Xiaohui Chen1, Xinran Liu1, Lijuan Wang1, Wenlan Zhou1, Yin Zhang1, Ying Tian1, Jianer Tan1, Ye Dong1, Lilan Fu1, Hubing Wu2. 1. Nanfang PET Center, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, 1838 Guangzhou Avenue North, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong Province, China. 2. Nanfang PET Center, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, 1838 Guangzhou Avenue North, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong Province, China. wuhbym@163.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To explore the expression of fibroblast activation protein (FAP) in lung cancer (LC) and its correlation with tumor glucose metabolism and histopathology. METHODS: From June 2018 to November 2020, 73 patients with newly diagnosed LC were included. Immunohistochemical staining was used to quantify FAP expression in tumors. The histopathological type and tumor grade were determined via histopathological examination. The tumor glucose metabolism parameters and tumor maximal diameter were measured via [18F] F-FDG PET/CT. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to study the correlation of FAP expression levels with glucose metabolism variables and tumor histopathology. RESULTS: Positive FAP expression was observed in 97.3% (71/73) LC lesions, which was significantly higher than 87.7% (64/73) of [18F] F-FDG positivity observed on PET/CT (χ2 = 4.818, P = 0.028). In 12 early adenocarcinomas (ADCs), only three lesions (25%) were positive for [18F] F-FDG on PET/CT; however, 10 lesions (83.3%) were positive for FAP. When FAP expression was classified into low level (scores ≤ 3) and high level (scores > 4), high FAP level was found in 80.8% tumors and low FAP level in the other 19.2% tumors. High FAP level was identified in 100.0% of squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs), 85.7% of ADCs, 66.7% (4/6) of large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas (LCNCs), and 40.0% (4/10) of small cell lung cancers (SCLCs) (P < 0.05). In non-mucinous ADC lesions, on univariate analysis, FAP expression level showed a close relationship with tumor metabolism parameters (maximal standard uptake value (SUVmax), mean standard uptake value (SUVmean), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG)), tumor diameter, tumor grade, and lesion attenuation (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The present study demonstrates that FAP is widely expressed in LC and shows great variation in different histopathological types. A high positive rate of FAP expression implies that FAP-targeted imaging may be a sensitive modality for diagnosing LC, especially in early ADCs. Further validation with such probes is warranted.
PURPOSE: To explore the expression of fibroblast activation protein (FAP) in lung cancer (LC) and its correlation with tumor glucose metabolism and histopathology. METHODS: From June 2018 to November 2020, 73 patients with newly diagnosed LC were included. Immunohistochemical staining was used to quantify FAP expression in tumors. The histopathological type and tumor grade were determined via histopathological examination. The tumor glucose metabolism parameters and tumor maximal diameter were measured via [18F] F-FDG PET/CT. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to study the correlation of FAP expression levels with glucose metabolism variables and tumor histopathology. RESULTS: Positive FAP expression was observed in 97.3% (71/73) LC lesions, which was significantly higher than 87.7% (64/73) of [18F] F-FDG positivity observed on PET/CT (χ2 = 4.818, P = 0.028). In 12 early adenocarcinomas (ADCs), only three lesions (25%) were positive for [18F] F-FDG on PET/CT; however, 10 lesions (83.3%) were positive for FAP. When FAP expression was classified into low level (scores ≤ 3) and high level (scores > 4), high FAP level was found in 80.8% tumors and low FAP level in the other 19.2% tumors. High FAP level was identified in 100.0% of squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs), 85.7% of ADCs, 66.7% (4/6) of large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas (LCNCs), and 40.0% (4/10) of small cell lung cancers (SCLCs) (P < 0.05). In non-mucinous ADC lesions, on univariate analysis, FAP expression level showed a close relationship with tumor metabolism parameters (maximal standard uptake value (SUVmax), mean standard uptake value (SUVmean), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG)), tumor diameter, tumor grade, and lesion attenuation (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The present study demonstrates that FAP is widely expressed in LC and shows great variation in different histopathological types. A high positive rate of FAP expression implies that FAP-targeted imaging may be a sensitive modality for diagnosing LC, especially in early ADCs. Further validation with such probes is warranted.
Authors: Gautam Mankaney; Pamela Leone; Michael Cruise; Lisa LaGuardia; Margaret O'Malley; Amit Bhatt; James Church; Carol A Burke Journal: Fam Cancer Date: 2017-07 Impact factor: 2.375
Authors: Elizabeth J Hamson; Fiona M Keane; Stefan Tholen; Oliver Schilling; Mark D Gorrell Journal: Proteomics Clin Appl Date: 2014-03-24 Impact factor: 3.494
Authors: Denise M T Yu; Tsun-Wen Yao; Sumaiya Chowdhury; Naveed A Nadvi; Brenna Osborne; W Bret Church; Geoffrey W McCaughan; Mark D Gorrell Journal: FEBS J Date: 2010-01-13 Impact factor: 5.542
Authors: Freddie Bray; Jacques Ferlay; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Rebecca L Siegel; Lindsey A Torre; Ahmedin Jemal Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2018-09-12 Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Frederik L Giesel; Clemens Kratochwil; Thomas Lindner; Manfred M Marschalek; Anastasia Loktev; Wencke Lehnert; Jürgen Debus; Dirk Jäger; Paul Flechsig; Annette Altmann; Walter Mier; Uwe Haberkorn Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2018-08-02 Impact factor: 10.057