| Literature DB >> 28265982 |
Ye Hu1, Swarit Jasial1, Erik Gilberg1, Jürgen Bajorath2.
Abstract
Publicly available screening data were systematically searched for extensively assayed structural analogs with large differences in the number of targets they were active against. Screening compounds with potential chemical liabilities that may give rise to assay artifacts were identified and excluded from the analysis. "Promiscuity cliffs" were frequently identified, defined here as pairs of structural analogs with a difference of at least 20 target annotations across all assays they were tested in. New assay indices were introduced to prioritize cliffs formed by screening compounds that were extensively tested in comparably large numbers of assays including many shared assays. In these cases, large differences in promiscuity degrees were not attributable to differences in assay frequency and/or lack of assay overlap. Such analog pairs have high priority for further exploring molecular origins of multi-target activities. Therefore, these promiscuity cliffs and associated target annotations are made freely available. The corresponding analogs often represent equally puzzling and interesting examples of structure-promiscuity relationships.Keywords: assay profiles; biological screening; multi-target activities; promiscuity cliffs; structure-promiscuity relationships
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28265982 DOI: 10.1208/s12248-017-0066-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: AAPS J ISSN: 1550-7416 Impact factor: 4.009