Literature DB >> 28265982

Structure-Promiscuity Relationship Puzzles-Extensively Assayed Analogs with Large Differences in Target Annotations.

Ye Hu1, Swarit Jasial1, Erik Gilberg1, Jürgen Bajorath2.   

Abstract

Publicly available screening data were systematically searched for extensively assayed structural analogs with large differences in the number of targets they were active against. Screening compounds with potential chemical liabilities that may give rise to assay artifacts were identified and excluded from the analysis. "Promiscuity cliffs" were frequently identified, defined here as pairs of structural analogs with a difference of at least 20 target annotations across all assays they were tested in. New assay indices were introduced to prioritize cliffs formed by screening compounds that were extensively tested in comparably large numbers of assays including many shared assays. In these cases, large differences in promiscuity degrees were not attributable to differences in assay frequency and/or lack of assay overlap. Such analog pairs have high priority for further exploring molecular origins of multi-target activities. Therefore, these promiscuity cliffs and associated target annotations are made freely available. The corresponding analogs often represent equally puzzling and interesting examples of structure-promiscuity relationships.

Keywords:  assay profiles; biological screening; multi-target activities; promiscuity cliffs; structure-promiscuity relationships

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28265982     DOI: 10.1208/s12248-017-0066-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AAPS J        ISSN: 1550-7416            Impact factor:   4.009


  27 in total

1.  A common mechanism underlying promiscuous inhibitors from virtual and high-throughput screening.

Authors:  Susan L McGovern; Emilia Caselli; Nikolaus Grigorieff; Brian K Shoichet
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2002-04-11       Impact factor: 7.446

Review 2.  Chemogenomics: an emerging strategy for rapid target and drug discovery.

Authors:  Markus Bredel; Edgar Jacoby
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 53.242

3.  Matched molecular pairs as a medicinal chemistry tool.

Authors:  Ed Griffen; Andrew G Leach; Graeme R Robb; Daniel J Warner
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 7.446

4.  Chemical substitutions that introduce activity cliffs across different compound classes and biological targets.

Authors:  Anne Mai Wassermann; Jürgen Bajorath
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2010-07-26       Impact factor: 4.956

5.  Global mapping of pharmacological space.

Authors:  Gaia V Paolini; Richard H B Shapland; Willem P van Hoorn; Jonathan S Mason; Andrew L Hopkins
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 54.908

6.  Recent progress in understanding activity cliffs and their utility in medicinal chemistry.

Authors:  Dagmar Stumpfe; Ye Hu; Dilyana Dimova; Jürgen Bajorath
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 7.446

7.  Computationally efficient algorithm to identify matched molecular pairs (MMPs) in large data sets.

Authors:  Jameed Hussain; Ceara Rea
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2010-03-22       Impact factor: 4.956

8.  Matched molecular pair analysis of small molecule microarray data identifies promiscuity cliffs and reveals molecular origins of extreme compound promiscuity.

Authors:  Dilyana Dimova; Ye Hu; Jürgen Bajorath
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 7.446

9.  PubChem's BioAssay Database.

Authors:  Yanli Wang; Jewen Xiao; Tugba O Suzek; Jian Zhang; Jiyao Wang; Zhigang Zhou; Lianyi Han; Karen Karapetyan; Svetlana Dracheva; Benjamin A Shoemaker; Evan Bolton; Asta Gindulyte; Stephen H Bryant
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  The Universal Protein Resource (UniProt) in 2010.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-10-20       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  6 in total

1.  Systematic computational identification of promiscuity cliff pathways formed by inhibitors of the human kinome.

Authors:  Filip Miljković; Martin Vogt; Jürgen Bajorath
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  Enhancing Molecular Promiscuity Evaluation Through Assay Profiles.

Authors:  Sorin Avram; Ramona Curpan; Alina Bora; Cristian Neanu; Liliana Halip
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 4.200

3.  Data structures for computational compound promiscuity analysis and exemplary applications to inhibitors of the human kinome.

Authors:  Filip Miljković; Jürgen Bajorath
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  Introducing the metacore concept for multi-target ligand design.

Authors:  Dagmar Stumpfe; Alexander Hoch; Jürgen Bajorath
Journal:  RSC Med Chem       Date:  2021-04-15

5.  Prediction of Promiscuity Cliffs Using Machine Learning.

Authors:  Thomas Blaschke; Christian Feldmann; Jürgen Bajorath
Journal:  Mol Inform       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 3.353

6.  Identifying Promiscuous Compounds with Activity against Different Target Classes.

Authors:  Christian Feldmann; Filip Miljković; Dimitar Yonchev; Jürgen Bajorath
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 4.411

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.