| Literature DB >> 28257077 |
Kristin M Priebatsch1, Marc Kvansakul2, Ivan K H Poon3, Mark D Hulett4.
Abstract
DivalentEntities:
Keywords: cancer; histidine-rich glycoprotein; plasma protein; tissue injury; wound healing; zinc
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28257077 PMCID: PMC5372734 DOI: 10.3390/biom7010022
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomolecules ISSN: 2218-273X
Figure 1Domain structure and ligands of histidine-rich glycoprotein (HRG). Proposed domains of human HRG are shown with ligands listed for each domain/region based on current literature [3,13,14,15]. The predicted structure of HRG consists of two N-terminal cystatin homology domains (N1 and N2), a histidine-rich region (HRR) flanked by two proline-rich regions (PRR1 and PRR2) and a C-terminal domain (C). N-linked glycosylation sites and disulphide bonds are indicated in bold. The only HRG domain of known structure is the recently solved N-terminal cystatin domain 2 (N2) from rabbit, which shares 80% sequence identity with its human counterpart [16]. Figure adapted from Poon et al. [3]. IgG: Immunoglobulin G; sHIP: streptococcal histidine-rich glycoprotein interaction protein.
Figure 2Ideal Zn2+ coordination geometries. The figure represents the types of ideal Zn2+ coordination geometries such as tetra (C4), penta (C5) and hexa (C6). The Ax = axial and Eq = equatorial define the ligand donor that participates in accommodating the Zn2+-binding site complex. Figure adapted by Patel et al. [29].
Figure 3Potential physiological representation of HRG during the different stages of acute or chronic wounds. HRG is exquisitely sensitive to changes in environmental pH, given the charged state of the histidines controlling its ability to coordinate with Zn2+ and thus regulating its previously mentioned activities such as its antimicrobial properties [35,49]. In addition, the release of peptide fragments containing the HRR are unlikely to contribute to its antimicrobial or anti-angiogenic activities in acute wounds, as there appears to be proteolytic protection of HRG during all stages of acute wound healing, possibly due to the positive charge generated during the inflammation and re-epithelialization stage or Zn2+ elevation during the proliferation stage (Figure 3A) [6,9,11,12]. Therefore the exact role of fragments released in chronic wounds remains unclear, as the alkali and hypozincemia environment does not favor the required charge associated with antimicrobial activity or Zn2+ coordination with its anti-angiogenic peptide [6,11,12,35,49]. In addition to plasmin and elastase, other proteases such as matrix metalloproteinases (MMP) -8, MMP-9, cathepsin G and urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) have shown harbor-elevated activity in chronic wounds and therefore could be prime candidates for the proteolytic breakdown of HRG observed in the chronic wound fluid fraction [35,50]. Interestingly, the study looked at the activity of these proteases over a pH range and observed optimum activity for most between pH 7–9, with in vivo data from 43 patients’ chronic wound fluid (derived from pressure, leg and diabetic foot ulcers) demonstrating that elastase is the most predominant protease contributing to impaired wound healing [50]. These pH values corroborate with the pH values observed in chronic wounds and therefore reinforce the possibility that proteases that act on HRG are under chronic wound settings (Figure 3B) [6,35]. This suggests HRG function can be regulated throughout the different phases of the acute or chronic wound-healing process. These pH curves in the figures were adapted from Schneider et al. [6].
Figure 4Predicted representation of thrombospondin (TSP) regulation by HRG during acute wound healing. HRG has been shown to enhance the enzymatic activity of heparanase (HPSE) under acidic conditions and therefore may work in unison in aiding cell migratory process as the extracellular matrix (ECM) constituent heparan sulfate (HS) is cleaved, while allowing TSP-1 to prevent angiogenic stimulation from the subsequent release of pro-angiogenic moieties such as basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) [6,12,83,101,104]. The differential expression patterns of TSP-1 and TSP-2 may allow HRG to guide angiogenic activation that flank each side of the proliferative stage of acute wound healing [101]. Figure adapted from Schneider et al. [6], Li et al. [105] and Simantov et al. [83]. CD36: cluster of differentiation 36.
Histidine-rich glycoprotein ligand interactions that can facilitate immunological or vascular processes, with the tick (✔) denoting the type of physiological setting wherein the interaction can take place; the cross (✖) denotes which condition was tested and no interaction was observed; no change (N/C) denotes that Zn2+ had no impact on the interaction; and not determined (N/D) denotes the interaction has not been tested.
| HRG Ligand Interactions | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Promoted by Zn2+ | Inhibited by Zn2+/or reduced affinity | Acidic (pH < 7.4) | pH ≥ 7.4 | |||
| Heparin | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | [ | ||
| Heparan Sulfate | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | [ | ||
| C1q | ✔ | N/D | ✔ | [ | ||
| Microbes | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | [ | ||
| IgG1κ | ✔ | N/D | ✔ | [ | ||
| IgGλ | ✔ | N/D | ✔ | [ | ||
| ATP Synthase | N/D | N/D | ✔ | [ | ||
| Phosphatidic acid | N/D | N/D | ✔ | [ | ||
| Heparanase | N/C | ✔ | ✔ | [ | ||
| Vasculostatin | N/D | N/D | ✔ | [ | ||
| Thrombospondin-1 | N/D | N/D | ✔ | [ | ||
| Thrombospondin-2 | N/D | N/D | ✔ | [ | ||
| Plasminogen | N/C | ✔ | ✔ | [ | ||
| Plasmin | ✔ | ✖ | ✔ | [ | ||
| Fibrinogen | ✔ | ✖ | ✖ | [ | ||
| Fibrin | ✔ | ✖ | ✖ | [ | ||
| Tropomyosin | ✔ | N/D | ✖ | [ | ||
| FXIIa | ✔ | N/D | ✔ | [ | ||
| αvβ3 | ✔ | N/D | ✔ | [ | ||
| Heparanase | N/C | ✔ | ✔ | [ | ||
| Heparin | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | [ | ||
| DNA/RNA | N/D | N/D | ✔ | [ | ||