Literature DB >> 28247362

Metabolic Syndrome Negatively Impacts the Outcome of Localized Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Maximilian Christian Kriegmair1, Philipp Mandel2, Stefan Porubsky3, Julia Dürr4, Nina Huck4, Philipp Nuhn4, Daniel Pfalzgraf4, Maurice Stephan Michel4, Nina Wagener4.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of metabolic syndrome (MetS) on outcome of patients with localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC). A retrospective database was compiled consisting of 646 patients who underwent surgery for localized RCC between 2005 and 2014. A total of 439 patients were eligible for final analysis. For diagnosis of MetS, the WHO criteria of 1998 were used. Median follow-up was 32 months (ranging from 2 to 119). Kaplan-Meier and log-rank analyses were performed to compare patients with and without MetS or its components. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression identified prognostic factors for progression-free survival (PFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS). In our cohort, 9.8% (n = 43) of patients were diagnosed with MetS. There were no differences between patients with and without MetS regarding clinicopathological parameters with the exception of patients' age (p = 0.002). Kaplan-Meier and log-rank analyses revealed a shorter PFS for patients with MetS (p = 0.018), whereas no differences were found for each of the single components of MetS, namely, diabetes mellitus (DM) (p = 0.332), BMI >30 kg/m2 (p = 0.753), hypertension (p = 0.451), and hypertriglyceridemia (p = 0.891). Logistic regression identified age (HR = 1.92, p = 0.03), tumor stage (HR = 4.37, p < 0.001), grading (HR = 4.57, p < 0.001), nodal status (HR = 3.73, p = 0.04), surgical margin (HR = 1.96, p = 0.04), concomitant sarcomatoid differentiation (HR = 5.06, p < 0.001), and MetS (HR = 1.98, p = 0.04) as independent factors for PFS. For CSS, only age (HR = 2.62, p = 0.035), tumor stage (HR = 3.06, p < 0.02), and grading (HR = 6.83, p < 0.001) were significant. In conclusion, patients with localized RCC and MetS show significantly reduced PFS and might profit from specific consultation and follow-up.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diabetes mellitus; Dyslipidemia; Hypertension; Metabolic syndrome; Obesity; Renal cell carcinoma; Survival

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28247362     DOI: 10.1007/s12672-017-0289-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Horm Cancer        ISSN: 1868-8497            Impact factor:   3.869


  27 in total

1.  The International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Vancouver Classification of Renal Neoplasia.

Authors:  John R Srigley; Brett Delahunt; John N Eble; Lars Egevad; Jonathan I Epstein; David Grignon; Ondrej Hes; Holger Moch; Rodolfo Montironi; Satish K Tickoo; Ming Zhou; Pedram Argani
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 6.394

2.  Pre-existing type-2 diabetes is not an adverse prognostic factor in patients with renal cell carcinoma: a single-center retrospective study.

Authors:  Alessandro Antonelli; Nicola Arrighi; Serena Corti; Tiziano Zanotelli; Alberto Cozzoli; Sergio Cosciani Cunico; Claudio Simeone
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 3.498

3.  Obesity: The fat advantage.

Authors:  Sujata Gupta
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Self-report of smoking, obesity and hypertension history and survival among a cohort of iowa renal cell carcinoma cases.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2000-10-01       Impact factor: 3.797

5.  Renal cell carcinoma is more aggressive in Turkish patients with the metabolic syndrome.

Authors:  Emin Ozbek; Alper Otunctemur; Suleyman Sahin; Murat Dursun; Huseyin Besiroglu; Ismail Koklu; Emre Can Polat; Mustafa Erkoc; Eyyup Danis; Muammer Bozkurt
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2013

6.  Cancer statistics, 2016.

Authors:  Rebecca L Siegel; Kimberly D Miller; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 508.702

7.  Definition, diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus and its complications. Part 1: diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus provisional report of a WHO consultation.

Authors:  K G Alberti; P Z Zimmet
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 4.359

8.  The impact of type 2 diabetes on the outcome of localized renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Thomas Höfner; Martin Zeier; Gencay Hatiboglu; Christian Eisen; Gita Schönberg; Boris Hadaschik; Dogu Teber; Stefan Duensing; Andreas Trumpp; Markus Hohenfellner; Sascha Pahernik
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-12-27       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 9.  A comprehensive review on metabolic syndrome.

Authors:  Jaspinder Kaur
Journal:  Cardiol Res Pract       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 1.866

10.  Influence of body mass index, smoking, and blood pressure on survival of patients with surgically-treated, low stage renal cell carcinoma: a 14-year retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Bumsoo Park; Byong Chang Jeong; Seong Il Seo; Seong Soo Jeon; Han Yong Choi; Hyun Moo Lee
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 2.153

View more
  9 in total

1.  Does diabetes mellitus play an independent prognostic role in kidney cancer?

Authors:  Johannes Breyer
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-12

2.  [Correlation between metabolic syndrome and prognosis of patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma].

Authors:  M N Zuo; Y Q DU; L P Yu; X Dai; T Xu
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2022-08-18

3.  Could Metabolic Syndrome Be a Predictor of Survival Outcomes in Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma? A Propensity Score Matching Study in a Large Chinese Center.

Authors:  Xiang Dai; Fei Wang; Yiqing Du; Caipeng Qin; Shicong Lai; Yuxuan Song; Zixiong Huang; Songchen Han; Xiaopeng Zhang; Tao Xu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 5.738

4.  Metabolic syndrome is associated with improved cancer-specific survival in patients with localized clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Zhenhua Liu; Haifeng Wang; Lian Zhang; Shaobo Li; Yu Fan; Yisen Meng; Shuai Hu; Qian Zhang; Zhisong He; Liqun Zhou; Wenke Han; Wei Yu; Jie Jin
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2019-10

5.  Effects of metabolic syndrome on renal function after radical nephrectomy in patients with renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Yong Zhang; Tingkun Wu; Jingjing Xie; Liqun Yan; Xiuli Guo; Weijia Xu; Liping Wang
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 2.370

6.  The combination of preoperative platelet count and neutrophil lymphocyte ratio as a prognostic indicator in localized renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Takuya Tsujino; Kazumasa Komura; Atsushi Ichihashi; Takeshi Tsutsumi; Tomohisa Matsunaga; Yuki Yoshikawa; Ryoichi Maenosono; Kyohei Okita; Tomoaki Takai; Rintaro Oide; Koichiro Minami; Hirofumi Uehara; Kohei Taniguchi; Hajime Hirano; Hayahito Nomi; Naokazu Ibuki; Kiyoshi Takahara; Teruo Inamoto; Haruhito Azuma
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-11-25

7.  Metabolic syndrome and risk of cancer: a study protocol of case-control study using data from the Information System for the Development of Research in Primary Care (SIDIAP) in Catalonia.

Authors:  Diana Puente; Tomàs López-Jiménez; Xavier Cos-Claramunt; Yolanda Ortega; Talita Duarte-Salles
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Can we Avoid the Unnecessary Loss of nephrons in the Management of Small Solid Renal Masses? Additional Clinical Parameters to Predict Benign-malign Distinction.

Authors:  Ismail Selvi; Halil Basar
Journal:  Sisli Etfal Hastan Tip Bul       Date:  2021-03-17

9.  Prognostic Implication of Metabolic Syndrome in Patients with Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Large Institution-Based Cohort Study from an Endemic Area.

Authors:  Shengyan Huang; Xirong Tan; Ping Feng; Sha Gong; Qingmei He; Xunhua Zhu; Na Liu; Yingqing Li
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2021-12-24       Impact factor: 3.989

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.