PURPOSE: To determine whether the change in the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness in a region of interest (ROI) is a better measure of glaucoma progression than the change in average circumpapillary (cp) RNFL thickness. METHODS: Disc cube scans were obtained with frequency domain optical coherence tomography from 60 eyes of 60 patients (age, 61.7±12.7 y) with early or suspected glaucoma and controlled intraocular pressure. The average time between 2 test dates was 3.2±1.8 years. En-face images of the scans from the 2 tests were aligned based on the blood vessels, and cp images were derived for an annulus 100 μm wide and 3.4 mm in diameter, centered on the disc. An ROI was defined as the portion of the circumpapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (cpRNFL) plot within the temporal disc that extended below the 1% confidence interval for ≥5 degrees. Trend analysis using multilevel mixed-effects models was used to compare the rates of change between ROI width and average cpRNFL thickness. RESULTS: In total, 26 of the 60 eyes had a total of 33 ROIs. The ROI width significantly increased between the 2 test dates (median, 4.9 degrees; Q1=1.03 degrees, Q3=10.5 degrees). In comparison, the average cpRNFL thickness did not decrease significantly over the same period (median, -0.7 μm; Q1=-2.7 μm, Q3=2.7 μm). Mixed-effects linear models confirmed significant ROI progression (P=0.015), but not average cpRNFL (P=0.878). CONCLUSIONS: In this population, RNFL thinning in a ROI is a better measure of progression than is average cpRNFL thickness change.
PURPOSE: To determine whether the change in the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness in a region of interest (ROI) is a better measure of glaucoma progression than the change in average circumpapillary (cp) RNFL thickness. METHODS: Disc cube scans were obtained with frequency domain optical coherence tomography from 60 eyes of 60 patients (age, 61.7±12.7 y) with early or suspected glaucoma and controlled intraocular pressure. The average time between 2 test dates was 3.2±1.8 years. En-face images of the scans from the 2 tests were aligned based on the blood vessels, and cp images were derived for an annulus 100 μm wide and 3.4 mm in diameter, centered on the disc. An ROI was defined as the portion of the circumpapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (cpRNFL) plot within the temporal disc that extended below the 1% confidence interval for ≥5 degrees. Trend analysis using multilevel mixed-effects models was used to compare the rates of change between ROI width and average cpRNFL thickness. RESULTS: In total, 26 of the 60 eyes had a total of 33 ROIs. The ROI width significantly increased between the 2 test dates (median, 4.9 degrees; Q1=1.03 degrees, Q3=10.5 degrees). In comparison, the average cpRNFL thickness did not decrease significantly over the same period (median, -0.7 μm; Q1=-2.7 μm, Q3=2.7 μm). Mixed-effects linear models confirmed significant ROI progression (P=0.015), but not average cpRNFL (P=0.878). CONCLUSIONS: In this population, RNFL thinning in a ROI is a better measure of progression than is average cpRNFL thickness change.
Authors: Donald C Hood; Anastasia Slobodnick; Ali S Raza; Carlos Gustavo de Moraes; Christopher C Teng; Robert Ritch Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2014-02-03 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Carlos Gustavo De Moraes; Shaban Demirel; Stuart K Gardiner; Jeffrey M Liebmann; George A Cioffi; Robert Ritch; Mae O Gordon; Michael A Kass Journal: Arch Ophthalmol Date: 2012-12
Authors: Paul J Ernest; Jan S Schouten; Henny J Beckers; Fred Hendrikse; Martin H Prins; Carroll A Webers Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2012-12-01 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Christopher Kai-shun Leung; Carol Yim Lui Cheung; Robert N Weinreb; Kunliang Qiu; Shu Liu; Haitao Li; Guihua Xu; Ning Fan; Chi Pui Pang; Kwok Kay Tse; Dennis Shun Chiu Lam Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2009-08-13 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Julia M Wessel; Folkert K Horn; Ralf P Tornow; Matthias Schmid; Christian Y Mardin; Friedrich E Kruse; Anselm G Juenemann; Robert Laemmer Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2013-05-01 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Bruce E Prum; Lisa F Rosenberg; Steven J Gedde; Steven L Mansberger; Joshua D Stein; Sayoko E Moroi; Leon W Herndon; Michele C Lim; Ruth D Williams Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2015-11-12 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Ricardo Y Abe; Alberto Diniz-Filho; Linda M Zangwill; Carolina P B Gracitelli; Amir H Marvasti; Robert N Weinreb; Saif Baig; Felipe A Medeiros Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2016-07-01 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Zhichao Wu; Abinaya Thenappan; Denis S D Weng; Robert Ritch; Donald C Hood Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol Date: 2018-02-28 Impact factor: 3.283
Authors: Zhichao Wu; Denis S D Weng; Abinaya Thenappan; Rashmi Rajshekhar; Robert Ritch; Donald C Hood Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol Date: 2018-06-04 Impact factor: 3.283
Authors: Zhichao Wu; Denis S D Weng; Abinaya Thenappan; Robert Ritch; Donald C Hood Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol Date: 2018-03-29 Impact factor: 3.283
Authors: Christopher Bowd; Akram Belghith; Mark Christopher; Michael H Goldbaum; Massimo A Fazio; Christopher A Girkin; Jeffrey M Liebmann; Carlos Gustavo de Moraes; Robert N Weinreb; Linda M Zangwill Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol Date: 2021-07-01 Impact factor: 3.048