| Literature DB >> 28247474 |
Ellie Harrison1, James P J Hall1, Steve Paterson2, Andrew J Spiers3, Michael A Brockhurst1.
Abstract
Bacteria engage in a complex network of ecological interactions, which includes mobile genetic elements (MGEs) such as phages and plasmids. These elements play a key role in microbial communities as vectors of horizontal gene transfer but can also be important sources of selection for their bacterial hosts. In natural communities, bacteria are likely to encounter multiple MGEs simultaneously and conflicting selection among MGEs could alter the bacterial evolutionary response to each MGE. Here, we test the effect of interactions with multiple MGEs on bacterial molecular evolution in the tripartite interaction between the bacterium, Pseudomonas fluorescens, the lytic bacteriophage, SBW25φ2, and conjugative plasmid, pQBR103, using genome sequencing of experimentally evolved bacteria. We show that individually, both plasmids and phages impose selection leading to bacterial evolutionary responses that are distinct from bacterial populations evolving without MGEs, but that together, plasmids and phages impose conflicting selection on bacteria, constraining the evolutionary responses observed in pairwise interactions. Our findings highlight the likely difficulties of predicting evolutionary responses to multiple selective pressures from the observed evolutionary responses to each selective pressure alone. Understanding evolution in complex microbial communities comprising many species and MGEs will require that we go beyond studies of pairwise interactions.Entities:
Keywords: bacteria; coevolution; experimental evolution; microbial biology; molecular evolution; species interactions
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28247474 PMCID: PMC5655702 DOI: 10.1111/mec.14080
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Ecol ISSN: 0962-1083 Impact factor: 6.185
Figure 1Bacterial genome evolution in the presence and absence of symbionts. (a) Venn diagram comparing loci targetted across six replicate clones shared within and between each treatment. (b) Summary of mutations identified across six sequenced clones for each treatment. Circles represent a summarized bacterial genome for each MGE treatment, with dots representing loci targetted by mutations across the six replicate clones per treatment. Dots are scaled by the number of times mutations appear across replicates. Expanded sections are shown for clarity. Loci highlighted in the text are named, with LPS‐associated loci indicted by *.
Figure 2The population dynamics of mucoid and GacAS‐deficient genotypes in replicate populations. Twenty‐four colonies collected from evolving populations at four transfer intervals were screened for exoprotease production, a phenotype associated with GacAS function. The proportion of exoprotease‐negative mutants is shown for each replicate population through time (blue), overlaid with the proportion of mucoid mutants (yellow) in the same population (data from Harrison et al. 2015b).