

Antibodies to Ro, La, SP1, CA6 and PSP were determined by ELISA in the sera of 24 patients with idiopathic dry eyes for less than 2 years and Schirmer’s tests < 6 mm. Data shown are the percent positive for each of these autoantibodies In animal models of SS, the autoantibodies identified early in the course of the disease are IgM antibodies [12]. At later stages of the disease, IgA and IgG antibodies are noted. We therefore examined the isotypes of the anti-SP1, anti-CA6 and anti-PSP antibodies in the patients evaluated in these studies. Figure 5a evaluates anti-SP1. There is a tendency in the patients with Schirmer’s <6 mm to have more IgM antibodies, but because the numbers are small, none of the differences seen are statistically significant. Figure 5b evaluates anti-CA6 antibodies. Patients with Schirmer’s <3 mm had more IgM anti-CA6 than both patients with Schirmer’s 3 mm < SCH < 6 mm (p = .02) and normals (p = .02). With the IgG anti-CA6 both the Schirmer’s < 3 mm (p = .002) and the Schirmer’s 3 mm < SCH < 6 mm (p = .02) patients were significantly greater than the normal controls. The IgA anti-CA6 were similar to the IgM anti-CA6 in that the Schirmer’s < 3 mm had more antibody than both the patients with Schirmer’s 3 mm < SCH < 6 mm (p = .005) and the normal controls (p = .005). Fig. 5c evaluates anti-PSP antibodies. In these studies, because of the small numbers, the only statistically significant changes were IgM anti-PSP Schirmer’s 3 mm < SCH < 6 mm versus normal controls (p = .04) and IgA anti-PSP Schirmer’s < 3 mm versus normals (p = .01). This suggests that even the patients that are picked up at what would be an early stage of SS, i.e. without systemic manifestations, have in fact had their autoimmune eye disease for a long period of time. Interestingly, patients with Schirmer’s tests 3 mm < SCH < 6 mm had symptoms of dry eyes for an average of 4.1 years while those with Schirmer’s tests <3 mm had symptoms of dry eyes for an average of 13 years. It has been noted in several studies that identification of patients with early SS is a major challenge [13].
Fig. 5

a IgM, IgG and IgA autoantibodies to SP1 were determined by ELISA in the sera of patients with idiopathic dry eyes and Schirmer’s tests < 3 mm (27 patients), Schirmer’s tests < 6 mm (38 patients) or normal controls (35 patients). Data shown are the percent positive in each group for each of these autoantibodies. b IgM, IgG and IgA autoantibodies to CA6 were determined by ELISA in the sera of patients with idiopathic dry eyes and Schirmer’s tests < 3 mm (27 patients), Schirmer’s tests < 6 mm (38 patients) or normal controls (35 patients). Data shown are the percent positive in each group for each of these autoantibodies. c IgM, IgG and IgA autoantibodies to PSP were determined by ELISA in the sera of patients with idiopathic dry eyes and Schirmer’s tests < 3 mm (27 patients), Schirmer’s tests < 6 mm (38 patients) or normal controls (35 patients). Data shown are the percent positive in each group for each of these autoantibodies

a IgM, IgG and IgA autoantibodies to SP1 were determined by ELISA in the sera of patients with idiopathic dry eyes and Schirmer’s tests < 3 mm (27 patients), Schirmer’s tests < 6 mm (38 patients) or normal controls (35 patients). Data shown are the percent positive in each group for each of these autoantibodies. b IgM, IgG and IgA autoantibodies to CA6 were determined by ELISA in the sera of patients with idiopathic dry eyes and Schirmer’s tests < 3 mm (27 patients), Schirmer’s tests < 6 mm (38 patients) or normal controls (35 patients). Data shown are the percent positive in each group for each of these autoantibodies. c IgM, IgG and IgA autoantibodies to PSP were determined by ELISA in the sera of patients with idiopathic dry eyes and Schirmer’s tests < 3 mm (27 patients), Schirmer’s tests < 6 mm (38 patients) or normal controls (35 patients). Data shown are the percent positive in each group for each of these autoantibodies

Discussion

The current studies demonstrate that many patients with “idiopathic” dry eyes, with or without dry mouth, have autoantibodies that are seen in patients with early SS. Some of these patients have autoantibodies included in the current diagnostic criteria for SS, anti-Ro and anti-La, while more patients express more recently discovered autoantibodies associated with an early stage of SS, anti-SP1, anti-CA6 and anti-PSP, without anti-Ro or anti-La. Previous studies from an academic Sjogren’s center demonstrated that many patients referred with a diagnosis of dry eyes in fact had SS that met full criteria established by the American College of Rheumatology [4]. Many of these patients had evidence of systemic manifestations of SS as well. In the current study, patients were studied from a private dry eye practice who lacked evidence of systemic manifestations of SS. These patients were in fact often self-referred or referred by an Internist for an initial evaluation. They likely had earlier disease than the patients referred to a tertiary academic center. Nonetheless, there was still a significant delay in the evaluation by the Ophthalmologist relative to the onset of dry eyes as indicated by the clinical history but also by the fact that the predominant autoantibodies were of the IgG or IgA isotype rather than the IgM isotype. Animal models have demonstrated that the earliest manifestations of SS are loss of salivary gland function secondary to involvement of the innate immune system [7, 12, 14]. Lacrimal gland involvement likely occurs initially in the same manner, although this has not yet been studied completely. At this stage, antibodies anti-SP1, anti-CA6 and anti-PSP are noted. In the next stage lymphocytic infiltration of the glands occurs followed by progression from a local disease to a systemic disease, with lung and kidney involvement. Antibodies anti-Ro and anti-La are identified in the animals at the point when the disease goes from being local to being systemic [7]. It should be noted, however, that one study demonstrated anti-Ro and anti-La antibodies in the sera of patients who developed SS years before clinical expression of their disease [15, 16]. So, in some cases, anti-Ro and anti-La may occur in early disease as well. The challenge from a therapeutic point of view is to identify the SS patients at the very earliest stages, before there has been permanent damage to the lacrimal and salivary glands [17-19]. In animal models, treatment at this stage can lead to halting of the disease process [20-22]. The current studies suggest that Ophthalmologists see patients who are in very early stages of SS. Perhaps with greater vigilance in the medical community, Ophthalmologists can see these patients at even earlier stages. At the same time, many of the patients in this study had dry eyes for longer than 10 years without the development of systemic symptoms. They had autoantibodies consistent with immune mediated lacrimal gland injury. Perhaps many patients develop a form of SS that involves only the lacrimal and/or salivary glands without ever progressing to more systemic manifestations. These patients would not meet the accepted criteria for SS, but in fact may deserve the same type of immunomodulatory therapy. This therapy could theoretically be given locally under these circumstances rather than systemically. Further study will be necessary to address these issues. In conclusion, many patients with “idiopathic dry eyes” identified in a private dry eyes practice have evidence of immune mediated lacrimal gland injury with serum autoantibodies consistent with early SS. The criteria for SS may have to change to accommodate these patients. Future studies will be necessary to determine the most appropriate therapies for these patients.

Conclusions

The current studies demonstrate that many patients with idiopathic dry eyes with or with out dry mouth have markers for early Sjogren’s syndrome, anti-SP1, anti-CA6 and anti-PSP. Further study will be necessary to assess antibody positive patients for various features of SS over a long period of time and to develop therapies appropriate for patients showing evidence of early SS.
  20 in total

Review 1.  Classification criteria for Sjogren's syndrome: a critical review.

Authors:  Chiara Baldini; Rosaria Talarico; Athanasios G Tzioufas; Stefano Bombardieri
Journal:  J Autoimmun       Date:  2011-12-30       Impact factor: 7.094

2.  Evaluation of patients with dry eye for presence of underlying Sjögren syndrome.

Authors:  Esen Karamursel Akpek; Alena Klimava; Jennifer E Thorne; Don Martin; Kaevalin Lekhanont; Ann Ostrovsky
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.651

3.  A role for lymphotoxin in primary Sjogren's disease.

Authors:  Long Shen; Lakshmanan Suresh; Jing Wu; Jingxiu Xuan; Hong Li; Chongjie Zhang; Oleh Pankewycz; Julian L Ambrus
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 5.422

4.  Discrimination between Sjögren's and non-Sjögren's sicca syndrome by sialoscintigraphy and antibodies against alpha-fodrin and Ro/La autoantigens.

Authors:  K-S Chen; M-C Jiang; C-J Li; O-K Liu; C-S S Tsai
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.671

Review 5.  Current Approach to Dry Eye Disease.

Authors:  Valéria Valim; Virginia Fernandes Moça Trevisani; Jacqueline Martins de Sousa; Verônica Silva Vilela; Rubens Belfort
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 8.667

6.  Prevalence and predictors of Sjogren's syndrome in a prospective cohort of patients with aqueous-deficient dry eye.

Authors:  Melissa Shiao Hui Liew; Min Zhang; Elizabeth Kim; Esen K Akpek
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 4.638

7.  IL-14 alpha, the nexus for primary Sjögren's disease in mice and humans.

Authors:  Long Shen; Lakshmanan Suresh; Hong Li; Chongjie Zhang; Vijay Kumar; Oleh Pankewycz; Julian L Ambrus
Journal:  Clin Immunol       Date:  2008-11-26       Impact factor: 3.969

8.  Novel autoantibodies in Sjogren's syndrome.

Authors:  Long Shen; Lakshmanan Suresh; Matthew Lindemann; Jingxiu Xuan; Przemek Kowal; Kishore Malyavantham; Julian L Ambrus
Journal:  Clin Immunol       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 3.969

Review 9.  What have we learned from clinical trials in primary Sjögren's syndrome about pathogenesis?

Authors:  Cees G M Kallenberg; Arjan Vissink; Frans G M Kroese; Wayel H Abdulahad; Hendrika Bootsma
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2011-02-28       Impact factor: 5.156

10.  Investigation of novel autoantibodies in Sjogren's syndrome utilizing Sera from the Sjogren's international collaborative clinical alliance cohort.

Authors:  Lakshmanan Suresh; Kishore Malyavantham; Long Shen; Julian L Ambrus
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 2.209

View more
  9 in total

1.  Prevalence of Novel Candidate Sjögren Syndrome Autoantibodies in the Penn Sjögren's International Collaborative Clinical Alliance Cohort.

Authors:  Vatinee Y Bunya; Mina Massaro-Giordano; Frederick B Vivino; Maureen G Maguire; Alan N Baer; John A Gonzales; Gui-Shuang Ying
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 2.651

2.  Prevalence of Novel Candidate Sjogren Syndrome Autoantibodies in the Dry Eye Assessment and Management (DREAM) Study.

Authors:  Vatinee Y Bunya; Gui-Shuang Ying; Maureen G Maguire; Eric Kuklinski; Meng C Lin; Ellen Peskin; Penny A Asbell
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 2.651

3.  Association Between Early Sjögren Markers and Symptoms and Signs of Dry Eye.

Authors:  Sasha Hubschman; Mario Rojas; Meghana Kalavar; Amy Kloosterboer; Alfonso L Sabater; Anat Galor
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 3.152

Review 4.  MicroRNA in Sjögren's Syndrome: Their Potential Roles in Pathogenesis and Diagnosis.

Authors:  M Reale; C D'Angelo; E Costantini; M Laus; A Moretti; A Croce
Journal:  J Immunol Res       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 4.818

5.  Carbonic Anhydrase 6 Gene Variation influences Oral Microbiota Composition and Caries Risk in Swedish adolescents.

Authors:  A Esberg; S Haworth; C Brunius; P Lif Holgerson; I Johansson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Clinical Correlations of Novel Autoantibodies in Patients with Dry Eye.

Authors:  Sezen Karakus; Alan N Baer; Esen K Akpek
Journal:  J Immunol Res       Date:  2019-01-13       Impact factor: 4.818

Review 7.  Role of tear film biomarkers in the diagnosis and management of dry eye disease.

Authors:  Pak Yui Fong; Kendrick Co Shih; Pun Yuet Lam; Tommy Chung Yan Chan; Vishal Jhanji; Louis Tong
Journal:  Taiwan J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-09-12

8.  Disease-Specific Expression of Conjunctiva Associated Lymphoid Tissue (CALT) in Mouse Models of Dry Eye Disease and Ocular Allergy.

Authors:  Philipp Steven; Sebastian Schwab; Anne Kiesewetter; Daniel R Saban; Michael E Stern; Uta Gehlsen
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  The Diagnostic Performance of Early Sjögren's Syndrome Autoantibodies in Juvenile Sjögren's Syndrome: The University of Florida Pediatric Cohort Study.

Authors:  Akaluck Thatayatikom; Inyoung Jun; Indraneel Bhattacharyya; Kathleen Berg; Yun Jong Lee; Yoosik Kim; Abi Adewumi; Weizhou Zhang; Sthorn Thatayatikom; Ankit Shah; Casey Beal; Renee Modica; Melissa E Elder; Seunghee Cha
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 7.561

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.