Literature DB >> 2825977

Sister chromatid exchanges, chromosomal aberrations, and cytotoxicity produced by antitumor topoisomerase II inhibitors in sensitive (DC3F) and resistant (DC3F/9-OHE) Chinese hamster cells.

Y Pommier1, D Kerrigan, J M Covey, C S Kao-Shan, J Whang-Peng.   

Abstract

4'-(9-Acridinylamino)methanesulfon-m-anisidide, etoposide, and 2-methyl-9-hydroxyellipticinium are antitumor topoisomerase II (topo II) inhibitors. The relationship between drug-induced sister chromatid exchanges (SCEs) or chromosomal aberrations and cytotoxicity was investigated in Chinese hamster cells sensitive (DC3F) and resistant (DC3F/9-OHE) to topo II inhibitors. Thirty-min drug treatments produced SCEs and chromosomal aberrations in sensitive (DC3F) cells, 4'-(9-acridinylamino)methanesulfon-m-anisidide being more potent than etoposide or 2-methyl-9-hydroxyellipticinium at equimolar concentrations. Comparable treatments of resistant (DC3F/9-OHE) cells did not produce chromosomal damage. The cytotoxicity of 4'-(9-Acridinylamino)-methanesulfon-m-anisidide was also greater than that of etoposide or 2-methyl-9-hydroxyellipticinium in DC3F cells, and no cytotoxicity was observed in DC3F/9-OHE at drug concentrations that produced more than two logs of cell kill in DC3F cells. A plot of cytotoxicity versus SCEs showed a good correlation between the two parameters. Therefore, short treatments of mammalian cells with topo II inhibitors produce reversible topo II-mediated DNA breaks which are associated with chromosomal aberrations and SCEs whose number correlates with cytotoxicity. In addition, topo II mutant DC3F/9-OHE cells were more sensitive than DC3F cells to the chromosomal, DNA cross-linking and cytotoxic effects of mitomycin C and were equally sensitive to the cytotoxic effect of camptothecin.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 2825977

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  7 in total

1.  Endonuclease cleavage of blocked replication forks: An indirect pathway of DNA damage from antitumor drug-topoisomerase complexes.

Authors:  George Hong; Kenneth N Kreuzer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-04-18       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  DNA topoisomerases and their poisoning by anticancer and antibacterial drugs.

Authors:  Yves Pommier; Elisabetta Leo; HongLiang Zhang; Christophe Marchand
Journal:  Chem Biol       Date:  2010-05-28

Review 3.  Topoisomerases, new targets in cancer chemotherapy.

Authors:  J G Zijlstra; S de Jong; E G de Vries; N H Mulder
Journal:  Med Oncol Tumor Pharmacother       Date:  1990

4.  Etoposide (VP-16-213)-induced gene alterations: potential contribution to cell death.

Authors:  N A Berger; S Chatterjee; J A Schmotzer; S R Helms
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1991-10-01       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  DNA topoisomerase I and II in cancer chemotherapy: update and perspectives.

Authors:  Y Pommier
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.333

6.  Repair of topoisomerase-mediated DNA damage in bacteriophage T4.

Authors:  B A Stohr; K N Kreuzer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 7.  Utility of a next-generation framework for assessment of genomic damage: A case study using the pharmaceutical drug candidate etoposide.

Authors:  John Nicolette; Mirjam Luijten; Jennifer C Sasaki; Laura Custer; Michelle Embry; Roland Froetschl; George Johnson; Gladys Ouedraogo; Raja Settivari; Veronique Thybaud; Kerry L Dearfield
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2021-11-22       Impact factor: 3.579

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.