Sophie Emilia Huttmann1, Katharina Wilms1, Christine Hamm1, Friederike Sophie Magnet1, Wolfram Windisch1, Jan Hendrik Storre2,3. 1. Department of Pneumology, Cologne-Merheim Hospital, Kliniken der Stadt Koeln gGmbH, Witten/Herdecke University Hospital, Ostmerheimer Strasse 200, 51109, Cologne, Germany. 2. Department of Pneumology, Cologne-Merheim Hospital, Kliniken der Stadt Koeln gGmbH, Witten/Herdecke University Hospital, Ostmerheimer Strasse 200, 51109, Cologne, Germany. storrej@kliniken-koeln.de. 3. Department of Pneumology, University Medical Hospital, Freiburg, Germany. storrej@kliniken-koeln.de.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: A restful sleep is essential for regenerative processes and remains crucial for patients recovering from stressful periods in the intensive care unit. The current study aimed to assess sleep quality in critically ill patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation within a specialized weaning unit in hospital. METHODS: Tracheotomized subjects undergoing prolonged weaning from mechanical ventilation were included in the study. Polysomnography and gas exchange monitoring was performed during nocturnal ventilation. Subjective evaluation of sleep quality and health-related quality of life were also assessed. RESULTS: Nineteen subjects completed the study protocol. Sleep architecture was highly heterogeneous across individual subjects. Mean total sleep time (TST) was 273 ± 114 min, sleep efficacy 70 ± 23%, slow-wave sleep 25.7 ± 18.4%/TST, rapid eye movement sleep 9.6 ± 7.5%/TST, and arousal index 18.7 ± 12.4/h. No significant difference in sleep quality was found between subjects with successful (N = 7) or unsuccessful (N = 12) weaning. Bicarbonate levels were negatively correlated both with sleep efficacy and sleep quality, that latter of which was subjectively assessed by the subjects using a visual analogue scale. CONCLUSION: Subjects who were undergoing prolonged weaning from mechanical ventilation and admitted to a specialized weaning unit, showed reduced sleep quality with preservation of high amounts of slow-wave sleep.
INTRODUCTION: A restful sleep is essential for regenerative processes and remains crucial for patients recovering from stressful periods in the intensive care unit. The current study aimed to assess sleep quality in critically illpatients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation within a specialized weaning unit in hospital. METHODS: Tracheotomized subjects undergoing prolonged weaning from mechanical ventilation were included in the study. Polysomnography and gas exchange monitoring was performed during nocturnal ventilation. Subjective evaluation of sleep quality and health-related quality of life were also assessed. RESULTS: Nineteen subjects completed the study protocol. Sleep architecture was highly heterogeneous across individual subjects. Mean total sleep time (TST) was 273 ± 114 min, sleep efficacy 70 ± 23%, slow-wave sleep 25.7 ± 18.4%/TST, rapid eye movement sleep 9.6 ± 7.5%/TST, and arousal index 18.7 ± 12.4/h. No significant difference in sleep quality was found between subjects with successful (N = 7) or unsuccessful (N = 12) weaning. Bicarbonate levels were negatively correlated both with sleep efficacy and sleep quality, that latter of which was subjectively assessed by the subjects using a visual analogue scale. CONCLUSION: Subjects who were undergoing prolonged weaning from mechanical ventilation and admitted to a specialized weaning unit, showed reduced sleep quality with preservation of high amounts of slow-wave sleep.
Authors: Emelie Ekkernkamp; Lena Welte; Claudia Schmoor; Sophie Emilia Huttmann; Michael Dreher; Wolfram Windisch; Jan Hendrik Storre Journal: Respiration Date: 2015-03-18 Impact factor: 3.580
Authors: Jonathan Y Gabor; Andrew B Cooper; Shelley A Crombach; Bert Lee; Nisha Kadikar; Harald E Bettger; Patrick J Hanly Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2003-03-01 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: J-M Boles; J Bion; A Connors; M Herridge; B Marsh; C Melot; R Pearl; H Silverman; M Stanchina; A Vieillard-Baron; T Welte Journal: Eur Respir J Date: 2007-05 Impact factor: 16.671
Authors: Wolfram Windisch; Stephan Budweiser; Frank Heinemann; Michael Pfeifer; Peter Rzehak Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 2008-03-25 Impact factor: 6.437