Literature DB >> 28261029

How does stigma affect people with psoriasis?

Patryk Łakuta1, Kamil Marcinkiewicz2, Beata Bergler-Czop3, Ligia Brzezińska-Wcisło3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Psoriasis is associated with a major additional psychological burden. AIM: To investigate whether the extent of skin involvement, stigmatization, and perceived social support are related to depressive symptoms in psoriasis patients.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: One hundred and forty-eight psoriasis patients completed in the BSA, the Beck Depression Inventory, Stigmatization Scale, and Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support.
RESULTS: Almost 13% of participants obtained a BDI total score indicating moderate depressive symptoms. The results of regression analysis revealed that greater depression severity in psoriasis patients is associated with higher levels of psoriasis-related stigma, lower perceived social support, female gender and a shorter duration of the disease, explaining 43% of the variance of depression. The stigmatization was the most powerful predictor of depressive symptoms for psoriasis patients and accounted for 33% of the variance.
CONCLUSIONS: The extent of psoriasis does not directly lead to mood disturbance in these patients. Rather, social stigma accounted for this relationship. Strategies for reducing the stigma attached to patients with psoriasis are required.

Entities:  

Keywords:  depression; psoriasis; social support; stigma

Year:  2017        PMID: 28261029      PMCID: PMC5329101          DOI: 10.5114/pdia.2016.62286

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Postepy Dermatol Alergol        ISSN: 1642-395X            Impact factor:   1.837


Introduction

Psoriasis is a chronic, immune-dependent and inflammatory skin disease, affecting men and women equally. Prevalence estimates suggest the incidence of psoriasis is approximately 2% of the general population [1]. In developed countries the incidence of illness is estimated at about 4.6% [1]. Psoriasis may involve all sites of the body and has a serious impact on the patients’ lives and well-being [2-5]. That impact is often higher than in other chronic diseases [6]. Burden of the disease extends beyond the physical symptoms experienced by patients. These components are rarely recognized among clinicians [7]. Previous studies accentuated a disconcertingly high percentage of various psychological problems in this group [3, 4]. Problems in daily life including experiences of humiliation and rejection, negative impact on the employment capacity, career prospects and earning potential, contribute to the cumulative impact of psoriasis on patients’ lives [2-4]. Stigmatization and other social difficulties may exacerbate negative emotions, maladaptive thought processes (e.g. defectiveness), unfavourable self-perceptions (e.g. lowered self-esteem and negative body image), and negative behaviour patterns (e.g. excessive social avoidance). Consequently, psychosocial comorbidities including depression, suicide ideation, anxiety, sexual dysfunctions, and alcohol addiction are fairly common among psoriasis patients [3, 8, 9]. Accumulation of physical, psychological, socioeconomic burden across a lifetime, along with the impact of psoriasis on minor and major life-changing decisions, has the potential to change substantially the trajectory of a patient’s life so that it differs highly from what it might have been in the absence of the disease [3, 4]. Nevertheless, depression and other psychosocial comorbidities are not always proportional to the disease severity. Studies which examine the impact of psoriasis on patients’ lives indicate that the relationship between the severity of the disease and the degree of deterioration in quality of life and mental health of patients is weak [10-12]. Based on the Stress-Coping Model of Maes et al. [13], patient’s own underlying perceptions of illness, body shame, and negative experiences of social interaction may have a particular importance in coping with the disease. These factors are often unexplored by physicians. Moreover, Tabolli et al. found that patients and physicians may differ in the assessment of the disease severity [14]. Divergent assessments and beliefs about the impact of psoriasis on patients’ day-to-day life can affect the doctor-patient relationship, and health care through unwillingness to the health care system, or distrust of prescribed therapies [15]. Thus, in this study we emphasize the importance of the role of patients’ subjective assessment of the disease severity. Furthermore, for this group of patients social support may be of particular importance. As was mentioned earlier, skin diseases such as psoriasis still arouse aversion and intolerance [2–4, 16]. We assumed that social support might be a substantial factor buffering the negative consequences of the diseases such as stigmatization and relegation to the fringe of society. Friends and relatives providing support resulting in enhanced self-esteem and approval may play an important role in better adaptation to the disease [17].

Aim

This study examined the role of subjective assessment of severity and symptoms perception, experiences of stigmatization, perceived social support in depressive symptoms among patients with psoriasis.

Material and methods

Participants and procedure

This study was conducted among psoriasis outpatients. Self-report questionnaires with instructions for completing were distributed over the Internet in cooperation with 6 psoriasis associations from all over Poland. Besides, a paper version was available to those patients without access to the Internet. To obtain permission to participate in the study, patients were provided with information about the purpose and scope of the study. The survey was anonymous, no incentive has been offered. The inclusion criteria were age ≥ 18 years and diagnosed psoriasis. A medical ethics review was not required according to the local Medical Review Ethics Committee. The recruitment took place between November 2014 and December 2014. The Internet-based surveys have become more popular in the recent years. Relevant advantages of Internet-based surveys concern to not being dependent on keeping appointments, increased disclosure and decreased social desirability bias [18]. Overall, findings show that paper-and-pencil and Internet data collection methods are generally equivalent and may serve as an advantageous and reliable methodology [19, 20].

Measures

Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)

The BDI is a self-report scale consisting of 21 items about how the subject has been feeling in the last 2 weeks. Each of the 21 items corresponding to symptoms of depression is summed to give a total score for the BDI. Higher total scores indicate more severe depressive symptoms [21, 22]. The Polish validated version shows good reliability and content validity [23]. The score of 0–11 indicates no or minimal depression; 12–26 mild depression; 27–49 moderate depression; and 50–63 severe depression. The reliability of the BDI in the present study was α = 0.92.

Stigmatization Scale

The Stigmatization Scale is a 6-item scale assessing the stigmatization caused by skin conditions [24]. Items are rated on a 4-point scale, ranging from 0 (Not at all) to 3 (Always), with higher scores reflecting greater experiences of stigmatization (total scores can range from 0 to 18). The Polish validated version of the scale was used [25]. Internal consistency of the scale in the current sample was α = 0.88.

Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS)

The MSPSS is a 12-item self-report measure assessing the perceived support from three domains: family, friends, and a significant other. The participants completing the MSPSS are asked to indicate their agreement with the items on a 7-point Likert-type scale, ranging from ‘very strongly disagree’ to ‘very strongly agree’. The sum of the three domains shows a global satisfaction with perceived social support. The MSPSS has proven to be psychometrically sound in diverse samples and to have good internal reliability, test-retest reliability, and robust factorial validity [26, 27]. In the current study internal consistency was good: α = 0.95, α = 0.91, α = 0.95 and α = 0.95 for Significant Other, Family, Friends, and Total support scales, respectively.

Body surface involvement

As in previous web-based studies [12, 28], the extent of psoriasis was defined based on self-reported body surface area involvement. Respondents were requested to estimate the surface area of their skin affected by psoriasis as a percentage of their total body surface, using the approximation that the palm of one hand represents 1% of the body surface area. Body surface area (BSA) is a simple and commonly used measure assessing the percentage of body surface involvement [12, 28, 29]. Mild involvement of skin with psoriasis is defined as 1–10% BSA, moderate to severe involvement > 10% BSA [30].

Additional questions

The items about medical data (as recognized by professionals: type of psoriasis, age at onset, the duration of the disease) and subjective evaluation of the effectiveness of the treatment were covered in the questionnaire. The remaining questions concerned the impact of psoriasis on patients’ life. Items were rated on a 5-point scale, ranging from 1 (Completely disagree) to 5 (Completely agree).

Statistical analysis

The data were analyzed using the statistical package Statistica, version 10 (StatSoft Inc.). Mann-Whitney U-test was used for group comparisons (the analyzed groups differed in size). Also, the effect size (r) was estimated. Effect sizes of 0.1, 0.3, and 0.5 are termed small, medium, and large, respectively [30]. Multiple regression analysis was used to identify predictors of depression in psoriasis patients.

Results

Patient characteristics

The final sample consisted of 148 psoriasis outpatients, 104 women and 44 men. Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of the sample are given in Table 1. Participants’ age range was 20–67 years (M = 34.64, SD = 11.82). The mean age at onset of psoriasis was 18.57 ±10.24 years, varying between 0 and 54 years of age. The mean duration of the disease was 16.07 ±11.65 years. Plaque psoriasis was the most common clinical type of psoriasis, which was present in 134 (90.5%) cases. Almost half of the respondents (45%) reported several types of psoriasis. Nail psoriasis occurred in 39% of participants. Sixty-one (41%) patients reported mild psoriasis (BSA ≤ 10%) and eighty-seven (59%) reported moderate to severe psoriasis (BSA > 10%).
Table 1

Sample characteristics (N = 148)

ParametrResult
Sex, n (%):
 Female104 (70.3)
 Male44 (29.7)
Age, mean ± SD [years]34.6 ±11.8
Marital status, n (%):
 Single53 (35.8)
 Married/cohabiting78 (52.7)
 Divorced12 (8.1)
 Widowed5 (3.4)
Work, n (%):
 Employed102 (68.9)
 Unemployed11 (7.4)
 Student21 (14.2)
 Retired14 (9.5)
Psoriasis, n (%):
 Plaque134 (90.5)
 Erythrodermic3 (2.0)
 Pustular30 (20.3)
 Psoriatic arthritis28 (18.9)
 Nail psoriasis58 (39.2)
Age at onset of psoriasis, mean ± SD [years]18.6 ±10.2
Duration of psoriasis, mean ± SD [years]16.1 ±11.7
BSA (body surface area), mean (range)20.8 (0–82)
Extent of skin involvement, n (%):
 BSA ≤ 10%61 (41.2)
 BSA > 10%87 (58.8)
Sample characteristics (N = 148) Most participants (60%) were not satisfied with the effectiveness of their treatment. Forty-three (30%) patients reported that their psoriasis had a strong impact on their family life, sixty-one (41%) reported negative impact on social life and forty (27%) on work and career. At the time of the study, 67 (45.3%) patients presented mild depressive symptoms, and 19 (12.8%) presented moderate depressive symptoms as defined by the BDI.

Comparison of women and men with psoriasis

No significant differences were found between men and women (Mann-Whitney U-test: p > 0.05). The results are shown in Table 2. Both women and men had similar levels of perceived social support from family, friends, and a significant other. Also, the groups did not differ significantly in age, extent of the disease, experiences of stigmatization, and duration of the disease. With respect to the BDI, women had higher BDI scores than men, indicating more severe depressive symptoms, although the observed differences were not statistically significant (p = 0.09), the calculated effect size is 0.14, which is considered “small”. It is not particularly big, but it is certainly nontrivial [31].
Table 2

Comparison of women and men with psoriasis

ParameterWomen (n = 104)Men (n = 44)Mann-Whitney U-testP-valuer
Mean rankMean rank
Age73.277.52155.00.580.05
Extent of psoriasis (BSA)74.973.62248.00.870.01
Duration of the disease74.674.22276.00.960.00
Experiences of stigmatization74.973.52244.00.850.02
Depression78.465.31881.00.090.14
Family social support75.771.62159.50.590.04
Friend social support77.766.91952.50.160.12
Significant other social support77.667.11964.50.170.11
Global perceived social support77.766.91952.00.160.12
Comparison of women and men with psoriasis

Predictors of depression in psoriasis patients

A stepwise multiple regression was used to identify predictors of depression. This multiple regression analysis examined the total score of the BDI as the dependent variable, with sex, extent of psoriasis, duration of the disease, perceived global social support and experiences of stigmatization as independent variables (Table 3).
Table 3

Results of multiple regression analysis of depression (N = 148)

VariableDepression
βΔR2FP-value
Experiences of stigmatization0.5033.372.89< 0.00001
Global social support–0.305.713.59< 0.0001
Sex (female)0.172.76.670.009
Duration of the disease–0.151.94.880.021
BSA0.111.12.92NS
Model characteristicsAdj. R 2 = 0.43; F (5,142) = 23.0; p < 0.00001
Results of multiple regression analysis of depression (N = 148) Regression analysis revealed that female sex (β = 0.17, p < 0.01), duration of the disease (β = – 0.15, p < 0.05), perceived global social support (β = – 0.30, p < 0.0001) and experiences of stigmatization (β = 0.50, p < 0.00001) were significant predictors of depressive symptoms, explaining 43% of the variance of depression. The stigmatization was the most powerful predictor of depression and accounted for 33% of the variance. The extent of the disease (BSA) did not make a significant contribution to the variance in depressive symptoms (p = 0.090). Summarizing, the regression analysis indicated that greater depression severity in psoriasis patients is associated with higher levels of psoriasis-related stigma, lower perceived social support, female gender, and a shorter duration of the disease.

Discussion

The results of the present study revealed that greater depression severity in patients with psoriasis is associated with higher levels of stigmatization, lower perceived social support, female gender, and a shorter duration of the disease. Stigmatization emerged as the most powerful predictor of depressive symptoms for psoriasis patients. It is worth noting that stigmatization is related to the fear of social rejection and deprivation of the basic need for belonging [32]. Experiences of humiliation may have a high impact on patient’s self-esteem, which in turn might contribute to developing negative self-beliefs about themselves. Chronicity of the rejection and stigmatization may lead to painful and negative emotions (particularly sadness, loneliness, and anger), and in consequence, as we have pointed out, negative mental health outcomes. Stigmatizing attitudes toward people with psoriasis may be due to lack of knowledge. Psoriasis is still perceived as contagious disease and a result of poor personal hygiene [33]. Therefore, according to Weiner’s attributional theory, the more a person is assessed as responsible for their condition, the higher affective reactions of hostility and anger prevail and the stronger the rejection is [34, 35]. Feelings of shame and stigmatization can lead to social avoidance and withdrawal, which in turn might result in a smaller social support network and the capability of receiving adequate support. Picardi et al. [36] pointed out that patients with psoriasis compared to those with other dermatological diseases, reported lower levels of perceived social support. The social support, as important social resources for an individual to cope with stressful life events, can buffer psychological distress and have beneficial effects on people’s mental health [17]. Correspondingly, our findings indicate that higher perceived social support is related to lower risk of depressive symptoms in psoriasis patients. Social support may provide a counterweight to negative experiences through reminder that an individual has important, supportive relationships and, thus, it helps to restore a sense of belonging. The findings from the regression analysis also showed that women have a higher risk of depressive symptoms. This result is in line with some previous outcomes suggesting that women may suffer more from psoriasis than men [29]. Psoriasis is a disease closely related to appearance concerns, and therefore, presented outcome may be due to appearance norms for women which are more rigid, homogeneous and pervasive than those for men [37]. It should be emphasized that women are more frequently valued and assessed by their appearance than men [38, 39]. Thus, especially among women suffering from psoriasis, everyday exposure to norms and social pressure may exacerbate negative emotions, maladaptive thoughts, and in consequence negative mental health outcomes. The cognitive processes linking self-image, illness representation, beliefs about impression formation and the reactions of others seem to be main problems to be considered in further research. In line with previous studies [10, 11, 29, 40], there was no significant relationship between the disease severity and depression. Thus, severity of psoriasis is a weak predictor of depression in psoriasis patients. But, we noted that duration of the disease was inversely related to the BDI scores. The result suggests that the disease duration might be related to lower levels of depression and better adaptation to living with the disease. A somewhat different result was obtained in previous research [40]. The disease duration had been found to be unrelated to depressive symptoms. Further studies are needed to provide a better insight into the associations between duration of psoriasis, depressive symptoms, adaptation and acceptance of life with the disease. In addition to physical problems, psoriasis significantly affects mental and emotional functioning. The results of our study suggest that nearly 13% of participants obtained a BDI total score indicating moderate depressive symptoms. Physicians should increase awareness of the broad impact of psoriasis on patients’ life. Recognition of the psychological impact of psoriasis seems to be essential as the first step towards improving care. It is important to evaluate the symptoms of depressive disorders in patients with psoriasis, as they represent substantial morbidity that can be improved with a variety of pharmacological and nonpharmacological approaches. Psychosocial burden is rarely reflected by physicians’ objective assessment of the severity of psoriasis [7, 10] and, as a result, the overall severity of the disease may be underestimated. Patients are constructing their own representation of illness according to their experiences, personal world views and social contexts [13], which may result in divergent beliefs and expectations in the physician-patient relationship. Agreement between the clinician and the patient is a key factor that may influence health outcomes [15]. When interpreting the findings of our study, several limitations have to be kept in mind. This study was conducted over the Internet. Web-based surveys might serve as an advantageous and reliable methodology, and allow to decrease possible social desirability bias [19, 20]. There are, however, some limitations while conducting surveys over the Internet. In this data collection method only self-reported measure of the extent of the disease might be obtained. Similarly, as in previous studies [12, 28], subjective assessments based on body surface coverage have been used. The BSA enables to define the body surface area affected, but is not a complete assessment of disease severity. Objective measures of the extent of psoriasis would be preferable. Future research might extend the current results taking into account the assessment of psoriasis severity measured by clinician and patient’s self-report. A subsequent limitation of our study is a relatively small sample of men with psoriasis, women accounted for 70% of the sample. Men may show different patterns of results, which should be investigated in further research. Moreover, the cross-sectional design of the present study does not allow for causal conclusions. Consequently, replication is warranted.

Conclusions

This study provides some insight into the relationship between the extent of psoriasis and depression. Our findings highlight that patients with psoriasis with low perceived social support and high levels of experiences of stigmatization have a higher risk of depressive symptoms. Therefore, identifying patients receiving low social support, with strong experiences of stigmatization may help to recognize those people who are at risk for depression. Moreover, reducing stigma and discrimination related to skin disorders seems to be an indispensable step towards improving mental health in patients with psoriasis.
  33 in total

1.  Risk among men who have sex with men in the United States: a comparison of an Internet sample and a conventional outreach sample.

Authors:  Scott D Rhodes; Ralph J DiClemente; Heather Cecil; Kenneth C Hergenrather; Leland J Yee
Journal:  AIDS Educ Prev       Date:  2002-02

Review 2.  Methodological and ethical issues in Internet-mediated research in the field of health: an integrated review of the literature.

Authors:  Lisa Claire Whitehead
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2007-05-23       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  The role of the media in body image concerns among women: a meta-analysis of experimental and correlational studies.

Authors:  Shelly Grabe; L Monique Ward; Janet Shibley Hyde
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 17.737

4.  Doctor-patient communication: a review.

Authors:  Jennifer Fong Ha; Nancy Longnecker
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2010

5.  An attributional analysis of reactions to stigmas.

Authors:  B Weiner; R P Perry; J Magnusson
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1988-11

Review 6.  The prevalence and odds of depressive symptoms and clinical depression in psoriasis patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Emmilia A Dowlatshahi; Marlies Wakkee; Lidia R Arends; Tamar Nijsten
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 8.551

7.  Examination of the equivalence of self-report survey-based paper-and-pencil and internet data collection methods.

Authors:  Arne Weigold; Ingrid K Weigold; Elizabeth J Russell
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2013-03

8.  Psychological distress and coping strategies in patients with psoriasis: the PSYCHAE Study.

Authors:  A Finzi; D Colombo; A Caputo; L Andreassi; S Chimenti; G Vena; L Simoni; S Sgarbi; A Giannetti
Journal:  J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 6.166

9.  Social support and adaptation to the disease in men and women with psoriasis.

Authors:  Konrad Janowski; Stanisława Steuden; Aldona Pietrzak; Dorota Krasowska; Lukasz Kaczmarek; Ilona Gradus; Grażyna Chodorowska
Journal:  Arch Dermatol Res       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 3.017

10.  Psoriasis and psycho-dermatology.

Authors:  Hee-Sun Moon; Alexandra Mizara; Sandy R McBride
Journal:  Dermatol Ther (Heidelb)       Date:  2013-07-10
View more
  8 in total

1.  Chronic Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus: Depression Burden and Associated Factors.

Authors:  Jennifer Hong; Laura Aspey; Gaobin Bao; Tamara Haynes; S Sam Lim; Cristina Drenkard
Journal:  Am J Clin Dermatol       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 7.403

2.  Common Fundamentals of Psoriasis and Depression.

Authors:  Stefanie Hölsken; Frederik Krefting; Manfred Schedlowski; Wiebke Sondermann
Journal:  Acta Derm Venereol       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 3.875

3.  Correlation Between Quality of Life and Depression Among Persons Suffering from Psoriasis.

Authors:  Jasmina Mahmutovic; Mufida Zukic; Arzija Pasalic; Suada Brankovic; Amila Jaganjac; Bakir Katana
Journal:  Med Arch       Date:  2017-10

4.  Quality-of-Life Impairment among Patients with Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Cross-Sectional Study of 1795 Patients.

Authors:  Piotr K Krajewski; Łukasz Matusiak; Esther von Stebut; Michael Schultheis; Uwe Kirschner; Georgios Nikolakis; Jacek C Szepietowski
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-08

5.  Freedom from disease in psoriasis: a Delphi consensus definition by patients, nurses and physicians.

Authors:  I van Ee; E Deprez; A Egeberg; M Augustin; C Conrad; V Corazza; L Donati; J Lambert; R Lăpădatu; A Meyer; C Paul; R Penzer-Hick; K Stephen; J van der Zon; A Bewley
Journal:  J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol       Date:  2021-12-27       Impact factor: 9.228

6.  Depression, stigma and social isolation: the psychosocial trifecta of primary chronic cutaneous lupus erythematosus, a cross-sectional and path analysis.

Authors:  Cristina Drenkard; Kristina A Theis; Timothy T Daugherty; Charles G Helmick; Charmayne Dunlop-Thomas; Gaobin Bao; Laura Aspey; Tené T Lewis; S Sam Lim
Journal:  Lupus Sci Med       Date:  2022-08

Review 7.  The Burden of Living With Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus.

Authors:  Cristina Drenkard; Kamil E Barbour; Kurt J Greenlund; S Sam Lim
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-08-08

Review 8.  The psychosocial adaptation of patients with skin disease: a scoping review.

Authors:  Xiu-Jie Zhang; Ai-Ping Wang; Tie-Ying Shi; Jun Zhang; Hui Xu; Da-Qiu Wang; Li Feng
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 3.295

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.