Yao-Wu Qin1, Jia Yu1, Quan Zhang1. 1. Ophthalmology Department of EENT Hospital, Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Visual Impairment and Restoration, Shanghai 200031, China.
Abstract
AIM: To analyze the reasons that may lead to the different vision result by combining the ranibizumab and triamcinolone acetate (TA) in sequence to treat macular edema in retinal vein occlusion (RVO). METHODS: Ranibizumab and TA were combined in sequence to treat 43 patients with macular edema secondary to RVO. Six months after the treatment, patients with central fovea thickness (CFT) less than 300 µm in optical coherence tomography (OCT) were collected into Groups I and II, based on vision acuity (VA) better than 78 letters or less than 60 letters. The age, baseline VA, duration from onset to treatment, CFT at the baseline, sub-retinal fluid (SRF), sub-foveal exudates and injection times of TA and ranibizumab were taken into comparison. RESULTS: The mean age of the subjects was 46.4y in Group I but 57.5y in Group II. The difference of age was significant between groups (P<0.01). The mean baseline VA was 51.4 letters in Group I and 43.9 letters in Group II (P<0.05). The baseline CFT were 670.9 µm in Group I with SRF in 54.3% patients and 678.1 µm in Group II with SRF in 52.9% (P>0.05). The mean number of injections of TA was 0.9 and the mean number of injections of ranibizumab was 2.3 in Group I but 1.7 and 2.9 respectively in Group II. The treatment times of ranibizumab had no difference between the 2 groups (P>0.05) but the difference of TA injection times was significant, P<0.05. Subfoveal exudates at final stage happened in no subjects in Group I but in 45.83% subjects in Group II. CONCLUSION: This combined treatment is safer than TA injection and cheaper than ranibizumab injection alone. Younger patients and earlier treatment will help to get better vision outcome. Subfoveal exudates at the final stage have significant relationship with vision outcome. No relationship existed between the baseline CFT, SRF and the vision outcome.
AIM: To analyze the reasons that may lead to the different vision result by combining the ranibizumab and triamcinolone acetate (TA) in sequence to treat macular edema in retinal vein occlusion (RVO). METHODS:Ranibizumab and TA were combined in sequence to treat 43 patients with macular edema secondary to RVO. Six months after the treatment, patients with central fovea thickness (CFT) less than 300 µm in optical coherence tomography (OCT) were collected into Groups I and II, based on vision acuity (VA) better than 78 letters or less than 60 letters. The age, baseline VA, duration from onset to treatment, CFT at the baseline, sub-retinal fluid (SRF), sub-foveal exudates and injection times of TA and ranibizumab were taken into comparison. RESULTS: The mean age of the subjects was 46.4y in Group I but 57.5y in Group II. The difference of age was significant between groups (P<0.01). The mean baseline VA was 51.4 letters in Group I and 43.9 letters in Group II (P<0.05). The baseline CFT were 670.9 µm in Group I with SRF in 54.3% patients and 678.1 µm in Group II with SRF in 52.9% (P>0.05). The mean number of injections of TA was 0.9 and the mean number of injections of ranibizumab was 2.3 in Group I but 1.7 and 2.9 respectively in Group II. The treatment times of ranibizumab had no difference between the 2 groups (P>0.05) but the difference of TA injection times was significant, P<0.05. Subfoveal exudates at final stage happened in no subjects in Group I but in 45.83% subjects in Group II. CONCLUSION: This combined treatment is safer than TA injection and cheaper than ranibizumab injection alone. Younger patients and earlier treatment will help to get better vision outcome. Subfoveal exudates at the final stage have significant relationship with vision outcome. No relationship existed between the baseline CFT, SRF and the vision outcome.
Authors: Rachel L McIntosh; Sophie L Rogers; Lyndell Lim; Ning Cheung; Jie Jin Wang; Paul Mitchell; Jonathan W Kowalski; Hiep P Nguyen; Tien Yin Wong Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Julia A Haller; Francesco Bandello; Rubens Belfort; Mark S Blumenkranz; Mark Gillies; Jeffrey Heier; Anat Loewenstein; Young Hee Yoon; Jenny Jiao; Xiao-Yan Li; Scott M Whitcup; Joanne Li Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2011-07-20 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Tahreem A Mir; Saleema Kherani; Gulnar Hafiz; Adrienne W Scott; Ingrid Zimmer-Galler; Adam S Wenick; Sharon Solomon; Ian Han; David Poon; Lingmin He; Syed Mahmood Shah; Christopher J Brady; Catherine Meyerle; Akrit Sodhi; Marguerite O Linz; Raafay Sophie; Peter A Campochiaro Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2015-12-19 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: David M Brown; Peter A Campochiaro; Robert B Bhisitkul; Allen C Ho; Sarah Gray; Namrata Saroj; Anthony P Adamis; Roman G Rubio; Wendy Yee Murahashi Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2011-08 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Peter A Campochiaro; David M Brown; Carl C Awh; S Young Lee; Sarah Gray; Namrata Saroj; Wendy Yee Murahashi; Roman G Rubio Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2011-06-29 Impact factor: 12.079