| Literature DB >> 28262720 |
C L Gandini1, M V Sanchez-Puerta1,2.
Abstract
Angiosperm mitochondrial genomes (mtDNA) exhibit variable quantities of alien sequences. Many of these sequences are acquired by intracellular gene transfer (IGT) from the plastid. In addition, frequent events of horizontal gene transfer (HGT) between mitochondria of different species also contribute to their expanded genomes. In contrast, alien sequences are rarely found in plastid genomes. Most of the plant-to-plant HGT events involve mitochondrion-to-mitochondrion transfers. Occasionally, foreign sequences in mtDNAs are plastid-derived (MTPT), raising questions about their origin, frequency, and mechanism of transfer. The rising number of complete mtDNAs allowed us to address these questions. We identified 15 new foreign MTPTs, increasing significantly the number of those previously reported. One out of five of the angiosperm species analyzed contained at least one foreign MTPT, suggesting a remarkable frequency of HGT among plants. By analyzing the flanking regions of the foreign MTPTs, we found strong evidence for mt-to-mt transfers in 65% of the cases. We hypothesize that plastid sequences were initially acquired by the native mtDNA via IGT and then transferred to a distantly-related plant via mitochondrial HGT, rather than directly from a foreign plastid to the mitochondrial genome. Finally, we describe three novel putative cases of mitochondrial-derived sequences among angiosperm plastomes.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28262720 PMCID: PMC5338292 DOI: 10.1038/srep43402
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Information on foreign plastid sequences identified in flowering plant mitochondrial genomes.
| # Foreign MTPT | Recipient species | Recipient lineage | mtDNA genBank accession number | Start (nt) | End (nt) | Length of MTPT (bp) | Gene content of MTPT | BS | Putative donor lineage | Evidence for mt-to-mt HGT in flanking regions of MTPT (+/−1000 bp) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5′ | 3′ | ||||||||||
| basal Magnoliophyta; Amborellales | KF754801 | 124144 | 127171 | 3028 | — | Santalales | no1 | no3 | |||
| KF754803 | 3077656 | 3078925 | 1270 | — | Santalales | no3 | |||||
| 3 | 474251 | 476207 | 1957 | — | rosids; fabids; Oxalidales | no3 | no5 | ||||
| 4 | KF754799 | 57856 | 61814 | 3959 | — | rosids; fabids; Fagales; Fagaceae | no3 | ||||
| 5 | asterids; lamiids; Gentianales | NC_022796 | 29093 | 29432 | 340 | 100 | rosids; fabids; Fabales | no1 | |||
| 6 | NC_022797 | 40124 | 42206 | 2083 | 100 | rosids; fabids; Fabales | no1 | no2 | |||
| 7 | NC_022798 | 310073 | 311353 | 1281 | non-coding region | 100 | rosids; fabids; Fabales | no3 | |||
| 8 | NC_022796 | 497713 | 497990 | 278 | 100 | rosids; malvids; Malvales; Malvaceae | no1 | no2 | |||
| rosids; fabids; Cucurbitales | NC_014050 | 252522 | 253546 | 1025 | 100 | asterids; lamiids; Lamiales; Orobanchaceae | no1 | ||||
| 10 | NC_014050 | 848217 | 849548 | 1332 | 93 | rosids; fabids; Malpighiales; Euphorbiaceae; Acalyphoideae | no2 | no1 | |||
| 11 | asterids; lamiids; Lamiales | NC_018041 | 469539 | 469886 | 348 | 90 | rosids; fabids; Fabales; Fabaceae | no3 | no3 | ||
| rosids; malvids; Geraniales | KP974317 | 47781 | 49416 | 1636 | — | asterids; lamiids; Solanales; Convolvulaceae; Cuscuta | no3 | no3 | |||
| KP974313 | 55290 | 56417 | 1128 | — | no1 | ||||||
| KP974311 | 98551 | 100870 | 2320 | — | no3 | ||||||
| KP974317 | 42601 | 44151 | 1551 | — | no3 | no3 | |||||
| 16 | KP974311 | 343448 | 347166 | 3719 | — | rosids; fabids; Malpighiales; Euphorbiaceae; Acalyphoideae | no3 | ||||
| 17 | KP974311 | 87980 | 89010 | 1031 | — | ||||||
| 18 | KP974317 | 19534 | 20704 | 1171 | — | no1 | no3 | ||||
| 19 | KP974312 | 105427 | 106239 | 813 | — | asterids; lamiids; Gentianales; Rubiaceae; Rubioideae | no3 | ||||
| 20 | rosids; malvids; Geraniales | NC_027000 | 454189 | 454564 | 376 | 98 | asterids; lamiids; Lamiales | no3 | |||
| 21 | rosids; fabids; Fabales | NC_020455 | 230204 | 230895 | 692 | — | asterids; lamiids; Gentianales; Apocynaceae | ||||
| 22 | rosids; malvids; Malvales | NC_027406 | 365728 | 365950 | 223 | 82 | rosids; fabids; Malpighiales; Euphorbiaceae | no3 | |||
| NC_027407 | 368914 | 369136 | 223 | ||||||||
| 23 | asterids; campanulids; Asterales | NC_023337 | 107850 | 108495 | 646 | 98 | rosids; Saxifragales; Penthoraceae | no5 | |||
| 24 | asterids; lamiids; Solanales | NC_026515 | 351599 | 353572 | 1974 | 98 | rosids; Rosales; Cannabaceae | ||||
| 25 | 354959 | 355152 | 194 | non-coding region | 99 | rosids; Rosales; CannabaceaeΩ | |||||
| 26 | 355156 | 356418 | 1263 | 100 | rosids; Rosales; Cannabaceae; CannabisΩ | ||||||
| Santalales | KU992322 to KU992380 | — | — | 245 | 100 | rosids; fabids; Fabales; Mimosoideae; Acacia ligulataΩ | |||||
| — | — | 726 | 80 | rosids; fabids; Fabales; Mimosoideae; Acacia ligulataΩ | no3 | ||||||
| — | — | 638 | 100 | rosids; fabids; Fabales; Mimosoideae; Acacia ligulataΩ | |||||||
| — | — | 520 | 72 | rosids; fabids; Fabales; Mimosoideae | no3 | no3 | |||||
| — | — | 673 | 76 | rosids; fabids; Fabales; Mimosoideae; Acacia ligulataΩ | |||||||
| — | — | 269 | 99 | rosids; fabids; Fabales; Fabaceae | no3 | no5 | |||||
| — | — | 771 | 90 | rosids; fabids; Fabales; Fabaceae | no1 | ||||||
| rosids; fabids; Fabales | NC_016743 | 307253 | 308275 | 1023 | — | asterids; lamiids; Solanales; Convolvulaceae; Cuscuta | no3 | ||||
| 35 | Liliopsida; Arecaceae | NC_016740 | 179688 | 180534 | 847 | — | rosids; fabids; Fagales; Fagaceae | no3 | no3 | ||
| 36 | asterids; lamiids; Gentianales | NC_024293 | 236269 | 237891 | 1623 | 87 | asterids; lamiids; Lamiales; Oleaceae; Oleeae; HesperelaeaΩ | no3 | |||
| 37 | asterids; lamiids; Lamiales | NC_023209 | 209571 | 209920 | 350 | 100 | rosids; fabids; Fabales; Fabaceae | ||||
| rosids; fabids; Malpighiales | — | — | — | 1737 | — | rosids; Vitales; TetrastigmaΩ | no1 | ||||
| — | — | — | 395 | — | rosids; Vitales; TetrastigmaΩ | no1 | no3 | ||||
| — | — | — | 504 | — | rosids; Vitales; Tetrastigma | no3 | |||||
| — | — | — | 477 | — | rosids; Vitales; TetrastigmaΩ | no1 | |||||
| — | — | — | 3703 | — | rosids; Vitales; Tetrastigma | ||||||
| — | — | — | 2595 | — | rosids; Vitales | NA | |||||
| — | — | — | 436 | — | rosids; Vitales | no3 | no3 | ||||
| — | — | — | 360 | — | rosids; Vitales; TetrastigmaΩ | no1 | no3 | ||||
| — | — | — | 457 | — | asterids; campanulids; Apiales; Daucus | no3 | no1 | ||||
aBold indicates MTPTs involving a host-parasite relationship.
b(1) Rice et al.15 (2) Park et al.17; (3) Sloan et al.8; (4) Sanchez-Puerta et al.27 and this study, Figure S2; (5) Xi et al.16.
cBS, bootstrap support value.
dΩ, the phylogenetic analysis showed the donor MTPT as sister to the MTPT of the recipient mitochondria.
e(1) no hit; (2) all hits related to the recipient lineage (putative native sequence); (3) hits to lineages unrelated to the donor or the recipient (unconclusive origin); (4) all hits related to the donor lineage; (5) hits to diverse lineages, phylogenetic analyses of flanking regions are shown in Figure S3; (6) Park et al.17; NA: not applicable, sequence not available for testing.
Figure 1Hypotheses on the origin of foreign plastid sequences located in plant mtDNA (MTPTs).
Hypothesis #1: Plant-to-plant interactions (direct contact or via vector intermediates) enable the transfer of entire plastids (pt) whose genomic sequences are freed into the recipient cell and then captured by the native mitochondria (mt). Hypothesis #2: Plastid sequences are transferred by intracellular gene transfer from the plastid to the mitochondria within the donor plant; later, plant-to-plant interactions enable the transfer of entire foreign mitochondria into the recipient cell, both mitochondria (foreign and native) fuse and their genomes recombine.
Figure 2HGT from the family Cannabaceae to Hyoscyamus niger mtDNA.
(a–c) Evidence of HGT from Cannabis sativa to H. niger mtDNA. Maximum likelihood trees of the plastid sequences rps12 (a), petB (b), and a non-coding region (c) are shown and include sequences located in the plastid or mitochondrial (MTPT) genomes of angiosperms. Several branches are collapsed and shown as triangles for clarity; the full trees are shown in Figure S2. Bootstrap support values >50% are shown above the branches. (d) Plastid (ptDNA) and mitochondrial (mtDNA) genomic comparisons of C. sativa and H. niger. The percent identity between mitochondrial homologous regions (f1–f4) found in C. sativa and H. niger are shown below the H. niger mtDNA.
Figure 3Analyses of foreign MTPTs in Lophophytum mirabile and their flanking regions.
Green rectangles represent a fragment of the donor plastid genome depicting coding sequences in dark green. Orange rectangles represent fragments of the L. mirabile mtDNA denoting the MTPT in green. BLAST results of the flanking regions are indicated with lines in fuchsia (hits to Acacia ligulata; donor lineage), grey (hits unrelated to the donor or the recipient lineages), and dark grey (hits to diverse lineages). When hits to diverse lineages were found, they were aligned and analyzed by phylogenetic analyses (Figure S3). In most cases, sequences of Acacia mtDNA were sister to the flanking regions of L. mirabile (depicted with an *). Best ML trees of plastid and MTPT fragments are shown. Members of the Fabaceae are shown in fuchsia. Several branches are collapsed and shown as triangles for clarity; the full trees are shown in Figure S2. Bootstrap support values >50% are shown above the branches.