Literature DB >> 28261343

Pretreatment Alkaline Phosphatase and Epstein-Barr Virus DNA Predict Poor Prognosis and Response to Salvage Radiotherapy in Patients with Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma and Metachronous Bone-Only Metastasis.

ShaSha He1, Yan Wang1, Hao Peng1, Lin Yang1, HaiYang Chen2, ShaoBo Liang3, LiXia Lu1, Yong Chen1.   

Abstract

Background : The bones are the most common site of distant metastasis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Few prognostic markers are available to guide treatment and sub-classify patients with bone metastasis. We aimed to identify the prognostic value of pretreatment serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and plasma Epstein-Barr virus DNA (EBV DNA) in patients with bone-only metastasis. Methods : A total of 272 patients who developed bone-only metastases after therapy were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were categorized according to pretreatment serum ALP (< or ≥ 110 U/L) and pretreatment plasma EBV DNA (< or ≥ 6,750 copies ml-1). Univariate and multivariate analyses of clinical variables were performed using Cox proportional hazards regression models. Overall survival (OS) was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Results : Median OS for the cohort was 34.06 months (range, 2.53-143.87 months). Multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis verified pretreatment serum ALP and pretreatment plasma EBV DNA were independent prognostic factors for OS. In stratified survival analysis of patients with elevated pretreatment serum ALP and/or plasma EBV DNA, delivery of radiotherapy (RT) to bone metastases provided a significant OS benefit compared to other therapeutic methods (P < 0.05). Conclusions : This study demonstrates two important points: firstly, pretreatment serum ALP and plasma EBV DNA have prognostic value at the first diagnosis of bone-only metastasis in NPC. Secondly, radiotherapy of bone metastasis improves the prognosis of patients with elevated pretreatment serum ALP and plasma EBV DNA.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Epstein-Barr virus DNA; Nasopharyngeal carcinoma; alkaline phosphatase; bone metastasis; prognosis.

Year:  2017        PMID: 28261343      PMCID: PMC5332893          DOI: 10.7150/jca.17310

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer        ISSN: 1837-9664            Impact factor:   4.207


Introduction

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is a malignancy that is disproportionally common in eastern Asia, with the highest incidence of approximately 20 per 100,000 people per year observed among the Cantonese population in the South of China 1, 2. A recent epidemiological analysis reported NPC was related to district, age, gender, diet, lifestyle, Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection, genetic factors and even the type of dialect in China 3. As it has a complicated anatomical localization, NPC is considered surgically unresectable, but is sensitive to radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Combination of radiotherapy and chemotherapy has been proven to provide survival benefits for patients with advanced stage NPC 4. In combination with developments in radiotherapy technology and imaging modalities, these therapeutic improvements have led to a reduction in mortality among patients with NPC since the peak value of 1.45/105 in 2002 5 . Approximately 15-19% of all patients with NPC develop distant metastasis 6. NPC frequently presents as metastatic disease, with a propensity for metastasizing to bone. The bones account for 50% cases of metastasis, and metastasis to bone is associated with a poor prognosis and survival outcomes 7. At present, the selection of radio- and/or chemotherapeutic treatments for NPC are generally based on the characteristics of the primary tumor 8. However, the current TNM staging system possesses a number of flaws, as patients with the same TNM stage display different clinical behaviors and achieve varied treatment responses and outcomes 9. Despite the relative unreliability of the current TNM staging system, there is a lack of related research and the prognostic value of clinicopathological factors, risk assessment of different cases and the role of combined treatment in patients with bone metastasis have not been systematically defined and explored. Currently, there is much interest in discovering prognostic markers that may help to discriminate patients and guide effective therapeutic strategies 10, 11. However, the identification of reliable biomarkers associated with prognosis is a continuous challenge. Surely, there have existed some studies about the prognostic value of ALP in the patients with NPC 12 and metastastic NPC 13. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic value of serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and plasma Epstein-Barr virus DNA (EBV DNA) in patients with bone-only metastatic NPC in order to assist individual treatment decision-making for patients with M1 stage NPC.

Materials and Methods

Patients

Between March 2004 and October 2013, the medical records of 2,685 patients with newly-diagnosed NPC who received therapy at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center (SYSUCC), China, were retrospectively reviewed. Prior patient consent and approval from the Institutional Review Board of SYSUCC were obtained for the review of clinical data for research purposes. We only included patients who underwent skeletal scintigraphy and 18F-FDG PET so that metastases at diagnosis would not be missed. Patients lacking complete records on clinical and hematological variables and follow-up data were excluded. Overall, the 272/2685 (10.1%) patients who developed bone metastasis after primary treatment (not including patients with bone metastasis at first diagnosis) were included in this analysis.

Clinical stage

For each patient, a complete medical history and physical examination were conducted, in conjunction with check-ups including serum biochemistry tests, direct fiber-optic nasopharyngoscopy, nasopharyngeal and neck magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), abdominal ultrasound, chest radiography and entire body bone scan and positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT). Plasma EBV DNA load was routinely measured before treatment using real-time quantitative PCR, as described previously 14, and the undetectable EBV signals in the sample were reported as 0 copy/mL. Clinical stage was classified according to the 7th edition of the International Union against Cancer/American Joint Committee on Cancer (UICC/AJCC) staging system for NPC 15.

Clinical data and treatment

The following data were recorded: clinical (age, gender, overall stage, T category, N category, radiotherapy technique, primary treatment, radiotherapy after diagnosis of metastasis), pathology (pathological pattern), and baseline laboratory data (serum alkaline phosphatase [ALP], plasma EBV DNA). Blood samples were routinely drawn at each patient's first appointment at our department (before initiation of any diagnostic or therapeutic interventions). All patients received primary curative-intent treatment. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with or without neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy was administered for advanced-stage disease (stage III-IVB), and either platinum-based chemotherapy or radiotherapy (2D/3DCRT/IMRT) was administered for early-stage disease or to patients that could not tolerate combined therapy. After diagnosis of bone metastasis, we developed a treatment plan based on the general status of the patient and their illness. Treatment modalities for bone metastasis varied depending on the metastatic time order, site and number of metastases. Radiotherapy was prescribed for localized bone metastatic lesions to cure or relieve pain; chemotherapy was added for palliative purposes. The radiotherapy doses/fractions and chemotherapy regimens were selected individually for each patient. In our study, the salvage radiotherapy technique for all patients were intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), and with a dose of 30Gy/10Fractions. Chemotherapy was the primary treatment, the most widely-used regimen was platins (cisplatin, carboplatin) or platins in association with docetaxel, paclitaxel or gemcitabine. The number of chemotherapy cycles was based on the patient's physical condition. In total, 120/272 (44.1%) patients received systemic chemotherapy only to treat bone metastases; 100 (36.8%) chemoradiotherapy; 35 (12.9%) local radiotherapy only; and 17 (6.2%) symptomatic therapy only.

Follow-up

Follow-up evaluations were performed every 3 months within the first 3 years, 6 months for the following 2 years and annually thereafter until death. The follow-up duration was calculated from the first day of therapy to the day of death or last examination. The last follow-up time was May, 2016. The study end-point was overall survival (OS), defined as the time from the date of first diagnosis to the date of death or last known date alive. Disease-free interval (DFI) was measured as the duration between the end of primary treatment and the date of first diagnosis of bone-only metastasis, which was diagnosed based on symptoms and a bone scan.

Statistical analysis

We established a cut-off value for EBV DNA by applying receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis. The Chi-square test was used to analyze the correlations between DFI and clinicopathological features. Univariate and multivariate analysis of clinical variables were performed using Cox proportional hazards regression models. Variables in the model included gender, age, overall stage, T category, N category, ALP, EBV DNA, radiotherapy after metastasis, vertebral metastasis, number of metastatic sites and DFI. Survival rates were plotted against time using the Kaplan-Meier method, and log-rank testing was used to compare the differences between the curves. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS statistical program package, version 22.0, IBM Corp. All statistical tests were two-sided; a P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Patient characteristics

Of the 272 patients with NPC who developed bone-only metastasis after treatment, 258 (94.9%) were male and 14 (5.1%) were female, and 17 (6.2%) were initially diagnosed with early stage disease (Stage I-II) and 255 (93.8%) with advanced stage NPC (Stage III-IVB). The baseline characteristics of the patients are presented in Table 1. The median follow-up time was 34.06 months (range, 2.53-143.87 months). At last follow-up, 132/272 (48.5%) patients had died. The 3-year OS rate for the entire cohort was 62.9%.
Table 1

Baseline characteristics of the 272 patients with nasopharyngeal cancer

Characteristicsn (%)
Total272 (100)
Gender
Male258 (94.9)
Female14 (5.1)
Age (years)
< 45140 (51.5)
≥ 45132 (48.5)
Overall stage
I+II17 (6.2)
III+IVB255 (93.8)
T category
T1-263 (23.2)
T3-4209 (76.8)
N category
N0-181 (46.1)
N2-3191 (53.9)
Primary treatment
Radiotherapy alone71 (29.8)
Chemoradiotherapy201 (70.2)
Vertebral metastasis
Absent99 (36.4)
Present173 (63.6)
Number of metastatic sites
1105 (38.6)
255 (20.2)
≥ 3112 (41.2)
Disease-free interval (months)
< 13115 (42.4)
≥ 13157 (57.6)

Abbreviations: T = tumor; N = node; †) According to the 7th edition of the AJCC/UICC staging system.

Pretreatment serum ALP

Median pretreatment ALP was 74.25 U/L, the cut-off value for ALP was defined as the upper limit of normal (ULN) value. In total, 250/272 (91.9%) patients were in the non-elevated ALP (NE-ALP) group (ALP < 110 U/L) and 22 (8.1%) were in the elevated ALP (E-ALP) group (ALP ≥ 110 U/L). In univariate analysis, 3-year OS was 65.1% for the NE-ALP group vs. 33.6% for the E-ALP group (P = 0.001, Figure 1A).
Figure 1

Kaplan-Meier overall survival curves for the 272 patients with nasopharyngeal cancer stratified by (A) pretreatment serum ALP and (B) pretreatment plasma EBV DNA.

Pretreatment plasma EBV DNA

Based on ROC curve analysis for OS, the pretreatment plasma EBV DNA cut-off value was identified as 6,750 copies ml-1. Univariate analysis showed the 3-year OS rate for the high EBV DNA group ( ≥ 6,750 copies ml-1) was 51.8% compared to 71.5% for the low DNA group ( < 6,750 copies ml-1, P < 0.001; Figure 1B).

Association between clinical variables and DFI and univariate analysis

The median DFI for this cohort of 272 patients who developed bone-only metastasis was 13 months (range, 1.03-86.07 months). Thus, using 13 months as the cut-off value for DFI, we found that the subgroups of patients with shorter DFI presented a more advanced T category and N category NPC (T3-4, N2-3) than patients with longer DFI, with P-values of 0.015 and 0.042, respectively. Also, there are more patients with high pretreatment ALP (P = 0.046) and EBV DNA (P = 0.029; Table 2) in shorter DFI group than in longer DFI group. In univariate analysis, the 3-year OS rates for patients with high DFI and low DFI were 77.9% and 39.8%, respectively (P < 0.001, Figure 2A).
Table 2

Association between clinical variables and the disease-free interval (DFI) to bone-only metastases

DFI
Clinical variable< 13 months≥ 13 monthsP*
Gender0.286
Male111 (96.5)147 (93.6)
Female4 (3.5)10 (6.4)
Age (years)0.303
< 4555 (47.8)85 (54.1)
≥ 4560 (52.2)72 (45.9)
Overall stage0.358
I+II9 (7.8)8 (5.1)
III+IVB106 (92.2)149 (94.9)
T category0.015
T1-235 (30.4)28 (17.8)
T3-480 (69.6)129 (28.2)
N category0.042
N0-127 (23.5)54 (34.4)
N2-388 (76.5)103 (65.6)
Radiotherapy technique0.104
2DRT/3DCRT29 (25.2)54 (34.4)
IMRT86 (74.8)103 (65.6)
Primary treatment0.164
Radiotherapy35 (30.4)36 (22.9)
Chemoradiotherapy80 (69.6)121(77.1)
Pretreatment ALP (U/L)0.046
< 110102 (88.7)148 (94.3)
≥ 11013 (11.3)9 (5.7)
Pretreatment EBV DNA (copies ml-1)0.029
< 6,75052 (45.2)92 (58.6)
≥ 6,75063 (54.8)65 (41.4)

Abbreviations: DFI = disease-free interval; 2DRT = two-dimensional radiotherapy; 3DCRT = three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy; IMRT = intensity-modulated radiation therapy; LDH = alkaline phosphatase.

* Chi-square test.

Figure 2

Kaplan-Meier overall survival curves. (A) Overall survival curves for the 272 patients with nasopharyngeal cancer stratified by the disease-free interval (DFI) to bone-only metastasis. (B) Overall survival curves for the 272 patients with nasopharyngeal cancer stratified as group A, non-elevated ALP (NE-ALP) and low EBV DNA; group B, NE-ALP and high EBV DNA or elevated ALP (E-ALP) and low EBV DNA; and group C, E-ALP and high EBV DNA. (C) Overall survival curves for group A stratified by radiotherapy after metastasis; (D) group B stratified by radiotherapy after metastasis; (E) group C stratified by radiotherapy after metastasis; and (F) the entire cohort of 272 patients stratified by radiotherapy after metastasis.

Prognostic value of integrating serum ALP and plasma EBV DNA

Using pretreatment serum ALP and plasma EBV DNA, we classified the 272 patients into three groups: group A, NE-ALP and low EBV DNA; group B, NE-ALP and high EBV DNA or E-ALP and low EBV DNA; and group C, E-ALP and high EBV DNA. The 3-year OS rates for these three groups were 74% vs. 50.9% vs. 33.8%, respectively (P < 0.001, Figure 2B). In addition, we further assessed OS for each of these groups to assess which subsets of patients benefited from local radiotherapy after developing bone metastasis. Patients whose metastases were treated with radiotherapy achieved longer OS than those who did not receive radiotherapy in both group B (P < 0.001, Figure 2D) and group C (P = 0.048, Figure 2E), but not in group A (P = 0.230, Figure 2C). Moreover, radiotherapy to the metastases provided a benefit in terms of OS in analysis of the entire group (P < 0.001, Figure 2F).

Cox multivariate analysis for OS

Univariate analysis indicated N category, pretreatment serum ALP, pretreatment EBV DNA, primary treatment, radiotherapy after metastasis, vertebral metastasis, the number of metastatic sites and DFI were significant predictors of OS. Multivariate analysis to adjust for these factors revealed pretreatment serum ALP (HR 1.720, 95% CI 1.199-2.467, P = 0.003) and pretreatment plasma EBV DNA (HR 1.635, 95% CI 1.131-2.363, P = 0.009) were independent prognostic factors for OS. The other independent significant prognostic factors were N category, radiotherapy after metastasis, vertebral metastasis, the number of metastatic sites and DFI (Table 3).
Table 3

Univariate and multivariate analyses for overall survival (OS)

CharacteristicsUnivariate analysisMultivariate analysis
HR95% CIPHR95% CIP
Gender
Female vs. male1.2750.62-2.6230.508
Age (years)
≥ 45 vs. < 451.1990.848-1.6940.304
Overall stage
III + IVB vs. I + II1.3730.641-2.9430.415
T category
T3-4 vs. T1-21.0290.684-1.5490.891
N category
N2-3 vs. N0-11.9131.572-2.326< 0.0011.4671.175-1.8320.001
Pretreatment ALP (U/L)
≥ 110 vs. < 1102.5171.438-4.4060.0011.7201.199-2.4670.003
Pretreatment EBV DNA (copies ml-1)
≥ 6,750 vs. < 6,7501.9331.362-2.745< 0.0011.6351.131-2.3630.009
IMRT after metastasis
No vs. yes1.4701.009-2.1430.0451.5781.077-2.3140.019
Vertebral metastasis
Present vs. absent2.2691.531-3.363< 0.0011.9971.321-3.0200.001
Number of metastatic sites
≥ 3 vs. < 31.5391.078-2.1980.0181.5311.056-2.2200.025
DFI (months)
≥ 13 vs. < 132.8241.983-4.023< 0.0012.8681.987-4.1390.001

Abbreviations: HR = unadjusted hazard ratio; CI = confidence interval; IMRT = intensity modulated radiotherapy; DFI = disease-free interval to bone-only metastases.

Discussion

In this study, we systematically evaluated OS, prognostic factors (especially ALP and EBV DNA), and post-metastasis treatment modalities for patients with NPC who develop bone-only metastasis as the first failure after primary treatment. A number of noteworthy findings emerged from this retrospective analysis. First, both elevated pretreatment serum ALP and pretreatment plasma EBV DNA were associated with significantly shorter DFI and poorer OS. Second, Cox multivariate analysis indicated N category, pretreatment serum ALP, pretreatment plasma EBV DNA, primary treatment, radiotherapy after metastasis, vertebral metastasis, the number of metastatic sites and DFI were independent prognostic factors for OS. Third, delivery of local radiotherapy to the sites of metastasis may provide an OS benefit compared to other treatments in patients with bone metastasis. It has been previously reported that patients with NPC have a high incidence of early bone metastasis, with the spine being the most common site of skeletal metastasis, accounting for 66.0% (of 206 cases) 16. In this cohort, spinal involvement was associated with poorer OS (HR, 1.997, 95% CI 1.199-2.467, P = 0.001). These results are similar to a previous study (HR: 1.91; 95% CI: 1.33-2.74) 11. It is well-recognized that the diagnostic ability of imaging for early bone metastatic lesions is far from sensitive, especially when the tumor cells are mainly confined to the bone marrow 17. In this study, patients were diagnosed with bone metastasis via a number of imaging technologies, each of which have disadvantages: bone scans have a low specificity and high false-positive rate, CT requires the use of radioisotopes, PET/CT is expensive and MRI also suffers from limitations include partial-volume effects. Moreover, skeletal-related events (SREs) occur non-specifically: one study reported that 12.1% of patients with bone metastasis did not have SREs 18. Thus, the imaging technologies employed for diagnosis of bone metastasis have inherent limitations that may lead to a delay in diagnosis, especially in patients without the symptoms of SREs. In recent years, a number of serum markers have been reported to have prognostic value in patients with NPC and bone metastasis, including lactic dehydrogenase (LDH) and ALP. Elevated serum ALP has been associated with the presence of bone, liver and other diseases 19. ALP is divided into four isozymes named after the site of tissue expression: intestinal ALP, placental ALP, germ cell ALP and liver/bone/kidney ALP 20. Although these ALPs are present in many tissues and have been investigated for a number of years, relatively little is known about their functions. ALP is a by-product of osteoblast activity, which is related to bone metabolism; therefore, elevated ALP indicates that bone formation could be occurring. Metabolic disorders of bone disease contribute to ALP elevation 21, 22. However, elevated ALP can be due to diseases in several other organs. Therefore, we excluded patients who presented evidence of diseases known to cause abnormal ALP levels. A recent review explored the impact of serum ALP on the clinical response and survival outcomes of patients with skeletal metastases in NPC 13. Likewise, our results confirmed high serum ALP level before treatment predicted poor OS in patients with NPC who developed bone-only metastasis (HR 1.720, 95% CI 1.199-2.467, P = 0.003). Clinical use of EBV in NPC continues to increase, with quantitative analyses of circulating EBV DNA used for population screening, prognostication and disease surveillance 23. At present, randomized trials are in progress to investigate the role of EBV DNA in order to stratify patients for tailored treatment. Patients with high plasma EBV DNA require more intense treatment 24, 25. However, the prognostic value of EBV DNA in patients with bone-only metastasis has not been explored. Thus, we preformed stratified analysis by pretreatment EBV DNA. ROC curve analysis for OS determined the cut-off value for EBV DNA should be 6,750 copies ml-1, which is much higher than that of the previously published cut-off values selected for analysis in patients with non-metastatic NPC treated in our department 26, 27. According to our mutilvariate analysis, pretreatment plasma EBV DNA were independent prognostic factors for OS (HR 1.635, 95% CI 1.131-2.363, P = 0.009) in patients with skeletal metastasis. After confirming the prognostic value of pretreatment serum ALP and pretreatment plasma EBV DNA, we categorized the patients into three subgroups. Kaplan-Meier curves revealed patients with elevated pretreatment ALP and high pretreatment EBV DNA achieved the poorest OS. In addition, further exploratory analysis was conducted to identify whether OS may differ in the subgroups who received radiotherapy or other treatments after metastasis. Remarkably, local radiotherapy for bone metastases provided an OS benefit over the treatment modalities that without radiotherapy in the subgroups of patients with elevated pretreatment serum ALP, high plasma pretreatment EBV DNA, or both elevated ALP and high EBV DNA. These results indicate that the combination of high pretreatment serum ALP and high pretreatment plasma EBV DNA is able to discriminate patients for whom radiotherapy to the metastases will result in a better prognosis compared to no radiotherapy or other treatments. Currently, systemic chemotherapy is the primary palliative treatment for patients with NPC who develop metastases, with numerous confirmations of its efficacy published 28. However, median survival for patients who develop metastases is short. When combined with locoregional radiotherapy, systemic chemotherapy improves the survival, disease control and quality of life of patients with metastatic NPC 1, 29. However, it has not been confirmed whether locoregional radiotherapy targeting the sites of bone metastasis affects the survival of patients with bone-only metastatic NPC. In this study, patients underwent chemotherapy, radiotherapy, targeted therapy, combined use of bisphosphonates, or only symptomatic therapy; 135/272 (49.6%) patients received locoregional radiotherapy. Of the entire cohort, univariate and multivariate analyses demonstrated that radiotherapy after metastasis improved OS, and confirmed radiotherapy after metastasis was an independent significant prognostic factor for OS. One limitation of this study that cannot be neglected is that the application of various adjuvant therapeutic methods may confuse the results; and moreover, the varied therapeutic protocols may also have led to diverse survival outcomes. Thus, randomized studies are necessary to authenticate the prognostic value of pretreatment serum ALP and pretreatment plasma EBV DNA, confirm the survival benefit of locoregional radiotherapy in patients with NPC who develop bone-only metastases, and further exploration of adjuvant therapies is warranted. Additionally, the quality of life of patients with metastatic NPC has received little investigation, and any future research to validate this study should consider the effect of such treatments on the patients' quality of life.

Conclusions

Several prognostic factors for OS were identified for patients with NPC who developed bone-only metastases. Using pretreatment serum ALP and plasma EBV DNA, as well as other clinicopathological factors, patients with bone-only metastases can be more effectively stratified into risk groups to guide individualized treatment. Additionally, radiotherapy after metastasis significantly improved OS, especially in patients with high pretreatment serum ALP and/or plasma EBV DNA, and radiotherapy after metastasis was an independent significant prognostic factor for OS.
  29 in total

1.  Combined chemoradiation versus radiation therapy alone in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: results of a meta-analysis of 1,528 patients from six randomized trials.

Authors:  Michael Huncharek; Bruce Kupelnick
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.339

2.  In-depth evaluation of the AJCC/UICC 1997 staging system of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: prognostic homogeneity and proposed refinements.

Authors:  Joseph S K Au; C K Law; W Foo; W H Lau
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2003-06-01       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 3.  Nasopharyngeal carcinoma: the next challenges.

Authors:  Albiruni R A Razak; Lillian L Siu; Fei-Fei Liu; Emma Ito; Brian O'Sullivan; Kelvin Chan
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 9.162

Review 4.  Evaluation of bone and mineral disorders.

Authors:  Laleh Ardeshirpour; David E C Cole; Thomas O Carpenter
Journal:  Pediatr Endocrinol Rev       Date:  2007-10

5.  Mortality Characteristic and Prediction of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma in China from 1991 to 2013.

Authors:  Zhen-Xi Xu; Zhi-Xiong Lin; Jia-Ying Fang; Ku-Sheng Wu; Pei-Ling Du; Yang Zeng; Wen-Rui Tang; Xiao-Ling Xu; Kun Lin
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2015

6.  Comparison of Epstein-Barr virus DNA level in plasma, peripheral blood cell and tumor tissue in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Jian-Yong Shao; Yu Zhang; Yu-Hong Li; Hong-Yi Gao; Hui-Xia Feng; Qiu-Liang Wu; Nian-Ji Cui; Gang Cheng; Bin Hu; Li-Fu Hu; Ingemar Ernberg; Yi-Xin Zeng
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.480

Review 7.  Alkaline phosphatase: an overview.

Authors:  Ujjawal Sharma; Deeksha Pal; Rajendra Prasad
Journal:  Indian J Clin Biochem       Date:  2013-11-26

8.  A comparison between the sixth and seventh editions of the UICC/AJCC staging system for nasopharyngeal carcinoma in a Chinese cohort.

Authors:  Jing Li; Xiong Zou; Yun-Long Wu; Jing-Cui Guo; Jing-Ping Yun; Miao Xu; Qi-Sheng Feng; Li-Zhen Chen; Jin-Xin Bei; Yi-Xin Zeng; Ming-Yuan Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Distant metastasis risk and patterns of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the era of IMRT: long-term results and benefits of chemotherapy.

Authors:  An-Chuan Li; Wei-Wei Xiao; Guan-Zhu Shen; Lin Wang; An-An Xu; Yan-Qing Cao; Shao-Min Huang; Cheng-Guang Lin; Fei Han; Xiao-Wu Deng; Chong Zhao
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-09-15

10.  Prognostic Impact of Plasma Epstein-Barr Virus DNA in Patients with Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Treated using Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy.

Authors:  Hao Peng; Rui Guo; Lei Chen; Yuan Zhang; Wen-Fei Li; Yan-Ping Mao; Ying Sun; Fan Zhang; Li-Zhi Liu; Ai-Hua Lin; Jun Ma
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  8 in total

1.  A nonendemic analysis of the patterns and prognosis of de novo metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinomas in older patients aged ≥ 65 years.

Authors:  Baoqiu Liu; Mingxing Zhang; Yanqing Cao; Zhe Wang; Xicheng Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 2.  Optimal management of oligometastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Honggen Liu; Peiying Yang; Yingjie Jia
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-06-05       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Bone Metastases Pattern in Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Real-World Analysis in the SEER Database.

Authors:  Xiaojing Yang; Hanru Ren; Weiwei Yu; Hongling Li; Xinmiao Yang; Jie Fu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Subdivision of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patients with Bone-Only Metastasis at Diagnosis for Prediction of Survival and Treatment Guidance.

Authors:  Xue-Song Sun; Yu-Jing Liang; Sai-Lan Liu; Qiu-Yan Chen; Shan-Shan Guo; Yue-Feng Wen; Li-Ting Liu; Hao-Jun Xie; Qing-Nan Tang; Xiao-Yun Li; Jin-Jie Yan; Lin-Quan Tang; Hai-Qiang Mai
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2019-01-04       Impact factor: 4.679

5.  Radiomic Nomogram: Pretreatment Evaluation of Local Recurrence in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma based on MR Imaging.

Authors:  Lu Zhang; Hongyu Zhou; Dongsheng Gu; Jie Tian; Bin Zhang; Di Dong; Xiaokai Mo; Jing Liu; Xiaoning Luo; Shufang Pei; Yuhao Dong; Wenhui Huang; Qiuyin Chen; Changhong Liang; Zhouyang Lian; Shuixing Zhang
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 4.207

6.  Radioprotective Effect of Arbutin in Megavoltage Therapeutic X-irradiated Mice using Liver Enzymes Assessment.

Authors:  Nadi S; Elahi M; Moradi S; Banaei A; Ataei Gh; Abedi-Firouzjah R
Journal:  J Biomed Phys Eng       Date:  2019-10-01

7.  Incidence of patients with bone metastases at diagnosis of solid tumors in adults: a large population-based study.

Authors:  Jin-Feng Huang; Jianfei Shen; Xiao Li; Ramesh Rengan; Nicola Silvestris; Minqi Wang; Lisa Derosa; Xuanqi Zheng; Andrea Belli; Xiao-Lei Zhang; Yan Michael Li; Aimin Wu
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-04

8.  Intensive Local Radiotherapy Is Associated With Better Local Control and Prolonged Survival in Bone-Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patients.

Authors:  Xiao-Yun Li; Guo-Dong Jia; Xue-Song Sun; Shan-Shan Guo; Li-Ting Liu; Sai-Lan Liu; Jin-Jie Yan; Dong-Hua Luo; Rui Sun; Ling Guo; Hao-Yuan Mo; Lin-Quan Tang; Qiu-Yan Chen; Hai-Qiang Mai
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 6.244

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.