Literature DB >> 30815112

Integration of Clinical Decision Support and Electronic Clinical Quality Measurement: Domain Expert Insights and Implications for Future Direction.

Polina Kukhareva1, Charlene R Weir1, Catherine Staes1, Damian Borbolla1, Stacey Slager1, Kensaku Kawamoto1.   

Abstract

The integration of clinical decision support (CDS) and electronic clinical quality measurement (eCQM) could help improve consistency, reduce redundancy, and ultimately help improve value. To guide efforts in this area, 15 leading experts in CDS and eCQM were interviewed to obtain insights on how CDS and eCQM could be better integrated. Four main themes emerged: cultural and business considerations for CDS, eCQM, and their integration trump the technical considerations; the purpose and goals of CDS and eCQM differ, and these differences must be accounted for; there is an oftentimes invisible overlap between CDS and eCQM, and with the larger domain of quality improvement; and despite the differences, synergies between CDS and eCQM should be pursued to amplify the effectiveness of each approach. A key implication of these findings is the need to bridge cultural and business differences between CDS and eCQM, with informaticists potentially playing a critical role.

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30815112      PMCID: PMC6371250     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc        ISSN: 1559-4076


  18 in total

1.  The critical incident technique.

Authors:  J C FLANAGAN
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1954-07       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  Monitoring adherence to evidence-based practices: a method to utilize HL7 messages from hospital information systems.

Authors:  R Konrad; B Tulu; M Lawley
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 2.342

3.  The use of decision support to measure documented adherence to a national imaging quality measure.

Authors:  Ali S Raja; Anurag Gupta; Ivan K Ip; Angela M Mills; Ramin Khorasani
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.173

4.  Changes in performance after implementation of a multifaceted electronic-health-record-based quality improvement system.

Authors:  Stephen D Persell; Darren Kaiser; Nancy C Dolan; Beth Andrews; Sue Levi; Janardan Khandekar; Thomas Gavagan; Jason A Thompson; Elisha M Friesema; David W Baker
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Normalization and standardization of electronic health records for high-throughput phenotyping: the SHARPn consortium.

Authors:  Jyotishman Pathak; Kent R Bailey; Calvin E Beebe; Steven Bethard; David C Carrell; Pei J Chen; Dmitriy Dligach; Cory M Endle; Lacey A Hart; Peter J Haug; Stanley M Huff; Vinod C Kaggal; Dingcheng Li; Hongfang Liu; Kyle Marchant; James Masanz; Timothy Miller; Thomas A Oniki; Martha Palmer; Kevin J Peterson; Susan Rea; Guergana K Savova; Craig R Stancl; Sunghwan Sohn; Harold R Solbrig; Dale B Suesse; Cui Tao; David P Taylor; Les Westberg; Stephen Wu; Ning Zhuo; Christopher G Chute
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 6.  Enabling health care decisionmaking through clinical decision support and knowledge management.

Authors:  David Lobach; Gillian D Sanders; Tiffani J Bright; Anthony Wong; Ravi Dhurjati; Erin Bristow; Lori Bastian; Remy Coeytaux; Gregory Samsa; Vic Hasselblad; John W Williams; Liz Wing; Michael Musty; Amy S Kendrick
Journal:  Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep)       Date:  2012-04

7.  Employing the electronic health record to improve diabetes care: a multifaceted intervention in an integrated delivery system.

Authors:  Valerie Weber; Frederick Bloom; Steve Pierdon; Craig Wood
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 8.  Computerized decision support systems in primary care for type 2 diabetes patients only improve patients' outcomes when combined with feedback on performance and case management: a systematic review.

Authors:  Frits G W Cleveringa; Kees J Gorter; Maureen van den Donk; Juliette van Gijsel; Guy E H M Rutten
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 6.118

9.  "My approach to this job is...one person at a time": Perceived discordance between population-level quality targets and patient-centred care.

Authors:  Noah Ivers; Jan Barnsley; Ross Upshur; Karen Tu; Baiju Shah; Jeremy Grimshaw; Merrick Zwarenstein
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.275

10.  The Case for Conceptual and Computable Cross-Fertilization Between Audit and Feedback and Clinical Decision Support.

Authors:  Benjamin Brown; Niels Peek; Iain Buchan
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2015
View more
  3 in total

1.  Generating and Reporting Electronic Clinical Quality Measures from Electronic Health Records: Strategies from EvidenceNOW Cooperatives.

Authors:  Joshua E Richardson; Luke V Rasmussen; David A Dorr; Jenna T Sirkin; Donna Shelley; Adovich Rivera; Winfred Wu; Samuel Cykert; Deborah J Cohen; Abel N Kho
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 2.762

2.  Social dynamics of a population-level dashboard for antimicrobial stewardship: A qualitative analysis.

Authors:  Peter Taber; Charlene Weir; Jorie M Butler; Christopher J Graber; Makoto M Jones; Karl Madaras-Kelly; Yue Zhang; Ann F Chou; Matthew H Samore; Matthew Bidwell Goetz; Peter A Glassman
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 2.918

3.  Integrating the Practical Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model With Best Practices in Clinical Decision Support Design: Implementation Science Approach.

Authors:  Katy E Trinkley; Michael G Kahn; Tellen D Bennett; Russell E Glasgow; Heather Haugen; David P Kao; Miranda E Kroehl; Chen-Tan Lin; Daniel C Malone; Daniel D Matlock
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 5.428

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.