Minu Johny1, Sai Sailesh Kumar1, Archana Rajagopalan2, Joseph Kurien Mukkadan3. 1. Department of Physiology, Little Flower Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Angamaly, Kerala, India. 2. Department of Physiology, Saveetha Medical College, Saveetha University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 3. Little Flower Medical Research Centre, Angamaly, Kerala, India.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The present study was undertaken to observe the effectiveness of vestibular stimulation in the management of premenstrual syndrome (PMS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The present study was an experimental study; twenty female participants of age group 18-30 years were recruited in the present study. Conventional swing was used to administer vestibular stimulation. Variables were recorded before and after vestibular stimulation and compared. RESULTS: Depression and stress scores are significantly decreased after 2 months of intervention. Anxiety scores decreased followed by vestibular stimulation. However, it is no statistically significant. Serum cortisol levels significantly decreased after 2 months of intervention. WHOQOL-BREF-transformed scores were not significantly changed followed by the intervention. However, psychological domain score (T2) and social relationships domain score (T3) were increased followed by intervention. Systolic blood pressure was significantly decreased after 2 months of intervention. No significant change was observed in diastolic pressure and pulse rate. Pain score was significantly decreased after 2 months of intervention. Mini mental status examination scores and spatial and verbal memory score were significantly improved followed by intervention. CONCLUSION: The present study provides preliminary evidence for implementing vestibular stimulation for management of PMS as a nonpharmacological therapy. Hence, we recommend further well-controlled, detailed studies in this area with higher sample size.
OBJECTIVES: The present study was undertaken to observe the effectiveness of vestibular stimulation in the management of premenstrual syndrome (PMS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The present study was an experimental study; twenty female participants of age group 18-30 years were recruited in the present study. Conventional swing was used to administer vestibular stimulation. Variables were recorded before and after vestibular stimulation and compared. RESULTS:Depression and stress scores are significantly decreased after 2 months of intervention. Anxiety scores decreased followed by vestibular stimulation. However, it is no statistically significant. Serum cortisol levels significantly decreased after 2 months of intervention. WHOQOL-BREF-transformed scores were not significantly changed followed by the intervention. However, psychological domain score (T2) and social relationships domain score (T3) were increased followed by intervention. Systolic blood pressure was significantly decreased after 2 months of intervention. No significant change was observed in diastolic pressure and pulse rate. Pain score was significantly decreased after 2 months of intervention. Mini mental status examination scores and spatial and verbal memory score were significantly improved followed by intervention. CONCLUSION: The present study provides preliminary evidence for implementing vestibular stimulation for management of PMS as a nonpharmacological therapy. Hence, we recommend further well-controlled, detailed studies in this area with higher sample size.
According to National Institute of Mental Health, premenstrual syndrome (PMS) is defined as “the cyclic occurrence of symptoms that are of sufficient severity to interfere with some aspects of life and which appear with consistent and predictable relationship to menses.”[1] PMS is one of the most common health problems experienced by women in reproductive age.[2] Women with PMS experience psychological symptom bloating, weight gain, breast tenderness, swelling, aches and pains, lack of concentration, sleep disturbance, and change in eating patterns. Most of these symptoms are present in the luteal phase of cycle and cease around menstruation.[3] Although exact cause for PMS is not clear, existing literature supports that stress is the cause of PMS, and PMS can be labeled as stress-induced psychophysiological disorder.[456] Nutritional deficiencies and hormonal aberrations have also been suggested as causes of PMS.[7] Alternative therapies have been found to be more beneficial in the management of PMS as they are affordable and have limited side effects.[8]Optimal vestibular stimulation is required throughout the life for homeostasis.[9101112131415] Vestibular stimulation by swinging on a swing was reported as an effective method for stress management in college students.[16] Vestibular stimulation inhibits the stress axes and brings to stress less condition; hence, we hypothesized that vestibular stimulation may be beneficial in relieving most of the symptoms of PMS.[17] The present study was undertaken to observe the effectiveness of vestibular stimulation in the management of PMS.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Research design
The present experimental study was conducted at Department of Physiology, Little Flower Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Angamaly. In the present study, participants served as self-controls. After recording the baseline values in premenstrual period (7 days before menstruation) of menstrual cycle, vestibular stimulation was administered for 2 months. Postintervention values were recorded in the premenstrual period of the 1st and 2nd month. All the parameters were recorded at 9 am to avoid diurnal changes. The present study was conducted in consultation with the physician of Little Flower Hospital and Research Centre.
Twenty female participants of age group 18–30 were recruited in the present study after obtaining, voluntary, written, informed consent.
Inclusion criteria
Healthy females with PMS (PMS will be screened by using PMS questionnaire)[81819]Having regular menstrual cycles from 28 to 34 daysWilling participants.
Exclusion criteria
The participants with any physical problem (musculoskeletal), psychiatric illness, or on medication including contraceptives will be excluded from the studyUnwilling participants.
Vestibular stimulation
Vestibular stimulation was administered by making the participants swing on a swing, according to their comfort, as standardized by previous methods.[20]
Assessment of depression, anxiety, and stress
Depression, anxiety, stress scale-42 was used to assess depression, anxiety, and stress.[21]
Assessment of serum cortisol
Serum cortisol levels were assessed by chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay ABBOTT method.
Assessment of autonomic parameters
Diamond digital sphygmomanometers (BPDG024) were used to record blood pressure, and pulse rate was recorded by using pulse oximeter (EDAN H100B).[10]
Assessment of pain score
Numerical pain score was used to assess the perception of the pain.[22]
Assessment of cognition
Spatial and verbal memory test and mini mental status examination (MMSE) were used to assess the cognition.[2324]
Assessment of quality of life
The WHOQOL BREF questionnaire is used to assess the quality of life.[25]
Statistical analysis
Data were analyzed by IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, IBM Corp. Armonk, NY: Statistical tests used are one-way analysis of variance and Tukey's multiple comparison tests. P <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Ethical consideration
The present study was approved by the institutional ethical committee of Little Flower Hospital and Research Centre, Angamaly. No; EC/3/2015.
RESULTS
Demographic characteristics are presented in Table 1. Depression and stress scores are significantly decreased after 2 months of intervention (P < 0.05) [Figure 1]. Anxiety scores decreased followed by vestibular stimulation. However, it is no statistically significant. Serum cortisol levels significantly decreased after 2 months of intervention (P < 0.001) [Figure 1]. WHOQOL BREF-transformed scores were not significantly changed followed by the intervention. However, psychological domain score (T2) and social relationships domain 8 score (T3) were increased followed by intervention [Figure 2]. Systolic blood pressure was significantly decreased after 2 months of intervention (P < 0.01). No significant change was observed in diastolic pressure and pulse rate [Figure 3]. Pain score was significantly decreased after 2 months of intervention (P < 0.001) [Figure 3]. MMSE scores and spatial and verbal memory score were significantly improved followed by intervention [Figure 4].
Table 1
Demographic characteristics (n=20)
Figure 1
Depression, anxiety, stress scores of participants before and after intervention (n = 20) (values expressed are mean ± standard deviation. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. D0 – Baseline value in premenstrual period (7 days before menstruation, D1 – postintervention value in premenstrual period (7 days before menstruation), D2 – postintervention values in premenstrual period after 2 months (7 days before menstruation), serum cortisol values are expressed in μg/dL)
Figure 2
WHOQOL BREF score of participants before and after intervention (n = 20) (values expressed are mean ± standard deviation. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. D0 – baseline value in premenstrual period (7 days before menstruation, D1 – postintervention value in premenstrual period (7 days before menstruation), D2 – postintervention values in premenstrual period after 2 months (7 days before menstruation)
Figure 3
Systolic, diastolic blood pressure, pulse rate, and pain score of the participants before and after intervention expressed in mm of Hg (n = 20) (values expressed are mean ± standard deviation. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. D0 – baseline value in premenstrual period (7 days before menstruation, D1 – postintervention value in premenstrual period (7 days before menstruation), D2 – postintervention values in premenstrual period after 2 months (7 days before menstruation)
Figure 4
Spatial and verbal memory score, mini mental status examination score of the participants before and after intervention (n = 20) (values expressed are mean ± standard deviation. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. D0 – preintervention score, D1 – postintervention score after 1 month of vestibular stimulation, D2 – postintervention score after 2 months of vestibular stimulation)
Demographic characteristics (n=20)Depression, anxiety, stress scores of participants before and after intervention (n = 20) (values expressed are mean ± standard deviation. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. D0 – Baseline value in premenstrual period (7 days before menstruation, D1 – postintervention value in premenstrual period (7 days before menstruation), D2 – postintervention values in premenstrual period after 2 months (7 days before menstruation), serum cortisol values are expressed in μg/dL)WHOQOL BREF score of participants before and after intervention (n = 20) (values expressed are mean ± standard deviation. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. D0 – baseline value in premenstrual period (7 days before menstruation, D1 – postintervention value in premenstrual period (7 days before menstruation), D2 – postintervention values in premenstrual period after 2 months (7 days before menstruation)Systolic, diastolic blood pressure, pulse rate, and pain score of the participants before and after intervention expressed in mm of Hg (n = 20) (values expressed are mean ± standard deviation. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. D0 – baseline value in premenstrual period (7 days before menstruation, D1 – postintervention value in premenstrual period (7 days before menstruation), D2 – postintervention values in premenstrual period after 2 months (7 days before menstruation)Spatial and verbal memory score, mini mental status examination score of the participants before and after intervention (n = 20) (values expressed are mean ± standard deviation. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. D0 – preintervention score, D1 – postintervention score after 1 month of vestibular stimulation, D2 – postintervention score after 2 months of vestibular stimulation)
DISCUSSION
In the present study, conventional swing was used to provide vestibular stimulation. Vestibular stimulation by motion devices is used in ancient times as a treatment for madness.[2627] However, use of vestibular stimulation as analgesic agent is recent.[28] Vestibular stimulation reduced the symptoms of pain in migrainepatients, amputees, and paraplegics. However, the degree of pain relief varied.[29] Ramachadran et al. reported that vestibular stimulation is an effective method of pain relief.[30] Vestibular stimulation may relieve pain by modulating somatosensory perception, through its connections with thalamic nuclei, its connection with raphe nuclei, and its connection with nucleus tractus solitaries.[31] Our study provides further evidence for analgesic effect of vestibular stimulation as we have observed significant decrease in the pain scores followed by vestibular stimulation. It was reported that vestibular stimulation relieves stress by inhibiting stress axes. Animal and human studies have reported decrease in cortisol levels followed by optimal vestibular stimulation.[323334] Our results are in accordance with earlier studies as we have observed decrease in depression, stress scores as well as serum cortisol followed by vestibular stimulation. Research testified the anatomical connections between vestibular and autonomic nuclei.[35] Vestibular lesions found to cause autonomic abnormalities and optimal vestibular stimulation found to decrease heart rate and blood pressure within normal limits.[36] In the present study, we have observed significant decrease in systolic blood pressure but no significant change in diastolic pressure, which may be due to short duration of intervention.[37] It was reported that vestibular stimulation improves cognition and vestibular lesions cause's defects in memory.[38] We agree with earlier studies as we have observed significant improvement in spatial and verbal memory scores followed by vestibular stimulation. Earlier studies reported marginal increase in all the domains of WHOQOL BREF quality of life.[39] In the present study, psychological domain and social relationship domains showed marginal improvement.
Limitations
We have not maintained control group in this study and the sample size was small.
CONCLUSION
The present study provides preliminary evidence for implementing vestibular stimulation for management of PMS as a nonpharmacological therapy. Hence, we recommend further well-controlled, detailed studies in this area with higher sample size.
Authors: Lotta Winter; Tillmann H C Kruger; Jean Laurens; Harald Engler; Manfred Schedlowski; Dominik Straumann; M Axel Wollmer Journal: Front Psychol Date: 2012-11-20