| Literature DB >> 28250383 |
Claudia-Nicole Meisrimler1, Friedrich Buck2, Sabine Lüthje3.
Abstract
Due to changing climate, flooding (waterlogged soils and submergence) becomes a major problem in agriculture and crop production. In the present study, the effect of waterlogging was investigated on peroxidases of maize (Zea mays L.) leaves. The plants showed typical adaptations to flooding stress, i.e., alterations in chlorophyll a/b ratios and increased basal shoot diameter. Seven peroxidase bands could be detected by first dimension modified SDS-PAGE and 10 bands by first dimension high resolution Clear Native Electrophoresis that altered in dependence on plant development and time of waterlogging. Native isoelectric focusing revealed three acidic to neutral and four alkaline guaiacol peroxidases that could be further separated by high resolution Clear Native Electrophorese in the second dimension. One neutral peroxidase (pI 7.0) appeared to be down-regulated within four hours after flooding, whereas alkaline peroxidases (pI 9.2, 8.0 and 7.8) were up-regulated after 28 or 52 h. Second dimensions revealed molecular masses of 133 kDa and 85 kDa for peroxidases at pI 8.0 and 7.8, respectively. Size exclusion chromatography revealed native molecular masses of 30-58 kDa for peroxidases identified as class III peroxidases and ascorbate peroxidases by mass spectrometry. Possible functions of these peroxidases in flooding stress will be discussed.Entities:
Keywords: Zea mays L.; flooding; guaiacol peroxidases; native PAGE; shoot; soluble proteins; water logging
Year: 2014 PMID: 28250383 PMCID: PMC5302756 DOI: 10.3390/proteomes2030303
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Proteomes ISSN: 2227-7382
Figure 1Morphological adaption of maize to submergence. (a) Phenotype of control plants and plants stressed by submergence at the end of the growing period; (b) Shoot length was measured for control and stressed plants over the three days of flooding; (c) Shoot basis of control and submerged plants; (d) Comparison of basal shoots of control and stressed samples at the end of the experiment; (e) Chlorophyll a/b ratio. All measurements were done for n ≥ 20 biological replicates. Except for (e) measurements were done for n ≥ 5 biological replicates. Control, light grey, flooded plants, dark grey. Significant changes were marked with an asterisk.
Figure 2First dimension gel electrophoresis and guaiacol/H2O2 staining (a) Guaiacol/H2O2 staining after separation by modified SDS-PAGE. The pre-stained marker is shown on the left, indicated with M at the top of the gel. Significantly detected guaiacol bands were amounted with the letters of A–E, referring to their mass; (b) Relative activity of the significantly detected bands A–E in the modified SDS-PAGE (n ≥ 3). The corresponding bands are indicated on the x-axis. Dark grey, s1/c1, light grey, s2/c2, middle grey, s3/c3 (s, stress, c, control, 1–3, day after stress induction); (c) Guaiacol/H2O2 staining after separation by native isoelectric focusing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (IEF-PAGE). The picture was inverted to enhance the visibility. Next to the pI, peroxidase identifiers are indicated on the left hand; (d) Relative activity of the significantly detected bands with the pI of 9.6–5.9 in the native IEF (n ≥ 3). The corresponding bands are indicated on the x-axis. Dark grey, s1/c1, light grey, s2/c2, middle grey, s3/c3 (s, stress, c, control, 1, 4 h, 2, 28 h, 3, 52 h). For the gels, the type of sample was indicated at the top with control or stress. At the bottom of the gel, the day after stress induction was specified. Significant changes between control and the associated stressed sample were marked with an asterisk (student’s t-test).
Summary of peroxidase properties separated by one-dimensional gel-electrophoresis.
| pIex | kDa | kDa |
|---|---|---|
| 9.6 ± 0.3 | 183 ± 7 | 637 ± 7 |
| 9.2 ± 0.4 | 133 ± 5 | 330 ± 7 |
| 8.0 ± 0.2 | 68 ± 1 | 431 ± 8 |
| 7.8 ± 0.2 | 55 ± 1 | 219 ± 8 |
| 7.0 ± 0.1 | 47 ± 2 | 200 ± 9 |
| 6.1 ± 0.1 | 162 ± 8 | |
| 136 ± 0.6 | ||
| 125 ± 2 | ||
| 117 ± 1.7 | ||
| 32 ± 1.7 |
Figure 3Second dimension gel electrophoresis for samples exposed to three days of waterlogged soil. (a) Guaiacol staining of the second dimension modified SDS-PAGE after separation by IEF-PAGE in the first dimension. The pI of the guaiacol detected spots in the first dimension was indicated at the top of the gel; (b) CCB staining of the gel shown in (c); (c) Guaiacol staining of the second dimension hrCNE after separation by IEF-PAGE in the first dimension. The pI of the guaiacol detected spots in the first dimension is indicated at the top of the gel.
Summary of peroxidase properties separated by two-dimensional gel-electrophoresis.
| Spot Name | pIex | kDa | kDa |
|---|---|---|---|
| H | 9.8 ± 0.2 | n.d. | 637 ± 10 |
| J | 9.2 ± 0.1 | n.d. | 637 ± 6 |
| K | 8.8 ± 0.2 | n.d. | 637 ± 5 |
| L | 9.6 ± 0.2 | n.d. | 440 ± 5 |
| M | 9.6 ± 0.2 | n.d. | 330 ± 8 |
| N | 9.2 ± 0.1 | n.d. | 370 ± 7 |
| O | 8.0 ± 0.3 | n.d. | 370 ± 7 |
| P | 7.8 ± 0.3 | n.d. | 330 ± 8 |
| F SDS−PAGE/Q hrCNE | 8.0 ± 0.3 | 133 ± 8 | 200 ± 4 |
| G SDS−PAGE/R hrCNE | 7.8 ± 0.3 | 85 ± 4 | 200 ± 6 |
| S | 6.1 ± 0.1 | n.d. | 139 ± 5 |
| T | 5.9 ± 0.2 | n.d. | 115 ± 2 |
Identified peroxidases by LC-MS. Separated samples by size exclusion chromatography were followed by native IEF and stained with guaiacol/H2O2. Detected spots were tryptical digested and analysed by LC-ESI-MS/MS. Identified peroxidases and their properties are listed in the table. Detailed information about the MS results can be found in the Supplemental Table S3. Name: name used in the publication; pI exp: experimental pI resulting from the calculation of the activity band in native IEF after SEC separation; MWexp: experimental molecular mass (kDa), resulting from the SEC separation; Accession: accession for the peroxidase in the searched database; pIth: theoretical pI given by the database; MWth: theoretical molecular mass (kDa) given by the database; Peptides: amount of identified peptides; Class: classification of the peroxidase identified; Localisation: known cellular localisation; Inducers/Repressors: known inducers or repressors of the identified peroxidase based on information provided by peroxibase [54].
| Band | pI exp | MW exp | Accession | Database | pI th | MW th | Peptides | Class | Localisation | Inducers/Repressors |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prx F1 | 9.6 | 34–51 | ZmPrx06 | Peroxibase | 6.2 | 33 | 6 | III | - | |
| ZmPrx118 | 5.5 | 37 | 10 | III | - | - | ||||
| ZmPrx97 | 6.6 | 38 | 12 | III | - | |||||
| ZmPrx124 | 4.7 | 37 | 15 | III | - | - | ||||
| ZmPrx125 | 8.6 | 34 | 10 | III | - | - | ||||
| Prx F2 | 8.0 | 34–58 | ZmPrx66 | UniProt | 8.0 | 33 | 2 | III | PM | |
| ZmPrx42 | Peroxibase | 5.3 | 33 | 9 | III | PM | - | |||
| ZmPrx07 | Peroxibase | 8.0 | 34 | 12 | III | - | - | |||
| ZmAPx01 | UniProt | 5.7 | 27 | 27 | I | cytosolic | - | |||
| ZmAPx02 | UniProt | 5.7 | 28 | 9 | I | cytosolic | - | |||
| Prx F3 | 7.8 | 34–58 | ZmAPx01 | UniProt/Peroxibase | 5.7 | 27 | 8 | I | cytosolic | - |
| ZmPrx38 | Peroxibase | 9.2 | 38 | 10 | III | - | - | |||
| ZmPrx07 | Peroxibase | 8.0 | 34 | 12 | III | - | - | |||
| Prx F4 | 6.1 | 45 | ZmPrx106 | Peroxibase | 8.4 | 34 | 40 | III | - | - |