Literature DB >> 23415775

Predictive value in retinal vein occlusions of early versus late or incomplete ranibizumab response defined by optical coherence tomography.

Robert B Bhisitkul1, Peter A Campochiaro, Howard Shapiro, Roman G Rubio.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine if optical coherence tomography (OCT) at baseline or month 3 in the Treatment of Macular Edema following Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion: Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety (BRAVO) and Treatment of Macular Edema following Central Retinal Vein Occlusion: Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety (CRUISE) studies provides information that predicts visual outcome.
DESIGN: Post hoc analysis from 2 prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trials. PARTICIPANTS: Three hundred ninety-seven patients from the BRAVO study and 392 patients from the CRUISE study.
METHODS: Time-domain OCT imaging data were analyzed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mean change from baseline best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) letter score at month 6 and month 12.
RESULTS: Among ranibizumab-treated patients, 71.2% (0.3 mg) and 78.5% (0.5 mg) in the CRUISE study and 79.1% (0.3 mg) and 84.7% (0.5 mg) in the BRAVO study had central foveal thickness (CFT) of 250 μm or less at month 3 and therefore were categorized as early ranibizumab responders. Early ranibizumab responders had excellent visual outcomes regardless of ranibizumab dose; mean improvement in BCVA letter score at 6 and 12 months was 15.0 to 16.5 (central retinal vein occlusion [CRVO]) and 17.4 to 19.1 (branch retinal vein occlusion [BRVO]). Late or incomplete ranibizumab responders with CRVO (CFT >250 μm at month 3) did not fare as well as early responders if they were treated with 0.3 mg ranibizumab (month 6, P = 0.012). At month 6, compared with ranibizumab-treated CRVO patients with resolved cystoid macular edema (CME) at month 3, those with persistent CME did worse, on average, and significantly so for 0.5 mg (13.1 vs. 18.6; P = 0.027). At baseline, subretinal fluid (SRF) was present in 57% of patients with CRVO and in 45% of patients with BRVO; its presence did not portend a poor outcome in patients treated with ranibizumab for whom SRF was eliminated in almost all by month 3.
CONCLUSIONS: At month 3 of ranibizumab treatment, OCT images provide predictive information for patients with CRVO, but not for those with BRVO. Visual outcome at months 6 and 12 was reduced in 0.5 mg ranibizumab-treated patients with CRVO who had persistent CME at month 3. It also was reduced in CRVO for those with CFT of more than 250 μm at month 3 who were treated with 0.3 mg ranibizumab. The findings suggest that late or incomplete responders may need careful follow-up. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.
Copyright © 2013 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23415775     DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.11.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  26 in total

1.  Intravitreal aflibercept for macular oedema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion in patients with prior treatment with bevacizumab or ranibizumab.

Authors:  T D Papakostas; L Lim; T van Zyl; J B Miller; B S Modjtahedi; C M Andreoli; D Wu; L H Young; I K Kim; D G Vavvas; D D Esmaili; D Husain; D Eliott; L A Kim
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 2.  Central retinal vein occlusion: modifying current treatment protocols.

Authors:  M Ashraf; A A R Souka; R P Singh
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Reply to 'Comment on: Intravitreal aflibercept for macular oedema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion in patients with prior treatment with bevacizumab or ranibizmab'.

Authors:  T D Papakostas; D Vavvas; D Eliott; L A Kim
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  Outcomes of switching treatment to aflibercept in patients with macular oedema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion refractory to ranibizumab.

Authors:  Vasileios Konidaris; Zahra Al-Hubeshy; Konstantinos T Tsaousis; Konstantina Gorgoli; Somnath Banerjee; Theodoros Empeslidis
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 2.031

Review 5.  Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor for macular oedema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion.

Authors:  Tasanee Braithwaite; Afshan A Nanji; Kristina Lindsley; Paul B Greenberg
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-05-01

6.  Characteristics of retinal vein occlusion with final vision better than 78 letters after sequential therapy with ranibizumab and triamcinolone acetate.

Authors:  Yao-Wu Qin; Jia Yu; Quan Zhang
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-02-18       Impact factor: 1.779

Review 7.  [Retinal vein occlusion : Epidemiology, classification and clinical findings].

Authors:  N Feltgen; A Pielen
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.059

8.  Predictors of short-term outcomes related to central subfield foveal thickness after intravitreal bevacizumab for macular edema due to central retinal vein occlusion.

Authors:  Mei-Zi Wang; Kang Feng; Yao Lu; Fang Qian; Xin-Rong Lu; Si-Wen Zang; Lin Zhao
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-01-18       Impact factor: 1.779

9.  Update in the Management of Macular Edema Following Retinal Vein Occlusions.

Authors:  Mariana R Thorell; Raquel Goldhardt
Journal:  Curr Ophthalmol Rep       Date:  2016-03-10

10.  Outcome of intravitreal dexamethasone implant for the treatment of ranibizumab-resistant macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion.

Authors:  Kleanthis Manousaridis; Silvia Peter; Stefan Mennel
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 2.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.