Literature DB >> 28256904

Utility of early dynamic and delayed post-diuretic 18F-FDG PET/CT SUVmax in predicting tumour grade and T-stage of urinary bladder carcinoma: results from a prospective single centre study.

Abhishek Sharma1, Uttam K Mete2, Ashwani Sood1, Nandita Kakkar3, Arun K R Gorla1, Bhagwant R Mittal1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Accurate pre-treatment grading and staging of bladder cancer are vital for better therapeutic decision and prognosis. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the correlation between maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) calculated during early dynamic and post-diuretic fluorine-18 fludeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/CT studies with grade and pT-stage of bladder cancer.
METHODS: 39 patients with suspected/proven bladder carcinoma underwent 10-min early dynamic pelvic imaging and delayed post-diuretic whole-body FDG PET/CT imaging. SUVmax of the lesions derived from both studies was compared with grade and pT-stage. Relationship of SUVmax with grade and pT-stage was analyzed using independent sample t-test and analysis of variance.
RESULTS: SUVmax of the early dynamic imaging showing tumour perfusion was independent from the SUVmax of delayed imaging. High-grade tumours showed higher SUVmax than low-grade tumours in the early dynamic imaging (5.4 ± 1.4 vs 4.7 ± 1.6; p-value 0.144) with statistically significant higher value in Stage pT1 tumours (6.8 ± 0.8 vs 5.5 ± 1.2; p-value 0.04). Non-invasive pTa tumours had significantly less SUVmax than higher stage tumours during early dynamic imaging [F(4,29) = 6.860, p 0.001].
CONCLUSION: Early dynamic imaging may have a role in predicting the grade and aggressiveness of the bladder tumours and thus can help in treatment planning and prognostication. Advances in knowledge: Dynamic PET/CT is a limitedly explored imaging technique. This prospective pilot study demonstrates the utility of this modality as a potential adjunct to standard FDG PET/CT imaging in predicting the grade and aggressiveness of the bladder tumours and thus can impact the patient management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28256904      PMCID: PMC5605066          DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20160787

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  18 in total

Review 1.  Dual-modality PET/CT tomography for clinical oncology.

Authors:  T Beyer; D W Townsend; T M Blodgett
Journal:  Q J Nucl Med       Date:  2002-03

2.  Early dynamic PET/CT and 18F-FDG blood flow imaging in bladder cancer detection: a novel approach.

Authors:  Sam Belakhlef; Clifford Church; Chirag Jani; Suresh Lakhanpal
Journal:  Clin Nucl Med       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 7.794

3.  Preliminary assessment of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in patients with bladder cancer.

Authors:  S Kosuda; P V Kison; R Greenough; H B Grossman; R L Wahl
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1997-06

4.  Clinical utility of 18F-FDG PET for patients with salivary gland malignancies.

Authors:  Jong-Lyel Roh; Chang Hwan Ryu; Seung-Ho Choi; Jae Seung Kim; Jeong Hyun Lee; Kyung-Ja Cho; Soon Yuhl Nam; Sang Yoon Kim
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  Impact of 18F-FDG PET/CT with retrograde filling of the urinary bladder in patients with suspected pelvic malignancies.

Authors:  Ana Maria Garcia Vicente; Angel Soriano Castrejón; Azahara Palomar Muñoz; Patrick Pilkington Woll; Alicia Nuñez García
Journal:  J Nucl Med Technol       Date:  2010-09

6.  Visualisation of bladder cancer using (11)C-choline PET: first clinical experience.

Authors:  Igle J de Jong; Jan Pruim; Philip H Elsinga; Maud M G J Jongen; Han J A Mensink; Willem Vaalburg
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2002-07-27       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  Clinically relevant reduction in risk of recurrence of superficial bladder cancer using 5-aminolevulinic acid-induced fluorescence diagnosis: 8-year results of prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Stefan Denzinger; Maximilian Burger; Bernhard Walter; Ruth Knuechel; Wolfgang Roessler; Wolf F Wieland; Thomas Filbeck
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  Quality of diagnostic staging in patients with bladder cancer: a process-outcomes link.

Authors:  Karim Chamie; Eric Ballon-Landa; Jeffrey C Bassett; Timothy J Daskivich; Meryl Leventhal; Dennis Deapen; Mark S Litwin
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 6.921

Review 9.  Pitfalls and Limitations of Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Urinary Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Wei-Ching Lin; Jeon-Hor Chen
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.243

Review 10.  FDG uptake, a surrogate of tumour hypoxia?

Authors:  Rudi Andre Dierckx; Christophe Van de Wiele
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2008-05-29       Impact factor: 9.236

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Advances in Imaging in Prostate and Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Abhishek Srivastava; Laura M Douglass; Victoria Chernyak; Kara L Watts
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Expression of fibroblast activation protein in lung cancer and its correlation with tumor glucose metabolism and histopathology.

Authors:  Xiaohui Chen; Xinran Liu; Lijuan Wang; Wenlan Zhou; Yin Zhang; Ying Tian; Jianer Tan; Ye Dong; Lilan Fu; Hubing Wu
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  A glance at imaging bladder cancer.

Authors:  Ebru Salmanoglu; Ethan Halpern; Edouard J Trabulsi; Sung Kim; Mathew L Thakur
Journal:  Clin Transl Imaging       Date:  2018-05-16

4.  Bladder Leiomyoma: A Rare Differential and a Potential Pitfall in the Evaluation for a Bladder Mass in 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose-Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Abhishek Sharma; Shelvin Kumar Vadi; Ashwani Sood; Santosh Kumar; Uttam Kumar Mete; Mayur Parkhi; Bhagwant Rai Mittal
Journal:  Indian J Nucl Med       Date:  2018 Jul-Sep
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.