| Literature DB >> 28264465 |
Yu-Shun Lin1, Ting-Yi Lin2, Jia-Jiuan Wu3, Hsien-Tsung Yao4, Sunny Li-Yun Chang5, Pei-Min Chao6.
Abstract
We previously reported that polar compounds (PO) in cooking oil are teratogenic and perturbed retinoic acid (RA) metabolism. Considering PO as a potent peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α (PPARα) activator, this study aimed to investigate the role of PPARα in PO-induced teratogenesis and disturbance of RA metabolism. Female PPARα knockout or wild type mice were mated with males of the same genotype. Pregnant mice were fed a diet containing 10% fat from either fresh oil (FO) or PO from gestational day1 to day18, and killed at day18. The PO diet significantly increased the incidence of teratogenesis and fetal RA concentrations, regardless of genotype. Though PPARα deficiency disturbed maternal RA homeostasis, itself did not contribute to teratogenesis as long as FO diet was given. The mRNA profile of genes involved in RA metabolism was differentially affected by diet or genotype in mothers and fetuses. Based on hepatic mRNA levels of genes involved in xenobiotic metabolism, we inferred that PO not only activated PPARα, but also altered transactivity of other xenobiotic receptors. We concluded that PO-induced fetal anomalies and RA accumulation were independent of PPARα activation.Entities:
Keywords: PPARα; oxidized frying oil; polar compounds; retinoic acid; teratogenesis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28264465 PMCID: PMC5372526 DOI: 10.3390/ijms18030510
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Quality index of fresh soybean oil (FO) and polar compounds (PO) from oxidized frying oil.
| Quality Index | FO | PO |
|---|---|---|
| Acid value, mg KOH/g | 0.056 ± 0.002 | 2.9 ± 0.1 |
| Conjugated diene, OD233/g | 392 ± 4.23 | 4933 ± 35.52 |
Embryotoxicity and reproductive characteristics of the wild (WT) and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α (PPARα) knock out (KO) females receiving FO or PO diets during pregnancy 1,2.
| Variables | FO(WT) | PO(WT) | FO(KO) | PO(KO) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D | G | D × G | |||||
| No. of dams | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | |||
| Maternal weight gain, g | 4.71 ± 0.52 | 2.97 ± 0.52 | 4.94 ± 0.86 | 1.98 ± 0.75 | <0.005 | NS | NS |
| Relative liver weight, % | 4.58 ± 0.15 c | 7.35 ± 0.12 a | 5.11 ± 0.23 bc | 5.90 ± 0.28 b | <0.0001 | NS | <0.005 |
| No. of corpora lutea/litter | 7.00 ± 0.32 | 8.60 ± 0.68 | 9.40 ± 0.51 | 9.20 ± 0.73 | NS | NS | NS |
| No. of implantations/litter | 7.00 ± 0.51 | 8.60 ± 0.68 | 9.40 ± 0.51 | 9.20 ± 0.73 | NS | NS | NS |
| No. of fetuses/litter | 5.40 ± 0.68 | 6.60 ± 0.75 | 8.60 ± 0.75 | 6.80 ± 1.69 | NS | NS | NS |
| No. of live fetuses/litter | 5.40 ± 0.68 | 6.40 ± 0.75 | 8.40 ± 0.93 | 6.60 ± 1.57 | NS | NS | NS |
| No. of dead fetuses/litter | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.20 ± 0.20 | 0.20 ± 0.20 | 0.20 ± 0.20 | NS | NS | NS |
| Pre-implantation loss/litter | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | NS | NS | NS |
| Post-implantation loss/litter | 1.00 ± 0.32 | 2.00 ± 0.45 | 0.80 ± 0.58 | 2.40 ± 1.21 | NS | NS | NS |
| Litters with resorptions ≥3, % | 0 (0/5) | 40 (2/5) | 20 (1/5) | 20 (1/5) | |||
| Full-litter resorptions, % | 0 (0/5) | 0 (0/5) | 0 (0/5) | 0 (0/5) | |||
1 Values are means ± SEM. Two-way ANOVA was conducted and results are shown in table (D, diet; G, genotype; D × G, interaction; NS, not significant). When there was a significant interaction between D and G, the significance of differences among groups was further analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Duncan’s multiple range test; a–c Values without a common superscript letter differed (p < 0.05); 2 For the last two variables, the difference between groups was analyzed by χ2. There was no significant difference between FO and PO groups within the same genotype, either in WD or KO mice within the same diet.
Body and tissue weight, mortality, and externally visible congenital anomalies of fetuses from the wild (WT) and PPARα knock out (KO) females receiving FO or PO diets during pregnancy 1.
| Variables | FO(WT) | PO(WT) | FO(KO) | PO(KO) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D | G | D × G | |||||
| No. of litter 2 | 5 (27) | 5 (33) | 5 (43) | 5 (34) | |||
| Body weight, g | 0.81 ± 0.03 | 0.88 ± 0.05 | 0.80 ± 0.36 | 0.76 ± 0.07 | NS | NS | NS |
| Placenta, g | 0.07 ± 0.00 | 0.09 ± 0.00 | 0.09 ± 0.04 | 0.10 ± 0.01 | <0.005 | NS | NS |
| Liver, g | 0.04 ± 0.00 | 0.04 ± 0.00 | 0.04 ± 0.02 | 0.04 ± 0.00 | NS | NS | NS |
| Mortality rate, % | 0 ± 0 | 3.4 ± 3.3 | 0 ± 0 | 2.8 ± 2.7 | NS | NS | NS |
| Eye defect | 0 ± 0 | 3.4 ± 3.3 | 0 ± 0 | 2.8 ± 2.7 | NS | NS | NS |
| Edema | 0 ± 0 | 3.4 ± 3.3 | 0 ± 0 | 3.4 ± 3.3 | NS | NS | NS |
| Brain defect | 0 ± 0 | 2.8 ± 2.7 | 0 ± 0 | 2.8 ± 2.7 | NS | NS | NS |
| Haematoma | 0 ± 0 | 8.8 ± 3.6 | 0 ± 0 | 20 ± 12 | <0.05 | NS | NS |
| Shrivelling | 0 ± 0 | 12.4 ± 5.3 | 0 ± 0 | 11.2 ± 4.8 | <0.05 | NS | NS |
| Spina bifida | 0 ± 0 | 3.4 ± 3.3 | 0 ± 0 | 6.2 ± 3.7 | NS | NS | NS |
| Limb defect | 0 ± 0 | 6.8 ± 4.0 | 0 ± 0 | 2.8 ± 2.7 | NS | NS | NS |
| Total 3 | 0 ± 0 | 30.2 ± 8.4 | 0 ± 0 | 32.5 ± 9.7 | <0.05 | NS | NS |
1 Values are means ± SEM. Two-way ANOVA was conducted and results are shown in table (D, diet; G, genotype; D × G, interaction; NS, not significant); 2 Total fetus number in parenthesis; 3 One fetus may have more than one abnormality.
Figure 1Retinol and retinoic acid (RA) concentrations in maternal liver (A) and fetus (B) of WT and KO mice receiving FO or PO diets during pregnancy. Samples were collected at pregnancy day18. Data are mean ± SEM, n = 5. Results of two-way ANOVA are shown in table (D, diet; G, genotype; D × G, interaction; NS, not significant).
Figure 2Levels of mRNA for genes associated with RA metabolism in maternal liver (A) and fetal liver (B) of WT and KO mice receiving FO or PO diets during pregnancy. Samples were collected at pregnancy day18. The value for the FO(WT) group was taken as 1. Data are mean ± SEM, n = 5. Results of two-way ANOVA are shown in table (D, diet; G, genotype; D × G, interaction; NS, not significant). When there was a significant interaction between D and G, the significance of differences among groups was further analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Duncan’s multiple range test; a–c Values without a common superscript letter differed (p < 0.05).
Figure 3Levels of mRNA for genes associated with xenobiotic receptor activity in maternal liver (A) and fetal liver (B) of WT and KO mice receiving FO or PO diets during pregnancy. Samples were collected at pregnancy day18. The value for the FO(WT) group was taken as 1. Data are mean ± SEM, n = 5. Results of two-way ANOVA are shown in table (D, diet; G, genotype; D × G, interaction; NS, not significant). When there was a significant interaction between D and G, the significance of differences among groups was further analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Duncan’s multiple range test; a–c Values without a common superscript letter differed (p < 0.05).