Literature DB >> 28254128

A Multisensor Algorithm Predicts Heart Failure Events in Patients With Implanted Devices: Results From the MultiSENSE Study.

John P Boehmer1, Ramesh Hariharan2, Fausto G Devecchi3, Andrew L Smith4, Giulio Molon5, Alessandro Capucci6, Qi An7, Viktoria Averina7, Craig M Stolen7, Pramodsingh H Thakur7, Julie A Thompson7, Ramesh Wariar7, Yi Zhang7, Jagmeet P Singh8.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to develop and validate a device-based diagnostic algorithm to predict heart failure (HF) events.
BACKGROUND: HF involves costly hospitalizations with adverse impact on patient outcomes. The authors hypothesized that an algorithm combining a diverse set of implanted device-based sensors chosen to target HF pathophysiology could detect worsening HF.
METHODS: The MultiSENSE (Multisensor Chronic Evaluation in Ambulatory Heart Failure Patients) study enrolled patients with investigational chronic ambulatory data collection via implanted cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators. HF events (HFEs), defined as HF admissions or unscheduled visits with intravenous treatment, were independently adjudicated. The development cohort of patients was used to construct a composite index and alert algorithm (HeartLogic) combining heart sounds, respiration, thoracic impedance, heart rate, and activity; the test cohort was sequestered for independent validation. The 2 coprimary endpoints were sensitivity to detect HFE >40% and unexplained alert rate <2 alerts per patient-year.
RESULTS: Overall, 900 patients (development cohort, n = 500; test cohort, n = 400) were followed for up to 1 year. Coprimary endpoints were evaluated using 320 patient-years of follow-up data and 50 HFEs in the test cohort (72% men; mean age 66.8 ± 10.3 years; New York Heart Association functional class at enrollment: 69% in class II, 25% in class III; mean left ventricular ejection fraction 30.0 ± 11.4%). Both endpoints were significantly exceeded, with sensitivity of 70% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 55.4% to 82.1%) and an unexplained alert rate of 1.47 per patient-year (95% CI: 1.32 to 1.65). The median lead time before HFE was 34.0 days (interquartile range: 19.0 to 66.3 days).
CONCLUSIONS: The HeartLogic multisensor index and alert algorithm provides a sensitive and timely predictor of impending HF decompensation. (Evaluation of Multisensor Data in Heart Failure Patients With Implanted Devices [MultiSENSE]; NCT01128166).
Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cardiac devices; cardiac resynchronization therapy; decompensation; diagnostics; heart failure; remote monitoring; sensors

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28254128     DOI: 10.1016/j.jchf.2016.12.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Heart Fail        ISSN: 2213-1779            Impact factor:   12.035


  73 in total

1.  Classification of Decompensated Heart Failure From Clinical and Home Ballistocardiography.

Authors:  Varol Burak Aydemir; Supriya Nagesh; Md Mobashir Hasan Shandhi; Joanna Fan; Liviu Klein; Mozziyar Etemadi; James Alex Heller; Omer T Inan; James M Rehg
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2019-08-15       Impact factor: 4.538

Review 2.  Electrophysiology devices and the regulatory approval process within the U.S. FDA and abroad.

Authors:  Kimberly A Selzman; Hetal Patel; Kenneth Cavanaugh
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 1.900

3.  Is There a Future for Remote Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Management?

Authors:  Haran Burri
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2017-08

Review 4.  Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy-Emerging Therapeutic Approaches.

Authors:  Neal A Chatterjee; E Kevin Heist
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2018-03-06

5.  Organizational model and reactions to alerts in remote monitoring of cardiac implantable electronic devices: A survey from the Home Monitoring Expert Alliance project.

Authors:  Gabriele Zanotto; Antonio D'Onofrio; Paolo Della Bella; Francesco Solimene; Ennio C Pisanò; Saverio Iacopino; Cristina Dondina; Daniele Giacopelli; Alessio Gargaro; Renato P Ricci
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2018-12-15       Impact factor: 2.882

6.  2021 ISHNE/HRS/EHRA/APHRS Expert Collaborative Statement on mHealth in Arrhythmia Management: Digital Medical Tools for Heart Rhythm Professionals: From the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology/Heart Rhythm Society/European Heart Rhythm Association/Asia-Pacific Heart Rhythm Society.

Authors:  Niraj Varma; Iwona Cygankiewicz; Mintu P Turakhia; Hein Heidbuchel; Yu-Feng Hu; Lin Yee Chen; Jean-Philippe Couderc; Edmond M Cronin; Jerry D Estep; Lars Grieten; Deirdre A Lane; Reena Mehra; Alex Page; Rod Passman; Jonathan P Piccini; Ewa Piotrowicz; Ryszard Piotrowicz; Pyotr G Platonov; Antonio Luiz Ribeiro; Robert E Rich; Andrea M Russo; David Slotwiner; Jonathan S Steinberg; Emma Svennberg
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2021-02-12

Review 7.  [Device-based remote monitoring : Current evidence].

Authors:  David Duncker; Roman Michalski; Johanna Müller-Leisse; Christos Zormpas; Thorben König; Christian Veltmann
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2017-08-15

Review 8.  Heart failure as a substrate and trigger for ventricular tachycardia.

Authors:  Chikezie K Alvarez; Edmond Cronin; William L Baker; Jeffrey Kluger
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 1.900

9.  Sensor-aided continuous care and self-management: implications for the post-COVID era.

Authors:  Megan Zhao; Jason H Wasfy; Jagmeet P Singh
Journal:  Lancet Digit Health       Date:  2020-09-16

Review 10.  Updates on Device-Based Therapies for Patients with Heart Failure.

Authors:  Jad Al Danaf; Javed Butler; Amin Yehya
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2018-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.