AIMS: Repetitive, fluctuating stress is an important biomechanical mechanism that underlies the rupture of atherosclerotic plaques. We developed a novel coronary angiography-based method for in vivo four-dimensional analysis of dynamic superficial wall stress (SWS) in coronary plaques and applied it for the first time in two clinical cases. Our aim was to investigate the potential relationship between dynamic stress concentration at baseline and plaque rupture during acute coronary syndrome (ACS) several months later. METHODS AND RESULTS: Three-dimensional angiographic reconstructions of the interrogated arteries were performed at several phases of the cardiac cycle, followed by finite element analysis to obtain the dynamic SWS data. The peak stress at baseline was found at the distal and proximal lesion longitudinal shoulders, being 121.8 kPa and 98.0 kPa, respectively. Intriguingly, in both cases, the sites with the highest SWS concentration at baseline co-registered with the location of plaque rupture during ACS, respectively six and 18 months after the baseline angiographic assessment. CONCLUSIONS: A novel angiography-based analysis method for four-dimensional evaluation of dynamic SWS was feasible for investigating plaque biomechanical behaviour in vivo. Initial experience suggests that this technique could be useful in exploring mechanisms of future plaque rupture.
AIMS: Repetitive, fluctuating stress is an important biomechanical mechanism that underlies the rupture of atherosclerotic plaques. We developed a novel coronary angiography-based method for in vivo four-dimensional analysis of dynamic superficial wall stress (SWS) in coronary plaques and applied it for the first time in two clinical cases. Our aim was to investigate the potential relationship between dynamic stress concentration at baseline and plaque rupture during acute coronary syndrome (ACS) several months later. METHODS AND RESULTS: Three-dimensional angiographic reconstructions of the interrogated arteries were performed at several phases of the cardiac cycle, followed by finite element analysis to obtain the dynamic SWS data. The peak stress at baseline was found at the distal and proximal lesion longitudinal shoulders, being 121.8 kPa and 98.0 kPa, respectively. Intriguingly, in both cases, the sites with the highest SWS concentration at baseline co-registered with the location of plaque rupture during ACS, respectively six and 18 months after the baseline angiographic assessment. CONCLUSIONS: A novel angiography-based analysis method for four-dimensional evaluation of dynamic SWS was feasible for investigating plaque biomechanical behaviour in vivo. Initial experience suggests that this technique could be useful in exploring mechanisms of future plaque rupture.
Authors: Shengxian Tu; Tim P van de Hoef; Young-Hak Kim; Javier Escaned; William Wijns Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2017-07 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Xinlei Wu; Clemens von Birgelen; Zehang Li; Su Zhang; Jiayue Huang; Fuyou Liang; Yingguang Li; William Wijns; Shengxian Tu Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2018-02-03 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Xinlei Wu; Clemens von Birgelen; Su Zhang; Daixin Ding; Jiayue Huang; Shengxian Tu Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2019-05-03 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Xinlei Wu; Masafumi Ono; Hideyuki Kawashima; Eric K W Poon; Ryo Torii; Atif Shahzad; Chao Gao; Rutao Wang; Peter Barlis; Clemens von Birgelen; Johan H C Reiber; Christos V Bourantas; Shengxian Tu; William Wijns; Patrick W Serruys; Yoshinobu Onuma Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med Date: 2021-06-18