| Literature DB >> 28269917 |
Samson W Tu1, Susana Martins2, Connie Oshiro2, Kaeli Yuen2, Dan Wang2, Amy Robinson2, Michael Ashcraft2, Paul A Heidenreich3, Mary K Goldstein3.
Abstract
Through close analysis of two pairs of systems that implement the automated evaluation of performance measures (PMs) and guideline-based clinical decision support (CDS), we contrast differences in their knowledge encoding and necessary changes to a CDS system that provides management recommendations for patients failing performance measures. We trace the sources of differences to the implementation environments and goals of PMs and CDS.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28269917 PMCID: PMC5333302
Source DB: PubMed Journal: AMIA Annu Symp Proc ISSN: 1559-4076