Donald M Mock1, Sean R Stowell2, Robert S Franco3, Svetlana V Kyosseva1, Demet Nalbant4, Robert L Schmidt5, Gretchen A Cress5, Ronald G Strauss5,6, José A Cancelas7, Melissa von Goetz8, Anne K North8, John A Widness5. 1. Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology and the Department of Pediatrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA. 2. Center for Transfusion and Cellular Therapies, Departments of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine and Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. 3. Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA. 4. Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Experimental Therapeutics, University of Iowa College of Pharmacy, Iowa City, Iowa, USA. 5. Stead Family Department of Pediatrics, The University of Iowa, Roy J. and Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa, USA. 6. Department of Pathology, The University of Iowa, Roy J. and Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa, USA. 7. Hoxworth Blood Center and Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA. 8. Cerus Corporation, Concord, California, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In hematologic and transfusion medicine research, measurement of red blood cell (RBC) in vivo kinetics must be safe and accurate. Recent reports indicate use of biotin-labeled RBC (BioRBC) to determine red cell survival (RCS) offers substantial advantages over 51 Cr and other labeling methods. Occasional induction of BioRBC antibodies has been reported. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: To investigate the causes and consequences of BioRBC immunization, we reexposed three previously immunized adults to BioRBC and evaluated the safety, antibody emergence, and RCS of BioRBC. RESULTS: BioRBC re-exposure caused an anamnestic increase of plasma BioRBC antibodies at 5-7 days; all were subclass IgG1 and neutralized by biotinylated albumin, thus indicating structural specificity for the biotin epitope. Concurrently, specific antibody binding to BioRBC was observed in each subject. As biotin label density increased, the proportion of BioRBC that bound increased antibody also increased; the latter was associated with proportional accelerated removal of BioRBC labeled at density 6 μg/mL. In contrast, only one of three subjects exhibited accelerated removal of BioRBC density 2 μg/mL. No adverse clinical or laboratory events were observed. Among three control subjects who did not develop BioRBC antibodies following initial BioRBC exposure, re-exposure induced neither antibody emergence nor accelerated BioRBC removal. DISCUSSION: We conclude re-exposure of immunized subjects to BioRBC can induce anamnestic antibody response that can cause an underestimation of RCS. To minimize chances of antibody induction and underestimation of RCS, we recommend an initial BioRBC exposure volume of ≤10 mL and label densities of ≤18 μg/mL.
BACKGROUND: In hematologic and transfusion medicine research, measurement of red blood cell (RBC) in vivo kinetics must be safe and accurate. Recent reports indicate use of biotin-labeled RBC (BioRBC) to determine red cell survival (RCS) offers substantial advantages over 51 Cr and other labeling methods. Occasional induction of BioRBC antibodies has been reported. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: To investigate the causes and consequences of BioRBC immunization, we reexposed three previously immunized adults to BioRBC and evaluated the safety, antibody emergence, and RCS of BioRBC. RESULTS: BioRBC re-exposure caused an anamnestic increase of plasma BioRBC antibodies at 5-7 days; all were subclass IgG1 and neutralized by biotinylated albumin, thus indicating structural specificity for the biotin epitope. Concurrently, specific antibody binding to BioRBC was observed in each subject. As biotin label density increased, the proportion of BioRBC that bound increased antibody also increased; the latter was associated with proportional accelerated removal of BioRBC labeled at density 6 μg/mL. In contrast, only one of three subjects exhibited accelerated removal of BioRBC density 2 μg/mL. No adverse clinical or laboratory events were observed. Among three control subjects who did not develop BioRBC antibodies following initial BioRBC exposure, re-exposure induced neither antibody emergence nor accelerated BioRBC removal. DISCUSSION: We conclude re-exposure of immunized subjects to BioRBC can induce anamnestic antibody response that can cause an underestimation of RCS. To minimize chances of antibody induction and underestimation of RCS, we recommend an initial BioRBC exposure volume of ≤10 mL and label densities of ≤18 μg/mL.
Authors: Connie M Arthur; Jerry William L Allen; Hans Verkerke; Justin Yoo; Ryan P Jajosky; Kathryn Girard-Pierce; Satheesh Chonat; Patricia Zerra; Cheryl Maier; Jen Rha; Ross Fasano; Cassandra D Josephson; John D Roback; Sean R Stowell Journal: Blood Adv Date: 2021-01-26
Authors: Donald M Mock; Nell I Matthews; Shan Zhu; Leon F Burmeister; M Bridget Zimmerman; Ronald G Strauss; Robert L Schmidt; Demet Nalbant; Kevin J Freise; Peter Veng-Pedersen; John A Widness Journal: Transfusion Date: 2010-12 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Donald M Mock; Nell I Matthews; Shan Zhu; Ronald G Strauss; Robert L Schmidt; M Bridget Zimmerman; Demet Nalbant; Kevin J Freise; Mohammad Saleh; Peter Veng-Pedersen; John A Widness Journal: Transfusion Date: 2012-01-09 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Donald M Mock; Gary L Lankford; Nell I Matthews; Leon F Burmeister; Daniel Kahn; John A Widness; Ronald G Strauss Journal: Transfusion Date: 2011-10-24 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Justine S Liepkalns; Chantel M Cadwell; Sean R Stowell; Eldad A Hod; Steven L Spitalnik; James C Zimring Journal: Transfusion Date: 2012-10-03 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Connie M Arthur; Seema R Patel; Nicole H Smith; Ashley Bennett; Nourine A Kamili; Amanda Mener; Christian Gerner-Smidt; Harold C Sullivan; J Scott Hale; Andreas Wieland; Benjamin Youngblood; James C Zimring; Jeanne E Hendrickson; Sean R Stowell Journal: J Immunol Date: 2017-03-01 Impact factor: 5.426
Authors: Harold C Sullivan; Christian Gerner-Smidt; Ajay K Nooka; Connie M Arthur; Louisa Thompson; Amanda Mener; Seema R Patel; Marianne Yee; Ross M Fasano; Cassandra D Josephson; Richard M Kaufman; John D Roback; Sagar Lonial; Sean R Stowell Journal: Blood Date: 2017-04-03 Impact factor: 25.476