Literature DB >> 28267899

Risk-stratification based on magnetic resonance imaging and prostate-specific antigen density may reduce unnecessary follow-up biopsy procedures in men on active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer.

Arnout R Alberts1, Monique J Roobol1, Frank-Jan H Drost1,2, Geert J van Leenders3, Leonard P Bokhorst1, Chris H Bangma1, Ivo G Schoots2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the value of risk-stratification based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and prostate-specific antigen density (PSA-D) in reducing unnecessary biopsies without missing Gleason pattern 4 prostate cancer in men on active surveillance (AS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 210 men on AS with Gleason score 3 + 3 prostate cancer received a first MRI and if indicated [Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) score ≥3] targeted biopsy (TBx) using MRI-transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) fusion. The MRI was performed 3 months after diagnosis (group A: n = 97), at confirmatory biopsy (group B: n = 39) or at surveillance biopsy after one or more repeat TRUS-guided systematic biopsies (TRUS-Bx) (group C: n = 74). The primary outcome was upgrading to Gleason score ≥3 + 4 prostate cancer based on MRI ± TBx in groups A, B and C. Biopsy outcomes were stratified for the overall PI-RADS score and PSA-D to identify a subgroup of men in whom a biopsy could have been avoided as no Gleason score upgrading was detected.
RESULTS: In all, 134/210 (64%) men had a positive MRI and 51/210 (24%) men had Gleason score upgrading based on MRI-TBx. The percentage of Gleason score upgrading based on MRI-TBx was 23% (22/97), 23% (9/39) and 27% (20/74) in respectively groups A, B and C. Additional Gleason score upgrading detected by TRUS-Bx occurred in 8% (3/39) of men in group B and 6% (1/17) of men who received TRUS-Bx in group C. No Gleason score upgrading was detected by MRI-TBx in men with a PI-RADS score of 3 and a PSA-D of <0.15 ng/mL2 (n = 15), nor by TRUS-Bx in men with a PI-RADS score of 1-3 and a PSA-D of <0.15 ng/mL2 (n = 15).
CONCLUSION: At least one out of five men on AS with Gleason score 3 + 3 prostate cancer at diagnostic TRUS-Bx show Gleason score upgrading based on first MRI ± TBx at baseline, confirmatory or surveillance biopsy. Men with a PI-RADS score of 1-3 and PSA-D of <0.15 ng/mL2 did not show Gleason score upgrading at MRI ± TBx or TRUS-Bx at each time point of surveillance. Thus risk-stratification based on PI-RADS and PSA-D may reduce unnecessary follow-up biopsy procedures in men on AS.
© 2017 The Authors BJU International © 2017 BJU International Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  #PCSM; #ProstateCancer; PSA density; active surveillance; magnetic resonance imaging; target biopsy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28267899     DOI: 10.1111/bju.13836

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  19 in total

Review 1.  Prostate Biopsy in Active Surveillance Protocols: Immediate Re-biopsy and Timing of Subsequent Biopsies.

Authors:  Jonathan H Wang; Tracy M Downs; E Jason Abel; Kyle A Richards; David F Jarrard
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 2.  Future Perspectives and Challenges of Prostate MR Imaging.

Authors:  Baris Turkbey; Peter L Choyke
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2017-12-09       Impact factor: 2.303

3.  Machine learning-based prediction of invisible intraprostatic prostate cancer lesions on 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in patients with primary prostate cancer.

Authors:  Zhilong Yi; Siqi Hu; Xiaofeng Lin; Qiong Zou; MinHong Zou; Zhanlei Zhang; Lei Xu; Ningyi Jiang; Yong Zhang
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 4.  The current role of MRI for guiding active surveillance in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Guillaume Ploussard; Olivier Rouvière; Morgan Rouprêt; Roderick van den Bergh; Raphaële Renard-Penna
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 16.430

5.  When to biopsy Prostate Imaging and Data Reporting System version 2 (PI-RADSv2) assessment category 3 lesions? Use of clinical and imaging variables to predict cancer diagnosis at targeted biopsy.

Authors:  Christopher S Lim; Jorge Abreu-Gomez; Michel-Alexandre Leblond; Ivan Carrion; Danny Vesprini; Nicola Schieda; Laurence Klotz
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 6.  Multiparametric MRI in Active Surveillance of Prostate Cancer: An Overview and a Practical Approach.

Authors:  Chau Hung Lee; Teck Wei Tan; Cher Heng Tan
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 3.500

Review 7.  MR-guided biopsy and focal therapy: new options for prostate cancer management.

Authors:  Fuad F Elkhoury; Demetrios N Simopoulos; Leonard S Marks
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 2.808

8.  Reduction of MRI-targeted biopsies in men with low-risk prostate cancer on active surveillance by stratifying to PI-RADS and PSA-density, with different thresholds for significant disease.

Authors:  Ivo G Schoots; Daniel F Osses; Frank-Jan H Drost; Jan F M Verbeek; Sebastiaan Remmers; Geert J L H van Leenders; Chris H Bangma; Monique J Roobol
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2018-02

9.  Addition of Prostate Volume and Prostate-specific Antigen Density to Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Prostate Cancer Nomograms.

Authors:  Michael Tzeng; Emily Vertosick; Spyridon P Basourakos; James A Eastham; Behfar Ehdaie; Peter T Scardino; Andrew J Vickers; Jim C Hu
Journal:  Eur Urol Open Sci       Date:  2021-06-15

Review 10.  Targeted Prostate Biopsy in the Era of Active Surveillance.

Authors:  Fuad F Elkhoury; Demetrios N Simopoulos; Leonard S Marks
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 2.633

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.