Literature DB >> 28255995

Meaningful Use and Hospital Performance on Post-Acute Utilization Indicators.

Yanick N Brice1, Karen E Joynt2, Christopher P Tompkins3, Grant A Ritter3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine trends in hospital post-acute utilization indicators and to determine whether improvement in these indicators is associated with attesting to meaningful use (MU). DATA SOURCES: Medicare claims-based, repeated measures on 30-day hospital-wide all-cause readmission and emergency department (ED) utilization rates for 160 short-stay hospitals (2009-2012); Medicare EHR Incentive Program Payments files (2011-2012); and other hospital and market data. STUDY
DESIGN: Interrupted time series with concurrent comparison group. PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: Propensity score-weighted multilevel models for change demonstrate that 30-day readmission rates (unadjusted) fell from 13.4 percent in 2009 to 12.1 percent in 2012. Similarly, 30-day ED utilization declined from 18.9 percent to 17.3 percent during the same period. However, MU and non-MU hospitals were indistinguishable vis-à-vis performance. Controlling for hospital and market characteristics, MU was unrelated to 30-day readmission. In contrast, 30-day ED utilization deteriorated.
CONCLUSIONS: Hospitals with MU Stage 1 designation did not show significantly higher improvement on post-acute utilization compared to their counterparts without. To achieve gains in quality and safety, potentially associated with EHRs, and to advance care coordination and patient engagement, the regulators should strengthen accountability by linking comprehensive, outcomes-based performance measures to specific MU objectives. © Health Research and Educational Trust.

Entities:  

Keywords:  30-day ED utilization; 30-day readmission; EHRs; Meaningful use

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28255995      PMCID: PMC5867063          DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.12677

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  51 in total

1.  Thirty-day readmissions--truth and consequences.

Authors:  Karen E Joynt; Ashish K Jha
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Evaluating the quality of medical care. 1966.

Authors:  Avedis Donabedian
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.911

Review 3.  Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution.

Authors:  Benjamin M Bolker; Mollie E Brooks; Connie J Clark; Shane W Geange; John R Poulsen; M Henry H Stevens; Jada-Simone S White
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 17.712

4.  Clinical information technologies and inpatient outcomes: a multiple hospital study.

Authors:  Ruben Amarasingham; Laura Plantinga; Marie Diener-West; Darrell J Gaskin; Neil R Powe
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2009-01-26

5.  The triple aim: care, health, and cost.

Authors:  Donald M Berwick; Thomas W Nolan; John Whittington
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2008 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.301

6.  Information technology and hospital patient safety: a cross-sectional study of US acute care hospitals.

Authors:  Ajit Appari; Eric M Johnson; Denise L Anthony
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 2.229

7.  Introduction and commentary for special issue on health information technology.

Authors:  Rainu Kaushal; David Blumenthal
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  The Medicare Electronic Health Record Incentive Program: provider performance on core and menu measures.

Authors:  Adam Wright; Joshua Feblowitz; Lipika Samal; Allison B McCoy; Dean F Sittig
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-12-21       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  Lack of impact of electronic health records on quality of care and outcomes for ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Karen E Joynt; Deepak L Bhatt; Lee H Schwamm; Ying Xian; Paul A Heidenreich; Gregg C Fonarow; Eric E Smith; Megan L Neely; Maria V Grau-Sepulveda; Adrian F Hernandez
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  The effect of electronic medical record adoption on outcomes in US hospitals.

Authors:  Jinhyung Lee; Yong-Fang Kuo; James S Goodwin
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 2.655

View more
  4 in total

1.  Electronic health records systems and hospital clinical performance: a study of nationwide hospital data.

Authors:  Neal Yuan; R Adams Dudley; W John Boscardin; Grace A Lin
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Health systems' use of enterprise health information exchange vs single electronic health record vendor environments and unplanned readmissions.

Authors:  Joshua R Vest; Mark Aaron Unruh; Seth Freedman; Kosali Simon
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Hospital participation in Meaningful Use and racial disparities in readmissions.

Authors:  Mark Aaron Unruh; Hye Young Jung; Rainu Kaushal; Joshua R Vest
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 2.229

4.  Is duration of hospital participation in meaningful use associated with value in Medicare?

Authors:  Yanick N Brice; Karen E Joynt Maddox
Journal:  JAMIA Open       Date:  2019-03-14
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.