Literature DB >> 28251080

Clinical results of non-Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty.

Tao Zhang1, Shao-Wei Li2, Tie-Hong Chen3, Jing-Liang He1, Yan-Wei Kang1, Fang-Qi Lyu3, Jian-Hua Ning3, Chang Liu4.   

Abstract

AIM: To investigate the impact of non-Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty (non-DSEK) on graft rejection rate, and its overall procedural effectiveness in patients.
METHODS: Non-DSEK was performed on 65 eyes of 64 patients, and the procedural outcomes, including rejection episodes, failure and dislocation of the grafts, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), endothelial cell density (ECD), and other complications, were analyzed retrospectively.
RESULTS: Of the 65 eyes, 63 recovered from bullous keratopathy with a clear cornea. The mean follow-up time was 26.4mo (range, 6-84mo). The mean BCVA improved from 1.70 logMAR preoperatively to 0.54 logMAR at 3mo, 0.46 logMAR at 6mo, and 0.37 logMAR at 1y after surgery. The postoperative donor ECD of the 25 patients who successfully underwent specular microscopic examination was 1918±534 cells/mm2 (range, 637 to 3056 cells/mm2), and the mean endothelial cell loss was 41.9% at 24mo postoperatively. One eye developed secondary glaucoma and required regrafting via penetrating keratoplasty (PKP). Another eye had postoperative graft failure due to rejection at 26mo. Postoperative graft dislocation occurred in eight eyes. All of the eight dislocated grafts were reattached using air reinjection.
CONCLUSION: Immunological graft rejection of the donor graft rarely occurs in non-DSEK. Therefore, non-DSEK is a safe, concise, and effective alternative to restore corneal decompensation when the Descemet membrane is disease-free.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Descemet membrane; endothelial dysfunction; endothelial keratoplasty; non-Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty

Year:  2017        PMID: 28251080      PMCID: PMC5313544          DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2017.02.07

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 2222-3959            Impact factor:   1.779


  21 in total

1.  [Preliminary clinical study of non-Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty for bullous keratopathy].

Authors:  Hu-ping Wu; Su-zhen Xie; Nuo Dong; Lei Yan; Zhao-sheng Liu
Journal:  Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2010-03

Review 2.  Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty: safety and outcomes: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.

Authors:  W Barry Lee; Deborah S Jacobs; David C Musch; Stephen C Kaufman; William J Reinhart; Roni M Shtein
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2009-07-30       Impact factor: 12.079

3.  Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Aaron Bronner
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.973

4.  Graft rejection following descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty: features, risk factors, and outcomes.

Authors:  Elaine I Wu; David C Ritterband; Guopei Yu; Rebecca A Shields; John A Seedor
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 5.258

5.  Risk of corneal transplant rejection significantly reduced with Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Arundhati Anshu; Marianne O Price; Francis W Price
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 6.  Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty--rapid recovery of visual acuity.

Authors:  Philip Maier; Thomas Reinhard; Claus Cursiefen
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 5.594

7.  Endothelial keratoplasty to restore clarity to a failed penetrating graft.

Authors:  Francis W Price; Marianne O Price
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.651

8.  [Non-Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty for graft failure after penetrating keratoplasty].

Authors:  Shao-wei Li; Tie-hong Chen; Jian-hua Ning; Fang-qi Lü; Zuo-feng Guo
Journal:  Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2012-01

9.  Clinical outcomes of non-Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Sunita Chaurasia; Muralidhar Ramappa; Virender S Sangwan
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 2.031

10.  Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty: three-year graft and endothelial cell survival compared with penetrating keratoplasty.

Authors:  Marianne O Price; Mark Gorovoy; Francis W Price; Beth A Benetz; Harry J Menegay; Jonathan H Lass
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2012-10-27       Impact factor: 12.079

View more
  2 in total

1.  "Separate the Wheat from the Chaff" - Descemet's Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty Graft Failure due to Accidental Implantation of Full-Thickness Precut Tissue.

Authors:  Arjun Srirampur; Tarannum Mansoori; Pasyanthi Balijepalli
Journal:  Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-04-30

2.  Comparative observation of the efficacy of simplified Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty in treating bullous keratopathy.

Authors:  Yingxin Chen; Shanshan Sun; Minghong Gao; Qiming Liu; Ziyue Wang
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 2.447

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.