Literature DB >> 28265048

Machine Learning of Global Phosphoproteomic Profiles Enables Discrimination of Direct versus Indirect Kinase Substrates.

Evgeny Kanshin1, Sébastien Giguère1, Cheng Jing1, Mike Tyers2,3, Pierre Thibault2,4.   

Abstract

Mass spectrometry allows quantification of tens of thousands of phosphorylation sites from minute amounts of cellular material. Despite this wealth of information, our understanding of phosphorylation-based signaling is limited, in part because it is not possible to deconvolute substrate phosphorylation that is directly mediated by a particular kinase versus phosphorylation that is mediated by downstream kinases. Here, we describe a framework for assignment of direct in vivo kinase substrates using a combination of selective chemical inhibition, quantitative phosphoproteomics, and machine learning techniques. Our workflow allows classification of phosphorylation events following inhibition of an analog-sensitive kinase into kinase-independent effects of the inhibitor, direct effects on cognate substrates, and indirect effects mediated by downstream kinases or phosphatases. We applied this method to identify many direct targets of Cdc28 and Snf1 kinases in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae Global phosphoproteome analysis of acute time-series demonstrated that dephosphorylation of direct kinase substrates occurs more rapidly compared with indirect substrates, both after inhibitor treatment and under a physiological nutrient shift in wt cells. Mutagenesis experiments revealed a high proportion of functionally relevant phosphorylation sites on Snf1 targets. For example, Snf1 itself was inhibited through autophosphorylation on Ser391 and new phosphosites were discovered that modulate the activity of the Reg1 regulatory subunit of the Glc7 phosphatase and the Gal83 β-subunit of SNF1 complex. This methodology applies to any kinase for which a functional analog sensitive version can be constructed to facilitate the dissection of the global phosphorylation network.
© 2017 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28265048      PMCID: PMC5417821          DOI: 10.1074/mcp.M116.066233

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics        ISSN: 1535-9476            Impact factor:   5.911


  72 in total

1.  Integration of biological networks and gene expression data using Cytoscape.

Authors:  Melissa S Cline; Michael Smoot; Ethan Cerami; Allan Kuchinsky; Nerius Landys; Chris Workman; Rowan Christmas; Iliana Avila-Campilo; Michael Creech; Benjamin Gross; Kristina Hanspers; Ruth Isserlin; Ryan Kelley; Sarah Killcoyne; Samad Lotia; Steven Maere; John Morris; Keiichiro Ono; Vuk Pavlovic; Alexander R Pico; Aditya Vailaya; Peng-Liang Wang; Annette Adler; Bruce R Conklin; Leroy Hood; Martin Kuiper; Chris Sander; Ilya Schmulevich; Benno Schwikowski; Guy J Warner; Trey Ideker; Gary D Bader
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 13.491

2.  Snf1/AMPK promotes SBF and MBF-dependent transcription in budding yeast.

Authors:  Sara Busnelli; Farida Tripodi; Raffaele Nicastro; Claudia Cirulli; Gabriella Tedeschi; Roberto Pagliarin; Lilia Alberghina; Paola Coccetti
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2013-09-29

3.  Design of allele-specific inhibitors to probe protein kinase signaling.

Authors:  A C Bishop; K Shah; Y Liu; L Witucki; C Kung; K M Shokat
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  1998-02-26       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  Src-Abl tyrosine kinase chimeras: replacement of the adenine binding pocket of c-Abl with v-Src to swap nucleotide and inhibitor specificities.

Authors:  Y Liu; L A Witucki; K Shah; A C Bishop; K M Shokat
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2000-11-28       Impact factor: 3.162

5.  Transcriptional activators Cat8 and Sip4 discriminate between sequence variants of the carbon source-responsive promoter element in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Stephanie Roth; Jacqueline Kumme; Hans-Joachim Schüller
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2003-12-19       Impact factor: 3.886

6.  PhosphoGRID: a database of experimentally verified in vivo protein phosphorylation sites from the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Chris Stark; Ting-Cheng Su; Ashton Breitkreutz; Pedro Lourenco; Matthew Dahabieh; Bobby-Joe Breitkreutz; Mike Tyers; Ivan Sadowski
Journal:  Database (Oxford)       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 3.451

7.  Physiological characterization of glucose repression in the strains with SNF1 and SNF4 genes deleted.

Authors:  Renata Usaite; Jens Nielsen; Lisbeth Olsson
Journal:  J Biotechnol       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 3.307

8.  I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction.

Authors:  Yang Zhang
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-01-23       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 9.  Cyclin-dependent kinases.

Authors:  Marcos Malumbres
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 13.583

10.  The PhosphoGRID Saccharomyces cerevisiae protein phosphorylation site database: version 2.0 update.

Authors:  Ivan Sadowski; Bobby-Joe Breitkreutz; Chris Stark; Ting-Cheng Su; Matthew Dahabieh; Sheetal Raithatha; Wendy Bernhard; Rose Oughtred; Kara Dolinski; Kris Barreto; Mike Tyers
Journal:  Database (Oxford)       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 3.451

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Post-translational regulation of plant immunity.

Authors:  John Withers; Xinnian Dong
Journal:  Curr Opin Plant Biol       Date:  2017-05-21       Impact factor: 7.834

Review 2.  Homing in: Mechanisms of Substrate Targeting by Protein Kinases.

Authors:  Chad J Miller; Benjamin E Turk
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 13.807

3.  Network inference reveals novel connections in pathways regulating growth and defense in the yeast salt response.

Authors:  Matthew E MacGilvray; Evgenia Shishkova; Deborah Chasman; Michael Place; Anthony Gitter; Joshua J Coon; Audrey P Gasch
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 4.475

4.  Snf1 cooperates with the CWI MAPK pathway to mediate the degradation of Med13 following oxidative stress.

Authors:  Stephen D Willis; David C Stieg; Kai Li Ong; Ravina Shah; Alexandra K Strich; Julianne H Grose; Katrina F Cooper
Journal:  Microb Cell       Date:  2018-06-25

5.  Novel interconnections of HOG signaling revealed by combined use of two proteomic software packages.

Authors:  Marion Janschitz; Natalie Romanov; Gina Varnavides; David Maria Hollenstein; Gabriela Gérecová; Gustav Ammerer; Markus Hartl; Wolfgang Reiter
Journal:  Cell Commun Signal       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 5.712

6.  Delineating the contribution of Spc105-bound PP1 to spindle checkpoint silencing and kinetochore microtubule attachment regulation.

Authors:  Babhrubahan Roy; Vikash Verma; Janice Sim; Adrienne Fontan; Ajit P Joglekar
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 10.539

7.  A phosphatase-centric mechanism drives stress signaling response.

Authors:  David Maria Hollenstein; Gabriela Gérecová; Natalie Romanov; Jessica Ferrari; Jiri Veis; Marion Janschitz; Reinhard Beyer; Christoph Schüller; Egon Ogris; Markus Hartl; Gustav Ammerer; Wolfgang Reiter
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2021-09-24       Impact factor: 8.807

8.  Synthesizing Signaling Pathways from Temporal Phosphoproteomic Data.

Authors:  Ali Sinan Köksal; Kirsten Beck; Dylan R Cronin; Aaron McKenna; Nathan D Camp; Saurabh Srivastava; Matthew E MacGilvray; Rastislav Bodík; Alejandro Wolf-Yadlin; Ernest Fraenkel; Jasmin Fisher; Anthony Gitter
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 9.423

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.