Literature DB >> 28263085

Exploration of thiaheterocyclic hHDAC6 inhibitors as potential antiplasmodial agents.

Rob De Vreese1, Carmen de Kock2, Peter J Smith2, Kelly Chibale3, Matthias D'hooghe1.   

Abstract

AIM: The recurring resistance of the malaria parasite to many drugs compels the design of innovative chemical entities in antimalarial research. Pan-histone deacetylase inhibitors (pan-HDACis) have recently been presented in the literature as powerful novel antimalarials, although their application is hampered due to toxic side effects. This drawback might be neutralized by the deployment of isoform-selective HDACis.
RESULTS: In this study, 42 thiaheterocyclic benzohydroxamic acids, 17 of them being potent and selective hHDAC6 inhibitors, were tested to investigate a possible correlation between hHDAC6 inhibition and antiplasmodial activity.
CONCLUSION: Four hHDAC6 inhibitors showed submicromolar potency against both a chloroquine-sensitive and a chloroquine-resistant strain of Plasmodium falciparum with high selectivity indices, pointing to the relevance of exploring hHDAC6 inhibitors as potential new antiplasmodial agents.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HDAC6; Plasmodium falciparum; benzohydroxamic acids; malaria; thiaheterocycles

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28263085      PMCID: PMC7099625          DOI: 10.4155/fmc-2016-0215

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Future Med Chem        ISSN: 1756-8919            Impact factor:   3.808


First draft submitted: 16 November2016; Accepted for publication: 12 January 2017; Published online: 6 March 2017 Malaria is a devastating parasitic disease, exemplified by the fact that roughly 3.2 billion people are at risk of contracting malaria and that this disease caused roughly 438,000 deaths in 2015, with an estimated 306,000 casualties in the group of children under the age of five (WHO) [1]. The main culprit causing this infection is the protozoan species Plasmodium falciparum, transmitted by mosquitoes of the genus Anopheles [2]. In the past 15 years (2000–2015), considerable progress has been made toward revoking this infection, as illustrated by a declining number of malaria cases and deaths (18 and 48%, respectively) [1]. However, there still is a pressing need to reduce the number of victims even further and to find solutions to address all challenges associated with this disease. A pertinent challenge relates to the expanding resistance of the Plasmodium parasite toward several treatment regimes. Indeed, resistance has emerged with respect to the standard antimalarials chloroquine (CQ), sulfadoxine, pyrimethamine and, more recently, artemisinin [3]. The acquired artemisinin resistance is particularly alarming, since artemisinin combination therapies represent the first-in-line treatment option for malaria nowadays. A consequence of this recurring resistance is the urgent need to develop new medicines with alternative mechanisms of action, in order to impede or deter the parasite from developing resistance by applying combination therapies. In that regard, histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACis) might offer new treatment opportunities, as several known HDAC inhibitors have recently been shown to demonstrate a promising activity against P. falciparum and other malarial strains [4-7]. HDACs and HATs function as regulators of lysine acetylation, an important post-translational modification responsible for the neutralization of the positive charges on lysine residues, and as such adjusting the exact mode of action of the targeted protein [8]. HDACs were first been discovered as histone lysine modifying enzymes but are now generally accepted to be lysine deacetylases, also deacetylating several nonhistone proteins [9]. In humans, this group of enzymes comprises four classes, with class I (HDAC1, 2, 3 and 8), IIa (HDAC4, 5, 7 and 9), IIb (HDAC6 and 10) and IV (HDAC11) employing zinc as an essential cofactor, while class III (SIRT1–7) uses NAD+ for its deacetylase activity [10]. On the other hand, five HDAC isoforms are known for P. falciparum: PfHDAC1, with homology to human class I, PfHDAC2 and 3, with homology to human class II, and PfSir2A and PfSir2B, with homology to human class III [11]. So far, mainly pan-HDACi's have been tested for their activity against P. falciparum, revealing high toxicities in the (low) nanomolar range toward the malaria parasite [4-7]. A major drawback associated with these broad-spectrum HDAC inhibitors involves the interaction with all human Zn2+-dependent HDACs, culminating in a higher risk to elicit toxic side effects upon administration. Therefore, the selective inhibition of pfHDACs over hHDAC isoforms represents a relevant challenge in antimalarial drug discovery and has led to the assessment of many hHDAC inhibitors as potential antiplasmodial agents. In that respect, a library screen of 2000 compounds has revealed (E)-7-[2-(2-bromobenzylidene)hydrazinyl]-N-hydroxy-7-oxoheptanamide to be such a selective compound and, in another report, a specific class of methylamides has been shown to be pfHDAC selective [12,13]. An alternative strategy could imply the examination of selective hHDAC inhibitors (instead of pan-hHDAC inhibitors) as novel antimalarial compounds. This approach lowers the risk of host toxicity without potentially compromising a pronounced antiplasmodial activity [14]. Selective human HDAC6 inhibitors could possibly serve this goal as it is known that mice lacking HDAC6 develop rather normally [15], so minor to no side effects are expected upon deployment of these agents. Bearing this rationale in mind, we decided to test a series of benzohydroxamic acids (previously developed by us) for their antiplasmodial activity, with several representatives being highly potent and selective hHDAC6 inhibitors. Indeed, a systematic exploration of the possible correlation between hHDAC6 inhibitors and antiplasmodial activity has not been performed so far and could reveal new opportunities in antimalarial drug development.

Materials & methods

Antiplasmodial assay

Continuous in vitro cultures of asexual erythrocyte stages of P. falciparum were maintained using a modified method of Trager and Jensen [16]. Quantitative assessment of antiplasmodial activity in vitro was determined via the parasite lactate dehydrogenase assay using a modified method described by Makler [17]. The test samples were prepared to a 20 mg/ml stock solution in 100% DMSO. Stock solutions were stored at -20°C. Further dilutions were prepared in complete medium on the day of the experiment. CQ and artesunate were used as the reference drugs. A full dose–response was performed to determine the concentration inhibiting 50% of parasite growth (IC50 value). Test samples were tested at a starting concentration of 100 μg/ml, which was then serially diluted twofold in complete medium to give 10 concentrations; with the lowest concentration being 0.2 μg/ml. The same dilution technique was used for all samples. References were tested at a starting concentration of 1 μg/ml. The highest concentration of solvent to which the parasites were exposed to had no measurable effect on the parasite viability (data not shown).

MTT assay

Test samples were screened for in vitro cytotoxicity against a mammalian cell-line, Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO), using the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazoliumbromide (MTT)-assay. The MTT-assay is used as a colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival, and compares well with other available assays [18,19]. The tetrazolium salt MTT was used to measure all growth and chemosensitivity. The test samples were tested in triplicate on one occasion. The same stock solutions prepared for antiplasmodial evaluation were used for cytotoxicity testing. Test compounds were stored at -20°C until use. Dilutions were prepared on the day of the experiment. Emetine was used as the reference drug in all experiments. The starting concentration was 100 μg/ml, which was serially diluted in complete medium with tenfold dilutions to give six concentrations, the lowest being 0.001 μg/ml. The highest concentration of solvent to which the cells were exposed to had no measurable effect on the cell viability (data not shown). The IC50 values were obtained from full dose–response curves, using a nonlinear dose–response curve fitting analysis via GraphPad Prism v.4 software.

Results & discussion

This brief article focuses on the antiplasmodial evaluation of three innovative classes of benzohydroxamic acids 1–3, all featuring a different thiahetero(bi- or tri-)cyclic ‘cap group’ (Figure 1). Class 1 consists of molecules containing a saturated thiaheterocyclic ring annulated onto an indole core (designated as Tubathians), class 2 comprises benzothiophenes embodying a nitrogen atom in the linker region and class 3 includes cycloalkane-annulated 1,5-benzothiazepine scaffolds. Because of small structural modifications with respect to the ‘mother structure’ within each class (Figure 1 & Table 1), a broad set of 42 compounds with divergent decoration patterns is synthetically available. The preparation of these compounds 1–3 has previously been described, together with a detailed account on their HDAC6 selectivity, cellular activity (α-tubulin acetylation, a known substrate of HDAC6) and mutagenicity [20-23]. For Tubathian structures 1, additional information concerning the ADME/Tox properties has been disclosed as well [22]. These different classes include a number of highly potent and selective hHDAC6 inhibitors (Table 2), which have in common a para-substituted benzohydroxamic acid fragment, no substituents in the meta-position with respect to the hydroxamic acid group, and superior HDAC6 inhibitory activity for sulfoxides and sulfones over the corresponding sulfides.

Available thiaheterocyclic benzohydroxamic acids 1–3.

Substitution pattern of thiaheterocyclic benzohydroxamic acids 1–3.

CompoundR1R2R3xnConfig.
1aHH01Para

1bHOMe01Para

1cFH01Para

1dFOMe01Para

1eHH21Para

1fHOMe21Para

1gFH21Para

1hFOMe21Para

1iBrH21Para

1jHH11Para

1kFH11Para

1lHH20Para

1mFH20Para

1nHH01Meta

1oFH01Meta

1pHH21Meta

1qFH21Meta

1rPhH21Meta

1sHH20Meta

1tFH20Meta

1uBrH10Meta

2aHHH

2bHBnH

2c5-BrHH

2d5-BrBnH

2e5-PhHH

2f5-PhBnH

2g6-BrHH

2h6-BrBnH

2i6-PhHH

2j6-PhBnH

2kHHMe

3aH01Cis

3bCl01Cis

3cCF301Cis

3dH21Cis

3eCl21Cis

3fCF321Cis

3gH11Cis

3hH02Cis

3iCl01Trans

3jH02Trans

†The para- and meta-configuration for compound 1 refers to the position of the hydroxamic acid group on the aromatic ring with respect to the aminomethyl substituent.

IC

CmpdNF54Dd2CHOSIRI§HDAC6
1a37.50.015

1b14.0

1c2.23.1105.2481.40.022

1d23.2

1e10.80.002

1f21.02.0

1g15.80.004

1h32.71.3

1i0.110.43109.09913.90.003

1j1.281.3>282>2171.00.014

1k0.400.80>269>6732.00.009

1l0.920.66>281>3050.70.008

1m1.071.55>267>2501.70.016

1n1.482.18>295>1991.5

1o1.321.4448.1361.1

1p5.45

1q7.84

1r8.13

1s12.2

1t9.80

1u11.9

2a1.602.1312.781.30.014

2b32.4

2c1.022.431.0302.40.037

2d17.8

2e5.07

2f5.75

2g1.301.5846.1351.20.064

2h8.45

2i3.341.1431.290.3

2j5.02

2k36.8

3a1.59>2.7103.9650.036

3b>2.48>2.4841.40.650

3c1.53>2.2961.5400.200

3d0.360.94107.63032.60.008

3e0.470.4435.4750.90.068

3f0.870.7056.8650.80.011

3g1.25>2.60172.91380.006

3h>2.61>2.6187.00.033

3i>2.481.5750.90.160

3j>2.61>2.6161.70.092

Bold: IC50-value of the hydroxamic acid lower than 1 μM against both P. falciparum strains. ‘–’ is not determined.

‡SI (selectivity index) = IC50 (CHO)/IC50 (NF54).

§RI (resistance index) = IC50 (Dd2)/IC50 (NF54).

Chloroquine IC50-NF54 = 0.01 μM, IC50-Dd2 = 0.175 μM; Artesunate IC50-NF54 < 0.01 μM, IC50-Dd2 = 0.016 μM; Emetine IC50-CHO = 0.112 μM.

CHO: Chinese hamster ovary; RI: Resistance index; SI: Selectivity index.

The antiplasmodial activity of this set of structures was first determined through a modified parasite lactate dehydrogenase assay against a CQ-sensitive (CQS) strain of P. falciparum (NF54) [16,17]. When the molecules proved to be reasonably active against this strain (IC50 <5 μM), a second assay was performed against a CQ-resistant (CQR) strain of P. falciparum (Dd2), as well as an MTT-assay (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) on CHO cells to assess their mammalian cytotoxicity (Table 2) [18]. Finally, a selectivity index (SI = IC50 CHO/IC50 NF54) and a resistance index (RI = IC50 Dd2/IC50 NF54) was calculated to be able to easily compare the therapeutic window (active concentration vs toxic concentration) and sensitivity toward resistance developing. Table 2 shows that all 42 benzohydroxamic acids 1–3 display interesting antiplasmodial activities (IC50 values against the CQS strain between 0.11 and 37.5 μM). The potent HDAC6 inhibitors 1i, 1k, 1l, 3d, 3e and 3f were also found to be highly active against both CQS and CQR parasitic strains (IC50 CQS and CQR < 1 μM, IC50 HDAC6 < 0.07 μM). However, other active HDAC6 inhibitors did not demonstrate a distinct submicromolar parasitic toxicity (e.g., 1a, 1e and 1g). Thus, no consistent correlation can be drawn between hHDAC6 inhibition and antiplasmodial activity, which could be expected considering the inevitable differences between human and parasite HDAC isoforms [11]. On the other hand, it is remarkable to note that the most effective antiplasmodial compounds all are powerful hHDAC6 inhibitors, and none of the less active hHDAC6 inhibitors showed submicromolar antiplasmodial potency. Based on these observations, it can be suggested that strong hHDAC6 inhibitory activity is a necessary but not a sufficient condition for thiaheterocyclic benzohydroxamic acids to exert submicromolar antiplasmodial activity as well. From the six compounds showing the most promising antiplasmodial activity, four molecules have excellent selectivity indices higher than 300 (1i, 1k, 1l and 3d), which means that the concentration at which they kill the parasite is at least 300-times lower than their toxic concentration for CHO cells. Comparison of the resistance indices (RI) suggests that the tested molecules have comparable activity (RI = 0.3–3.9) against both strains (CQS and CQR). This is in marked contrast to the control drug CQ, which is 17-times less active against the CQR strain (RI = 17.5).

Conclusion

42 thiaheterocyclic benzohydroxamic acids 1–3, 17 of them previously being identified as highly potent and selective hHDAC6 inhibitors, were assessed in terms of their antiplasmodial profile. This study revealed six selective HDAC6 inhibitors to demonstrate submicromolar antiplasmodial potency against both a CQS and a CQR strain, and four of these structures (1i, 1k, 1l and 3d) also proved to have an excellent therapeutic window (SI > 300). On the other hand, hydroxamic acids which do not strongly inhibit hHDAC6, appear to possess only moderate antiplasmodial effects. Thus, potent and selective hHDAC6 inhibitory activity of thiaheterocyclic benzohydroxamic acids seems to be a necessary but not a sufficient condition to elicit pronounced antiplasmodial activity as well. Moreover, selective hHDAC6 inhibitors can induce powerful P. falciparum toxicity without being toxic for CHO cells (as a model for mammalian cytotoxicity). In conclusion, hHDAC6 inhibitory activity and antiplasmodial activity are somehow interconnected, and these HDAC6i new chemical entities can certainly be considered a valuable starting point for further medicinal chemistry investigation en route to novel types of antiplasmodial drugs.

Future perspective

The evaluation of isoform-selective hHDAC inhibitors, in particular hHDAC6is, as antiplasmodial agents represents a new and promising approach in antimalarial research, and further study is desirable to unravel the specific interplay between these compounds and their antiplasmodial activity (structure–activity relationship). In addition to this phenotypic approach, more information on the structure and function of pfHDACs should be obtained, which will enable rational design of pfHDAC inhibitors. †The para- and meta-configuration for compound 1 refers to the position of the hydroxamic acid group on the aromatic ring with respect to the aminomethyl substituent. Bold: IC50-value of the hydroxamic acid lower than 1 μM against both P. falciparum strains. ‘–’ is not determined. SI (selectivity index) = IC50 (CHO)/IC50 (NF54). §RI (resistance index) = IC50 (Dd2)/IC50 (NF54). Chloroquine IC50-NF54 = 0.01 μM, IC50-Dd2 = 0.175 μM; Artesunate IC50-NF54 < 0.01 μM, IC50-Dd2 = 0.016 μM; Emetine IC50-CHO = 0.112 μM. CHO: Chinese hamster ovary; RI: Resistance index; SI: Selectivity index. Antimalarial drug resistance encourages the need for innovative chemical entities with alternative modes of action. hHDAC6 inhibitors are proposed as a novel strategy against Plasmodium falciparum. Three classes of thiaheterocyclic benzohydroxamic acids were tested against P. falciparum. Four potent and selective hHDAC6 inhibitors were shown to be highly active as antiplasmodial agents, displaying a good therapeutic window and resistance index as well. Potent and selective hHDAC6 inhibitory activity of thiaheterocyclic benzohydroxamic acids is a necessary but not a sufficient condition to elicit pronounced antiplasmodial activity. hHDAC6 inhibitors can induce powerful P. falciparum toxicity without being toxic for CHO cells.
  21 in total

1.  Synthesis of benzothiophene-based hydroxamic acids as potent and selective HDAC6 inhibitors.

Authors:  Rob De Vreese; Nicholas Van Steen; Tom Verhaeghe; Tom Desmet; Nadia Bougarne; Karolien De Bosscher; Veronick Benoy; Wanda Haeck; Ludo Van Den Bosch; Matthias D'hooghe
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 6.222

2.  Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays.

Authors:  T Mosmann
Journal:  J Immunol Methods       Date:  1983-12-16       Impact factor: 2.303

Review 3.  Malaria.

Authors:  Nicholas J White; Sasithon Pukrittayakamee; Tran Tinh Hien; M Abul Faiz; Olugbenga A Mokuolu; Arjen M Dondorp
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 4.  HDAC inhibitors in parasitic diseases.

Authors:  Katherine T Andrews; Ashraful Haque; Malcolm K Jones
Journal:  Immunol Cell Biol       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 5.126

Review 5.  Histone deacetylases (HDACs): characterization of the classical HDAC family.

Authors:  Annemieke J M de Ruijter; Albert H van Gennip; Huib N Caron; Stephan Kemp; André B P van Kuilenburg
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2003-03-15       Impact factor: 3.857

Review 6.  Malaria biology and disease pathogenesis: insights for new treatments.

Authors:  Louis H Miller; Hans C Ackerman; Xin-zhuan Su; Thomas E Wellems
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 53.440

7.  Lysine acetylation targets protein complexes and co-regulates major cellular functions.

Authors:  Chunaram Choudhary; Chanchal Kumar; Florian Gnad; Michael L Nielsen; Michael Rehman; Tobias C Walther; Jesper V Olsen; Matthias Mann
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Synthesis and SAR assessment of novel Tubathian analogs in the pursuit of potent and selective HDAC6 inhibitors.

Authors:  Rob De Vreese; Yves Depetter; Tom Verhaeghe; Tom Desmet; Veronick Benoy; Wanda Haeck; Ludo Van Den Bosch; Matthias D'hooghe
Journal:  Org Biomol Chem       Date:  2016-02-28       Impact factor: 3.876

9.  Synthesis of Potent and Selective HDAC6 Inhibitors Bearing a Cyclohexane- or Cycloheptane-Annulated 1,5-Benzothiazepine Scaffold.

Authors:  Rob De Vreese; Lisa Galle; Yves Depetter; Jorick Franceus; Tom Desmet; Kristof Van Hecke; Veronick Benoy; Ludo Van Den Bosch; Matthias D'hooghe
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 5.236

10.  Identification and characterization of small molecule inhibitors of a class I histone deacetylase from Plasmodium falciparum.

Authors:  Vishal Patel; Ralph Mazitschek; Bradley Coleman; Cokey Nguyen; Sameer Urgaonkar; Joseph Cortese; Robert H Barker; Edward Greenberg; Weiping Tang; James E Bradner; Stuart L Schreiber; Manoj T Duraisingh; Dyann F Wirth; Jon Clardy
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2009-04-23       Impact factor: 7.446

View more
  6 in total

1.  Multicomponent Synthesis and Binding Mode of Imidazo[1,2- a]pyridine-Capped Selective HDAC6 Inhibitors.

Authors:  Marcel K W Mackwitz; Alexandra Hamacher; Jeremy D Osko; Jana Held; Andrea Schöler; David W Christianson; Matthias U Kassack; Finn K Hansen
Journal:  Org Lett       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 6.005

2.  One-pot, multi-component synthesis and structure-activity relationships of peptoid-based histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors targeting malaria parasites.

Authors:  Daniela Diedrich; Katharina Stenzel; Eva Hesping; Yevgeniya Antonova-Koch; Tamirat Gebru; Sandra Duffy; Gillian Fisher; Andrea Schöler; Stephan Meister; Thomas Kurz; Vicky M Avery; Elizabeth A Winzeler; Jana Held; Katherine T Andrews; Finn K Hansen
Journal:  Eur J Med Chem       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 6.514

3.  Structure-Activity and Structure-Toxicity Relationships of Peptoid-Based Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors with Dual-Stage Antiplasmodial Activity.

Authors:  Marcel K W Mackwitz; Eva Hesping; Yevgeniya Antonova-Koch; Daniela Diedrich; Tamirat Gebru Woldearegai; Tina Skinner-Adams; Mary Clarke; Andrea Schöler; Laura Limbach; Thomas Kurz; Elizabeth A Winzeler; Jana Held; Katherine T Andrews; Finn K Hansen
Journal:  ChemMedChem       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 3.466

4.  A novel multistage antiplasmodial inhibitor targeting Plasmodium falciparum histone deacetylase 1.

Authors:  Zhenghui Huang; Ruoxi Li; Tongke Tang; Dazheng Ling; Manjiong Wang; Dandan Xu; Maoxin Sun; Lulu Zheng; Feng Zhu; Hui Min; Rachasak Boonhok; Yan Ding; Yuhao Wen; Yicong Chen; Xiaokang Li; Yuxi Chen; Taiping Liu; Jiping Han; Jun Miao; Qiang Fang; Yaming Cao; Yun Tang; Jie Cui; Wenyue Xu; Liwang Cui; Jin Zhu; Gary Wong; Jian Li; Lubin Jiang
Journal:  Cell Discov       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 10.849

Review 5.  Histone Deacetylase (HDAC) Inhibitors for the Treatment of Schistosomiasis.

Authors:  Ehab Ghazy; Mohamed Abdelsalam; Dina Robaa; Raymond J Pierce; Wolfgang Sippl
Journal:  Pharmaceuticals (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-10

6.  Synthesis, Antiplasmodial, and Antileukemia Activity of Dihydroartemisinin-HDAC Inhibitor Hybrids as Multitarget Drugs.

Authors:  Lukas von Bredow; Thomas Martin Schäfer; Julian Hogenkamp; Maik Tretbar; Daniel Stopper; Fabian B Kraft; Julian Schliehe-Diecks; Andrea Schöler; Arndt Borkhardt; Sanil Bhatia; Jana Held; Finn K Hansen
Journal:  Pharmaceuticals (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-09
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.