| Literature DB >> 28255657 |
Stefanos Farfaras1,2, Lars Erik Ejerhed3, Erling K Hallström3,4, Kjell Hultenby5, Khaled Meknas6, Tomas Movin7, Nikos Papadogiannakis8, Jüri-Toomas Kartus3,4.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of the present study was to analyze biopsy samples from the subscapularis tendon and from the joint capsule from male patients with shoulder impingement syndrome (SAIS) and compare them with samples from male patients with post-traumatic recurrent shoulder instability. The hypothesis of the study was that patients with SAIS would have more histologic and ultrastructural degenerative changes in their subscapularis tendon and joint capsule than patients with post-traumatic recurrent shoulder instability.Entities:
Keywords: Biopsy; Degeneration; Shoulder instability; Shoulder joint capsule; Subacromial impingement; Subscapularis tendon
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28255657 PMCID: PMC5754398 DOI: 10.1007/s00167-017-4442-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc ISSN: 0942-2056 Impact factor: 4.342
Fig. 1Four-point scoring system (TDS)
Age of the study groups
| Diagnosis | Age (years) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number | Mean | SD | Median | Min–max | |
| SAIS | 8 | 57.5 | 10.7 | 53 | 45–74 |
| Shoulder instability | 12 | 30.4 | 8.0 | 27 | 22–48 |
|
| <0.00001 | ||||
Patients suffering from SAIS were significantly older than patients with shoulder instability problems
SD standard deviation
Fig. 2Correlation between fibril diameter and age for the subscapularis tendon
Fig. 3Correlation between fibril diameter and age for the joint capsule
Fig. 4Distribution (expressed in %) of fibril diameters in the subscapularis tendon revealed that the instability patients had significantly larger fibril diameters
Fig. 5Distribution (expressed in %) of fibril diameters in the joint capsule revealed that the instability patients had significantly larger fibril diameters
Mean and median fibril diameters in the tendon and in the capsule in nm
| Tendon | Capsule | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SD | Median | min–max | Mean | SD | Median | min–max | |
| SAIS | 68.6 | 40.5 | 57 | 12–240 | 56.3 | 14.2 | 53 | 30–129 |
| Shoulder instability | 79.5 | 38.0 | 67 | 20–233 | 63.2 | 29.6 | 57 | 30–242 |
|
| <0.0001 | <0.0001 | ||||||
Patients with shoulder instability had fibrils with significantly larger diameter in both the subscapularis tendon and the joint capsule compared to SAIS patients
Fig. 6Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images showing the fibril diameter composition in cross-sectioned subscapularis tendon (a, b). The fibrillar composition in the subscapularis tendon from the instability group (a) revealed a larger and more heterogenic fibril diameter size (mean 79.5 nm) compared with the impingement group (mean 68.6 nm). In the joint capsule, the size distribution is more homogeneous, but the diameters in the capsule of the instability group are larger (mean 63.2 nm) (c) compared with the impingement group (mean 56.3 nm) (d). Bar 200 nm
Fig. 7Light-microscopic views of specimens obtained from four different male patients from the subscapularis tendon (a, b) and the shoulder joint capsule (c, d). The biopsies from the instability patients are viewed in a, c, while b and d are from impingement syndrome patients. The surfaces are lined with a thin synovial layer (a–d). The subscapularis tendon (a, b) depicts bundles of dense connective tissue with surrounding loose connective tissue, the endotenon, containing vessels. In comparison, the joint capsule is composed of looser connective tissue with small vessels within the tissue (c, d).The fiber structure, cellularity, and vascularity were not significantly altered in the tendon of shoulder impingement syndrome patients, illustrated by view b compared with view a. However, signs of separation and deterioration in the fiber structure could be found in the joint capsule in both groups, while increased cellularity was more common in impingement syndrome patients, illustrated by view d compared with view c. Original magnification ×100
Histologic analysis according to the four-point scoring system and the total degeneration score (TDS)
| Data | Capsule | Significance ( | Tendon | Significance ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shoulder instability | SAIS | Shoulder instability | SAIS | |||
| Median (range) | Median (range) | Median (range) | Median (range) | |||
| Fiber structure | 1 (0–3) | 2 (1–3) | ns (0.11) | 1 (0–2) | 1 (0–2) | ns (0.94) |
| Cellularity | 1 (0–3) | 1 (1–2) | 0.016 | 0 (0–2) | 1 (0–3) | ns (0.16) |
| Mean (SD) | 0.8 (0.7) | 1.3 (0.4) | ||||
| Vascularity | 1.5 (1–3) | 2 (1–3) | ns (0.33) | 0 (0–2) | 1 (0–2) | ns (0.58) |
| GAGs | 0 (0–1) | 0 (0–1) | ns (0.067) | 0.5 (0–1) | 1 (0–3) | ns (0.07) |
| TDS | 4 (2–7) | 5 (3–7) | 0.014 | 2 (0–6) | 3 (1–9) | ns (0.19) |
| Mean (SD) | 4.1 (1.3) | 5.1 (1.1) | ||||
The cellularity and the TDS were significantly higher (worse) in patients with SAIS compared to patients with shoulder instability, indicating higher degeneration in the SAIS group
ns non-significant (p > 0.05), SD standard deviation, GAGs glycosaminoglycans, TDS total degeneration score