Literature DB >> 28250249

One-stage extreme lateral interbody fusion and percutaneous pedicle screw fixation in lumbar spine tuberculosis.

Q-Y Wang1, M-G Huang, D-Q Ou, Y-C Xu, J-W Dong, H-D Yin, W Chen, L-M Rong.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We explored the efficacy of minimal invasive surgery including one-stage debridement and intervertebral fusion through extreme lateral channel (XLIF) combined with lateral or percutaneous posterior pedicle screw fixation for the treatment of lumbar spine tuberculosis.
METHODS: Twenty two patients with lumbar tuberculosis who underwent surgery with XLIF technique and internal fixation were included in the study. Their data about operative time, intraoperative blood loss, bone fusion, kyphosis correction, and clinical recovery were retrospectively collected and analyzed.
RESULTS: The mean intraoperative blood loss was 249.8±27.8 ml and the operative time 347.5±20.7 min. At the final follow-up, 11 to 15 months postoperatively, ESR and CRP were normal and pain (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) were significantly reduced (23.0±-3.1 vs 0.6±-0.7 and 57.2±-1.6 vs 6.4±-1.2 respectively) compared to preoperative values. Progression of the kyphotic deformity was effectively prevented (mean Cobb angle 23.9° +/-1.9° vs 24.5° +/-1.4°, P>0.05). There was one failure of the fixation associated to poor therapy adherence. All the patients showed neurological recovery.
CONCLUSION: Debridement and interbody fusion by extreme lateral channel combined with lateral or percutaneous posterior pedicle screw fixation effectively retained the spine stability and provided clinical and neurologic recovery in selected patients with lumbar spine tuberculosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28250249      PMCID: PMC5383773     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact        ISSN: 1108-7161            Impact factor:   2.041


Introduction

Current therapeutic options for spinal tuberculosis are antituberculous therapy and conservative management with bracing or surgery[1]. Many studies have confirmed the effectiveness of surgical treatment of spinal tuberculosis through anterior, anterolateral, posterior debridement and intervertebral fusion or combinations with internal fixation to improve the neurological deficit and correct the kyphotic deformity[2,3]. However, these surgical methods are related to excessive blood loss and long operative and hospitalization time, thus are not suitable for some patients. The XLIF is a novel surgical technique that is mainly used for spinal degenerative diseases[4-7], or adult degenerative scoliosis[8,9]. Pimenta et al.[10] verified the feasibility of total lumbar disc replacement through the extreme lateral approach. Considering the particular biomechanics and anatomy of lumbar spinal tuberculosis compared to other segments, we applied XLIF, a minimally invasive technique in patients with tuberculosis located in the lumbar spine. In our study, 22 patients with lumbar spine tuberculosis and an indication for surgical therapy, were managed by one-stage debridement and fusion with a cage or bone graft through the extreme lateral interbody (XLIF) channel combined with posterior (or lateral) pedicle screw fixation and their preoperative and final data at follow-up were assessed in order to evaluate the effectiveness of the method.

Subjects and methods

Twelve men and ten women 28 to 79 years old, with lumbar spine tuberculosis who underwent XLIF and debridement combined with percutaneous or lateral pedicle screw fixation between October 2012 and March 2014 and had completed the one-year follow-up, were included in the study (Table 1). All patients had clinical evident disease with pain, fatigue, night sweats, low fever, and weight loss for 0.5 to 12 months (mean 0.5-12 months). Among them sixteen had neurological deficits. The FRANKEL grade classification of spinal nerve injury was D in 14 patients, C in 2 patients, and the rest were normal (E). Diagnosis was confirmed by x-rays, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) imaging, laboratory erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP). The final pathological examination of lesion was the gold standard to diagnosis. After the preliminary diagnosis the patients received the conventional standard antituberculosis treatment including rifampicin (450 mg per day, orally), isoniazid (300 mg per day, orally), pyrazinamide (750 mg per day, orally), and Streptomycin (75 mg per day, intramuscular injection). The preoperative drug treatment lasted for at least two weeks. The surgical indications included the unstable spine caused by vertebral destruction and deformity, nerve function injury, or abscess around the lesion. The patients had spondylitis located to one intervertebral segment (Table 1). All the patients signed an informed consent before the operation. The operations were conducted by experienced surgeons whose professional titles were above associate professor.
Table 1

The clinical general data of patients with lumbar tuberculosis.

General dataCases(n)/Description
Number of males/females12/10
Lesion location(n=22)
L2/33
L3/411
L4/58
Duration of operation (min)347.5±20.7
Blood loss (ml)249.8±27.8
Time in hospital (d)25.8±1.9
The clinical general data of patients with lumbar tuberculosis.

Surgical technique

Four critical steps were included in this surgical technique.

1) Surgical position

After a successful intratracheal intubation of anesthesia, the patients were positioned in lateral decubitus position. To relax the psoas and to increase the distance between the thorax and iliac crest, we flexed the hip joint in the left lower limb and adjusted the head and tailstock of the operating bed. Adhesive tapes were used to fix the trunk and lower limbs. Before routine disinfection, cross K-wires were used to locate the anteroposterior and lateral view of the major segment or intervertebral space under fluoroscopy.

2) Establishment of surgical channel through the lateral approach

First, the skin incision (about 3-4 cm in length) was performed to the vertical K-wires and aimed to the middle of the upper and lower end plate before establishing the lateral approach and dilator. A primary dilator was used to separate the psoas, and a guiding pin was placed to the lateral of the intervertebral disc through primary dilator under X-ray fluoroscopy. Expansion tubes of different diameters were used and the final dilator was hooked up to the free arm and fixed beside the operating bed. Afterward, a light source was installed to the dilator.

3) Debridement and fusion in the intervertebral space

The annulus of the object’s intervertebral disc was cut with a sharp blade through the surgical channel under direct vision. Necrotic tissues, including nucleus pulposus, adjacent end plate and vertebra, and abscess, were removed with different types of curettes and rongeurs. After the clearance of lesions, the intervertebral fusion material (e.g., titanium mesh and or autologous iliac crest) with streptomycin powder was positioned between the two vertebral bodies according to the size of molding. Finally, a routine drainage tube was placed after surgery.

4) Minimally invasive posterior pedicle screws fixation

The patient was changed to the prone position, and the entry point of percutaneous pedicle screws under the AP X-ray was secured. Four 6.5 mm × 45 mm titanium screws (VIPER II, Depuy Spine) were used to place the four K-wires at the objective vertebra. Finally, pedicle-rods were passed through the relevant trajectory of pedicle screws under the VIPER II system.

Postoperative treatment

Routine prophylactic antibiotic therapy was given for 3-5 days, while the conventional antituberculosis drugs were continued for 12-18 months. The drainage was removed when the volume was less than 50 ml. The patients stayed in bed for 1 week postoperatively and gradually started walking with waistlines recommended for at least 6 months. The conventional clinical evaluation and imaging follow-ups were performed in the 3rd, 6th, and 12th postoperative months. ESR and CRP were measured at the final follow-up. Successful bone fusion was evaluated according to criteria established by Moon et al; no loss of correction, no graft resorption or graft bed resorption, and if there was visible graft remodeling, such as trabeculation between the graft beds and graft and the graft hypertrophy[11]. The clinical assessment of patients included the assessments of Visual analogue scale of pain (VAS) and the Oswestry disability index (ODI) and the FRANKEL grade classification to evaluate the neuro functional recovery. The data were reviewed and statistical analysis was performed with paired t-test. P<0.05 was taken as the threshold value to judge statistical significance.

Results

The mean follow-up time was 12.4±1.1 months (11 to 15 months). Data about the level of the spondylodiscitis, the operative time, intraoperative blood loss and hospitalization time are shown in Table 1. Table 2 summarizes the laboratory and clinical indices of the disease and their postoperative recovery at the final follow-up. All the patients who were neurologically comprised preoperatively showed neurological improvement. The majority of them (14 patients) moved from Frankel D preoperatively to Frankel E, at the final follow up.
Table 2

Clinical assessment and Frankel grade of patients before surgery and final follow up.

ContentPreoperationFinal follow-upPFrankel gradePreoperative gradePostoperative gradeFinal follow-up
Low back ache visual analog scale(VAS)6.4±1.20.6±0.7P<0.05C200
Oswestry Disability Index(ODI)57.2±6.123.0±3.1P<0.05
Erythrocyte sedimentation rate, mm/h26.4±4.07.9±1.2P<0.05D1410
C-reactive protein, mg/L23.8±4.04.0±1.4P<0.05E62122
Clinical assessment and Frankel grade of patients before surgery and final follow up. Postoperatively, bone interbody fusion obtained by different types of graft/implants was generally good (Figure 1). The internal fixation loosened in one case after the operation which was attributed to drug treatment disobedience and earlier frequent activities. The postoperative spinal deformity correction effect achieved good results through the imaging analysis (p>0.05) (Table 3). No case except the one mentioned before had lost the correction at the last follow-up. This patient was treated by evacuation of the psoas abscess and improvement of the adherence to drug therapy.
Figure 1

A) A 60 year old woman with spinal tuberculosis in L3-L4 B) A 79 year old female patient presented with low back pain due to destructive spinal tuberculosis at L4-L5 with a mild paravertebral abscess. C) A 36 year old male diagnosed with L2-L3 spinal tuberculosis. A titanium (A) (OR: Autologous bone grafting (B), Cage (C)) were instrumented anteriorly, and correction of kyphosis deformity was obtained after posterior percutaneous pedicle screws fixation (A, B) (OR: Lateral pedicle screws fixation (C)). Preoperative a1, a2 X-ray radiographs (Anterior and Lateral position) and b1, b2 sagittal MRI or CT, and c1, c2 postoperative X-ray radiographs and d1, d2 one year follow up X-ray radiographs.

Table 3

Imaging analysis in global lumbar lordosis. * L1-L5: Measurement method: superior border of L1 vertebra to inferior border of L5 vertebra. ** No significant difference was found between the preoperative and final follow-up (p>0.05).

ContentPreoperationFinal follow-up
cobb angle(Ll-L5*)23.9± 1.924.5± 1.4**
A) A 60 year old woman with spinal tuberculosis in L3-L4 B) A 79 year old female patient presented with low back pain due to destructive spinal tuberculosis at L4-L5 with a mild paravertebral abscess. C) A 36 year old male diagnosed with L2-L3 spinal tuberculosis. A titanium (A) (OR: Autologous bone grafting (B), Cage (C)) were instrumented anteriorly, and correction of kyphosis deformity was obtained after posterior percutaneous pedicle screws fixation (A, B) (OR: Lateral pedicle screws fixation (C)). Preoperative a1, a2 X-ray radiographs (Anterior and Lateral position) and b1, b2 sagittal MRI or CT, and c1, c2 postoperative X-ray radiographs and d1, d2 one year follow up X-ray radiographs. Imaging analysis in global lumbar lordosis. * L1-L5: Measurement method: superior border of L1 vertebra to inferior border of L5 vertebra. ** No significant difference was found between the preoperative and final follow-up (p>0.05).

Discussion

Many clinical studies have proven the effectiveness and security of anterior approach by XLIF in degenerative spinal diseases[4-11]. However the method has rarely been reported for treating spinal infections such as spondylodiscitis and tuberculosis spondylitis. In the present study, we proposed a novel treatment strategy for lumbar tuberculosis, in which the lesions could be removed via the extreme lateral mini-invasive approach. We should be aware of the neurological complications related to this approach. Nerve injury is a complication that should always be considered a priority during surgery. With more and more applications of electromyography, postoperative neurological deficits could be effectively prevented by this special recording technique[12]. In spite of this, the failure of intraoperative monitoring to detect nerve injury could still not be completely avoided. Houten et al.[13] advised that surgeons should not simply rely on electrophysiological monitoring. Moreover, anatomical studies and radiographic assessments[14-17] have been used for the early prevention of related complications. Tormenti et al. reported a high complication rate with XLIF during the perioperative period[18], but the small sample size represents one of the limitations of this study. To avoid limitations that result from a small sample size, a series of large studies were conducted. They revealed that the incidence of complications after XLIF surgery is not high[19]. In conclusion, a comprehensive preoperative assessment is important before treating lumbar infections to prevent many of the complications associated with the extreme lateral approach. The follow-up study showed that no case of nerve function damage was found, which may be related to G arm machine positioning before operation; more attention was given in L4/5 segmental localization[20-22]. We did not observe spinal cord injury or other obvious complications in the patient. Another considerable issue is the rate of bone fusion after surgery. Many studies demonstrated that the bone fusion rate after XLIF is high[23,24]. In our study a high bone fusion rate was found, and bone healing was completed at the one-year follow-up (Figure 1). Although a loss of the Cobb angle existed at the final follow-up, the imaging examination revealed that the stability of the spine was preserved. Moreover, quality of life significantly improved, as was evident by the postoperative evaluation of ODI and VAS. Nevertheless, the indication of this new technique for lumbar tuberculosis should be acknowledged. The following preoperative prerequisities should be noted: (1) The preoperative antituberculosis treatment reaction was well; (2) The preoperative imaging evaluation showed that the focus could be completely removed through a minimally invasive channel; Finally the third prerequisite is the stable internal fixation as an important basis for spinal reconstruction. Thus the preoperative regular antituberculosis treatment was very important. After the general conditions were improved and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate was significantly decreased, the surgery was important to control the development of the disease. Moreover, the debridement range through the XL channel generally involves only the segments near the vertebral body. Therefore, the spinal tuberculous foci needed to be selected before the operation. Larger foci may not be cleared up through the channel. Destructive bone and intervertebral disc should be completely resected, and a strong fixation is necessary to obtain reduction and spinal stability to successfully implant the autologous bone and internal fixation materials. Posterior (or lateral) pedicle screw fixation was important especially for the patients with osteoporosis or with obviously unstable spine. Previous studies have proved the necessity of posterior internal fixation on unstable spinal tuberculosis[25]. Furthermore, screw-setting through lateral minimally invasive channel was suitable for young patients with tuberculosis (Figure 1C). Therefore, surgeons should carefully consider the clinical indications to maximize the outcomes for the patients before using this technique for lesions where infections are present. Improving the quality of life is a goal that we all aspire to. One of the greatest advantages of mini-invasive surgery is a more favorable postoperative recovery without extensive soft tissue dissection. Early recovery is important for spinal infectious diseases in the elderly. A study suggested that the operative time, the estimated blood loss, and the short length of hospitalization for mini-invasive lateral approach (XLIF) are significantly less than with traditional open surgery[26]. Furthermore, Karikari et al. confirmed that elderly people also had fewer major complications after undergoing minimally invasive surgery (including XLIF and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion)[27]. Although there were limited cases in this study, we believe that mini-invasive surgery through the lateral approach is a promising new treatment for lumbar tuberculosis and other infectious diseases, and its benefits should be validated in the future with large multicenter prospective studies.
  26 in total

1.  An anatomic study of the lumbar plexus with respect to retroperitoneal endoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Takatomo Moro; Shin-ichi Kikuchi; Shin-ichi Konno; Hiroyuki Yaginuma
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  A comparison of perioperative charges and outcome between open and mini-open approaches for anterior lumbar discectomy and fusion.

Authors:  William D Smith; Ginger Christian; Sherrie Serrano; Kyle T Malone
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 1.961

3.  Intraoperative and early postoperative complications in extreme lateral interbody fusion: an analysis of 600 cases.

Authors:  W Blake Rodgers; Edward J Gerber; Jamie Patterson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2011-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  A radiographic assessment of the ability of the extreme lateral interbody fusion procedure to indirectly decompress the neural elements.

Authors:  Leonardo Oliveira; Luis Marchi; Etevaldo Coutinho; Luiz Pimenta
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 5.  Nerve injury during the transpsoas approach for lumbar fusion.

Authors:  John K Houten; Lucien C Alexandre; Rani Nasser; Adam L Wollowick
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2011-05-27

6.  [Identification of the lumbosacral nerve plexus during the extreme lateral interbody fusion procedure].

Authors:  L Hrabálek; M Adamus; T Wanek
Journal:  Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 0.531

7.  Minimally invasive surgery: lateral approach interbody fusion: results and review.

Authors:  Jim A Youssef; Paul C McAfee; Catherine A Patty; Erin Raley; Spencer DeBauche; Erin Shucosky; Liana Chotikul
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Lumbar total disc replacement from an extreme lateral approach: clinical experience with a minimum of 2 years' follow-up.

Authors:  Luiz Pimenta; Leonardo Oliveira; Thomas Schaffa; Etevaldo Coutinho; Luis Marchi
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2010-12-17

9.  Posterior instrumentation and anterior interbody fusion for tuberculous kyphosis of dorsal and lumbar spines.

Authors:  M S Moon; Y K Woo; K S Lee; K Y Ha; S S Kim; D H Sun
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1995-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Allograft cellular bone matrix in extreme lateral interbody fusion: preliminary radiographic and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Antoine G Tohmeh; Blake Watson; Mirna Tohmeh; Xavier J Zielinski
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2012-12-02
View more
  3 in total

1.  Minimally invasive technique for the abscess drainage in lumbosacral tuberculosis using arthroscopy sheath: A case report.

Authors:  Singkat Dohar Apul Lumban Tobing; Dody Kurniawan
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2020-05-19

2.  Extreme lateral interbody fusion and percutaneous pedicle screw fixation in the minimally invasive treatment of thoracic tuberculosis.

Authors:  Liang Deng; Yuan-Wei Zhang; Liang-Yu Xiong; Su-Li Zhang; Wen-Yan Ni; Qiang Xiao
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 1.671

3.  Minimally invasive far lateral debridement combined with posterior instrumentation for thoracic and lumbar tuberculosis without severe kyphosis.

Authors:  Wei Xiong; Bing Yu; Yao Zhang; Chunxiao Wang; Xiaojie Tang; Haifei Cao; Xibing Zhang; Qinyong Song; Fang Tan; Jiangwei Tan
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 2.359

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.