Literature DB >> 28264623

Cellular detection of 50 Hz magnetic fields and weak blue light: effects on superoxide levels and genotoxicity.

Anne Höytö1, Mikko Herrala1, Jukka Luukkonen1, Jukka Juutilainen1, Jonne Naarala1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We tested the hypothesis that the effects of 50 Hz magnetic fields (MFs) on superoxide levels and genotoxicity depend on the presence of blue light.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Human SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells were exposed to a 50 Hz, 100 μT MF with or without non-phototoxic level of blue light for 24 h. We also studied whether these treatments alter responses to menadione, an agent that induces mitochondrial superoxide (O2• -) production and DNA damage. Micronuclei, proliferation, viability, cytosolic and mitochondrial O2• - levels were assessed.
RESULTS: MF (without blue light) increased cytosolic O2• - production and blue light suppressed this effect. Mitochondrial O2• - production was reduced by both MF and blue light, but these effects were not additive. Micronucleus frequency was not affected by blue light or MF alone, but blue light (significantly when combined with MF) enhanced menadione-induced micronuclei.
CONCLUSIONS: The original simple hypothesis (blue light is needed for MF effects) was not supported, but interaction of MF and blue light was nevertheless observed. The results are consistent with MF effects on light-independent radical reactions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Extremely low frequency magnetic field; blue light; in vitro; micronucleus; superoxide

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28264623     DOI: 10.1080/09553002.2017.1294275

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol        ISSN: 0955-3002            Impact factor:   2.694


  7 in total

Review 1.  Magnetocarcinogenesis: is there a mechanism for carcinogenic effects of weak magnetic fields?

Authors:  Jukka Juutilainen; Mikko Herrala; Jukka Luukkonen; Jonne Naarala; P J Hore
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Direction-Dependent Effects of Combined Static and ELF Magnetic Fields on Cell Proliferation and Superoxide Radical Production.

Authors:  Jonne Naarala; Kavindra Kumar Kesari; Ian McClure; Cristina Chavarriaga; Jukka Juutilainen; Carlos F Martino
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 3.  Extremely Low-Frequency Magnetic Fields and Redox-Responsive Pathways Linked to Cancer Drug Resistance: Insights from Co-Exposure-Based In Vitro Studies.

Authors:  Stefano Falone; Silvano Santini; Valeria Cordone; Giovanna Di Emidio; Carla Tatone; Marisa Cacchio; Fernanda Amicarelli
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2018-02-23

Review 4.  Cellular stress response to extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields (ELF-EMF): An explanation for controversial effects of ELF-EMF on apoptosis.

Authors:  Mojdeh Barati; Behrad Darvishi; Mohammad Amin Javidi; Ali Mohammadian; Seyed Peyman Shariatpanahi; Mohammad Reza Eisavand; Alireza Madjid Ansari
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  2021-11-06       Impact factor: 6.831

Review 5.  Magnetic Fields and Cancer: Epidemiology, Cellular Biology, and Theranostics.

Authors:  Massimo E Maffei
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 6.  Magnetic field effects in biology from the perspective of the radical pair mechanism.

Authors:  Hadi Zadeh-Haghighi; Christoph Simon
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 4.293

7.  Rotations of macromolecules affect nonspecific biological responses to magnetic fields.

Authors:  Vladimir N Binhi; Frank S Prato
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.