Literature DB >> 28258145

Comparison of Fecal Collection Methods for Microbiota Studies in Bangladesh.

Emily Vogtmann1, Jun Chen2,3, Muhammad G Kibriya4, Yu Chen5, Tariqul Islam6, Mahbubul Eunes6, Alauddin Ahmed6, Jabun Naher6, Anisur Rahman6, Amnon Amir7, Jianxin Shi8, Christian C Abnet9, Heidi Nelson2,10, Rob Knight7,11, Nicholas Chia2,3,10,12, Habibul Ahsan4, Rashmi Sinha9.   

Abstract

To our knowledge, fecal microbiota collection methods have not been evaluated in low- and middle-income countries. Therefore, we evaluated five different fecal sample collection methods for technical reproducibility, stability, and accuracy within the Health Effects of Arsenic Longitudinal Study (HEALS) in Bangladesh. Fifty participants from the HEALS provided fecal samples in the clinic which were aliquoted into no solution, 95% ethanol, RNAlater, postdevelopment fecal occult blood test (FOBT) cards, and fecal immunochemical test (FIT) tubes. Half of the aliquots were frozen immediately at -80°C (day 0) and the remaining samples were left at ambient temperature for 96 h and then frozen (day 4). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated for the relative abundances of the top three phyla, for two alpha diversity measures, and for four beta diversity measures. The duplicate samples had relatively high ICCs for technical reproducibility at day 0 and day 4 (range, 0.79 to 0.99). The FOBT card and samples preserved in RNAlater and 95% ethanol had the highest ICCs for stability over 4 days. The FIT tube had lower stability measures overall. In comparison to the "gold standard" method using immediately frozen fecal samples with no solution, the ICCs for many of the microbial metrics were low, but the rank order appeared to be preserved as seen by the Spearman correlation. The FOBT cards, 95% ethanol, and RNAlater were effective fecal preservatives. These fecal collection methods are optimal for future cohort studies, particularly in low- and middle-income countries.IMPORTANCE The collection of fecal samples in prospective cohort studies is essential to provide the opportunity to study the effect of the human microbiota on numerous health conditions. However, these collection methods have not been adequately tested in low- and middle-income countries. We present estimates of technical reproducibility, stability at ambient temperature for 4 days, and accuracy comparing a "gold standard" for fecal samples in no solution, 95% ethanol, RNAlater, postdevelopment fecal occult blood test cards, and fecal immunochemical test tubes in a study conducted in Bangladesh. Fecal occult blood test cards and fecal samples stored in 95% ethanol or RNAlater adequately preserve fecal samples in this setting. Therefore, new studies in low- and middle-income countries should include collection of fecal samples using fecal occult blood test cards, 95% ethanol, or RNAlater for prospective cohort studies.
Copyright © 2017 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  feces; low/middle-income countries; microbiota; sampling methods; stability

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28258145      PMCID: PMC5411505          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.00361-17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  30 in total

1.  Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with ARB.

Authors:  T Z DeSantis; P Hugenholtz; N Larsen; M Rojas; E L Brodie; K Keller; T Huber; D Dalevi; P Hu; G L Andersen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Comparison of Collection Methods for Fecal Samples in Microbiome Studies.

Authors:  Emily Vogtmann; Jun Chen; Amnon Amir; Jianxin Shi; Christian C Abnet; Heidi Nelson; Rob Knight; Nicholas Chia; Rashmi Sinha
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Relating the metatranscriptome and metagenome of the human gut.

Authors:  Eric A Franzosa; Xochitl C Morgan; Nicola Segata; Levi Waldron; Joshua Reyes; Ashlee M Earl; Georgia Giannoukos; Matthew R Boylan; Dawn Ciulla; Dirk Gevers; Jacques Izard; Wendy S Garrett; Andrew T Chan; Curtis Huttenhower
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Health Effects of Arsenic Longitudinal Study (HEALS): description of a multidisciplinary epidemiologic investigation.

Authors:  Habibul Ahsan; Yu Chen; Faruque Parvez; Maria Argos; Azm Iftikhar Hussain; Hassina Momotaj; Diane Levy; Alexander van Geen; Geoffrey Howe; Joseph Graziano
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 5.563

5.  Fecal collection, ambient preservation, and DNA extraction for PCR amplification of bacterial and human markers from human feces.

Authors:  Jordan M Nechvatal; Jeffrey L Ram; Marc D Basson; Phanramphoei Namprachan; Stephanie R Niec; Kawsar Z Badsha; Larry H Matherly; Adhip P N Majumdar; Ikuko Kato
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2007-11-21       Impact factor: 2.363

6.  Comparison of methods for fecal microbiome biospecimen collection.

Authors:  Christine Dominianni; Jing Wu; Richard B Hayes; Jiyoung Ahn
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 3.605

7.  The microbiome quality control project: baseline study design and future directions.

Authors:  Rashmi Sinha; Christian C Abnet; Owen White; Rob Knight; Curtis Huttenhower
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 13.583

8.  Disentangling type 2 diabetes and metformin treatment signatures in the human gut microbiota.

Authors:  Kristoffer Forslund; Falk Hildebrand; Trine Nielsen; Gwen Falony; Emmanuelle Le Chatelier; Shinichi Sunagawa; Edi Prifti; Sara Vieira-Silva; Valborg Gudmundsdottir; Helle K Pedersen; Manimozhiyan Arumugam; Karsten Kristiansen; Anita Yvonne Voigt; Henrik Vestergaard; Rajna Hercog; Paul Igor Costea; Jens Roat Kultima; Junhua Li; Torben Jørgensen; Florence Levenez; Joël Dore; H Bjørn Nielsen; Søren Brunak; Jeroen Raes; Torben Hansen; Jun Wang; S Dusko Ehrlich; Peer Bork; Oluf Pedersen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Storage conditions of intestinal microbiota matter in metagenomic analysis.

Authors:  Silvia Cardona; Anat Eck; Montserrat Cassellas; Milagros Gallart; Carmen Alastrue; Joel Dore; Fernando Azpiroz; Joaquim Roca; Francisco Guarner; Chaysavanh Manichanh
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 3.605

10.  Methods for Improving Human Gut Microbiome Data by Reducing Variability through Sample Processing and Storage of Stool.

Authors:  Monika A Gorzelak; Sandeep K Gill; Nishat Tasnim; Zahra Ahmadi-Vand; Michael Jay; Deanna L Gibson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  26 in total

1.  Habitual Diet Pattern Associations with Gut Microbiome Diversity and Composition: Results from a Chinese Adult Cohort.

Authors:  Yuhan Zhang; Hongda Chen; Ming Lu; Jie Cai; Bin Lu; Chenyu Luo; Min Dai
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-06-25       Impact factor: 6.706

2.  Reproducibility of assessing fecal microbiota in chronic constipation.

Authors:  G Parthasarathy; J Chen; N Chia; H M O'Connor; H R Gaskins; A E Bharucha
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 3.598

3.  The colorectal cancer-associated faecal microbiome of developing countries resembles that of developed countries.

Authors:  Caroline Young; Henry M Wood; Ramakrishnan Ayloor Seshadri; Pham Van Nang; Carlos Vaccaro; Luis Contreras Melendez; Mayilvahanan Bose; Mai Van Doi; Tamara Alejandra Piñero; Camilo Tapia Valladares; Julieta Arguero; Alba Fuentes Balaguer; Kelsey N Thompson; Yan Yan; Curtis Huttenhower; Philip Quirke
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 11.117

4.  The Human Microbiome in Relation to Cancer Risk: A Systematic Review of Epidemiologic Studies.

Authors:  Inge Huybrechts; Semi Zouiouich; Astrid Loobuyck; Zeger Vandenbulcke; Emily Vogtmann; Silvia Pisanu; Isabel Iguacel; Augustin Scalbert; Iciar Indave; Vitaly Smelov; Marc J Gunter; Nathalie Michels
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Comparison of Oral Collection Methods for Studies of Microbiota.

Authors:  Emily Vogtmann; Jun Chen; Muhammad G Kibriya; Amnon Amir; Jianxin Shi; Yu Chen; Tariqul Islam; Mahbubul Eunes; Alauddin Ahmed; Jabun Naher; Anisur Rahman; Bhaswati Barmon; Rob Knight; Nicholas Chia; Habibul Ahsan; Christian C Abnet; Rashmi Sinha
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2018-09-27       Impact factor: 4.090

6.  Microbiome Analysis of More Than 2,000 NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme Samples Shows the Potential to Improve Screening Accuracy.

Authors:  Caroline Young; Henry M Wood; Alba Fuentes Balaguer; Daniel Bottomley; Niall Gallop; Lyndsay Wilkinson; Sally C Benton; Martin Brealey; Cerin John; Carole Burtonwood; Kelsey N Thompson; Yan Yan; Jennifer H Barrett; Eva J A Morris; Curtis Huttenhower; Philip Quirke
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 13.801

7.  Next steps in studying the human microbiome and health in prospective studies, Bethesda, MD, May 16-17, 2017.

Authors:  Rashmi Sinha; Habibul Ahsan; Martin Blaser; J Gregory Caporaso; Joseph Russell Carmical; Andrew T Chan; Anthony Fodor; Mitchell H Gail; Curtis C Harris; Kathy Helzlsouer; Curtis Huttenhower; Rob Knight; Heidi H Kong; Gabriel Y Lai; Diane Leigh Smith Hutchinson; Loic Le Marchand; Hongzhe Li; Michael J Orlich; Jianxin Shi; Ann Truelove; Mukesh Verma; Emily Vogtmann; Owen White; Walter Willett; Wei Zheng; Somdat Mahabir; Christian Abnet
Journal:  Microbiome       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 14.650

8.  Interpersonal Variations in Gut Microbiota Profiles Supersedes the Effects of Differing Fecal Storage Conditions.

Authors:  Caspar Bundgaard-Nielsen; Søren Hagstrøm; Suzette Sørensen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Association of Body Mass Index with Fecal Microbial Diversity and Metabolites in the Northern Finland Birth Cohort.

Authors:  Erikka Loftfield; Karl-Heinz Herzig; Marjo-Riitta Järvelin; Rashmi Sinha; J Gregory Caporaso; Andriy Derkach; Yunhu Wan; Doratha A Byrd; Emily Vogtmann; Minna Männikkö; Ville Karhunen; Rob Knight; Marc J Gunter
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2020-08-27       Impact factor: 4.090

10.  The Southern Bluefin Tuna Mucosal Microbiome Is Influenced by Husbandry Method, Net Pen Location, and Anti-parasite Treatment.

Authors:  Jeremiah J Minich; Cecilia Power; Michaela Melanson; Rob Knight; Claire Webber; Kirsten Rough; Nathan J Bott; Barbara Nowak; Eric E Allen
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 5.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.