Mark H Ebell1, Woncheol Jang, Ye Shen, Romergryko G Geocadin. 1. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of Georgia, Athens2Institute for Evidence-Based Practice in the Health Professions, University of Georgia, Athens.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: Informing patients and providers of the likelihood of survival after in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA), neurologically intact or with minimal deficits, may be useful when discussing do-not-attempt-resuscitation orders. OBJECTIVE: To develop a simple prearrest point score that can identify patients unlikely to survive IHCA, neurologically intact or with minimal deficits. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The study included 51,240 inpatients experiencing an index episode of IHCA between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2009, in 366 hospitals participating in the Get With the Guidelines-Resuscitation registry. Dividing data into training (44.4%), test (22.2%), and validation (33.4%) data sets, we used multivariate methods to select the best independent predictors of good neurologic outcome, created a series of candidate decision models, and used the test data set to select the model that best classified patients as having a very low (<1%), low (1%-3%), average (>3%-15%), or higher than average (>15%) likelihood of survival after in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation for IHCA with good neurologic status. The final model was evaluated using the validation data set. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Survival to discharge after in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation for IHCA with good neurologic status (neurologically intact or with minimal deficits) based on a Cerebral Performance Category score of 1. RESULTS: The best performing model was a simple point score based on 13 prearrest variables. The C statistic was 0.78 when applied to the validation set. It identified the likelihood of a good outcome as very low in 9.4% of patients (good outcome in 0.9%), low in 18.9% (good outcome in 1.7%), average in 54.0% (good outcome in 9.4%), and above average in 17.7% (good outcome in 27.5%). Overall, the score can identify more than one-quarter of patients as having a low or very low likelihood of survival to discharge, neurologically intact or with minimal deficits after IHCA (good outcome in 1.4%). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The Good Outcome Following Attempted Resuscitation (GO-FAR) scoring system identifies patients who are unlikely to benefit from a resuscitation attempt should they experience IHCA. This information can be used as part of a shared decision regarding do-not-attempt-resuscitation orders.
IMPORTANCE: Informing patients and providers of the likelihood of survival after in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA), neurologically intact or with minimal deficits, may be useful when discussing do-not-attempt-resuscitation orders. OBJECTIVE: To develop a simple prearrest point score that can identify patients unlikely to survive IHCA, neurologically intact or with minimal deficits. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The study included 51,240 inpatients experiencing an index episode of IHCA between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2009, in 366 hospitals participating in the Get With the Guidelines-Resuscitation registry. Dividing data into training (44.4%), test (22.2%), and validation (33.4%) data sets, we used multivariate methods to select the best independent predictors of good neurologic outcome, created a series of candidate decision models, and used the test data set to select the model that best classified patients as having a very low (<1%), low (1%-3%), average (>3%-15%), or higher than average (>15%) likelihood of survival after in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation for IHCA with good neurologic status. The final model was evaluated using the validation data set. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Survival to discharge after in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation for IHCA with good neurologic status (neurologically intact or with minimal deficits) based on a Cerebral Performance Category score of 1. RESULTS: The best performing model was a simple point score based on 13 prearrest variables. The C statistic was 0.78 when applied to the validation set. It identified the likelihood of a good outcome as very low in 9.4% of patients (good outcome in 0.9%), low in 18.9% (good outcome in 1.7%), average in 54.0% (good outcome in 9.4%), and above average in 17.7% (good outcome in 27.5%). Overall, the score can identify more than one-quarter of patients as having a low or very low likelihood of survival to discharge, neurologically intact or with minimal deficits after IHCA (good outcome in 1.4%). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The Good Outcome Following Attempted Resuscitation (GO-FAR) scoring system identifies patients who are unlikely to benefit from a resuscitation attempt should they experience IHCA. This information can be used as part of a shared decision regarding do-not-attempt-resuscitation orders.
Authors: Ari Moskowitz; Lars W Andersen; Mathias Karlsson; Anne V Grossestreuer; Maureen Chase; Michael N Cocchi; Katherine Berg; Michael W Donnino Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2017-03-04 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Arash Nayeri; Nirmanmoh Bhatia; Benjamin Holmes; Nyal Borges; Michael N Young; Quinn S Wells; John A McPherson Journal: Heart Vessels Date: 2017-06-06 Impact factor: 2.037
Authors: Patrick J Coppler; Jonathan Elmer; Luis Calderon; Alexa Sabedra; Ankur A Doshi; Clifton W Callaway; Jon C Rittenberger; Cameron Dezfulian Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2015-01-28 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Timothy J Fendler; John A Spertus; Kevin F Kennedy; Lena M Chen; Sarah M Perman; Paul S Chan Journal: JAMA Date: 2015 Sep 22-29 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Mathias J Holmberg; Ari Moskowitz; Tia T Raymond; Robert A Berg; Vinay M Nadkarni; Alexis A Topjian; Anne V Grossestreuer; Michael W Donnino; Lars W Andersen Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2018-03 Impact factor: 3.624
Authors: Corey R Fehnel; Alissa Trepman; Dale Steele; Muhib A Khan; Brian Silver; Susan L Mitchell Journal: J Clin Neurosci Date: 2018-05-19 Impact factor: 1.961
Authors: Steven M Bradley; Wenhui Liu; Paul S Chan; Saket Girotra; Zachary D Goldberger; Javier A Valle; Sarah M Perman; Brahmajee K Nallamothu Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2016-12-27 Impact factor: 5.262