Literature DB >> 28267618

Predicting in-hospital mortality for initial survivors of acute respiratory compromise (ARC) events: Development and validation of the ARC Score.

Ari Moskowitz1, Lars W Andersen2, Mathias Karlsson2, Anne V Grossestreuer3, Maureen Chase4, Michael N Cocchi5, Katherine Berg6, Michael W Donnino7.   

Abstract

AIM: Acute respiratory compromise (ARC) is a common and highly morbid event in hospitalized patients. To date, however, few investigators have explored predictors of outcome in initial survivors of ARC events. In the present study, we leveraged the American Heart Association's Get With The Guidelines®-Resuscitation (GWTG-R) ARC data registry to develop a prognostic score for initial survivors of ARC events.
METHODS: Using GWTG-R ARC data, we identified 13,193 index ARC events. These events were divided into a derivation cohort (9807 patients) and a validation cohort (3386 patients). A score for predicting in-hospital mortality was developed using multivariable modeling with generalized estimating equations.
RESULTS: The two cohorts were well balanced in terms of baseline demographics, illness-types, pre-event conditions, event characteristics, and overall mortality. After model optimization, nine variables associated with the outcome of interest were included. Age, hypotension preceding the event, and intubation during the event were the greatest predictors of in-hospital mortality. The final score demonstrated good discrimination in both the derivation and validation cohorts. The score was also very well calibrated in both cohorts. Observed average mortality was <10% in the lowest score category of both cohorts and >70% in the highest category, illustrating a wide range of mortality separated effectively by the scoring system.
CONCLUSIONS: In the present study, we developed and internally validated a prognostic score for initial survivors of in-hospital ARC events. This tool will be useful for clinical prognostication, selecting cohorts for interventional studies, and for quality improvement initiatives seeking to risk-adjust for hospital-to-hospital comparisons.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  American Heart Association; Hospital rapid response team; Respiratory failure; Severity of illness index

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28267618      PMCID: PMC5502129          DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2017.02.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Resuscitation        ISSN: 0300-9572            Impact factor:   5.262


  16 in total

1.  The Medical Emergency Team: 12 month analysis of reasons for activation, immediate outcome and not-for-resuscitation orders.

Authors:  M J Parr; J H Hadfield; A Flabouris; G Bishop; K Hillman
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.262

2.  A validated prediction tool for initial survivors of in-hospital cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Paul S Chan; John A Spertus; Harlan M Krumholz; Robert A Berg; Yan Li; Comilla Sasson; Brahmajee K Nallamothu
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2012-06-25

3.  Risk of cardiopulmonary arrest after acute respiratory compromise in hospitalized patients.

Authors:  Henry E Wang; Benjamin S Abella; Clifton W Callaway
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2008-08-08       Impact factor: 5.262

4.  Implications of Heterogeneity of Treatment Effect for Reporting and Analysis of Randomized Trials in Critical Care.

Authors:  Theodore J Iwashyna; James F Burke; Jeremy B Sussman; Hallie C Prescott; Rodney A Hayward; Derek C Angus
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2015-11-01       Impact factor: 21.405

5.  Clinical practice and risk factors for immediate complications of endotracheal intubation in the intensive care unit: a prospective, multiple-center study.

Authors:  Samir Jaber; Jibba Amraoui; Jean-Yves Lefrant; Charles Arich; Robert Cohendy; Liliane Landreau; Yves Calvet; Xavier Capdevila; Aba Mahamat; Jean-Jacques Eledjam
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 7.598

6.  Use and misuse of the receiver operating characteristic curve in risk prediction.

Authors:  Nancy R Cook
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2007-02-20       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Epidemiology and outcomes of acute respiratory failure in the United States, 2001 to 2009: a national survey.

Authors:  Mihaela S Stefan; Meng-Shiou Shieh; Penelope S Pekow; Michael B Rothberg; Jay S Steingrub; Tara Lagu; Peter K Lindenauer
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 2.960

8.  Risk-standardizing survival for in-hospital cardiac arrest to facilitate hospital comparisons.

Authors:  Paul S Chan; Robert A Berg; John A Spertus; Lee H Schwamm; Deepak L Bhatt; Gregg C Fonarow; Paul A Heidenreich; Brahmajee K Nallamothu; Fengming Tang; Raina M Merchant
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Cardiopulmonary resuscitation of adults in the hospital: a report of 14720 cardiac arrests from the National Registry of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation.

Authors:  Mary Ann Peberdy; William Kaye; Joseph P Ornato; Gregory L Larkin; Vinay Nadkarni; Mary Elizabeth Mancini; Robert A Berg; Graham Nichol; Tanya Lane-Trultt
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 5.262

10.  Development and validation of the Good Outcome Following Attempted Resuscitation (GO-FAR) score to predict neurologically intact survival after in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Authors:  Mark H Ebell; Woncheol Jang; Ye Shen; Romergryko G Geocadin
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 21.873

View more
  1 in total

1.  Shortening of low-flow duration over time was associated with improved outcomes of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in in-hospital cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Akiko Higashi; Taka-Aki Nakada; Taro Imaeda; Ryuzo Abe; Koichiro Shinozaki; Shigeto Oda
Journal:  J Intensive Care       Date:  2020-06-15
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.