Lauren J Breen1, Moira O'Connor2, Samuel Calder2, Vivian Tai2, Jade Cartwright2,3, Janet M Beilby2. 1. School of Psychology and Speech Pathology, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth, WA, 6845, Australia. Lauren.Breen@curtin.edu.au. 2. School of Psychology and Speech Pathology, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth, WA, 6845, Australia. 3. Centre for Neuroscience of Speech, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The aim was to identify the views of Australian and New Zealand health professionals regarding the support needs of people with head and neck cancer (HNC) and their families and current gaps in service delivery. METHODS: A modified Delphi process assessed support needs of people with HNC following acute medical management. A systematic review of the literature was used to develop items relevant to seven key concepts underpinning the psychological experience of living with HNC. A panel of 105 health professionals was invited to participate in two questionnaire rounds. RESULTS: Of the potential panellists, 50 (48%) completed round 1, and of these, 39 (78%) completed round 2. Following two rounds, there was consensus agreement on the concepts uncertainty and waiting, disruption to daily life and fear of recurrence. The concepts the diminished self, making sense of and managing the experience, sharing the burden and finding a path did not achieve consensus. There were no differences in responses according to gender, organization type or location. Medical professionals had significantly higher agreement for the concept uncertainty and waiting compared to allied health professionals, and professionals with five years' or more experience had significantly higher agreement than those with less experience. CONCLUSIONS: Health professionals agreed that many psychosocial support needs of HNC survivors and families are not being met and that they experience difficulties in meeting these needs. Findings may inform evidence-based treatment programs for HNC survivors and their families to promote psychological resilience and quality of life in this vulnerable population.
PURPOSE: The aim was to identify the views of Australian and New Zealand health professionals regarding the support needs of people with head and neck cancer (HNC) and their families and current gaps in service delivery. METHODS: A modified Delphi process assessed support needs of people with HNC following acute medical management. A systematic review of the literature was used to develop items relevant to seven key concepts underpinning the psychological experience of living with HNC. A panel of 105 health professionals was invited to participate in two questionnaire rounds. RESULTS: Of the potential panellists, 50 (48%) completed round 1, and of these, 39 (78%) completed round 2. Following two rounds, there was consensus agreement on the concepts uncertainty and waiting, disruption to daily life and fear of recurrence. The concepts the diminished self, making sense of and managing the experience, sharing the burden and finding a path did not achieve consensus. There were no differences in responses according to gender, organization type or location. Medical professionals had significantly higher agreement for the concept uncertainty and waiting compared to allied health professionals, and professionals with five years' or more experience had significantly higher agreement than those with less experience. CONCLUSIONS: Health professionals agreed that many psychosocial support needs of HNC survivors and families are not being met and that they experience difficulties in meeting these needs. Findings may inform evidence-based treatment programs for HNC survivors and their families to promote psychological resilience and quality of life in this vulnerable population.
Entities:
Keywords:
Head and neck cancer; Health professionals; Psychosocial support needs; Survivorship
Authors: Jacques Ferlay; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Rajesh Dikshit; Sultan Eser; Colin Mathers; Marise Rebelo; Donald Maxwell Parkin; David Forman; Freddie Bray Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2014-10-09 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Kaaren J Watts; Louise H Good; Sandy McKiernan; Lisa Miller; Moira O'Connor; Robert Kane; Deborah J Kruger; Bree R Adams; Toni Musiello Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2015-10-17 Impact factor: 3.359
Authors: Judith E Raber-Durlacher; Mike T Brennan; Irma M Verdonck-de Leeuw; Rachel J Gibson; June G Eilers; Tuomas Waltimo; Casper P Bots; Marisol Michelet; Thomas P Sollecito; Tanya S Rouleau; Aniel Sewnaik; Rene-Jean Bensadoun; Monica C Fliedner; Sol Silverman; Fred K L Spijkervet Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2011-12-29 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: I C van der Meulen; A M May; J R J de Leeuw; R Koole; M Oosterom; G-J Hordijk; W J G Ros Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2013-11-26 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Sarah-May Blaschke; Sylvie D Lambert; Patricia M Livingston; Sanchia Aranda; Anna Boltong; Penelope Schofield; Suzanne K Chambers; Meinir Krishnasamy; Anna Ugalde Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2019-02-13 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Rebecca L Venchiarutti; Masako Dunn; Emma Charters; Kai Cheng; Catriona Froggatt; Payal Mukherjee; Christine Wallace; Dale Howes; David Leinkram; Jasvir Singh; Kevin Nguyen; Tsu-Hui Hubert Low; Sydney Ch'ng; James Wykes; Raymond Wu; Jonathan R Clark Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2022-09-20 Impact factor: 6.575