Literature DB >> 28257491

The association between adult attained height and sitting height with mortality in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC).

Norie Sawada1,2, Petra A Wark1, Melissa A Merritt1, Shoichiro Tsugane2, Heather A Ward1, Sabina Rinaldi3, Elisabete Weiderpass4,5,6,7, Laureen Dartois8, Mathilde His8, Marie-Christine Boutron-Ruault8, Renée Turzanski-Fortner9, Rudolf Kaaks9, Kim Overvad10,11, María-Luisa Redondo12, Noemie Travier13, Elena Molina-Portillo14,15, Miren Dorronsoro16, Lluis Cirera17, Eva Ardanaz15,18,19, Aurora Perez-Cornago20, Antonia Trichopoulou21,22, Pagona Lagiou21,22,23, Elissavet Valanou21, Giovanna Masala24, Valeria Pala25, Petra Hm Peeters26, Yvonne T van der Schouw26, Olle Melander27, Jonas Manjer28, Marisa da Silva4, Guri Skeie4, Anne Tjønneland29, Anja Olsen29, Marc J Gunter3, Elio Riboli1, Amanda J Cross1.   

Abstract

Adult height and sitting height may reflect genetic and environmental factors, including early life nutrition, physical and social environments. Previous studies have reported divergent associations for height and chronic disease mortality, with positive associations observed for cancer mortality but inverse associations for circulatory disease mortality. Sitting height might be more strongly associated with insulin resistance; however, data on sitting height and mortality is sparse. Using the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition study, a prospective cohort of 409,748 individuals, we examined adult height and sitting height in relation to all-cause and cause-specific mortality. Height was measured in the majority of participants; sitting height was measured in ~253,000 participants. During an average of 12.5 years of follow-up, 29,810 deaths (11,931 from cancer and 7,346 from circulatory disease) were identified. Hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for death were calculated using multivariable Cox regression within quintiles of height. Height was positively associated with cancer mortality (men: HRQ5 vs. Q1 = 1.11, 95%CI = 1.00-1.24; women: HRQ5 vs. Q1 = 1.17, 95%CI = 1.07-1.28). In contrast, height was inversely associated with circulatory disease mortality (men: HRQ5 vs. Q1 = 0.63, 95%CI = 0.56-0.71; women: HRQ5 vs. Q1 = 0.81, 95%CI = 0.70-0.93). Although sitting height was not associated with cancer mortality, it was inversely associated with circulatory disease (men: HRQ5 vs. Q1 = 0.64, 95%CI = 0.55-0.75; women: HRQ5 vs. Q1 = 0.60, 95%CI = 0.49-0.74) and respiratory disease mortality (men: HRQ5 vs. Q1 = 0.45, 95%CI = 0.28-0.71; women: HRQ5 vs. Q1 = 0.60, 95%CI = 0.40-0.89). We observed opposing effects of height on cancer and circulatory disease mortality. Sitting height was inversely associated with circulatory disease and respiratory disease mortality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28257491      PMCID: PMC5336260          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Poor nutrition, illness and early life exposures may contribute to ill health in later life [1-3]; however, there is a paucity of data to explore such associations in prospective cohorts with extended follow-up of children. Adult height is an easily measured variable, and is thought to reflect both genetic and environmental factors including nutrition, physical and social environments in early life [4, 5]. The association between height and mortality has been investigated in previous studies. A meta-analysis of 121 cohort studies comprising over 1 million participants reported that height was inversely associated with risk of death from circulatory diseases such as coronary disease, stroke and heart failure [6]. In contrast, height was positively associated with risk of death from melanoma and cancers of the pancreas, endocrine and nervous systems, ovary, breast, prostate, colorectum, blood and lung [6]. Despite many studies investigating overall height and mortality, there have been few studies examining the association between sitting height and mortality. Higher sitting height is of interest because compared with adult height, sitting height may be more strongly positively associated with insulin resistance [7], and is positively associated with lung function, independently of height [8]; therefore, the effects of sitting height on mortality might be different from those of overall height. One cohort study reported that sitting height was positively associated with cancer mortality and inversely associated with death from circulatory disease [9], but others showed no association [7, 10–12]. To further knowledge on the association of height and health outcomes among adults, we examined whether adult height and sitting height were associated with overall and cause-specific mortality in a large prospective cohort of approximately half a million men and women from 10 European countries.

Methods

Study cohort

The European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) study includes 23 centres within 10 European countries (Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Spain, Sweden, and the United Kingdom (UK)). Most centres recruited from the general population living in defined towns and provinces. In Florence (Italy) and Utrecht (the Netherlands), however, participants undergoing breast cancer screening were recruited; parts of the Italian and Spanish cohorts were recruited among blood donors and their spouses; most of the Oxford cohort (UK) consisted of vegetarian and health-conscious volunteers; and female members of the health insurance scheme for state school employees were recruited in France. Between 1992 and 2000, 521,457 individuals (approximately 70% women, mostly 20–70 years old) were enrolled after providing written informed consent. Ethical approval for the EPIC study was obtained from the review boards of the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) and local participating centres. The cohort characteristics have been described in detail elsewhere [13, 14].

Exposure assessment

At recruitment, standardized questionnaires on lifestyle, demographic information and personal history were collected [13, 14]. Height was measured in participating centres to the nearest 0.1, 0.5, or 1.0 cm in participants without shoes on [15]. Norway was the only centre in which height was all self-reported; furthermore, height was only measured in 29% of the French and 13% of the Oxford cohort with the remainder of the participants self-reporting their height. Self-reported data on height tends to be overestimated, with the degree of overestimation being larger for shorter individuals and this also depends on age [15]. The self-reported data from the Oxford cohort were adjusted using earlier described sex-specific regression equations that incorporated age [15]; this was not done for the French cohort because the interval between the self-reported data and measurement was considered to be too long to do so reliably, thus only those participants with measured data were included. Sitting height was measured (the minimum unit was 0.1cm) in over 90% of participants in six countries (Italy, Spain, the Netherlands, Germany, Greece, Denmark) and in 29% of French participants.

Follow-up and endpoint assessment

Vital status, causes and dates of death were ascertained from population registries in Denmark, Italy (except Naples), the Netherlands, Norway, Spain, Sweden, and the UK. In Germany, Greece and Naples, this information was obtained by follow-up mailings or inquiries to municipal registries, regional health departments, physicians, and hospitals, and also by directly contacting their next-of-kin. In France, the causes and dates of death were obtained from the French Epidemiological Center for the Medical Causes of Death (CépiDc, Inserm). Mortality data were coded according to the 10th revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10). All-cause mortality included deaths from external causes. The codes for the underlying cause of death were classified as follows: circulatory (ICD-10: I00-I99), cancer (C00-C97), respiratory (J00-J99), other or not reported (all other codes). Additionally, cancers were classified as smoking-related cancers [16] (oral cavity (C00-06), pharynx (C10), nasopharynx (C11-13), oesophagus (C15), stomach (C16), colorectal (C18-20), liver (C22), bile duct (C24), pancreas (C25), larynx and lung (C32-34), uterine cervix (C53), ovarian (C56), kidney and renal pelvis, ureter and bladder (C64-68), and myeloid leukaemia (C92) [16]) and non-smoking-related cancers (all other cancers). Furthermore, circulatory disease was subdivided into ischaemic heart disease (I20-I25), myocardial infarction (I21), cerebrovascular disease (I60-I69), haemorrhagic stroke (I60-I62) and ischemic stroke (I63).

Statistical analysis

From the 521,457 participants recruited, those in a subsample in France (n = 52,809) and in the whole cohort in Norway (n = 37,185) were excluded because measured height was unavailable. Additionally, participants with missing questionnaire data (n = 1,286), missing dietary data (n = 6,627), missing all potential confounders (n = 3,127), without dates of death or follow-up information (n = 542) and those within the lowest and highest 1% of the cohort distribution of the ratio of reported total energy intake to energy requirements (n = 10,133) were excluded [17]. The final analytic cohort consisted of 409,748 individuals. For the analysis of sitting height, participants whose sitting height was not assessed were also excluded, leaving an analytic cohort for sitting height of 253,427 individuals. Cox proportional hazard regression models with age as the underlying time scale were used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association between height, sitting height and mortality risk. Height and sitting height were analysed as categorical variables defined by quintiles, and rounded off to the nearest 1 cm, and as continuous variables. Time at risk was estimated from the date of recruitment to the date of death, emigration, loss to follow-up, or the end of follow-up (a maximum through 2010, depending on centre), whichever occurred first. To control for differences in questionnaire design and follow-up procedures, all models were stratified by study centre. Models were further stratified by age at recruitment (continuous) to allow the form of the baseline hazard functions to vary across ages. All models were fitted for men and women separately, and adjusted for weight (kg, quintiles), combined recreational and household physical activity (inactive, moderately inactive, moderately active, active, unknown), alcohol consumption (0, >0–4, 5–14, 15–29, 30–59, ≥ 60 g/day), smoking status (never, former smokers (who quit <10 or ≥10 years ago), current smokers (1–14, 15–24 or ≥25 cigarettes per day), current smoker but amount missing (unknown smoking status), education level (none/primary school, technical or professional school, secondary school, university degree, not specified/missing) and energy intake (kcals/day, continuous). Moreover, the Cox models for women were further adjusted for menopausal status (pre, post-, peri-menopausal or unknown) and menopausal hormone use (yes, no, unknown). Potential non-linearity of the dose-response relationship was investigated using restricted cubic spline regression with knots placed at the 5th, 25th, 75th and 95th percentiles of height and corresponding likelihood ratio tests to compare the goodness-of-fit of the models with and without the spline terms [18, 19]. Because linearity could indeed be assumed, we computed a test for trend based on models with height and sitting height as a continuous variable. Finally, we conducted interaction analyses to examine the relation between sitting height and overall height in relation to mortality; for these analyses we categorized height and sitting height into tertiles (low, middle and high) and examined risks within each combined strata and calculated a P-value for the interaction term. In addition, we examined interaction terms for height (as a continuous variable, per 5cm increment) and all-cause and cause-specific mortality according to country, age at recruitment, body mass index (BMI), smoking status and alcohol intake. All reported P-values were two-sided and were regarded as statistically significant if P<0.05. The potential for multiple comparisons was addressed by examining Bonferroni correction; p = 0.004 (0.05/13 variables). All analyses were performed using Statistical Analysis Software (SAS version 9.1, SAS Institute, Cary, NC).

Results

After an average follow-up of 12.5 years (range 0.01–17.8), 29,810 participants (15,320 men and 14,490 women) had died from any cause among all 409,748 participants. Out of all deaths with a reported cause (n = 25,526), major causes were cancer (n = 11,931), diseases of the circulatory system (n = 7,346) and the respiratory tract (n = 1,266). Among participants with data on sitting height, there were 15,630 all-cause deaths, 6,909 deaths from cancer, and 3,656 deaths from circulatory diseases. Participants who were taller, compared with those who were shorter, were younger, heavier, had higher energy intakes and were more physically active. The proportion of current smokers was lower in taller men but there was a higher proportion of current smokers in taller women; furthermore, taller women were more likely to have a higher education level, consume higher levels of alcohol, to be premenopausal, and among post-menopausal women, were more likely to use menopausal hormones (Table 1). After excluding individuals without data for sitting height, the characteristics were similar to those with measured height (data not shown).
Table 1

Baseline characteristics according to height.

CharacteristicHeight
<168cm (n = 24,624)168-172cm (n = 32,317)173-175cm (n = 23,126)176-180cm (n = 35,141)≧181cm (n = 29,754)
%Median (10–90%)%Median (10–90%)%Median (10–90%)%Median (10–90%)%Median (10–90%)
MEN
  Age at recruitment (years)55.8 (42.9–67.5)54.0 (41.1–64.9)53.3 (40.1–64.2)52.3 (39.1–63.3)50.7 (32.7–61.6)
  Weight (g)73.0 (61.4–87.0)77.0 (65.5–91.2)79.4 (67.9–94.3)81.8 (70.0–97.2)86.5 (73.6–103.5)
  Education
    None135210.3
    Primary school completed4335312518
    Technical/professional school completed1823252726
    Secondary school completed912131417
    University1422263137
    Missing33332
  Smoking status
    Never smokers3031323437
    Former smokers3738383734
      Time since stopped smoking (years)13.0 (2.5–31.0)14.5 (3.0–31.0)14.5 (2.5–31.0)15.0 (2.5–30.5)14.0 (2.5–29.0)
      Duration of smoking (years)23 (8–40)21 (7–38)20 (6–37)20 (6–36)18 (5–34)
    Current smokers3230302828
      No. of cifarettes/day18 (4–31)18 (4–30)17 (5–30)17 (4–30)15 (4–30)
      Duration of smoking (years)34.5 (22.5–48)34.5 (21–46)34 (20.5–45.5)33.5 (19.5–45)32 (14.5–43.5)
    Missing22111
  Alcohol consumption (g/day)12.3 (0–5.19)12.6 (0.4–51.0)12.6 (0.6–50.9)12.5 (0.8–48.6)12.3 (0.9–48.1)
    Non-consumers117654
  Physical activity
    Active2124252526
  Total energy intake (kcal/day)2,262 (1,543–3,201)2,315 (1,599–3,248)2,337 (1,612–3,262)2,351 (1,627–3,298)2,439 (1,687–3,394)
<156cm (n = 48,547)156-159cm (n = 51,049)160-162cm (n = 47,088)163-167cm (n = 66,397)≧168cm (n = 51,705)
%Median (10–90%)%Median (10–90%)%Median (10–90%)%Median (10–90%)%Median (10–90%)
WOMEN
  Age at recruitment (years)54.6 (40.8–66.8)52.7 (38.6–64.6)51.7 (37.5–63.8)51.3 (36.4–63.1)50.0 (30.4–60.9)
  Weight (g)61.7 (50.1–78.1)62.5 (51.6–79.8)63.8 (53.1–81.0)65.5 (55.0–82.8)68.7 (58.2–86.0)
  Education
    None187320.4
    Primary school completed4032272215
    Technical/professional school completed1321252830
    Secondary school completed1316181921
    University1118222431
    Missing46553.6
  Smoking status
    Never smokers6759555250
    Former smokers1621242527
      Time since stopped smoking (years)14.0 (2.5–31.0)14.0 (2.5–30.0)14.0 (2.5–29.5)14.0 (2.5–29.0)13.0 (2.0–27.5)
      Duration of smoking (years)17.0 (4.0–34.0)16.0 (4.0–33.0)16.0 (4.0–32.0)15.0 (4.0–32.0)14.0 (4.0–31.0)
    Current smokers1619202123
      No. of cifarettes/day11.0 (3.0–21.0)11.0 (3.0–21.0)11.0 (3.0–21.0)12.0 (3.0–21.0)12.0 (3.0–21.0)
      Duration of smoking (years)27.0 (10.5–42.0)28.5 (15.5–42.5)29.5 (16.0–42.5)30.0 (15.5–42.0)29.0 (12.5–40.5)
    Missing11111
  Alcohol consumption (g/day)1.3 (0–17.7)2.8 (0–20.7)3.8 (0–22.7)4.5 (0–23.8)5.6 (0.2–25.6)
    Non-consumers201914118
  Physical activity
    Active914171923
  Total energy intake (kcal/day)1,808 (1,231–2,586)1,852 (1,282–2,618)1,873 (1,303–2,637)1,886 (1,317–2,642)1,923 (1,349–2,678)
  Menopausal status
    Premenopausal2833353644
    Postmenopausal5549464437
    Perimenopausal1214151717
    Surgical postmenopausal54432
  Use of menopausal hormone
    yes1822242523
    Missing5891111
Tables 2 and 3 shows the HRs for height and all-cause and cause-specific mortality in men and women, respectively. There was a statistically significant linear inverse association between height and all-cause mortality in men (HRQ5 vs. Q1 = 0.85, 95%CI = 0.80–0.91, p for trend<0.01), but no association was observed in women (HRQ5 vs. Q1 = 1.01, 95%CI = 0.95–1.08, p for trend = 0.66). We observed a positive association between height and death from cancer in both sexes (HRQ5 vs. Q1 = 1.11, 95%CI = 1.00–1.24, p for trend = 0.08 in men; HRQ5 vs. Q1 = 1.17, 95%CI = 1.07–1.28, p for trend<0.01 in women). HRs for smoking-related cancers and non-smoking-related cancers were not substantially different (Table 3). In contrast, height was inversely associated with the risk of death from circulatory disease in both sexes (HRQ5 vs. Q1 = 0.63, 95%CI = 0.56–0.71, p for trend<0.01 in men; HRQ5 vs. Q1 = 0.81, 95%CI = 0.70–0.93, p for trend<0.01 in women). Furthermore, height was inversely associated with ischaemic heart disease and myocardial infarction in both men and women, as well as cerebrovascular disease mortality in men only. There was no association between height and death from stroke or respiratory diseases in men or women. Excluding subjects with a past history of cancer, cardiovascular disease or diabetes (n = 38,760) yielded similar results (data not shown).
Table 2

Hazard ratios* and 95% confidence intervals for all cause and cause-specific mortality according to height in men.

Height
Cause of death<168 cm168-<173 cm173-<176 cm176-<181 cm≧181cmP for linear trendHR (95% CI) per 5 cm increase in height
All-cause mortalityPerson-years293,986390,290280,389431,003369,328
Deaths3,4163,7532,4643,3112,376
HR (95% CI)10.93 (0.89–0.98)0.91 (0.86–0.96)0.86 (0.81–0.91)0.85 (0.80–0.91)<0.010.96 (0.94–0.97)
Cause-specific mortalityPerson-years277,037363,393260,139399,967344,047
CancerDeaths1,1121,3389051,249916
HR (95% CI)11.05 (0.97–1.15)1.07 (0.97–1.17)1.06 (0.96–1.17)1.11 (1.00–1.24)0.081.03 (1.00–1.05)
Smoking-related cancerDeaths453574373519389
HR (95% CI)11.26 (1.05–1.52)1.21 (0.98–1.50)1.30 (1.06–1.59)1.04 (0.83–1.31)0.930.99 (0.95–1.04)
Non smoking-related cancerDeaths659764532730527
HR (95% CI)10.95 (0.82–1.09)0.94 (0.80–1.10)1.07 (0.91–1.25)0.86 (0.72–1.03)0.360.98 (0.95–1.02)
Circulatory diseaseDeaths1,1661,065715845608
HR (95% CI)10.79 (0.73–0.87)0.78 (0.71–0.87)0.64 (0.58–0.72)0.63 (0.56–0.71)<0.010.88 (0.86–0.90)
Ischaemic heart diseaseDeaths632594412483323
HR (95% CI)10.75 (0.66–0.84)0.75 (0.65–0.86)0.59 (0.52–0.68)0.54 (0.46–0.63)<0.010.86 (0.83–0.89)
Myocardial infarctionDeaths319311207267172
HR (95% CI)10.78 (0.66–0.92)0.75 (0.62–0.91)0.64 (0.53–0.77)0.54 (0.43–0.67)<0.010.86 (0.82–0.90)
Cerebrovascular diseaseDeaths23818211212495
HR (95% CI)10.81 (0.66–1.00)0.80 (0.62–1.03)0.65 (0.50–0.84)0.73 (0.54–0.99)<0.010.91 (0.86–0.97)
Haemorrhagic strokeDeaths6159344544
HR (95% CI)10.80 (0.54–1.18)0.65 (0.41–1.04)0.61 (0.38–0.96)0.73 (0.44–1.20)0.130.89 (0.79–0.99)
Ischemic strokeDeaths3321122617
HR (95% CI)10.47 (0.26–0.85)0.36 (0.18–0.74)0.60 (0.33–1.11)0.55 (0.27–1.14)0.200.85 (0.72–1.01)
Respiratory diseaseDeaths1911659811866
HR (95% CI)10.96 (0.77–1.21)1.01 (0.77–1.32)0.95 (0.72–1.24)0.87 (0.62–1.23)0.490.97 (0.90–1.04)
Other cause of deathDeaths595624389567431
HR (95% CI)10.86 (0.76–0.97)0.77 (0.67–0.88)0.76 (0.67–0.88)0.74 (0.64–0.87)<0.010.92 (0.89–0.95)

* Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) estimated in a Cox regression model stratified by centre, 1-year age and 5-year birth cohort categories, adjusted for education level (none,/primary school completed, technical/professional school, secondary school, university degree, not specified), smoking status (never smoker, former smoker who quit <10 years ago, former smoker who quit >10 years ago, former smoker, unknown when quit, current smoker of 1–14 cigarettes a day, current smoker of 15–24 cigarettes a day, current smoker of > = 25 cigarettes a day, current smoker but amount missing, smoking status unknown), physical activity (inactive, moderately inactive, moderately active, active), alcohol consumption (0, 0-<5, 5-<15, 15-<30, 30-<60, > = 60 g/day), weight (quintiles), intake of energy (kcals/day, continuous).

† Median values of each category as continuous variable (cm).

Table 3

Hazard ratios* and 95% confidence intervals for all cause and cause-specific mortality according to height in women.

Height
Cause of death<156 cm156-<160 cm160-<163 cm163-<168 cm≧168cmP for linear trendHR (95% CI) per 5 cm increase in height
All-cause mortalityPerson-years590,468628,657581,655680,731791,060
Deaths3,1672,8842,6952,8792,865
HR (95% CI)10.97 (0.92–1.02)1.04 (0.99–1.10)0.98 (0.93–1.04)1.01 (0.95–1.08)0.661.00 (0.99–1.02)
Cause-specific mortalityPerson-years554,304587,926543,440635,688745,828
CancerDeaths1,1381,2541,2011,3351,483
HR (95% CI)11.07 (0.98–1.16)1.14 (1.04–1.24)1.09 (0.99–1.19)1.17 (1.07–1.28)<0.011.05 (1.02–1.07)
Smoking-related cancerDeaths503512542540551
HR (95% CI)10.97 (0.81–1.17)1.08 (0.89–1.31)0.98 (0.81–1.19)0.98 (0.80–1.20)0.791.00 (0.95–1.04)
Non smoking-related cancerDeaths635742659795932
HR (95% CI)11.12 (0.96–1.30)1.11 (0.95–1.30)1.00 (0.86–1.17)1.10 (0.94–1.28)0.621.01 (0.97–1.05)
Circulatory diseaseDeaths842638506521440
HR (95% CI)10.95 (0.85–1.06)0.92 (0.82–1.04)0.86 (0.76–0.98)0.81 (0.70–0.93)<0.010.94 (0.91–0.97)
Ischaemic heart diseaseDeaths303233179188135
HR (95% CI)10.89 (0.75–1.07)0.83 (0.68–1.01)0.78 (0.64–0.96)0.61 (0.48–0.78)<0.010.88 (0.83–0.93)
Myocardial infarctionDeaths14711310911084
HR (95% CI)10.86 (0.66–1.12)0.96 (0.73–1.26)0.84 (0.63–1.12)0.67 (0.49–0.92)0.020.89 (0.82–0.96)
Cerebrovascular diseaseDeaths274197180158134
HR (95% CI)10.94 (0.77–1.14)1.07 (0.87–1.32)0.88 (0.70–1.10)0.84 (0.65–1.07)0.150.96 (0.90–1.02)
Haemorrhagic strokeDeaths7373646667
HR (95% CI)10.98 (0.70–1.37)0.99 (0.69–1.43)0.88 (0.61–1.28)0.89 (0.60–1.33)0.480.97 (0.88–1.07)
Ischemic strokeDeaths2125272216
HR (95% CI)10.99 (0.54–1.80)1.10 (0.60–2.03)0.77 (0.40–1.48)0.59 (0.28–1.22)0.100.86 (0.72–1.01)
Respiratory diseaseDeaths17910811813489
HR (95% CI)10.72 (0.56–0.93)0.95 (0.73–1.23)0.98 (0.75–1.26)0.75 (0.56–1.01)0.310.96 (0.89–1.03)
Other cause of deathDeaths568470442436461
HR (95% CI)10.91 (0.80–1.04)1.01 (0.88–1.16)0.88 (0.76–1.01)0.95 (0.82–1.11)0.440.97 (0.94–1.01)

* Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) estimated in a Cox regression model stratified by centre, 1-year age and 5-year birth cohort categories, adjusted for education level (none,/primary school completed, technical/professional school, secondary school, university degree, not specified), smoking status (never smoker, former smoker who quit <10 years ago, former smoker who quit >10 years ago, former smoker, unknown when quit, current smoker of 1–14 cigarettes a day, current smoker of 15–24 cigarettes a day, current smoker of > = 25 cigarettes a day, current smoker but amount missing, smoking status unknown), physical activity (inactive, moderately inactive, moderately active, active), alcohol consumption (0, 0-<5, 5-<15, 15-<30, 30-<60, > = 60 g/day), weight (quintiles), intake of energy (kcals/day, continuous), menopausal status (pre, post-, peri-, unknown) and menopausal hormone use (yes, no, unknown).

† Median values of each category as continuous variable (cm).

* Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) estimated in a Cox regression model stratified by centre, 1-year age and 5-year birth cohort categories, adjusted for education level (none,/primary school completed, technical/professional school, secondary school, university degree, not specified), smoking status (never smoker, former smoker who quit <10 years ago, former smoker who quit >10 years ago, former smoker, unknown when quit, current smoker of 1–14 cigarettes a day, current smoker of 15–24 cigarettes a day, current smoker of > = 25 cigarettes a day, current smoker but amount missing, smoking status unknown), physical activity (inactive, moderately inactive, moderately active, active), alcohol consumption (0, 0-<5, 5-<15, 15-<30, 30-<60, > = 60 g/day), weight (quintiles), intake of energy (kcals/day, continuous). † Median values of each category as continuous variable (cm). * Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) estimated in a Cox regression model stratified by centre, 1-year age and 5-year birth cohort categories, adjusted for education level (none,/primary school completed, technical/professional school, secondary school, university degree, not specified), smoking status (never smoker, former smoker who quit <10 years ago, former smoker who quit >10 years ago, former smoker, unknown when quit, current smoker of 1–14 cigarettes a day, current smoker of 15–24 cigarettes a day, current smoker of > = 25 cigarettes a day, current smoker but amount missing, smoking status unknown), physical activity (inactive, moderately inactive, moderately active, active), alcohol consumption (0, 0-<5, 5-<15, 15-<30, 30-<60, > = 60 g/day), weight (quintiles), intake of energy (kcals/day, continuous), menopausal status (pre, post-, peri-, unknown) and menopausal hormone use (yes, no, unknown). † Median values of each category as continuous variable (cm). Tables 4 and 5 shows the HRs for sitting height and all-cause and cause-specific mortality in men and women, respectively. We observed inverse associations for sitting height and all-cause mortality in both men and women (HRQ5 vs. Q1 = 0.81, 95%CI = 0.74–0.88, p for trend<0.01 in men; HRQ5 vs. Q1 = 0.86, 95%CI = 0.79–0.94, p for trend<0.01 in women). In contrast to the findings for overall height, we did not observe an association between sitting height and cancer mortality in either men or women. The associations between sitting height and circulatory disease mortality were similar to the inverse findings for overall height. In addition, we observed an inverse association between sitting height and death from haemorrhagic stroke in men only (HRQ5 vs. Q1 = 0.44, 95%CI = 0.23–0.84, p for trend<0.01) and from respiratory disease in men and women (HRQ5 vs. Q1 = 0.45, 95%CI = 0.28–0.71, p for trend <0.01; HRQ5 vs. Q1 = 0.60, 95%CI = 0.40–0.89, p for trend<0.01, respectively). When we analysed the association between sitting height and mortality, additional adjustment for overall height did not substantially change our results.
Table 4

Hazard ratios* and 95% confidence intervals for all cause and cause-specific mortality according to sitting height in men.

Sitting height
Cause of death<87 cm87-<89 cm89-<91 cm91-<93 cm≧93cmP for linear trendHR (95% CI) per 1 cm increase in height
MEN
All-cause mortalityPerson-years190,524155,166193,151192,945271,451
Deaths1,8941,2731,5311,4121,839
HR (95% CI)10.87 (0.81–0.94)0.89 (0.83–0.96)0.84 (0.78–0.91)0.81 (0.74–0.88)<0.010.98 (0.97–0.99)
Cause-specific mortalityPerson-years183,369148,567184,265183,540255,934
CancerDeaths710497635597808
HR (95% CI)10.91 (0.80–1.02)1.01 (0.90–1.14)1.01 (0.89–1.14)1.07 (0.94–1.22)0.291.01 (0.995–1.02)
Smoking-related cancerDeaths303229294236352
HR (95% CI)11.28 (0.97–1.69)1.21 (0.93–1.58)1.32 (0.99–1.76)1.30 (0.98–1.73)0.661.01 (0.98–1.03)
Non smoking-related cancerDeaths407268341361456
HR (95% CI)10.82 (0.66–1.02)0.83 (0.67–1.02)0.90 (0.73–1.12)0.78 (0.63–0.97)0.090.98 (0.96–1.00)
Circulatory diseaseDeaths615367425353443
HR (95% CI)10.81 (0.70–0.93)0.81 (0.70–0.93)0.69 (0.60–0.81)0.64 (0.55–0.75)<0.010.96 (0.94–0.97)
Ischaemic heart diseaseDeaths291192219176221
HR (95% CI)10.84 (0.69–1.02)0.81 (0.67–0.99)0.67 (0.54–0.83)0.62 (0.50–0.78)<0.010.95 (0.93–0.97)
Myocardial infarctionDeaths159101119100113
HR (95% CI)10.86 (0.66–1.12)0.88 (0.67–1.15)0.77 (0.57–1.03)0.63 (0.47–0.86)<0.010.95 (0.93–0.98)
Cerebrovascular diseaseDeaths13961805363
HR (95% CI)10.72 (0.52–0.98)0.87 (0.64–1.19)0.62 (0.43–0.89)0.56 (0.38–0.82)<0.010.96 (0.93–0.99)
Haemorrhagic strokeDeaths3622292026
HR (95% CI)10.75 (0.43–1.32)0.80 (0.46–1.39)0.53 (0.28–0.99)0.44 (0.23–0.84)<0.010.93 (0.88–0.98)
Ischemic strokeDeaths18310612
HR (95% CI)10.24 (0.07–0.85)0.71 (0.29–1.72)0.46 (0.16–1.35)0.72 (0.26–1.97)0.850.99 (0.91–1.09)
Respiratory diseaseDeaths11060414639
HR (95% CI)10.85 (0.60–1.19)0.52 (0.35–0.78)0.67 (0.45–1.01)0.45 (0.28–0.71)<0.010.93 (0.90–0.96)
Other cause of deathDeaths375265308297345
HR (95% CI)10.87 (0.74–1.03)0.82 (0.69–0.97)0.79 (0.66–0.94)0.64 (0.53–0.77)<0.010.96 (0.94–0.97)

* Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) estimated in a Cox regression model stratified by centre, 1-year age and 5-year birth cohort categories, adjusted for education level (none,/primary school completed, technical/professional school, secondary school, university degree, not specified), smoking status (never smoker, former smoker who quit <10 years ago, former smoker who quit >10 years ago, former smoker, unknown when quit, current smoker of 1–14 cigarettes a day, current smoker of 15–24 cigarettes a day, current smoker of > = 25 cigarettes a day, current smoker but amount missing, smoking status unknown), physical activity (inactive, moderately inactive, moderately active, active), alcohol consumption (0, 0-<5, 5-<15, 15-<30, 30-<60, > = 60 g/day), weight (quintiles), intake of energy (kcals/day, continuous).

† Median values of each category as continuous variable (cm).

Table 5

Hazard ratios* and 95% confidence intervals for all-cause and cause-specific mortality according to sitting height in women.

Sitting height  
Cause of death <82 cm82-<84 cm84-<86 cm86-<88 cm≧88cmP for linear trendHR (95% CI) per 1 cm increase in height
All-cause mortalityPerson-years336,999329,496426,977404,731484,850  
  Deaths1,5821,3321,6741,4671,626  
  HR (95% CI)10.95 (0.88–1.03)0.94 (0.87–1.02)0.90 (0.83–0.97)0.86 (0.79–0.94)<0.010.99 (0.98–0.99)
          
Cause-specific mortalityPerson-years320,489311,699402,879381,913459,258  
CancerDeaths614606822730890  
  HR (95% CI)11.08 (0.96–1.21)1.13 (1.01–1.27)1.07 (0.94–1.20)1.08 (0.95–1.22)0.261.01 (0.995–1.02)
 Smoking-related cancerDeaths292242352292344  
  HR (95% CI)10.78 (0.59–1.03)0.78 (0.59–1.03)0.86 (0.64–1.14)0.71 (0.53–0.95)0.120.98 (0.96–1.01)
 Non-smoking-related cancerDeaths322364470438546  
  HR (95% CI)11.09 (0.87–1.37)1.04 (0.83–1.30)0.96 (0.77–1.21)1.15 (0.91–1.44)0.151.01 (0.995–1.03)
Circulatory diseaseDeaths442264294230223  
  HR (95% CI)10.80 (0.68–0.94)0.77 (0.65–0.91)0.69 (0.57–0.83)0.60 (0.49–0.74)<0.010.95 (0.94–0.97)
 Ischaemic heart diseaseDeaths13679866357  
  HR (95% CI)10.77 (0.57–1.03)0.69 (0.51–0.94)0.59 (0.42–0.83)0.47 (0.33–0.69)<0.010.94 (0.91–0.97)
 Myocardial infarctionDeaths6946614440  
  HR (95% CI)10.85 (0.57–1.26)0.87 (0.59–1.29)0.71 (0.46–1.10)0.54 (0.34–0.87)<0.010.94 (0.90–0.98)
 Cerebrovascular diseaseDeaths13190926867  
  HR (95% CI)10.96 (0.72–1.28)0.86 (0.64–1.16)0.73 (0.52–1.02)0.64 (0.44–0.92)0.020.96 (0.94–0.99)
 Haemorrhagic strokeDeaths3836353443  
  HR (95% CI)10.93 (0.57–1.50)0.73 (0.44–1.20)0.75 (0.45–1.27)0.79 (0.46–1.35)0.280.97 (0.93–1.02)
 Ischemic strokeDeaths10101396  
  HR (95% CI)10.91 (0.36–2.28)0.86 (0.35–2.12)0.64 (0.24–1.75)0.40 (0.13–1.24)0.100.92 (0.84–1.01)
Respiratory diseaseDeaths8947695561  
  HR (95% CI)10.58 (0.40–0.84)0.66 (0.46–0.93)0.59 (0.40–0.86)0.60 (0.40–0.89)<0.010.95 (0.92–0.98)
Other cause of deathDeaths296281298275287  
  HR (95% CI)11.06 (0.89–1.26)0.88 (0.74–1.06)0.90 (0.75–1.09)0.81 (0.66–0.98)<0.010.98 (0.96–0.995)

* Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) estimated in a Cox regression model stratified by centre, 1-year age and 5-year birth cohort categories, adjusted for education level (none,/primary school completed, technical/professional school, secondary school, university degree, not specified), smoking status (never smoker, former smoker who quit <10 years ago, former smoker who quit >10 years ago, former smoker, unknown when quit, current smoker of 1–14 cigarettes a day, current smoker of 15–24 cigarettes a day, current smoker of > = 25 cigarettes a day, current smoker but amount missing, smoking status unknown), physical activity (inactive, moderately inactive, moderately active, active), alcohol consumption (0, 0-<5, 5-<15, 15-<30, 30-<60, > = 60 g/day), weight (quintiles), energy intake (kcals/day, continuous), menopausal status (pre, post-, peri-, unknown) and menopausal hormone use (yes, no, unknown).

† Median values of each category as continuous variable (cm).

* Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) estimated in a Cox regression model stratified by centre, 1-year age and 5-year birth cohort categories, adjusted for education level (none,/primary school completed, technical/professional school, secondary school, university degree, not specified), smoking status (never smoker, former smoker who quit <10 years ago, former smoker who quit >10 years ago, former smoker, unknown when quit, current smoker of 1–14 cigarettes a day, current smoker of 15–24 cigarettes a day, current smoker of > = 25 cigarettes a day, current smoker but amount missing, smoking status unknown), physical activity (inactive, moderately inactive, moderately active, active), alcohol consumption (0, 0-<5, 5-<15, 15-<30, 30-<60, > = 60 g/day), weight (quintiles), intake of energy (kcals/day, continuous). † Median values of each category as continuous variable (cm). * Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) estimated in a Cox regression model stratified by centre, 1-year age and 5-year birth cohort categories, adjusted for education level (none,/primary school completed, technical/professional school, secondary school, university degree, not specified), smoking status (never smoker, former smoker who quit <10 years ago, former smoker who quit >10 years ago, former smoker, unknown when quit, current smoker of 1–14 cigarettes a day, current smoker of 15–24 cigarettes a day, current smoker of > = 25 cigarettes a day, current smoker but amount missing, smoking status unknown), physical activity (inactive, moderately inactive, moderately active, active), alcohol consumption (0, 0-<5, 5-<15, 15-<30, 30-<60, > = 60 g/day), weight (quintiles), energy intake (kcals/day, continuous), menopausal status (pre, post-, peri-, unknown) and menopausal hormone use (yes, no, unknown). † Median values of each category as continuous variable (cm). We also investigated interactions between sitting height and overall height in relation to mortality (Table 6). Taller overall height and taller sitting height was strongly inversely associated with death from respiratory disease in men (Pinteraction = 0.03) but not women. However, there were no significant interactions between sitting height and overall height in relation to all-cause, cancer or circulatory disease mortality. Interaction terms for overall height and mortality by age, smoking status (smoker/non-smoker), and alcohol intake (high/low) did not reveal meaningful differences; however, for BMI, we observed an increased risk per 5cm increment in height for all-cause mortality only among women with a BMI <25 kg/m2 (data not shown).
Table 6

Hazard ratios* and 95% confidence intervals for all-cause and cause-specific mortality according to sitting height and overall height in men and women.

Overall height (tertiles)
Lowest (<170 cm)Middle (170-<176 cm)Highest (≧92 cm)Pinteraction
MEN
All-cause mortalityLowest (<89 cm)10.89 (0.82–0.97)1.04 (0.87–1.24)
Middle (89-<92 cm)0.99 (0.90–1.08)0.88 (0.82–0.96)0.81 (0.73–0.90)0.58
Highest (≧92 cm)0.99 (0.79–1.25)0.91 (0.83–1.00)0.83 (0.76–0.90)
All cancerLowest (<89 cm)10.93 (0.81–1.07)1.18 (0.89–1.56)
Middle (89-<92 cm)1.08 (0.93–1.26)1.03 (0.91–1.16)0.98 (0.83–1.15)0.77
Highest (≧92 cm)1.03 (0.71–1.48)1.18 (1.02–1.36)1.08 (0.95–1.23)
Circulatory diseaseLowest (<89 cm)10.75 (0.64–0.89)0.74 (0.50–1.08)
Middle (89-<92 cm)0.95 (0.80–1.12)0.75 (0.65–0.87)0.58 (0.47–0.72)0.53
Highest (≧92 cm)0.91 (0.60–1.39)0.70 (0.58–0.84)0.62 (0.53–0.73)
Respiratory diseaseLowest (<89 cm)11.27 (0.87–1.84)1.22 (0.48–3.09)
Middle (89-<92 cm)0.79 (0.49–1.28)0.69 (0.45–1.04)0.36 (0.17–0.75)0.03
Highest (≧92 cm)0.71 (0.17–2.92)0.84 (0.51–1.38)0.50 (0.32–0.80)
Sitting height (tertiles)Lowest (<158cm)Middle (158-<163 cm)Highest (≧163 cm)Pinteraction
WOMEN
All-cause mortalityLowest (<84 cm)11.07 (0.98–1.16)1.15 (0.95–1.39)
Middle (84-<87 cm)0.91 (0.82–1.00)1.00 (0.93–1.08)1.02 (0.93–1.12)0.29
Highest (≧87 cm)1.04 (0.83–1.30)0.91 (0.82–1.01)0.93 (0.86–1.01)
All cancerLowest (<84 cm)11.07 (0.94–1.23)1.19 (0.91–1.55)
Middle (84-<87 cm)1.04 (0.89–1.20)1.14 (1.02–1.27)1.08 (0.94–1.25)0.66
Highest (≧87 cm)1.24 (0.91–1.68)0.99 (0.85–1.15)1.09 (0.97–1.23)
Circulatory diseaseLowest (<84 cm)11.19 (0.99–1.44)1.30 (0.85–1.98)
Middle (84-<87 cm)0.84 (0.67–1.06)0.89 (0.74–1.07)0.88 (0.70–1.12)0.05
Highest (≧87 cm)0.97 (0.59–1.60)0.86 (0.67–1.09)0.75 (0.62–0.91)
Respiratory diseaseLowest (<84 cm)10.67 (0.43–1.10)1.43 (0.64–3.16)
Middle (84-<87 cm)0.46 (0.25–0.84)0.85 (0.59–1.22)1.07 (0.70–1.62)0.11
Highest (≧87 cm)0.31 (0.04–2.25)0.72 (0.43–1.19)0.71 (0.48–1.05)

* Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) estimated in a Cox regression model stratified by centre, 1-year age and 5-year birth cohort categories, adjusted for education level (none,/primary school completed, technical/professional school, secondary school, university degree, not specified), smoking status (never smoker, former smoker who quit <10 years ago, former smoker who quit >10 years ago, former smoker, unknown when quit, current smoker of 1–14 cigarettes a day, current smoker of 15–24 cigarettes a day, current smoker of > = 25 cigarettes a day, current smoker but amount missing, smoking status unknown), physical activity (inactive, moderately inactive, moderately active, active), alcohol consumption (0, 0-<5, 5-<15, 15-<30, 30-<60, > = 60 g/day), weight (quintiles), energy intake (kcals/day, continuous). Models in women were further adjusted by menopausal status (pre, post-, peri-, unknown) and menopausal hormone use (yes, no, unknown).

* Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) estimated in a Cox regression model stratified by centre, 1-year age and 5-year birth cohort categories, adjusted for education level (none,/primary school completed, technical/professional school, secondary school, university degree, not specified), smoking status (never smoker, former smoker who quit <10 years ago, former smoker who quit >10 years ago, former smoker, unknown when quit, current smoker of 1–14 cigarettes a day, current smoker of 15–24 cigarettes a day, current smoker of > = 25 cigarettes a day, current smoker but amount missing, smoking status unknown), physical activity (inactive, moderately inactive, moderately active, active), alcohol consumption (0, 0-<5, 5-<15, 15-<30, 30-<60, > = 60 g/day), weight (quintiles), energy intake (kcals/day, continuous). Models in women were further adjusted by menopausal status (pre, post-, peri-, unknown) and menopausal hormone use (yes, no, unknown). After Bonferroni correction, the significance of our results was not substantially changed.

Discussion

In this large prospective study, overall height was positively associated with deaths from cancer, but inversely associated with deaths from circulatory disease. These results are supported by a previous meta-analysis of 1 million people from 121 prospective studies [6]. In the present study, sitting height was not associated with cancer mortality but was inversely associated with all-cause mortality, circulatory deaths, and death from respiratory disease. To our knowledge, this is the first study to report an inverse association between sitting height and death from respiratory disease. The World Cancer Research Fund/ American Institute for Cancer Research (WCRF/AICR) reported that there is convincing data that height increases the risk of individuals being diagnosed with cancers of the colorectum, breast (postmenopausal) and ovary [20, 21]; furthermore, height ‘probably’ increases the risk of cancers of the pancreas and breast (premenopausal). To complement this previous data on incidence, our data suggests a role for height and risk of cancer mortality. Short stature is a well-documented risk factor for mortality from circulatory diseases [6, 9, 22], ischemic heart disease [23], ischemic stroke [22, 24, 25] and haemorrhagic stroke [24, 25] in previous studies. The results of this current analysis corroborate these prior studies but we also observed strong inverse associations between height and subtypes of circulatory disease death despite their different pathologies. Whether a relationship between sitting height and mortality also exists is largely unknown. Wang et al. reported height and sitting height were positively associated with cancer death, but were inversely associated with death from cardiovascular disease in a cohort of 135,000 Chinese men and women [9]. Four other studies reported no association between sitting height and mortality [7, 10–12]. Our study in a large European population generally supports the reports from the Chinese, although we did not find a positive association between sitting height specifically and cancer mortality. There are several potential underlying mechanisms to explain the opposing association of adult height with circulatory disease and cancer mortality. The positive association between adult height and mortality from cancer may be a result of taller people having larger organs, and a greater number of cells at risk of malignant transformation and/or proliferation [26]. Furthermore, attained adult height is known to be related to early nutrition in childhood or adolescence [3, 5]. In contrast, the inverse association between height and cardiovascular disease mortality has been proposed to be due to taller people and people with higher sitting height having larger coronary vessel diameters and a slower heart rate and/or greater lung capacity [8, 27–30]. Height may also be a marker of early exposure to components of the insulin/growth hormone axis. Height is correlated with circulating levels of insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I, the main mediator of growth hormone activity and a hormone that has been positively associated with cancers at a number of anatomic sites [31-35], but IGF-1 levels are generally inversely related with circulatory disease risk [36-40]. Crowe et al. reported that each 10cm increase in height corresponded to a 4% increase in circulating IGF-1 levels [41]; therefore, increasing IGF-1 levels might mediate the opposing effect of height on cancer and circulatory disease mortality. To clarify the underlying mechanisms, further studies are needed to investigate IGF-1 levels in relation to cause-specific mortality risk while accounting for adult height. Furthermore, several genetic factors are related with height, cancer and cardiovascular disease [42, 43]. Identifying such genetic variants might shed light on potential mechanisms underlying the associations between height and mortality. Davey Smith et al. reported that sitting height was strongly positively associated with insulin resistance [7]; thus, we expected a clearer association between sitting height and cancer mortality than overall height. Despite finding a positive association between overall height and cancer mortality in our data, there was no association for sitting height. These null findings for sitting height and cancer mortality may be plausible because despite the association with insulin resistance, sitting height has been associated with improved prognosis in cancer survivors due to better lung function in those with greater sitting height [8, 44]. Our finding that sitting height was inversely associated with death from respiratory disease is of note as this may be due to the aforementioned association between sitting height and lung function [8, 44]. Height is positively associated with education level among women in this study. Previous studies reported that lower educational levels have been associated with increased mortality, and incidence of coronary heart disease and stroke in Europe and the United States [45-47]. In an attempt to control for this potential confounder, we adjusted our models for educational level, although our results did not change from the unadjusted models. A major strength of the EPIC study is the large study population representing findings from multiple countries and its long follow-up, resulting in a large number of deaths allowing us to analyse and distinguish between different causes of death. This study enabled us to examine measured height on the majority of participants, to adjust the self-reported height variable in the others, and to examine measured sitting height in a large subset of the cohort. In contrast, this study had some limitations. With a large body of information on lifestyle variables, we could adjust for many potential confounding factors, although the possibility of residual confounding cannot be excluded. Additionally, we divided cardiovascular disease into subgroups, which may result in some degree of misclassification. In conclusion, this study revealed opposing findings for the relationship between height on cancer and circulatory disease mortality. Specifically, we showed that height was positively associated with death from cancer, but inversely associated with death from circulatory disease. Furthermore, this is the first study to show the inverse association between sitting height and death from respiratory disease. These findings could be used to contribute to risk prediction models to target individuals for specific screening programmes.
  45 in total

1.  Can adult anthropometry be used as a 'biomarker' for prenatal and childhood exposures?

Authors:  David Gunnell
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 7.196

Review 2.  Preventable exposures associated with human cancers.

Authors:  Vincent James Cogliano; Robert Baan; Kurt Straif; Yann Grosse; Béatrice Lauby-Secretan; Fatiha El Ghissassi; Véronique Bouvard; Lamia Benbrahim-Tallaa; Neela Guha; Crystal Freeman; Laurent Galichet; Christopher P Wild
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2011-12-12       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Adult height and the risk of cardiovascular disease among middle aged men and women in Japan.

Authors:  Kaori Honjo; Hiroyasu Iso; Manami Inoue; Shoichiro Tsugane
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-10-16       Impact factor: 8.082

4.  Report of the Japan Diabetes Society/Japanese Cancer Association Joint Committee on Diabetes and Cancer.

Authors:  Masato Kasuga; Kohjiro Ueki; Naoko Tajima; Mitsuhiko Noda; Ken Ohashi; Hiroshi Noto; Atsushi Goto; Wataru Ogawa; Ryuichi Sakai; Shoichiro Tsugane; Nobuyuki Hamajima; Hitoshi Nakagama; Kazuo Tajima; Kohei Miyazono; Kohzoh Imai
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 6.716

5.  Childhood dairy and calcium intake and cardiovascular mortality in adulthood: 65-year follow-up of the Boyd Orr cohort.

Authors:  J C van der Pols; D Gunnell; G M Williams; J M P Holly; C Bain; R M Martin
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2009-07-29       Impact factor: 5.994

6.  Low serum insulin-like growth factor I is associated with increased risk of ischemic heart disease: a population-based case-control study.

Authors:  Anders Juul; Thomas Scheike; Michael Davidsen; Jesper Gyllenborg; Torben Jørgensen
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-08-20       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Evaluation of under- and overreporting of energy intake in the 24-hour diet recalls in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC).

Authors:  P Ferrari; N Slimani; A Ciampi; A Trichopoulou; A Naska; C Lauria; F Veglia; H B Bueno-de-Mesquita; M C Ocké; M Brustad; T Braaten; M José Tormo; P Amiano; I Mattisson; G Johansson; A Welch; G Davey; K Overvad; A Tjønneland; F Clavel-Chapelon; A Thiebaut; J Linseisen; H Boeing; B Hemon; E Riboli
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.022

8.  European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC): study populations and data collection.

Authors:  E Riboli; K J Hunt; N Slimani; P Ferrari; T Norat; M Fahey; U R Charrondière; B Hémon; C Casagrande; J Vignat; K Overvad; A Tjønneland; F Clavel-Chapelon; A Thiébaut; J Wahrendorf; H Boeing; D Trichopoulos; A Trichopoulou; P Vineis; D Palli; H B Bueno-De-Mesquita; P H M Peeters; E Lund; D Engeset; C A González; A Barricarte; G Berglund; G Hallmans; N E Day; T J Key; R Kaaks; R Saracci
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.022

9.  Cellular growth factors in relation to mortality from cardiovascular disease in middle-aged Japanese: the JACC study.

Authors:  Hiroyasu Iso; Koutatsu Maruyama; Satoyo Ikehara; Kazumasa Yamagishi; Akiko Tamakoshi
Journal:  Atherosclerosis       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 5.162

10.  Insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1), IGF binding protein 3 (IGFBP3), and breast cancer risk: pooled individual data analysis of 17 prospective studies.

Authors:  Timothy J Key; Paul N Appleby; Gillian K Reeves; Andrew W Roddam
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 41.316

View more
  10 in total

1.  Risk factors for 5-year prospective height loss among postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Xiaodan Mai; Britt Marshall; Kathleen M Hovey; Jill Sperrazza; Jean Wactawski-Wende
Journal:  Menopause       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.953

2.  Does adult height predict later mortality?: Comparative evidence from the Early Indicators samples in the United States.

Authors:  Sven E Wilson
Journal:  Econ Hum Biol       Date:  2019-06-08       Impact factor: 2.184

3.  Sirtuin 1 genetic variation, energy balance and colorectal cancer risk by sex and subsite in the Netherlands Cohort Study.

Authors:  C C J M Simons; L J Schouten; R W Godschalk; F J van Schooten; P A van den Brandt; M P Weijenberg
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  The burden and predisposing factors of non-communicable diseases in Mashhad University of Medical Sciences personnel: a prospective 15-year organizational cohort study protocol and baseline assessment.

Authors:  Fariba Tohidinezhad; Ali Khorsand; Seyed Rasoul Zakavi; Reza Rezvani; Siamak Zarei-Ghanavati; Majid Abrishami; Ali Moradi; Mahmoud Tavakoli; Donya Farrokh; Masoud Pezeshki Rad; Bita Abbasi; Mitra Ahadi; Lahya Afshari Saleh; Mohammad Tayebi; Mahnaz Amini; Hossein Poustchi; Ameen Abu-Hanna; Saeid Eslami
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 5.  Influence of height on endothelial maintenance activity: a narrative review.

Authors:  Yuji Shimizu; Takahiro Maeda
Journal:  Environ Health Prev Med       Date:  2021-02-06       Impact factor: 3.674

6.  Growth, body composition, and cardiovascular and nutritional risk of 5- to 10-y-old children consuming vegetarian, vegan, or omnivore diets.

Authors:  Małgorzata A Desmond; Jakub G Sobiecki; Maciej Jaworski; Paweł Płudowski; Jolanta Antoniewicz; Meghan K Shirley; Simon Eaton; Janusz Książyk; Mario Cortina-Borja; Bianca De Stavola; Mary Fewtrell; Jonathan C K Wells
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 7.045

7.  Association between circulating CD34-positive cell count and height loss among older men.

Authors:  Yuji Shimizu; Shin-Ya Kawashiri; Kenichi Nobusue; Fumiaki Nonaka; Mami Tamai; Yukiko Honda; Hirotomo Yamanashi; Seiko Nakamichi; Masahiko Kiyama; Naomi Hayashida; Yasuhiro Nagata; Takahiro Maeda
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 4.996

8.  Adult height and all-cause and cause-specific mortality in the Japan Public Health Center-based Prospective Study (JPHC).

Authors:  Hikaru Ihira; Norie Sawada; Motoki Iwasaki; Taiki Yamaji; Atsushi Goto; Mitsuhiko Noda; Hiroyasu Iso; Shoichiro Tsugane
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Height and overall cancer risk and mortality: evidence from a Mendelian randomisation study on 310,000 UK Biobank participants.

Authors:  Jue-Sheng Ong; Jiyuan An; Matthew H Law; David C Whiteman; Rachel E Neale; Puya Gharahkhani; Stuart MacGregor
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  The Role of Diet, Alcohol, BMI, and Physical Activity in Cancer Mortality: Summary Findings of the EPIC Study.

Authors:  Esther Molina-Montes; Esther Ubago-Guisado; Dafina Petrova; Pilar Amiano; María-Dolores Chirlaque; Antonio Agudo; María-José Sánchez
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-11-28       Impact factor: 5.717

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.