| Literature DB >> 28251825 |
Ana Amélia Freitas-Vilela1, Rebecca M Pearson2, Pauline Emmett2, Jon Heron2, Andrew D A C Smith2, Alan Emond2, Joseph R Hibbeln3, Maria Beatriz Trindade Castro1, Gilberto Kac1.
Abstract
Dietary intake during pregnancy may influence child neurodevelopment and cognitive function. This study aims to investigate the associations between dietary patterns obtained in pregnancy and intelligence quotients (IQ) among offspring at 8 years of age. Pregnant women enrolled in the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children completed a food frequency questionnaire at 32 weeks' gestation (n = 12,195). Dietary patterns were obtained by cluster analysis. Three clusters best described women's diets during pregnancy: "fruit and vegetables," "meat and potatoes," and "white bread and coffee." The offspring's IQ at 8 years of age was assessed using the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children. Models, using variables correlated to IQ data, were performed to impute missing values. Linear regression models were employed to investigate associations between the maternal clusters and IQ in childhood. Children of women who were classified in the meat and potatoes cluster and white bread and coffee cluster during pregnancy had lower average verbal (β = -1.74; p < .001 and β = -3.05; p < .001), performance (β = -1.26; p = .011 and β = -1.75; p < .001), and full-scale IQ (β = -1.74; p < .001 and β = -2.79; p < .001) at 8 years of age when compared to children of mothers in the fruit and vegetables cluster in imputed models of IQ and all confounders, after adjustment for a wide range of known confounders including maternal education. The pregnant women who were classified in the fruit and vegetables cluster had offspring with higher average IQ compared with offspring of mothers in the meat and potatoes cluster and white bread and coffee cluster.Entities:
Keywords: ALSPAC; children; cluster analysis; dietary patterns; intelligence quotient; pregnancy
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28251825 PMCID: PMC5763349 DOI: 10.1111/mcn.12431
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Matern Child Nutr ISSN: 1740-8695 Impact factor: 3.092
Figure 1Flow chart illustrating the participant data of the study. Model 1, all available data; Model 2, imputations for missing data of intelligence quotients (IQ) and all confounders, only up to the sample for complete the IQ scale at 8 years and child neurodevelopment data assessed before 8 years of age, which were correlated to IQ; Model 3, imputations for missing data of IQ and all confounders
Maternal and child characteristics of offspring with and without IQ data at 8 years of age and according to maternal dietary clusters in pregnancya
| Confounders | Without IQ data | With IQ data | Fruit and vegetables | Meat and potatoes | White bread and coffee | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Continuous | Mean ( | Mean ( |
| Mean ( | Mean ( | Mean ( |
|
| Prepregnancy BMI | 22.9 (4.0) | 22.9 (3.7) | .329 | 22.4 (3.2)g | 22.6 (3.5)g | 23.7 (4.2)h | <.001 |
| Child's diet at 7 years (kJ) | 7,743 (1,930) | 7,637 (1,776) | .010 | 7,610 (1,700)g | 7,984 (2,282)h | 7,461 (2,486)i | <.001 |
| Child's age at 8 year clinic (months) | – | 103.4 (3.3) | – | 103.3 (3.1)g | 103.3 (3.1)g | 103.7 (3.7)h | <.001 |
Note. BMI = body mass index; SD = standard deviation.
Data without imputation.
The left portion presents the confounding variable data for mothers whose children did not have IQ data and the right portion the data for mothers of children with IQ data.
At least one IQ data (verbal or performance).
p values refer to Student's t test.
p values refer to analysis of variance test.
p values refer to chi‐square test.
g, h, i Where superscripts differ, there is a difference among variables according to the dietary clusters (Tukey–Kramer method).
IQ at 8 years of age (unadjusted, without imputation) according to maternal dietary clusters during pregnancy
| IQ data | Fruit and vegetables | Meat and potatoes | White bread and coffee | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Mean ( |
| Mean ( |
| Mean ( |
| Mean ( |
| |
| Verbal IQ | 6,582 | 107.5 (16.7) | 2,758 | 111.6 (16.7)b | 1,385 | 106.6 (16.1)c | 2,439 | 103.3 (16.0)d | <.001 |
| Performance IQ | 6,572 | 99.9 (17.1) | 2,751 | 102.9 (16.8)b | 1,384 | 99.1 (17.0)c | 2,437 | 97.1 (16.9)d | <.001 |
| Full‐scale IQ | 6,552 | 104.5 (16.4) | 2,746 | 108.6 (16.1)b | 1,378 | 103.5 (16.2)c | 2,428 | 100.5 (15.9)d | <.001 |
Note. SD = standard deviation.
p values refer to analysis of variance test.
b, c, d Where superscripts differ, there is a difference among variables according to the dietary clusters (Tukey–Kramer method).
Unadjusted and adjusted models of linear regression between maternal dietary clusters during pregnancy and verbal, performance, and full scale of IQ at 8 years of age
| Verbal IQ | Performance IQ | Full‐scale IQ | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| β | 95% CI |
|
| β | 95% CI |
|
| β | 95% CI |
| |
| Model 1—unadjusted | 6,582 | 6,572 | 6,552 | |||||||||
| Fruit and vegetables | Reference | Reference | Reference | |||||||||
| Meat and potatoes | −5.00 | −6.05, −3.95 | <.001 | −3.77 | −4.86, −2.68 | <.001 | −5.08 | −6.11, −4.04 | <.001 | |||
| White bread and coffee | −8.34 | −9.23, −7.45 | <.001 | −5.75 | −6.67, −4.83 | <.001 | −8.13 | −9.00, −7.25 | <.001 | |||
| Model 1—adjusted | 4,751 | 4,738 | 4,726 | |||||||||
| Fruit and vegetables | Reference | Reference | Reference | |||||||||
| Meat and potatoes | −1.92 | −3.11, −0.72 | .002 | −1.92 | −3.18, −0.66 | .003 | −2.25 | −3.41, −1.09 | <.001 | |||
| White bread and coffee | −3.51 | −4.61, −2.41 | <.001 | −1.76 | −2.92, −0.59 | .003 | −3.10 | −4.18, −2.03 | <.001 | |||
| Model 2—unadjusted | 6,817 | 6,817 | 6,817 | |||||||||
| Fruit and vegetables | Reference | Reference | Reference | |||||||||
| Meat and potatoes | −4.97 | −6.01, −3.92 | <.001 | −3.68 | −4.77, −2.60 | <.001 | −4.97 | −6.00, −3.93 | <.001 | |||
| White bread and coffee | −8.35 | −9.23, −7.46 | <.001 | −5.74 | −6.66, −4.81 | <.001 | −8.09 | −8.96, −7.21 | <.001 | |||
| Model 2—adjusted | 6,817 | 6,817 | 6,817 | |||||||||
| Fruit and vegetables | Reference | Reference | Reference | |||||||||
| Meat and potatoes | −1.83 | −2.84, −0.81 | <.001 | −1.46 | −2.55, −0.38 | .008 | −1.90 | −2.90, −0.90 | <.001 | |||
| White bread and coffee | −2.97 | −3.89, −2.05 | <.001 | −1.62 | −2.61, −0.63 | .001 | −2.67 | −3.58, −1.76 | <.001 | |||
| Model 3—unadjusted | 12,039 | 12,039 | 12,039 | |||||||||
| Fruit and vegetables | Reference | Reference | Reference | |||||||||
| Meat and potatoes | −5.46 | −6.41, −4.52 | <.001 | −3.91 | −4.89, −2.93 | <.001 | −5.38 | −6.33, −4.43 | <.001 | |||
| White bread and coffee | −9.17 | −10.03, −8.30 | <.001 | 6.42 | −7.29, −5.54 | <.001 | −8.94 | −9.77, −8.10 | <.001 | |||
| Model 3—adjusted | 12,039 | 12,039 | 12,039 | |||||||||
| Fruit and vegetables | Reference | Reference | Reference | |||||||||
| Meat and potatoes | −1.74 | −2.65, −0.83 | <.001 | −1.26 | −2.23, −0.28 | .011 | −1.74 | −2.65, −0.83 | <.001 | |||
| White bread and coffee | −3.05 | −3.95, −2.15 | <.001 | −1.75 | −2.70, −0.80 | <.001 | −2.79 | −3.66, −1.92 | <.001 | |||
Note.
Model 1, all available data; Model 2, imputations for missing data of IQ and all confounders, only up to the sample for complete the IQ scale at 8 years and child neurodevelopment data assessed before 8 years of age, which were correlated to IQ; Model 3, imputations for missing data of IQ and all confounders.
All models were adjusted for maternal education, housing tenure, crowding at home, partner present, maternal age, maternal smoking in pregnancy, maternal alcohol use in pregnancy, parity, ethnic origin, prepregnancy BMI, breastfeeding, child sex, child's energy intake at 7 years of age, child's dietary patterns at 7 years of age, and child's age at IQ measurement.
Largest fraction of missing information:
Verbal IQ = 0.035, performance IQ = 0.045, full‐scale IQ = 0.041;
Verbal IQ = 0.175, performance IQ = 0.204, full‐scale IQ = 0.192;
Verbal IQ = 0.413, performance IQ = 0.389, full‐scale IQ = 0.384;
Verbal IQ = 0.735, performance IQ = 0.790, full‐scale IQ = 0.759.