Literature DB >> 28263008

FRAX and mandibular sparse trabeculation as fracture predictors: a longitudinal study from 1980 to 2002.

Valter Sundh1,2, Dominique Hange2,3, Margareta Ahlqwist4, Magnus Hakeberg5, Lauren Lissner1, Grethe Jonasson3,5.   

Abstract

The fracture assessment tool (FRAX) is widely used for predicting fractures, but better methods are needed. The aim of this study was to determine whether visual assessments of mandibular trabecular bone could improve FRAX predictions. Three age-cohorts of women were examined twice - 499 women in 1980/1981 and 412 women in 1992/1993; 397 participated in both examinations. Information on 10-yr fracture events was available, and bone trabeculation was assessed in radiographs as 'dense', 'mixed', or 'sparse'. Fracture assessment tool values, without bone mineral density (BMD), were calculated twice. Both sparse trabeculation and FRAX >15% were associated with a twofold higher risk for future fracture in the younger group and with a three- to fourfold higher risk for future fracture in the older group. For those with both FRAX >15% and sparse trabeculation, the relative risk (RR) for a fracture in the next 10 yr was 5.9 (95% CI: 3.5-9.8) in the younger group and 22.7 (95% CI: 5.6-92) in the older group. If either FRAX >15% or sparse trabeculation was present, the RR was 2.6 (95% CI: 1.7-4.1) in the younger group and 15.7 (95% CI: 3.9-6.4) in the older group. We concluded that FRAX >15%, without BMD measurements, was an effective fracture predictor, and mandibular sparse trabeculation had a substantial additive effect. Together, FRAX plus mandibular sparse trabeculation predicts major osteoporotic fractures to approximately the same extent as does FRAX with BMD measurements.
© 2017 Eur J Oral Sci.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bone density; bone fracture; osteoporosis; population study; radiography

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28263008     DOI: 10.1111/eos.12341

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Oral Sci        ISSN: 0909-8836            Impact factor:   2.612


  6 in total

Review 1.  Prediction Models for Osteoporotic Fractures Risk: A Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal.

Authors:  Xuemei Sun; Yancong Chen; Yinyan Gao; Zixuan Zhang; Lang Qin; Jinlu Song; Huan Wang; Irene Xy Wu
Journal:  Aging Dis       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 9.968

Review 2.  Clinical guidelines for the application of panoramic radiographs in screening for osteoporosis.

Authors:  Akira Taguchi; Ray Tanaka; Naoya Kakimoto; Yasuhiro Morimoto; Yoshinori Arai; Takafumi Hayashi; Tohru Kurabayashi; Akitoshi Katsumata; Junichi Asaumi
Journal:  Oral Radiol       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 1.852

Review 3.  Repercussions of osteoporosis on the maxillofacial complex: a critical overview.

Authors:  Valesca Sander Koth; Fernanda Gonçalves Salum; Maria Antonia Zancanaro de Figueiredo; Karen Cherubini
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  Changing trabecular patterns in panoramic radiographs of Swedish women during 25 years of follow-up.

Authors:  Wil Gm Geraets; Grethe Jonasson; Magnus Hakeberg
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 2.419

5.  Effectiveness of Prophylactic Preoperative Antibiotics in Mandible Fracture Repair: A National Database Study.

Authors:  Elizabeth H Wick; Brian Deutsch; Dorina Kallogjeri; John J Chi; Gregory H Branham
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 5.591

6.  Predicting fractures using trabecular patterns on panoramic radiographs.

Authors:  Wil Geraets; Grethe Jonasson; Magnus Hakeberg
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 3.573

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.